424(B(1)
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
Registration No. 333-130327
333-129967
PROSPECTUS
15,750,000 Shares
Copa Holdings, S.A.
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
The selling shareholders identified in this prospectus are
offering all of the 15,750,000 shares of Class A
common stock to be sold in this offering. This is Copa Holdings,
S.A.s initial public offering, and no public market
currently exists for its shares.
The selling shareholders have granted the underwriters the right
to purchase up to an additional 2,362,500 shares of
Class A common stock to cover any over-allotments.
The Class A shares have been approved for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CPA.
Copa Holdings, S.A. will not receive any proceeds from the sale
by the selling shareholders of Class A common stock in this
offering.
Investing in the companys Class A shares involves
risks. See Risk Factors beginning on
page 13.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other
regulatory body has approved or disapproved these securities or
passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Price to public
|
|
$ |
20.00 |
|
|
$ |
315,000,000 |
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
15,750,000 |
|
Proceeds to selling shareholders
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
$ |
299,250,000 |
|
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of Class A
common stock to purchasers on December 20, 2005.
|
|
Morgan Stanley |
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
Citigroup
December 14, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
iii |
|
|
|
|
iii |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. Neither we nor the selling shareholders have, and
the underwriters have not, authorized any other person to
provide you with different information. If anyone provides you
with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely
on it. Neither we nor the selling shareholders are, and the
underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these securities
in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
This document may only be used where it is legal to sell these
securities. You should assume that the information appearing in
this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front
cover of this prospectus, regardless of when this prospectus is
delivered or when any sale of the Class A shares occurs.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
In this prospectus, we use the term Copa Holdings to
refer to Copa Holdings, S.A. and Copa or Copa
Airlines to refer to Compañía Panameña de
Aviación, S.A., a subsidiary of Copa Holdings, S.A. The
terms we, us and our refer
to Copa Holdings, S.A. together with its subsidiaries, except
where the context requires otherwise. References to
Class A shares refer to Class A shares of
Copa Holdings, S.A.
This prospectus contains terms relating to operating performance
that are commonly used within the airline industry and are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft utilization represents the average number
of block hours operated per day per aircraft for the total
aircraft fleet. |
|
|
|
Available seat miles or ASMs represents
the aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of miles
the seats are flown. |
|
|
|
Average stage length represents the average number
of miles flown per flight. |
|
|
|
Block hours refers to the elapsed time between an
aircraft leaving an airport gate and arriving at an airport gate. |
|
|
|
Break-even load factor represents the load factor
that would have resulted in total revenues being equal to total
expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Load factor represents the percentage of aircraft
seating capacity that is actually utilized (calculated by
dividing revenue passenger miles by available seat miles). |
|
|
|
Operating expense per available seat mile represents
operating expenses divided by available seat miles. |
|
|
|
Operating revenue per available seat mile represents
operating revenues divided by available seat miles. |
|
|
|
Passenger revenue per available seat mile represents
passenger revenue divided by available seat miles. |
|
|
|
Revenue passenger miles represents the number of
miles flown by revenue passengers. |
|
|
|
Revenue passengers represents the total number of
paying passengers (including all passengers redeeming OnePass
frequent flyer miles and other travel awards) flown on all
flight segments (with each connecting segment being considered a
separate flight segment). |
|
|
|
Yield represents the average amount one passenger
pays to fly one mile. |
MARKET DATA
This prospectus contains certain statistical data regarding our
airline routes and our competitive position and market share in,
and the market size of, the Latin American airline industry.
This information has been derived from a variety of sources,
including the International Air Transport Association, the
U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, the International
Monetary Fund and other third-party sources, governmental
agencies or industry or general publications. Information for
which no source is cited has been prepared by us on the basis of
our knowledge of Latin American airline markets and other
information available to us. The methodology and terminology
used by different sources are not always consistent, and data
from different sources are not readily comparable. In addition,
sources other than us use methodologies that are not identical
to ours and may produce results that differ from our own
estimates. Although we have not independently verified the
information concerning the competitive position, market share,
market size, market growth or other similar data provided by
third-party sources or by industry or general publications, we
believe these sources and publications are generally accurate
and reliable.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND STATISTICAL DATA
Included elsewhere in this prospectus are our audited
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2004
and the audited consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Also included herein are
our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements as of
and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and
2005. The consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 and for the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 2001 has been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements that were prepared
under International Financial Reporting Standards and adjusted
to be presented on a basis consistent with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, and
which have not been included in this prospectus. Our audited and
unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP and are stated in
U.S. dollars. We began consolidating the results of our
recently acquired AeroRepública operating subsidiary as of
its acquisition date on April 22, 2005. Unless otherwise
indicated, all references in the prospectus to $ or
dollars refer to U.S. dollars, and all
references to Pesos or Ps. refer to
Colombian pesos, the local currency of Colombia.
Unless otherwise indicated, all information contained in this
prospectus assumes no exercise of the underwriters option
to purchase up to 2.36 million additional shares of
Class A common stock to cover over-allotments. Unless
otherwise indicated, all references to amounts or percentages of
total outstanding capital stock following the offering include
937,500 restricted Class A shares that will be awarded to
certain management employees in connection with the offering.
Certain figures included in this prospectus have been subject to
rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in
certain tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the
figures that precede them.
ii
ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are a corporation (sociedad anónima) organized
under the laws of the Republic of Panama. Most of our directors
and officers and certain of the experts named in this prospectus
reside outside of the United States, and all or a
substantial portion of the assets of such persons and ours are
located outside the United States. As a result, it may not
be possible for investors to effect service of process within
the United States upon such persons, including with respect
to matters arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act), or to effect the due process
necessary to enforce judgments of courts of the United States
against us or any of our directors and officers. We have been
advised by our Panamanian legal counsel, Galindo,
Arias & Lopez, that there is doubt as to the
enforceability, in original actions in Panamanian courts, of
liabilities predicated solely on the United States federal
securities laws. Any judgment rendered by a U.S. court may
be enforced in Panama through a suit on the judgment
(exequatur), would be recognized and accepted by the
courts of Panama and would be enforceable by the courts of
Panama without a new trial or examination of the merits of the
original action, provided due process had been granted to all
parties and that the obligation the judgment is seeking to
enforce is not illegal or against public policy in Panama.
SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements, principally
under the captions Summary, Risk
Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
The Industry and Business. We have based
these forward-looking statements largely on our current beliefs,
expectations and projections about future events and financial
trends affecting our business. Many important factors, in
addition to those discussed elsewhere in this prospectus, could
cause our actual results to differ substantially from those
anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic, political and business conditions in Panama
and Latin America and particularly in the geographic markets we
serve; |
|
|
|
our managements expectations and estimates concerning our
future financial performance and financing plans and programs; |
|
|
|
our level of debt and other fixed obligations; |
|
|
|
demand for passenger and cargo air service in the markets in
which we operate; |
|
|
|
competitive pressures on pricing; |
|
|
|
our capital expenditure plans; |
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory environment in which we operate; |
|
|
|
changes in labor costs, maintenance costs, fuel costs and
insurance premiums; |
|
|
|
changes in market prices, customer demand and preferences and
competitive conditions; |
|
|
|
cyclical and seasonal fluctuations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
defects or mechanical problems with our aircraft; |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully implement our growth strategy; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financing on commercially reasonable
terms; and |
|
|
|
the risk factors discussed under Risk Factors
beginning on page 13. |
The words believe, may,
will, aim, estimate,
continue, anticipate,
intend, expect and similar words are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include information concerning our possible or
assumed future results of operations, business strategies,
financing plans, competitive position, industry environment,
potential growth opportunities, the effects of future regulation
and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no
obligation to update publicly or to revise any forward-looking
statements after we distribute this prospectus because of new
information, future events or other factors. In light of the
risks and uncertainties described above, the forward-looking
events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus might not
occur and are not guarantees of future performance. Considering
these limitations, you should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus.
iii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information about us and the
Class A shares being offered by the selling shareholders.
It may not contain all of the information that may be important
to you. Before investing in the Class A shares, you should
read this entire prospectus carefully for a more complete
understanding of our business and this offering, including our
audited and unaudited financial statements and the related notes
and the sections entitled Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
We are a leading Latin American provider of international
airline passenger and cargo service. Operating from our
strategically located position in the Republic of Panama, we
currently offer approximately 80 daily scheduled flights among
30 destinations in 20 countries in North, Central and South
America and the Caribbean. Additionally, we provide passengers
with access to flights to more than 110 other destinations
through codeshare arrangements with Continental Airlines
pursuant to which each airline places its name and flight
designation code on the others flights. We provide airline
passenger and cargo service through our Panama City hub which
enables us to consolidate passenger traffic from multiple points
to serve each destination effectively. We also operate a
Colombian carrier, AeroRepública S.A., that we acquired
during the second quarter of 2005.
We operate a modern fleet of 22 Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft with an average age of approximately 3.3 years as
of September 30, 2005 (not taking into account the fleet of
AeroRepública, our recently-purchased operating
subsidiary). We also accepted delivery of our first 94-seat
Embraer 190 aircraft on November 16, 2005. To meet our
growing capacity requirements, we have firm commitments to
accept delivery of 18 additional aircraft through 2009 and have
negotiated purchase rights and options that, if exercised, would
allow us to accept delivery of up to 28 additional aircraft
through 2011. Our firm orders are for seven additional Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft and eleven additional
Embraer 190s, and our purchase rights and options are for
up to ten Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and up to 18
Embraer 190s.
Since January 2001, Copa Holdings has grown significantly and
has established a track record of consistent profitability,
recording four consecutive years of increasing earnings. Our
total operating revenues have increased from $290.4 million
in 2001 to $399.8 million in 2004, while our net income has
increased from $14.8 million to $68.6 million over the
same period. Our operating margins also improved from 8.6% in
2001 to 20.6% in 2004. Over the same period, Copa Airlines
increased its capacity from 2,920 million available seat
miles to 3,639 million available seat miles while improving
its load factor from 64.0% during 2001 to 70.0% during 2004 and
its yield from 13.79 cents during 2001 to 14.31 cents during
2004.
We started our strategic alliance with Continental Airlines in
1998 in conjunction with its purchase of 49% of our capital
stock. Together, we conduct joint marketing and code-sharing
arrangements, and we participate in the award-winning OnePass
frequent flyer loyalty program globally and on a co-branded
basis in Latin America. We believe that our co-branding and
joint marketing activities with Continental have enhanced our
brand and reputation in Latin America, and that our relationship
has afforded us many cost-related benefits, such as improving
our purchasing power in negotiations with service providers,
aircraft vendors and insurers. Immediately prior to the
consummation of this offering, our alliance and related services
agreements with Continental will be extended until 2015.
We recently purchased AeroRepública S.A. for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $23.4 million, including
acquisition costs. AeroRepública is a Colombian air carrier
that operates a fleet of ten leased MD-80s and two owned DC-9s.
According to the Colombian Civil Aviation Administration,
Unidad Especial Administrativa de Aeronáutica Civil,
in 2004 AeroRepública was the second-largest domestic
carrier in Colombia in terms of number of passengers carried,
providing service to 11 cities in Colombia through a
point-to-point route network. We believe that this acquisition
represents an attractive opportunity to increase our access to
one of the largest airline passenger markets in Latin America
and to improve AeroRepúblicas operational and
financial performance.
1
Our Strengths
We believe our primary business strengths that have allowed us
to compete successfully in the airline industry include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Hub of the Americas airport is strategically
located. We believe that our base of operations at the
geographically central location of Tocumen International Airport
in Panama City, Panama provides convenient connections to our
principal markets in North, Central and South America and the
Caribbean, enabling us to consolidate traffic to serve several
destinations that do not generate enough demand to justify
point-to-point service. Flights from Panama operate with few
service disruptions due to weather, contributing to high
completion factors and on-time performance. Tocumen
International Airports sea-level altitude allows our
aircraft to operate without performance restrictions that they
would be subject to at higher-altitude airports. We believe that
the geographic reach provided by our central location allows us
to generate revenue across a large and diverse base of
destinations. We also believe that our hub in Panama allows us
to benefit from Panama Citys status as a center for
financial services, shipping and commerce and from Panamas
stable, dollar-based economy, free-trade zone and growing
tourism industry. |
|
|
|
We focus on keeping our operating costs low. In recent
years, our low operating costs and efficiency have contributed
significantly to our profitability. Our cost per available seat
mile was 8.72 cents in 2004 and 9.08 cents in the first nine
months of 2005. The cost per available seat mile of our Copa
operating segment when excluding costs for fuel and fleet
impairment charges was 7.50 cents in 2001, 7.59 cents in 2002,
7.17 cents in 2003, 7.01 cents in 2004 and 6.61 cents
during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Results of
Operations for a reconciliation of our cost per available
seat mile when excluding costs for fuel and fleet impairment
charges to our cost per available seat mile. We believe that our
cost per available seat mile reflects our modern fleet,
efficient operations and the competitive cost of labor in Panama. |
|
|
|
We operate a modern fleet. Copa Airlines recently
completed a fleet renovation program through which it replaced
all of its older Boeing 737-200s with Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft equipped with winglets and other modern cost-saving and
safety features. We also recently accepted delivery of our first
Embraer 190 aircraft. Over the next four years, we intend to
further enhance our modern fleet through the addition of at
least seven additional Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and
eleven new Embraer 190s. We expect our Boeing 737-700s and
737-800s and our new Embraer 190s to offer substantial
operational cost savings over the replaced aircraft in terms of
fuel efficiency and maintenance costs. In addition, Copa
Airlines believes that its modern fleet contributes to its
excellent on-time performance and high completion factor which
contribute to passenger satisfaction. |
|
|
|
We believe we have a strong brand and a reputation for
quality service. We believe that the Copa brand is
associated with value to passengers, providing world-class
service and competitive pricing. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, Copa Airlines statistic for
on-time performance was 93.3%, completion factor was 99.7% and
baggage handling was 0.8 mishandled bags per
1000 passengers. Our goal is to apply our expertise in
these areas to improve AeroRepúblicas service
statistics to comparable levels. Our focus on customer service
has helped to build passenger loyalty. We believe that our brand
has also been enhanced through our relationship with
Continental, including our joint marketing of the OnePass
loyalty program in Latin America, the similarity of our aircraft
livery and aircraft interiors and our participation in
Continentals Presidents Club lounge program. |
|
|
|
Our management fosters a culture of teamwork and continuous
improvement. Our management team has been successful at
creating a culture based on teamwork and focused on continuous
improvement. Each of our employees has individual objectives
based on corporate goals that serve as a basis for measuring
performance. When corporate operational and financial targets
are met, employees are eligible to receive bonuses according to
our profit sharing program. See
BusinessEmployees. We also recognize
outstanding performance of individual employees through
company-wide recognition, one-time awards, special events and,
in the case of our senior management after this offering, grants
of restricted stock and stock options. According to internal
surveys, over 90% of our employees report being satisfied with
their job. Our goal-oriented culture and incentive programs have
contributed to a motivated work force that is focused on
satisfying customers, achieving efficiencies and growing
profitability. |
2
Our Strategy
Our goal is to continue to grow profitably and enhance our
position as a leader in Latin American aviation by providing a
combination of superior customer service, convenient schedules
and competitive fares, while maintaining competitive costs. The
key elements of our business strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Expand our network by increasing frequencies and adding new
destinations. We believe that demand for air travel in Latin
America is likely to expand in the next decade, and we intend to
use our increasing fleet capacity to meet this growing demand.
We intend to focus on expanding our operations by increasing
flight frequencies on our most profitable routes and initiating
service to new destinations. Our Panama City hub allows us to
consolidate traffic and provide service to certain underserved
markets, particularly in Central America and the Caribbean, and
we intend to focus on providing new service to regional
destinations that we believe best enhance the overall
connectivity and profitability of our network. With the addition
of Embraer 190 aircraft and growth in overall capacity, we will
have more flexibility in scheduling our flights for our
customers convenience. |
|
|
|
Continue to focus on keeping our costs low. We seek to
reduce our cost per available seat mile without sacrificing
services valued by our customers as we execute our growth plans.
Our goal is to maintain a young fleet of modern aircraft and to
make effective use of our resources through efficient aircraft
utilization and employee productivity. We intend to reduce our
distribution costs by increasing direct sales, including
internet and call center sales, as well as improving efficiency
through technology and automated processes. |
|
|
|
Introduce service with new Embraer 190 aircraft. We
believe that the addition of the Embraer 190 aircraft in
late 2005 will allow us to provide service to new destinations
in underserved markets whose demand would be more efficiently
served with the 94-seat Embraer 190 aircraft. In addition, we
believe that the Embraer 190s will also enable us to more
efficiently match our capacity to demand, allowing us to improve
service frequencies to currently served markets and to redeploy
the higher capacity Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft to serve
routes with greater demand. |
|
|
|
Emphasize superior service and value to our customers. We
intend to continue to focus on satisfying our customers and
earning their loyalty by providing a combination of superior
service and competitive fares. We believe that continuing our
operational success in keeping flights on time, reducing
mishandled luggage and offering convenient schedules to
attractive destinations will be essential to achieving this
goal. We intend to continue to incentivize our employees to
improve or maintain operating and service metrics relating to
our customers satisfaction by continuing our profit
sharing plan and employee recognition programs and to reward
customer loyalty with the popular OnePass frequent flyer
program, upgrades and access to Presidents Club lounges. |
|
|
|
Selectively evaluate future acquisitions. From time to
time in the future, we expect to evaluate acquisition
opportunities in the Latin American aviation sector as they
arise. We intend to evaluate any such opportunities selectively,
focusing in particular on the extent to which they might
complement our existing operations and provide potential for
growth and increased shareholder value. |
Selling Shareholders
Fifty-one percent of Copa Holdings is currently owned by
Corporación de Inversiones Aéreas, S.A., or
CIASA, a holding company controlled by a group of
Panamanian investors. The remaining 49% is owned by Continental.
In connection with this offering, we have amended our Articles
of Incorporation (Pacto Social) to provide for two
classes of stock with different voting rights. Our new equity
structure provides for Class A shares that initially have
no voting rights except in certain circumstances and
Class B shares that will be entitled to one vote per share
on all matters. After the completion of the offering,
Continental is expected to hold approximately 42.3% of our
Class A shares, representing approximately 30.0% of our
total capital stock. CIASA will hold all of our Class B
shares and 1,181,250 Class A shares, together
representing approximately 31.9% of our total capital stock and
all of the voting rights associated with our capital stock. As
long as CIASA beneficially owns a majority of the voting power
of our capital stock, it will be able to elect a majority of our
directors and to determine the outcome of the voting on
substantially all actions that require shareholder approval. See
Description of Capital Stock.
3
Recent Development
Prices for jet fuel have risen significantly throughout 2005 and
remained at historically high levels during the third quarter of
2005. Our fuel cost increased from an average of $1.74 per
gallon for the month ended June 30, 2005 to $2.15 per
gallon for the month ended September 30, 2005. This recent
upward trend was exacerbated by widespread disruption to oil
production, refineries and pipeline capacity along portions of
the U.S. Gulf Coast caused by the damage of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita during the third quarter of 2005. Although we
have managed to offset some of the increases in fuel prices with
higher load factors, fuel surcharges and fare increases, we
cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to do so in
the future. Fuel is our single largest operating expense and, as
a result, our results of operations are likely to continue to be
materially affected by the cost of fuel as compared with prior
periods.
Our Organizational Structure
The following is an organizational chart showing Copa Holdings
and its principal subsidiaries:
|
|
* |
Includes ownership by us held through wholly-owned holding
companies organized in the British Virgin Islands. |
Copa is our principal airline operating subsidiary that operates
out of our hub in Panama and provides passenger service in
North, South and Central America and the Caribbean. Oval
Financial Leasing, Ltd. controls the special purpose vehicles
that have a beneficial interest in the majority of our aircraft.
OPAC, S.A. is a property holding company that owns our former
corporate headquarters facility. AeroRepública S.A. is our
recently acquired operating subsidiary that primarily operates
domestic flights within Colombia.
Copa Holdings was formed on May 6, 1998 as a corporation
(sociedad anónima) duly incorporated under the laws
of Panama with an indefinite duration. Copa Holdings was
organized to be a holding company for Copa and related companies
in connection with the acquisition by Continental of its 49%
interest in us.
Our principal executive offices are located at Boulevard Costa
del Este, Avenida Principal y Avenida de la Rotonda,
Urbanización Costa del Este, Complejo Business Park,
Torre Norte, Parque Lefevre, Panama City, Panama, and our
telephone number is +507 303-3348. The website of Copa is
www.copaair.com. AeroRepública maintains a website at
www.aerorepublica.com.co. Information contained on, or
accessible through, these websites is not incorporated by
reference herein and shall not be considered part of this
prospectus. Our agent for service in the United States is
Puglisi & Associates, 850 Library Avenue,
Suite 204, Newark, Delaware 19715, and its telephone number
is (302) 738-6680.
4
The Offering
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Copa Holdings, S.A. |
|
Selling shareholders |
|
Corporación de Inversiones Aéreas, S.A. and
Continental Airlines, Inc. |
|
Shares offered by the selling shareholders |
|
15,750,000 Class A shares, without par value, of which
7,875,000 Class A shares are being offered by Continental
and 7,875,000 Class A shares are being offered by CIASA. |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
The selling shareholders have granted the underwriters the right
for a period of 30 days to purchase up to an additional
2,362,500 Class A shares solely to cover over-allotments,
if any. |
|
Offering price |
|
$20 per Class A share. |
|
Shares outstanding after the offering |
|
Immediately following the offering (assuming the
underwriters over-allotment option is not exercised), the
number of shares of our capital stock will be as shown below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A: |
|
|
|
|
Public, including management |
|
16,687,500 shares |
|
|
Continental |
|
13,103,125 shares |
|
|
CIASA |
|
1,181,250 shares |
|
|
Total Class A shares |
|
30,971,875 shares |
|
|
Class B: |
|
|
|
|
CIASA |
|
12,778,125 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding
shares |
|
43,750,000 shares |
|
|
|
Voting rights |
|
The holders of the Class A shares have no voting rights
except with respect to certain corporate transformations,
mergers, consolidations or spin-offs, changes of our corporate
purpose, voluntary delistings of the Class A shares from
the NYSE, approval of nominations of the independent directors
or amendments to the foregoing provisions that adversely affect
the rights and privileges of any Class A shares. Under
certain circumstances which we believe are not likely in the
foreseeable future, each Class A share will entitle its
record holder to one vote on all matters on which our
shareholders are entitled to vote. |
|
|
|
Each Class B share will be entitled to one vote on all
matters for which shareholders are entitled to vote. |
|
|
|
See Description of Capital Stock. |
|
Controlling shareholder |
|
Following this offering, CIASA will continue to beneficially own
100% of our Class B shares which will represent all of the
voting power of our capital stock. As long as CIASA beneficially
owns a majority of the voting power of our capital stock, it
will be able to elect a majority of our directors and to
determine the outcome of the voting on substantially all actions
that require shareholder approval. See Description of
Capital Stock. |
|
Ownership restrictions |
|
Our independent directors have the power under certain
circumstances to control or restrict the level of non-Panamanian
ownership of our Class B shares and the exercise of voting
rights |
5
|
|
|
|
|
attaching to Class A shares held by non-Panamanian
nationals in order to allow us to comply with Panamanian airline
ownership and control requirements. See Description of
Capital Stock. |
|
Tag-along rights |
|
Our board of directors may refuse to register any transfer of
shares in which CIASA proposes to sell Class B shares at a
price per share that is greater than the average public trading
price per share of the Class A shares for the preceding
30 days to an unrelated third party that would, after
giving effect to such sale, have the right to elect a majority
of the board of directors and direct our management and
policies, unless the proposed purchaser agrees to make, as
promptly as possible, a public offer for the purchase of all
outstanding Class A shares and Class B shares at a
price per share equal to the price per share paid for the CIASA
shares being sold. However, a proposed purchaser could acquire
control of Copa Holdings in a transaction that would not give
holders of Class A shares the right to participate,
including a sale by a party that had previously acquired control
from CIASA, the sale of interests by another party in
conjunction with a sale by CIASA, the sale by CIASA of control
to more than one party, or the sale of controlling interests in
CIASA itself. See Description of Capital Stock
Tag-Along Rights. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our
Class A shares by the selling shareholders. |
|
Dividends |
|
Holders of the Class A and Class B shares will be
entitled to receive dividends to the extent they are declared by
our board of directors in its absolute discretion. Our Articles
of Incorporation provide that all dividends declared by our
board of directors will be paid equally with respect to all of
the Class A and Class B shares. After this offering,
our board of directors intends to adopt a dividend policy that
contemplates the annual payment of equal dividends to our
Class A and Class B shareholders in an aggregate
amount approximately equal to 10% of our consolidated net income
for each year. This dividend policy can be amended or
discontinued by our board of directors at any time for any
reason. See Dividends and Dividend Policy and
Description of Capital Stock. |
|
Lock-up agreement |
|
We, the selling shareholders, our directors and executive
officers have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to
issue or transfer, until 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, any shares of our capital stock, any options or
warrants to purchase shares of our capital stock or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our
capital stock. |
|
Market for Class A shares |
|
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
Class A shares. There can be no assurance that an active
public market in the United States for the Class A shares
will develop or that it will continue if one does develop. |
|
Listing |
|
The Class A shares have been approved for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). |
|
NYSE symbol for the Class A shares |
|
CPA. |
6
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 13 and the
other information included in this prospectus for a discussion
of certain important risks you should carefully consider before
deciding to invest in the Class A shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected offering timetable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commencement of marketing of the offering
|
|
|
November 29, 2005 |
|
|
Announcement of offer price and allocation of Class A shares
|
|
|
December 14, 2005 |
|
|
Commencement of trading of Class A shares on the NYSE
|
|
|
December 15, 2005 |
|
|
Settlement and delivery of Class A shares
|
|
|
December 20, 2005 |
|
7
Summary Financial and Operating Data
The following table presents summary consolidated financial and
operating data as of the dates and for the periods indicated.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP and are stated in U.S. dollars. You
should read this information in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results
of Operations and Financial Condition appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus.
The summary consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 has been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 and for the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 2001 has been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements that were prepared
under International Accounting Standards and adjusted to be
presented on a basis consistent with U.S. GAAP and which
have not been included in this prospectus.
The summary consolidated financial data as of and for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 has been
derived from our unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements for these periods appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. We recently acquired 99.6% of the stock of
AeroRepública, a Colombian air carrier, and began
consolidating AeroRepúblicas results on
April 22, 2005. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and for future periods, we will be
reporting AeroRepúblicas operations as a separate
segment in our financial statements and the related notes. As a
result of the acquisition, our financial information at and for
the nine-months ended September 30, 2005 is not comparable
to the information at and for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2004. The results of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily
indicative of the operating results to be expected for the
entire year ending December 31, 2005 or for any other
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
INCOME STATEMENT DATA |
Operating revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$ |
226,012 |
|
|
$ |
257,918 |
|
|
$ |
269,629 |
|
|
$ |
311,683 |
|
|
$ |
364,611 |
|
|
$ |
268,652 |
|
|
$ |
398,550 |
|
|
Cargo, mail and other
|
|
|
29,402 |
|
|
|
32,454 |
|
|
|
31,008 |
|
|
|
30,106 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
24,514 |
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
255,414 |
|
|
|
290,372 |
|
|
|
300,637 |
|
|
|
341,789 |
|
|
|
399,837 |
|
|
|
293,166 |
|
|
|
428,929 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
48,126 |
|
|
|
46,514 |
|
|
|
40,024 |
|
|
|
48,512 |
|
|
|
62,549 |
|
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
|
97,733 |
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
30,385 |
|
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
|
39,264 |
|
|
|
45,254 |
|
|
|
51,701 |
|
|
|
35,985 |
|
|
|
48,134 |
|
|
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
33,128 |
|
|
|
32,834 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
|
36,172 |
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
31,537 |
|
|
|
31,652 |
|
|
|
28,720 |
|
|
|
27,681 |
|
|
|
29,073 |
|
|
|
21,458 |
|
|
|
31,456 |
|
|
Reservations and sales
|
|
|
15,238 |
|
|
|
18,629 |
|
|
|
16,707 |
|
|
|
18,011 |
|
|
|
22,118 |
|
|
|
15,727 |
|
|
|
21,415 |
|
|
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
26,815 |
|
|
|
25,369 |
|
|
|
20,733 |
|
|
|
20,354 |
|
|
|
19,742 |
|
|
|
13,899 |
|
|
|
21,933 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
12,453 |
|
|
|
13,887 |
|
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
|
13,135 |
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
8,571 |
|
|
|
8,451 |
|
|
|
8,495 |
|
|
|
10,551 |
|
|
|
12,155 |
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
12,282 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
|
|
25,977 |
|
|
|
29,306 |
|
|
|
19,847 |
|
|
|
25,364 |
|
|
Fleet impairment
charge(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
253,797 |
|
|
|
265,368 |
|
|
|
269,796 |
|
|
|
283,493 |
|
|
|
317,494 |
|
|
|
225,664 |
|
|
|
346,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
25,004 |
|
|
|
30,841 |
|
|
|
58,296 |
|
|
|
82,343 |
|
|
|
67,502 |
|
|
|
82,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
Non-operating income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,751 |
) |
|
|
(10,988 |
) |
|
|
(7,629 |
) |
|
|
(11,613 |
) |
|
|
(16,488 |
) |
|
|
(12,076 |
) |
|
|
(15,755 |
) |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
Other,
net(2)
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(9,602 |
) |
|
|
(8,364 |
) |
|
|
(7,174 |
) |
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
|
|
(8,039 |
) |
|
|
(6,146 |
) |
|
|
(8,737 |
) |
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,985 |
) |
|
|
16,640 |
|
|
|
23,667 |
|
|
|
52,133 |
|
|
|
74,304 |
|
|
|
61,356 |
|
|
|
73,604 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
(2,999 |
) |
|
|
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
(5,732 |
) |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(9,515 |
) |
|
|
14,818 |
|
|
|
20,668 |
|
|
|
48,489 |
|
|
|
68,572 |
|
|
|
56,693 |
|
|
|
65,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments(3)
|
|
$ |
16,893 |
|
|
$ |
28,385 |
|
|
$ |
39,088 |
|
|
$ |
65,962 |
|
|
$ |
114,891 |
|
|
$ |
105,531 |
|
|
$ |
129,201 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
36,791 |
|
|
|
30,205 |
|
|
|
24,006 |
|
|
|
31,019 |
|
|
|
27,706 |
|
|
|
30,529 |
|
|
|
54,965 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
61,682 |
|
|
|
69,040 |
|
|
|
73,552 |
|
|
|
108,053 |
|
|
|
156,035 |
|
|
|
151,820 |
|
|
|
208,428 |
|
Purchase deposits for flight equipment
|
|
|
21,035 |
|
|
|
46,540 |
|
|
|
55,867 |
|
|
|
45,869 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
42,189 |
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
205,071 |
|
|
|
227,717 |
|
|
|
345,411 |
|
|
|
480,488 |
|
|
|
541,211 |
|
|
|
521,754 |
|
|
|
572,868 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
270,506 |
|
|
|
300,121 |
|
|
|
421,935 |
|
|
|
591,915 |
|
|
|
702,050 |
|
|
|
678,136 |
|
|
|
846,126 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
142,437 |
|
|
|
111,125 |
|
|
|
211,698 |
|
|
|
311,991 |
|
|
|
380,827 |
|
|
|
345,754 |
|
|
|
369,237 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
|
46,426 |
|
|
|
67,094 |
|
|
|
115,583 |
|
|
|
174,155 |
|
|
|
172,276 |
|
|
|
229,223 |
|
CASH FLOW DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
25,386 |
|
|
$ |
32,997 |
|
|
$ |
50,931 |
|
|
$ |
73,561 |
|
|
$ |
98,633 |
|
|
$ |
70,301 |
|
|
$ |
78,308 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(111,926 |
) |
|
|
(39,473 |
) |
|
|
(145,591 |
) |
|
|
(151,884 |
) |
|
|
(90,268 |
) |
|
|
(50,201 |
) |
|
|
(69,425 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
93,100 |
|
|
|
14,466 |
|
|
|
100,400 |
|
|
|
105,298 |
|
|
|
29,755 |
|
|
|
23,389 |
|
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(4)
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
38,660 |
|
|
|
42,728 |
|
|
|
74,890 |
|
|
|
107,685 |
|
|
|
84,974 |
|
|
|
101,246 |
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
Operating
margin(5)
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per
share(6)
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
Net income (loss) per
share(6)
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue passengers
carried(7)
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
(22) |
Revenue passenger
miles(8)
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
(22) |
Available seat
miles(9)
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
Load
factor(10)
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
65.9 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
70.2 |
% |
|
|
71.8 |
%(22) |
Break-even load
factor(11)
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
|
58.7 |
% |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
56.6 |
%(22) |
Total block
hours(12)
|
|
|
57,443 |
|
|
|
59,760 |
|
|
|
58,112 |
|
|
|
64,909 |
|
|
|
70,228 |
|
|
|
52,161 |
|
|
|
73,645 |
|
Average daily aircraft utilization
(13)
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Average passenger fare
|
|
|
137.2 |
|
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
148.2 |
|
|
|
153.7 |
|
|
|
156.3 |
|
|
|
155.6 |
|
|
|
131.6 |
(22) |
Yield(14)
|
|
|
13.74 |
|
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
(22) |
Passenger revenue per
ASM(15)
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
8.83 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
Operating revenue per
ASM(16)
|
|
|
9.86 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
|
11.23 |
|
Operating expenses per ASM (CASM)
(17)
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
9.08 |
|
Departures
|
|
|
24,715 |
|
|
|
23,742 |
|
|
|
23,361 |
|
|
|
25,702 |
|
|
|
27,434 |
|
|
|
20,469 |
|
|
|
33,636 |
|
Average daily departures
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
151.8 |
|
Average number of aircraft
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Airports served at period end
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Employees at period end
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
SEGMENT FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue
|
|
$ |
255,414 |
|
|
$ |
290,372 |
|
|
$ |
300,637 |
|
|
$ |
341,789 |
|
|
$ |
399,837 |
|
|
$ |
293,166 |
|
|
$ |
367,253 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
253,797 |
|
|
|
265,368 |
|
|
|
269,796 |
|
|
|
283,493 |
|
|
|
317,494 |
|
|
|
225,664 |
|
|
|
290,832 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
14,342 |
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,751 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
14,188 |
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
Net income (loss) before tax
|
|
|
(7,985 |
) |
|
|
16,640 |
|
|
|
23,667 |
|
|
|
52,133 |
|
|
|
74,304 |
|
|
|
61,356 |
|
|
|
70,629 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
270,506 |
|
|
|
300,121 |
|
|
|
421,935 |
|
|
|
591,915 |
|
|
|
702,050 |
|
|
|
678,136 |
|
|
|
785,383 |
|
AeroRepública (since
April 22, 2005): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
61,676 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
55,756 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
502 |
|
Aircraft rentals |
|
|
2,960 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,567 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
106 |
|
Net income (loss) before tax |
|
|
2,975 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
84,103 |
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
SEGMENT OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat
miles(9)
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
Load
factor(10)
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
65.9 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
70.2 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
Break-even load factor
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
|
58.7 |
% |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
Yield(14)
|
|
|
13.74 |
|
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
14.32 |
|
|
|
Operating revenue per
ASM(16)
|
|
|
9.86 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
|
11.32 |
|
|
|
CASM(17)
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
8.97 |
|
|
|
Average stage
length(19)
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
On time
performance(18)
|
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
AeroRepública (since April 22, 2005): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
seat
miles(9) |
|
|
575 |
|
Load
factor(10) |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
Break
even load factor |
|
|
63.1 |
% |
Yield(14) |
|
|
15.88 |
(22) |
Operating
revenue per
ASM(16) |
|
|
10.73 |
|
CASM(17) |
|
|
9.70 |
|
Average
stage
length(19) |
|
|
365 |
|
On
time
performance(20) |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents impairment losses on our Boeing 737-200 aircraft and
related assets. See the notes to our consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
(2) |
Consists primarily of changes in the fair value of fuel
derivative contracts, foreign exchange gains/losses and gains on
sale of Boeing 737-200 aircraft. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the notes to our consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes restricted cash and cash equivalents of
$4.6 million as of December 31, 2002,
$4.5 million as of December 31, 2003,
$3.9 million as of December 31, 2004,
$4.4 million as of September 30, 2004 and
$4.9 million as of September 30, 2005. |
|
|
(4) |
EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization minus the
sum of interest capitalized and interest income. EBITDA is
presented as supplemental information because we believe it is a
useful indicator of our operating performance and is useful in
comparing our operating performance with other airlines.
However, EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, as a
substitute for net income prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a companys
profitability. In addition, our calculation of EBITDA may not be
comparable to other companies similarly titled measures.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our net income
to EBITDA for the specified periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(9,515 |
) |
|
$ |
14,818 |
|
|
$ |
20,668 |
|
|
$ |
48,489 |
|
|
$ |
68,572 |
|
|
$ |
56,693 |
|
|
$ |
65,346 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,751 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
10,902 |
|
|
|
40,953 |
|
|
|
44,673 |
|
|
|
77,786 |
|
|
|
110,071 |
|
|
|
86,800 |
|
|
|
104,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
(657 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
38,660 |
|
|
|
42,728 |
|
|
|
74,890 |
|
|
|
107,685 |
|
|
|
84,974 |
|
|
|
101,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft rentals represents a significant operating expense of
our business. Because we leased several of our aircraft during
the periods presented, we believe that when assessing our EBITDA
you should also consider the impact of our aircraft rent expense, |
11
|
|
|
which was $20.4 million in 2000, $20.1 million in
2001, $21.2 million in 2002, $16.7 million in 2003,
$14.4 million in 2004, $10.4 million during the first
nine months of 2004 and $19.3 million during the first nine
months of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Operating margin represents operating income divided by
operating revenues. |
|
|
(6) |
All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated
to reflect the current capital structure described under
Description of Capital Stock and in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(7) |
Total number of paying passengers (including all passengers
redeeming OnePass frequent flyer miles and other travel awards)
flown on all flight segments, expressed in thousands. |
|
|
(8) |
Number of miles flown by scheduled revenue passengers, expressed
in millions. |
|
|
(9) |
Aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of miles the
seats are flown, expressed in millions. |
|
|
(10) |
Percentage of aircraft seating capacity that is actually
utilized. Load factors are calculated by dividing revenue
passenger miles by available seat miles. |
|
(11) |
Load factor that would have resulted in total revenues being
equal to total expenses. |
|
(12) |
The number of hours from the time an airplane moves off the
departure gate for a revenue flight until it is parked at the
gate of the arrival airport. |
|
(13) |
Average number of block hours operated per day per aircraft for
the total aircraft fleet. |
|
(14) |
Average amount (in cents) one passenger pays to fly one mile. |
|
(15) |
Passenger revenues (in cents) divided by the number of available
seat miles. |
|
(16) |
Total operating revenues for passenger aircraft related costs
(in cents) divided by the number of available seat miles. |
|
(17) |
Total operating expenses for passenger aircraft related costs
(in cents) divided by the number of available seat miles. |
|
(18) |
Percentage of flights that arrive at the destination gate within
fifteen minutes of scheduled arrival. |
|
(19) |
The average number of miles flown per flight. |
|
(20) |
Percentage of flights that depart within fifteen minutes of the
scheduled departure time. |
|
(21) |
For AeroRepública operating data, this period covers from
April 22, 2005 until September 30, 2005 which
corresponds to the period that AeroRepública was
consolidated in our financial statements. |
|
(22) |
AeroRepública has not historically distinguished between
revenue passengers and non-revenue passengers. While we are
implementing systems at AeroRepública to record that
information, revenue passenger information and other statistics
derived from revenue passenger data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 has been derived from estimates that we
believe to be materially accurate. Non-revenue passengers
represented approximately 2.3% of AeroRepúblicas
total passengers for the period from April 22, 2005 to
September 30, 2005. |
12
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our Class A shares involves a high
degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks
described below before making an investment decision. Our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The
trading price of our Class A shares could decline due to
any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your
investment. The risks described below are those known to us and
that we currently believe may materially affect us.
Risks Relating to Our Company
|
|
|
Our failure to successfully implement our growth strategy
may adversely affect our results of operations and harm the
market value of our Class A shares. |
We have grown rapidly over the past five years. We intend to
continue to grow our fleet, expand our service to new markets
and increase the frequency of flights to the markets we
currently serve. Achieving these goals is essential in order for
our business to benefit from cost efficiencies resulting from
economies of scale. We expect to have substantial cash needs as
we expand, including cash required to fund aircraft purchases or
aircraft deposits as we add to our fleet. We cannot assure you
that we will have sufficient cash to fund such projects, and if
we are unable to successfully expand our route system, our
future revenue and earnings growth would be limited.
When we commence a new route, our load factors tend to be lower
than those on our established routes and our advertising and
other promotional costs tend to be higher, which may result in
initial losses that could have a negative impact on our results
of operations as well as require a substantial amount of cash to
fund. We also periodically run special promotional fare
campaigns, particularly in connection with the opening of new
routes. Promotional fares may have the effect of increasing load
factors while reducing our yield on such routes during the
period that they are in effect. The number of markets we serve
and our flight frequencies depend on our ability to identify the
appropriate geographic markets upon which to focus and to gain
suitable airport access and route approval in these markets.
There can be no assurance that the new markets we enter will
provide passenger traffic that is sufficient to make our
operations in those new markets profitable. Any condition that
would prevent or delay our access to key airports or routes,
including limitations on the ability to process more passengers,
the imposition of flight capacity restrictions, the inability to
secure additional route rights under bilateral agreements or the
inability to maintain our existing slots and obtain additional
slots, could constrain the expansion of our operations.
The expansion of our business will also require additional
skilled personnel, equipment and facilities. The inability to
hire and retain skilled pilots and other personnel or secure the
required equipment and facilities efficiently and
cost-effectively may adversely affect our ability to execute our
growth strategy. Expansion of our markets and flight frequencies
may also strain our existing management resources and
operational, financial and management information systems to the
point where they may no longer be adequate to support our
operations, requiring us to make significant expenditures in
these areas. In light of these factors, we cannot assure you
that we will be able to successfully establish new markets or
expand our existing markets, and our failure to do so could harm
our business and results of operations, as well as the value of
our Class A shares.
|
|
|
If we fail to successfully integrate the new Embraer 190
aircraft we have agreed to purchase into our operations, our
business could be harmed. |
In October 2004, we announced an order to purchase ten new
Embraer 190 aircraft, with options for an additional 20 new
aircraft. In April 2005 we increased the number of firm
commitments to purchase Embraer 190s to twelve by exercising two
of those options. On November 16, 2005, we accepted
delivery on the first of our twelve firm commitments to purchase
the Embraer 190. Acquisition of an all-new type of aircraft,
such as the Embraer 190, involves a variety of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties or delays in obtaining the necessary certifications
from the aviation regulatory authorities of the countries to
which we fly; |
|
|
|
manufacturers delays in meeting the agreed upon aircraft
delivery schedule; |
13
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining financing on acceptable terms to
complete our purchase of all of the aircraft we have committed
to purchase; and |
|
|
|
the inability of the new aircraft and its components to comply
with agreed upon specifications and performance standards. |
In addition, we also face risks in integrating a second type of
aircraft into our existing infrastructure and operations,
including, among other things, the additional costs, resources
and time needed to hire and train new pilots, technicians and
other skilled support personnel. If we fail to successfully take
delivery of, place into service and integrate into our
operations the new Embraer 190 aircraft, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be harmed.
|
|
|
We are dependent on our alliance with Continental and
cannot assure you that it will continue. |
We maintain a broad commercial and marketing alliance with
Continental that has allowed us to enhance our network and, in
some cases, offer our customers services that we could not
otherwise offer. Similarly, if Continental were to experience
severe financial difficulties or go bankrupt, our alliance and
service agreements might be terminated or we may not realize the
anticipated benefits from our relationship with Continental.
Continental has incurred significant losses since
September 11, 2001, primarily as a result of record high
fuel prices and decreased yields. Continental has indicated that
it expects to incur a significant loss in 2005 year and
that the magnitude of its recent losses is not sustainable. We
cannot assure you that Continentals results will improve
or that it will avoid bankruptcy and as a result we may be
materially and adversely affected by a continuing deterioration
of Continentals financial condition.
Since we began the alliance in 1998, we have benefited from
Continentals support in negotiations for aircraft
purchases, insurance and fuel purchases, sharing of best
practices and engineering support in our maintenance
operations, and significant other intangible support. This
support has assisted us in our growth strategy, while also
improving our operational performance and the quality of our
service. Our alliance relationship with Continental is the
subject of a grant of antitrust immunity from the
U.S. Department of Transportation, or DOT. If our
relationship with Continental were to deteriorate, or our
alliance relationship were no longer to benefit from a grant of
antitrust immunity, or our alliance or services agreements were
terminated, our business, financial condition and results of
operations would likely be materially and adversely affected.
The loss of our code-sharing relationship with Continental would
likely result in a significant decrease in our revenues. We also
rely on Continentals OnePass frequent flyer program that
we participate in globally and on a co-branded basis in Latin
America, and our business may be adversely affected if the
OnePass program does not remain a competitive marketing program.
In addition, our competitors may benefit from alliances with
other airlines that are more extensive than our alliance with
Continental. We cannot predict the extent to which we will be
disadvantaged by competing alliances. See Related Party
Transactions.
|
|
|
Continentals economic interest in our continued
success can be expected to decline over time. |
After giving effect to this offering, Continental will reduce
its ownership level in us from 49% to approximately 30% of our
capital stock. Continental may monetize its investment in us
and, pursuant to its registration rights agreement with CIASA,
is entitled to require us to register with the Securities and
Exchange Commission so that Continental may sell to the public
up to 4,790,625 additional shares of our outstanding
capital stock held by it. Continental will have certain rights
pursuant to a shareholders agreement among Continental,
CIASA and us, including the right to select two of our
11 directors for so long as Continental retains at least
19% of our capital stock. In addition, so long as our alliance
agreement with Continental continues, even if Continentals
ownership declines to below 19% of our capital stock,
Continental will still be entitled to select one of our
11 directors. Nevertheless, Continentals interests
will likely diverge from those of our other shareholders as
Continental reduces its investment in us over time. Other than
certain exclusivity provisions and a termination event for
certain competitive activities contained in our alliance
agreement, we do not have any non-competition agreement with
Continental, and as Continental continues to reduce its economic
stake in us, it may take actions that are adverse to the
interests of the majority of our shareholders. See Related
Party Transactions.
14
|
|
|
We operate using a hub-and-spoke model and are vulnerable
to competitors offering direct flights between destinations we
serve. |
The structure of substantially all of our current flight
operations (other than those of AeroRepública) generally
follows what is known in the airline industry as a
hub-and-spoke model. This model aggregates
passengers by operating flights from a number of
spoke origins to a central hub through which they
are transported to their final destinations. In recent years,
many traditional hub-and-spoke operators have faced significant
and increasing competitive pressure from low-cost,
point-to-point carriers on routes with sufficient demand to
sustain point-to-point service. A point-to-point structure
enables airlines to focus on the most profitable, high-demand
routes and to offer greater convenience and, in many instances,
lower fares. With the passage of time, and in particular as
demand for air travel in Latin America increases, it is
increasingly likely that one or more of our competitors will
initiate non-stop service between important destinations that we
currently serve through our Panamanian hub. By bypassing our hub
in Panama, any non-stop service would be more convenient and
possibly less expensive, than our connecting service and could
significantly decrease demand for our service to those
destinations. We believe that future competition from
point-to-point carriers will be directed towards the largest
markets that we serve. As a result, the effect of such
competition on us could be significant and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
|
|
|
The Panamanian Aviation Act and certain of the bilateral
agreements under which we operate contain Panamanian ownership
requirements that are not clearly defined, and our failure to
comply with these requirements could cause us to lose our
authority to operate in Panama or to the international
destinations we serve. |
Under Law No. 21 of January 29, 2003, which regulates
the aviation industry in the Republic of Panama and which we
refer to as the Aviation Act, substantial ownership
and effective control of our airline must remain in
the hands of Panamanian nationals. Under certain of the
bilateral agreements between Panama and other countries pursuant
to which we have the right to fly to those other countries and
over their territory, we must continue to have substantial
Panamanian ownership and effective control by Panamanian
nationals to retain these rights. Neither substantial
ownership nor effective control are defined in
the Aviation Act or in the bilateral agreements, and it is
unclear how a Panamanian court or, in the case of the bilateral
agreements, foreign regulatory authorities might interpret these
requirements. In addition, the manner in which these
requirements are interpreted may change over time. We cannot
predict whether these requirements would be satisfied through
ownership and control by Panamanian record holders, or if these
requirements would be satisfied only by direct and indirect
ownership and control by Panamanian beneficial owners.
At the present time, CIASA, a Panamanian entity, is the record
owner of 51% of our share capital, and Continental, a
U.S. entity, is the owner of 49% of our share capital.
Immediately after giving effect to this offering (assuming the
underwriters over-allotment options are exercised), CIASA
will be the record owner of all of our Class B voting
shares, representing approximately 29.2% of our total share
capital and all of the voting power of our capital stock.
On November 25, 2005, the Executive Branch of the
Government of Panama promulgated a decree stating that the
substantial ownership and effective
control requirements of the Aviation Act are met if a
Panamanian citizen or a Panamanian company is the record holder
of shares representing 51% or more of the voting power of the
company. Although the decree has the force of law for so long as
it remains in effect, it does not supersede the Aviation Act,
and it can be modified or superseded at any time by a future
Executive Branch decree. Additionally, the decree has no binding
effect on regulatory authorities of other countries whose
bilateral agreements impose Panamanian ownership and control
limitations on us. We cannot assure you that the decree will not
be challenged, modified or superseded in the future, or that
record ownership of a majority of our Class B shares by
Panamanian entities will be sufficient to satisfy the
substantial ownership requirement of the Aviation
Act and the decree. If the Panamanian Civil Aviation Authority
(the Autoridad de Aeronáutica Civil), which we refer
to as the AAC, or a Panamanian court were to determine that
substantial Panamanian ownership should be
determined on the basis of our direct and indirect ownership, we
could lose our license to operate our airline in Panama.
Likewise, if a foreign regulatory authority were to determine
that our direct or indirect Panamanian ownership fails to
satisfy the minimum Panamanian ownership requirements for a
Panamanian carrier under the applicable bilateral agreement, we
may lose the
15
benefit of that agreement and be prohibited from flying to the
relevant country or over its territory. Any such determination
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations, as well as on the value of
the Class A shares.
|
|
|
Our business is subject to extensive regulation which may
restrict our growth or our operations or increase our
costs. |
Our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected if we or certain aviation
authorities in the countries to which we fly fail to maintain
the required foreign and domestic governmental authorizations
necessary for our operations. In order to maintain the necessary
authorizations issued by the AAC and other corresponding foreign
authorities, we must continue to comply with applicable
statutes, rules and regulations pertaining to the airline
industry, including any rules and regulations that may be
adopted in the future. We cannot predict or control any actions
that the AAC or foreign aviation regulators may take in the
future, which could include restricting our operations or
imposing new and costly regulations. Also, our fares are
technically subject to review by the AAC and the regulators of
certain other countries to which we fly, any of which may in the
future impose restrictions on our fares.
We are also subject to international bilateral air transport
agreements that provide for the exchange of air traffic rights
between Panama and various other countries, and we must obtain
permission from the applicable foreign governments to provide
service to foreign destinations. There can be no assurance that
existing bilateral agreements between the countries in which our
airline operating companies are based and foreign governments
will continue, or that we will be able to obtain more route
rights under those agreements to accommodate our future
expansion plans. A modification, suspension or revocation of one
or more bilateral agreements could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. The suspension of our permits to operate to certain
airports or destinations or the imposition of other sanctions
could also have a material adverse effect. Due to the nature of
bilateral agreements, we can fly to many destinations only from
Panama. We cannot assure you that a change in a foreign
governments administration of current laws and regulations
or the adoption of new laws and regulations will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We plan to continue to increase the scale of our operations and
revenues by expanding our presence on new and existing routes.
Our ability to successfully implement this strategy will depend
upon many factors, several of which are outside our control or
subject to change. These factors include the permanence of a
suitable political, economic and regulatory environment in the
Latin American countries in which we operate or intend to
operate and our ability to identify strategic local partners.
The most active government regulator among the countries to
which we fly is the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration,
or FAA. The FAA from time to time issues directives and other
regulations relating to the maintenance and operation of
aircraft that require significant expenditures. FAA requirements
cover, among other things, collision avoidance systems, airborne
windshear avoidance systems, noise abatement and other
environmental issues, and increased inspections and maintenance
procedures to be conducted on older aircraft. We expect to
continue incurring expenses to comply with the FAAs
regulations, and any increase in the cost of compliance could
have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations. Additional new regulations continue to be regularly
implemented by the U.S. Transportation Security
Administration, or TSA, as well.
|
|
|
The growth of our operations to the United States and the
benefits of our code-sharing arrangements with Continental are
dependent on Panamas continued favorable safety
assessment. |
The FAA periodically audits the aviation regulatory authorities
of other countries. As a result of its investigation, each
country is given an International Aviation Safety Assessment, or
IASA, rating. In May 2001, Panamas IASA rating was
downgraded from Category 1 to Category 2 due to alleged
deficiencies in Panamanian air safety standards and AACs
capability to provide regulatory oversight. As a result of this
downgrade, we were prevented from offering flights to any new
destinations in the United States and from certifying new
aircraft for flights to the United States, and Continental was
no longer able to codeshare on our flights. In April 2004, after
extensive investment by the Panamanian government in the AAC and
consultations among Copa, the AAC and U.S. safety
officials, Panamas IASA rating was restored to
16
Category 1. We cannot assure you that the government of Panama,
and the AAC in particular, will continue to meet international
safety standards, and we have no direct control over their
compliance with IASA guidelines. If Panamas IASA rating
were to be downgraded in the future, it could prohibit us from
increasing service to the United States and Continental would
have to suspend the placing of its code on our flights, causing
us to lose direct revenue from codesharing as well as reducing
flight options to our customers.
|
|
|
We are highly dependent on our hub at Panama Citys
Tocumen International Airport. |
Our business is heavily dependent on our operations at our hub
at Panama Citys Tocumen International Airport.
Substantially all of our Copa flights either depart from or
arrive at our hub. The hub-and-spoke structure of our operations
is particularly dependent on the on-time arrival of tightly
coordinated groupings of flights to ensure that passengers can
make timely connections to continuing flights. Like other
airlines, we are subject to delays caused by factors beyond our
control, including air traffic congestion at airports, adverse
weather conditions and increased security measures. Delays
inconvenience passengers, reduce aircraft utilization and
increase costs, all of which in turn negatively affect our
profitability. A significant interruption or disruption in
service at Tocumen International Airport could have a serious
impact on our business, financial condition and operating
results. Also, Tocumen International Airport provides
international service to the Republic of Panamas
population of approximately 3.0 million, whereas the hub
markets of our current competitors tend to be much larger,
providing those competitors with a larger base of customers at
their hub.
Tocumen International Airport is operated by a corporation that
is controlled by the government of the Republic of Panama. We
depend on our good working relationship with the
quasi-governmental corporation that operates the airport to
ensure that we have adequate access to aircraft parking
positions, landing rights and gate assignments for our aircraft
to accommodate our current operations and future plans for
expansion. The corporation that operates Tocumen International
Airport does not enter into any formal, written leases or other
agreements with airlines that govern rights to use the
airports jetways or aircraft parking spaces. Therefore, in
connection with the ongoing or future expansion of the airport,
the airport authority could assign new capacity to competing
airlines or could reassign resources that are currently used by
us to other aircraft operators. Either such event could result
in significant new competition for our routes or could otherwise
have a material adverse effect on our current operations or
ability for future growth.
|
|
|
We are exposed to increases in landing charges and other
airport access fees and cannot be assured access to adequate
facilities and landing rights necessary to achieve our expansion
plans. |
We must pay fees to airport operators for the use of their
facilities. Any substantial increase in airport charges could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
Passenger taxes and airport charges have also increased in
recent years, sometimes substantially. Certain important
airports that we use, such as Bogotás El Dorado
airport, may be privatized in the near future which is likely to
result in significant cost increases to the airlines that use
these airports. We cannot assure you that the airports used by
us will not impose, or further increase, passenger taxes and
airport charges in the future, and any such increases could have
an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Certain airports that we serve (or that we plan to serve in the
future) are subject to capacity constraints and impose slot
restrictions during certain periods of the day. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to obtain a sufficient number of slots,
gates and other facilities at airports to expand our services as
we are proposing to do. It is also possible that airports not
currently subject to capacity constraints may become so in the
future. In addition, an airline must use its slots on a regular
and timely basis or risk having those slots re-allocated to
others. Where slots or other airport resources are not available
or their availability is restricted in some way, we may have to
amend our schedules, change routes or reduce aircraft
utilization. Any of these alternatives could have an adverse
financial impact on us.
Some of the airports to which we fly impose various
restrictions, including limits on aircraft noise levels, limits
on the number of average daily departures and curfews on runway
use. In addition, we cannot assure you that airports at which
there are no such restrictions may not implement restrictions in
the future or that, where such restrictions exist, they may not
become more onerous. Such restrictions may limit our ability to
continue to provide or to increase services at such airports.
17
|
|
|
We and our auditors identified a material
weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting
in connection with the preparation of our financial statements
under U.S. GAAP, and if we fail to remediate this material
weakness and achieve and maintain an effective system of
internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial results on a timely basis. As a result, current and
potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial
reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price
of our Class A shares. |
We are currently a non-public company incorporated in Panama and
have traditionally prepared our financial statements under
International Financial Reporting Standards (also known as
International Accounting Standards). In connection with the
initial preparation of our financial statements under
U.S. GAAP, we and our auditors identified a material
weakness (as defined under standards established by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board) in our internal controls
over financial reporting. A material weakness is a significant
deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented or detected. Specifically, we found that we did
not have appropriate expertise in U.S. GAAP accounting and
reporting among our financial and accounting staff to prepare
our periodic financial statements without needing to make
material corrective adjustments and footnote revisions when
those statements are audited or reviewed. In light of this
material weakness, in preparing the financial statements
included in this prospectus, we performed additional analyses
and other post-closing procedures in the course of preparing our
financial statements and related footnotes in accordance with
U.S. GAAP.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
beginning with our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, we will be required
to furnish a report by our management on our internal control
over financial reporting. This report will contain, among other
matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal
controls over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal
year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal
controls over financial reporting are effective. We have
contracted an additional accounting manager with experience in
preparing financial statements under U.S. GAAP, we have
engaged an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist
us in developing our procedures to comply with the requirements
of Section 404 and our management and audit committee are
developing other plans to prepare for our compliance with the
requirements of Section 404 and to correct the weakness
identified above. We will incur incremental costs as a result of
these efforts, including increased auditing and legal fees, the
magnitude of which we are not able to estimate at this time. We
may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and
procedures that adequately respond to Section 404 or other
increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements that
will be applicable to us as a public company. We cannot assure
you that we will not discover further weaknesses or deficiencies
as we continue to develop these procedures. In addition, we
cannot assure you that the steps we plan to take or the
procedures we plan to implement will be sufficient to ensure
that we will be able to prevent or detect any misstatements to
our financial statements in the future.
Any failure to implement and maintain the improvements in the
controls over our financial reporting, or difficulties
encountered in the implementation of these improvements in our
controls, could result in a material misstatement to the annual
or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or
detected or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations
under applicable securities laws. Any failure to improve our
internal controls to address the identified weakness could
result in our incurring substantial liability for not having met
our legal obligations and could also cause investors to lose
confidence in our reported financial information, which could
have a negative impact on the trading price of our Class A
shares. Similar adverse effects could result if our auditors
express an adverse opinion or disclaim or qualify an opinion on
managements assessment or on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
We have significant fixed financing costs and expect to
incur additional fixed costs as we expand our fleet. |
The airline business is characterized by high leverage, and
accordingly we have a high level of indebtedness. We also have
significant expenditures in connection with our operating leases
and facility rental costs, and substantially all of our property
and equipment is pledged to secure indebtedness. For the year
ended December 31, 2004, our interest expense and aircraft
and facility rental expense under operating leases aggregated
$35.6 million. At September 30, 2005, approximately
70% of our total indebtedness bore interest at
18
fixed rates, and a small portion of our lease obligations was
determined with reference to LIBOR. Accordingly, our financing
and rent expense will not decrease significantly if market
interest rates decline.
As of September 30, 2005, we had firm commitments to
purchase seven Boeing 737s and twelve Embraer 190s, with an
aggregate list price of approximately $816 million. We have
arranged for financing for a significant portion of the
commitment relating to such aircraft and will require
substantial capital from external sources to meet our remaining
financial commitment. The acquisition and financing of these
aircraft will likely result in a substantial increase in our
leverage and fixed financing costs. A high degree of leverage
and fixed payment obligations could:
|
|
|
|
|
limit our ability in the future to obtain additional financing
for working capital or other important needs; |
|
|
|
impair our liquidity by diverting substantial cash from our
operating needs to service fixed financing obligations; or |
|
|
|
limit our ability to plan for or react to changes in our
business, in the airline industry or in general economic
conditions. |
Any one of these could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
The cost of refinancing our debt and obtaining additional
financing for new aircraft could increase significantly if the
Export-Import Bank of the United States does not continue to
guarantee our debt. |
We currently finance our aircraft through bank loans and, to a
lesser extent, operating leases and local bond offerings. In the
past, we have obtained most of the financing for our Boeing
aircraft purchases from commercial financial institutions
utilizing guarantees provided by the Export-Import Bank of the
United States. The Export-Import Bank provides guarantees
to companies that purchase goods from U.S. companies for
export, enabling them to obtain financing at substantially lower
interest rates as compared to those that they could obtain
without a guarantee. The Export-Import Bank will not be able to
provide similar guarantees in connection with financing for our
aircraft purchases from Embraer since those aircraft are not
exports from the United States. At September 30, 2005, we
had $344.9 million of outstanding indebtedness that is owed
to financial institutions under financing arrangements
guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank. We cannot predict whether
the Export-Import Banks credit support will continue to be
available to us to fund future purchases of Boeing aircraft. The
Export-Import Bank may in the future limit its exposure to
Panama-based companies, to our airline or to airlines generally,
or may encourage us to diversify our credit sources by limiting
future guarantees. Similarly, we cannot assure you that we will
be able to continue to raise financing from past sources, or
from other sources, on terms comparable to our existing
financing. We may not be able to continue to obtain lease or
debt financing on terms attractive to us, or at all, and if we
are unable to obtain financing, we may be forced to modify our
aircraft acquisition plans or to incur higher than anticipated
financing costs which could have an adverse impact on the
execution of our growth strategy and business.
|
|
|
Our existing debt financing agreements and our aircraft
operating leases contain restrictive covenants that impose
significant operating and financial restrictions on us. |
Our aircraft financing loans and operating leases and the
instruments governing our other indebtedness contain a number of
significant covenants and restrictions that limit our ability
and our subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
create material liens on our assets; |
|
|
|
take certain actions that may impair creditors rights to
our aircraft; |
|
|
|
sell assets or engage in certain mergers or
consolidations; and |
|
|
|
engage in other specified significant transactions. |
In addition, several of our aircraft financing agreements
require us to maintain compliance with specified financial
ratios and other financial and operating tests. For example, our
access to certain borrowings under our aircraft financing
arrangements is conditioned upon our maintenance of minimum debt
service coverage
19
and capitalization ratios. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationLiquidity and Capital Resources. Complying
with these covenants may cause us to take actions that make it
more difficult to execute successfully our business strategy and
we may face competition from companies not subject to such
restrictions. Moreover, our failure to comply with these
covenants could result in an event of default or refusal by our
creditors to extend certain of our loans.
|
|
|
If we were to determine that our aircraft, rotable parts
or inventory were impaired, it would have a significant adverse
effect on our operating results. |
We perform impairment reviews when there are particular risks of
impairment or other indicators described in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, in order to
determine whether we need to reduce the carrying value of our
aircraft and related assets with a related charge to our
earnings. In addition to the fact that the value of our fleet
declines as it ages, the excess capacity that currently exists
in the airline industry, airline bankruptcies and other factors
beyond our control may further contribute to the decline of the
fair market value of our aircraft and related rotable parts and
inventory. If such an impairment does occur, we would be
required under U.S. GAAP to write down these assets to
their estimated fair market value through a charge to earnings.
A significant charge to earnings would adversely affect our
financial condition and operating results. In addition, the
interest rates on and the availability of certain of our
aircraft financing loans are tied to the value of the aircraft
securing the loans. If those values were to decrease
substantially, our interest rates may rise or the lenders under
those loans may cease extending credit to us, either of which
could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and
results of operations.
|
|
|
We rely on information technology systems, and we may
become more dependent on such systems in the future. |
We rely upon information technology systems to operate our
business and increase our efficiency. We are highly reliant on
certain critical systems, such as the Sceptre system for
maintenance, the SHARES computer reservation and
check-in system and our new revenue management system. Other
systems are designed to decrease distribution costs through
Internet reservations and to maximize cargo distributions. These
systems may not deliver their anticipated benefits. Also, in
transitioning to new systems we may lose data or experience
interruptions in service, which could harm our business.
|
|
|
Our quarterly results can fluctuate substantially. |
The airline industry is by nature cyclical and seasonal, and our
operating results may vary from quarter to quarter. We tend to
experience the highest levels of traffic and revenue in July and
August, with a smaller peak in traffic in December and January.
In general, demand for air travel is higher in the third and
fourth quarters, particularly in international markets, because
of the increase in vacation travel during these periods relative
to the remainder of the year. We generally experience our lowest
levels of passenger traffic in April and May. Given our high
proportion of fixed costs, seasonality can affect our
profitability from quarter to quarter. Demand for air travel is
also affected by factors such as economic conditions, war or the
threat of war, fare levels and weather conditions.
Due to the factors described above and others described in this
prospectus, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating
results may not be good indicators of our future performance. In
addition, it is possible that in any quarter our operating
results could be below the expectations of investors and any
published reports or analyses regarding our company. In that
event, the price of our Class A shares could decline,
perhaps substantially.
|
|
|
Our reputation and financial results could be harmed in
the event of an accident or incident involving our
aircraft. |
An accident or incident involving one of our aircraft could
involve significant claims by injured passengers and others, as
well as significant costs related to the repair or replacement
of a damaged aircraft and its temporary or permanent loss from
service. A short time prior to our acquisition of
AeroRepública, one of its aircraft slid off of a runway in
an accident without serious injuries to passengers; however, the
aircraft was severely damaged and declared a total loss by its
insurers. We are required by our creditors and the lessors of
20
our aircraft under our operating lease agreements to carry
liability insurance, but the amount of such liability insurance
coverage may not be adequate and we may be forced to bear
substantial losses in the event of any future accident. Our
insurance premiums may also increase due to an accident or
incident affecting one of our aircraft. Substantial claims
resulting from an accident in excess of our related insurance
coverage or increased premiums would harm our business and
financial results. Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident,
even if fully insured, could cause the public to perceive us as
less safe or reliable than other airlines which could harm our
business and results of operations. Our business would also be
significantly harmed if the public avoids flying our aircraft
due to an adverse perception of the Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft or the Embraer 190 due to safety concerns or other
problems, whether real or perceived, or in the event of an
accident involving either of those types of aircraft.
|
|
|
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could negatively
affect our net income. |
In 2004, approximately 80% of our expenses and 50% of our
revenues were denominated in U.S. dollars. The remainder of
our expenses and revenues were denominated in the currencies of
the various countries to which we fly, with the largest
non-dollar amount denominated in Pesos. As a result of the
acquisition of AeroRepública in April 2005, we will have an
increased exposure to the Peso in future periods. If any of
these currencies decline in value against the U.S. dollar,
our revenues, expressed in U.S. dollars, and our operating
margin would be adversely affected. We may not be able to adjust
our fares denominated in other currencies to offset any
increases in U.S. dollar-denominated expenses, increases in
interest expense or exchange losses on fixed obligations or
indebtedness denominated in foreign currency. We currently do
not hedge the risk of fluctuation in foreign exchange rates. We
are exposed to exchange rate losses and gains due to the
fluctuation in the value of local currencies vis-à-vis the
U.S. dollar during the period of time (typically between 1
to 2 weeks) between the time we are paid in local
currencies and the time we are able to repatriate the revenues
in U.S. dollars.
|
|
|
Our maintenance costs will increase as Copa Airlines
fleet ages and as we perform maintenance on
AeroRepúblicas older fleet. |
Because the average age of Copa Airlines aircraft is
approximately 3.3 years as of September 30, 2005, the
fleet requires less maintenance now than it will in the future.
We have incurred a relatively low level of maintenance expenses
in recent years because most of the parts on Copa Airlines
aircraft are still covered under multi-year warranties. Our
maintenance costs will increase significantly, both on an
absolute basis and as a percentage of our operating expenses as
our fleet ages and these warranties expire.
AeroRepúblicas fleet is considerably older than Copa
Airlines fleet, having an average age of 22.4 years
as of September 30, 2005. The aircraft operated by
AeroRepública will likely be less reliable than Copa
Airlines newer aircraft and can be expected to require
significantly greater expenditures on maintenance which may lead
to an overall increase in our consolidated operating expenses.
|
|
|
If we enter into a prolonged dispute with any of our
employees, many of whom are represented by unions, or if we are
required to increase substantially the salaries or benefits of
our employees, it may have an adverse impact on our operations
and cash flows. |
Approximately 48.3% of our employees belong to a labor union.
There are currently five unions covering our employees based in
Panama: the pilots union; the flight attendants
union; the mechanics union; the traffic attendants
union; and a generalized union, which represents baggage
handlers, aircraft cleaners, counter agents, and other
non-executive administrative staff. After extensive
negotiations, we entered into a new collective bargaining
agreement with the general union on October 26, 2005. We
will begin negotiations for new collective bargaining agreements
with the mechanics union and the flight attendants
union near the end of 2005. Our next negotiation with the
pilots union is scheduled to begin in mid-2008. Typically,
our collective bargaining agreements in Panama are between three
and four year terms. We also have union contracts with employees
in Brazil and Mexico. AeroRepública is a party to
collective bargaining agreements that cover 96 of
AeroRepúblicas 112 pilots and co-pilots and all of
AeroRepúblicas 178 flight attendants. A strike, work
interruption or stoppage or any prolonged dispute with our
employees who are represented by any of these unions, or any
sizable number of our employees, could have an adverse impact on
our operations.
21
These risks are typically exacerbated during periods of
renegotiation with the unions. For example, in 2000 we
experienced a brief localized pilots union work slow-down
during contract negotiations that was eventually resolved to our
satisfaction. Any renegotiated collective bargaining agreement
could feature significant wage increases and a consequent
increase in our operating expenses. Employees outside of Panama
that are not currently members of unions may also form new
unions that may seek further wage increases or benefits.
Our business is labor intensive. We expect salaries, wages and
benefits to increase on a gross basis, and these costs could
increase as a percentage of our overall costs. If we are unable
to hire, train and retain qualified pilots and other employees
at a reasonable cost, our business could be harmed and we may be
unable to complete our expansion plans.
|
|
|
Our investment in AeroRepública may not generate the
benefits we sought when we purchased the company. |
In the second quarter of 2005, we purchased AeroRepública,
a Colombian airline currently providing point-to-point service
among eleven cities in Colombia. Until our acquisition of
AeroRepública, we had been almost entirely focused on
providing international air travel through our hub in Panama.
Our investment in AeroRepública is subject to many risks
and uncertainties that will ultimately determine whether the
acquisition will increase or reduce our overall profitability.
See Business AeroRepública.
We have identified several errors in the accounting and
internal control procedures of AeroRepública. Prior to
the acquisition, our diligence investigations identified several
errors in the accounting and internal control procedures of
AeroRepública indicating that their previous financial
statements may not be reliable. As we become more directly
involved in the management of AeroRepública, we may
discover additional liabilities or problems of which we are
currently unaware.
Our maintenance costs will increase as we perform maintenance
on AeroRepúblicas older fleet. AeroRepública
currently operates a fleet of twelve aircraft having an average
age in excess of 20 years, compared to an average age of
3.3 years as of September 30, 2005 for the rest of our
fleet. As a result, substantial unanticipated investments may be
required to bring AeroRepúblicas fleet and operations
up to our standards of reliability and safety.
We may not be able to achieve cost savings and other
improvements in efficiency. We may not be able to achieve
the cost savings and other improvements in efficiency that we
seek at AeroRepública, and our failure to do so could harm
our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
We believe that in recent years AeroRepública had operating
margins that were close to zero and, as a result, we expect that
the consolidation of AeroRepúblicas results of
operations may significantly decrease our future net operating
margins.
AeroRepúblicas operations are sensitive to
competitive conditions in the Colombian domestic air travel
market as well as macroeconomic and political conditions in
Colombia. All of AeroRepúblicas scheduled
operations are conducted within Colombia, so its results of
operations are highly sensitive to competitive conditions in the
Colombian domestic air travel market. AeroRepúblicas
rapid growth in recent years came during a period in which the
domestic market leader, Aerovías del Continente Americano
S.A. (Avianca), experienced severe financial difficulties that
resulted in its bankruptcy and several other significant
competitors exited the market. Recently, however, Avianca
emerged from bankruptcy with new management and a substantially
improved financial condition, and several new competitors have
entered the Colombian domestic market. It is therefore likely
that AeroRepública will face significantly stronger
competition in the near future than it has in recent years, and
its prior results may not be indicative of its future
performance. AeroRepúblicas future results will be
highly sensitive to macroeconomic and political conditions
prevailing in Colombia which have been highly volatile and
unstable and may continue to be so for the foreseeable future.
As a result of these and other factors,
AeroRepúblicas future results are subject to
significant uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control.
Therefore, we may encounter significant unanticipated problems
at AeroRepública which could have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations.
22
|
|
|
The integration of AeroRepública into our business
may require a significant amount of our managements time
and distract our management from our core operations. |
Although we believe that our recent acquisition of
AeroRepública represents an attractive opportunity,
substantial resources will be needed to implement our plan to
improve its profitability. Implementation of our plan is subject
to many uncertainties and may eventually require us to dedicate
a potentially significant portion of our limited management
resources to this effort. Inconsistencies in standards, internal
controls, procedures, policies, business cultures and
compensation structures between us and AeroRepública, and
the need to implement, coordinate and harmonize various
business-specific operating procedures and systems, as well as
the financial, accounting, information and other systems of us
and AeroRepública, may result in substantial costs and may
divert a substantial amount of our managements resources
from our core international operations. Diversion of Copas
resources could materially and negatively affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our revenues depend on our relationship with travel agents
and tour operators. |
In 2004, approximately 62% of our revenues were derived from
tickets sold by travel agents or tour operators. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to maintain favorable
relationships with these ticket sellers. Our revenues could be
adversely impacted if travel agents or tour operators elect to
favor other airlines or to disfavor us. Our relationship with
travel agents and tour operators may be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
the size of commissions offered by other airlines; |
|
|
|
changes in our arrangements with other distributors of airline
tickets; and |
|
|
|
the introduction and growth of new methods of selling tickets. |
|
|
|
We rely on third parties to provide our customers and us
with facilities and services that are integral to
our business. |
We have entered into agreements with third-party contractors to
provide certain facilities and services required for our
operations, such as heavy aircraft and engine maintenance; call
center services; and catering, ground handling, cargo and
baggage handling, or below the wing aircraft
services. For example, at airports other than Tocumen
International Airport, all of the below the wing
aircraft services for Copa flights are performed by contractors.
AeroRepública contracts ground handling equipment in nine
of the eleven cities it serves and has contracted labor for
below the wing tasks in six of the eleven cities.
Overhaul maintenance and C-checks for Copa are
handled by contractors in the United States and Costa Rica, and
some line maintenance for Copa is handled at certain airports by
contract workers rather than our employees. Substantially all of
our agreements with third-party contractors are subject to
termination on short notice. The loss or expiration of these
agreements or our inability to renew these agreements or to
negotiate new agreements with other providers at comparable
rates could harm our business and results of operations.
Further, our reliance on third parties to provide essential
services on our behalf gives us less control over the costs,
efficiency, timeliness and quality of those services. A
contractors negligence could compromise our aircraft or
endanger passengers and crew. This could also have a material
adverse effect on our business. We expect to be dependent on
such agreements for the foreseeable future and if we enter any
new market, we will need to have similar agreements in place.
|
|
|
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for our
aircraft and engines. |
One of the elements of our business strategy is to save costs by
operating a simplified aircraft fleet. Copa currently operates
the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft powered by
CFM 56-7B engines from CFM International. As of
November 16, 2005, Copa began operating the
Embraer 190, powered by General Electric
CF 34-10 engines. We currently intend that Copa will
continue to rely exclusively on these aircraft for the
foreseeable future. If any of Boeing, Embraer, CFM International
or GE Engines were unable to perform their contractual
obligations, or if we are unable to acquire or lease new
aircraft or engines from aircraft or engine manufacturers or
lessors on acceptable terms, Copa would have to find another
supplier for a similar type of aircraft or engine.
23
If Copa has to lease or purchase aircraft from another supplier,
we could lose the benefits we derive from our current fleet
composition. We cannot assure you that any replacement aircraft
would have the same operating advantages as the Boeing
737-700/800 Next Generation or Embraer 190 aircraft that would
be replaced or that Copa could lease or purchase engines that
would be as reliable and efficient as the CFM 56-7B and GE
CF34-10. We may also incur substantial transition costs,
including costs associated with retraining our employees,
replacing our manuals and adapting our facilities. Our
operations could also be harmed by the failure or inability of
Boeing, Embraer, CFM International or GE Engines to provide
sufficient parts or related support services on a timely basis.
Our business would be significantly harmed if a design defect or
mechanical problem with either the Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft or the Embraer 190 were discovered that would ground
any of Copas aircraft while the defect or problem was
corrected, assuming it could be corrected at all. The use of our
aircraft could be suspended or restricted by regulatory
authorities in the event of any actual or perceived mechanical
or design problems. Our business would also be significantly
harmed if the public began to avoid flying with us due to an
adverse perception of the Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft or
the Embraer 190 stemming from safety concerns or other problems,
whether real or perceived, or in the event of an accident
involving either of those types of aircraft. Carriers that
operate a more diversified fleet are better positioned than we
are to manage such events.
|
|
|
We are dependent on key personnel. |
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts and
abilities of our senior management team and key financial,
commercial, operating and maintenance personnel. In particular,
we depend on the services of our senior management team,
including Pedro Heilbron, our Chief Executive Officer, Victor
Vial, our Chief Financial Officer, Lawrence Ganse, our Chief
Operating Officer, Jorge Isaac García, our Vice-President,
Commercial, and Daniel Gunn, our Vice-President, Planning. We
have no employment agreements or non-competition agreements in
place with members of our senior management team other than
Mr. Heilbron, our Chief Executive Officer. Competition for
highly qualified personnel is intense, and the loss of any
executive officer, senior manager or other key employee without
adequate replacement or the inability to attract new qualified
personnel could have a material adverse effect upon our
business, operating results and financial condition.
Risks Relating to the Airline Industry
|
|
|
The airline industry is highly competitive. |
We face intense competition throughout our route network.
Overall airline industry profit margins are low and industry
earnings are volatile. Airlines compete in the areas of pricing,
scheduling (frequency and flight times), on-time performance,
frequent flyer programs and other services. We compete with a
number of other airlines that currently serve the routes on
which we operate, including Grupo TACA, American Airlines Inc.,
LAN Airlines S.A. and Avianca. Some of our competitors, such as
American Airlines, have larger customer bases and greater brand
recognition in the markets we serve outside Panama, and some of
our competitors have significantly greater financial and
marketing resources than we have. Airlines based in other
countries may also receive subsidies, tax incentives or other
state aid from their respective governments, which are not
provided by the Panamanian government. The commencement of, or
increase in, service on the routes we serve by existing or new
carriers could negatively impact our operating results.
Likewise, competitors service on routes that we are
targeting for expansion may make those expansion plans less
attractive.
We must constantly react to changes in prices and services
offered by our competitors to remain competitive. The airline
industry is highly susceptible to price discounting,
particularly because airlines incur very low marginal costs for
providing service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold
seats. Carriers use discount fares to stimulate traffic during
periods of lower demand to generate cash flow and to increase
market share. Any lower fares offered by one airline are often
matched by competing airlines, which often results in lower
industry yields with little or no increase in traffic levels.
Price competition among airlines in the future could lead to
lower fares or passenger traffic on some or all of our routes,
which could negatively impact our profitability. Grupo TACA
lowered many of its fares a year ago in an effort to generate
higher demand, and we
24
have been forced to respond by adjusting our fares to remain
competitive on the affected routes. We cannot assure you that
Grupo TACA or any of our other competitors will not undercut our
fares in the future or increase capacity on routes in an effort
to increase their respective market shares as they have done in
the past. Although we intend to compete vigorously and to assert
our rights against any predatory conduct, such activity by other
airlines could reduce the level of fares or passenger traffic on
our routes to the point where profitable levels of operations
could not be maintained. Due to our smaller size and financial
resources compared to several of our competitors, we may be less
able to withstand aggressive marketing tactics or fare wars
engaged in by our competitors should such events occur.
|
|
|
We may face increasing competition from low-cost carriers
offering discounted fares. |
Traditional hub-and-spoke carriers in the United States and
Europe have in recent years faced substantial and increasing
competitive pressure from low-cost carriers offering discounted
fares. The low-cost carriers operations are typically
characterized by point-to-point route networks focusing on the
highest demand city pairs, high aircraft utilization, single
class service and fewer in-flight amenities. As evidenced by the
operations of Gol Intelligent Airlines Inc., or Gol, in Brazil
and several new low-cost carriers planning to start service in
Mexico, among others, the low-cost carrier business model
appears to be gaining acceptance in the Latin American aviation
industry. As a result, we may face new and substantial
competition from low-cost carriers in the future which could
result in significant and lasting downward pressure on the fares
we charge for flights on our routes.
|
|
|
Significant changes or extended periods of high fuel costs
or fuel supply disruptions could materially affect our operating
results. |
Fuel costs constitute a significant portion of our total
operating expenses, representing approximately 14.8% of our
operating expenses in 2002, 17.1% in 2003, 19.7% in 2004 and
28.2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. As a
result, substantial increases in fuel costs materially affect
our operating results. Jet fuel costs have been subject to wide
fluctuations as a result of increases in demand, sudden
disruptions in and other concerns about global supply, as well
as market speculation. Both the cost and availability of fuel
are subject to many economic and political factors and events
occurring throughout the world that we can neither control nor
accurately predict, including international political and
economic circumstances such as the political instability in
major oil-exporting countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia.
As a result, fuel prices continue to exhibit substantial
volatility. Although we entered into hedging agreements with
respect to approximately 15% of Copas projected fuel needs
for 2005, these agreements provide limited protection against
future increases in the price of fuel, and we cannot assure you
that our current or any such future arrangements will be
adequate to protect us from further increases in the price of
fuel, or that fuel prices will decline from their current levels
at any time in the near future. Indeed, numerous market experts
and analysts have predicted that fuel prices can be expected to
increase further, perhaps significantly, from their already high
levels. If a future fuel supply shortage were to arise as a
result of production curtailments by the Organization of the
Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, a disruption of oil
imports, supply disruptions resulting from severe weather or
natural disasters, a further delay in the restart of the Gulf
Coast refineries, the continued unrest in Iraq, other conflicts
in the Middle East or otherwise, higher fuel prices or further
reductions of scheduled airline services could result.
Significant increases in fuel costs would materially and
negatively affect our operating results. We cannot assure you
that we would be able to offset any increases in the price of
fuel by increasing our fares.
The recent high prices were exacerbated by widespread disruption
to oil production, refinery operations and pipeline capacity
along certain portions of the U.S. Gulf Coast caused by the
damage of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita during the third
quarter of 2005. Our fuel costs increased from $1.74 per
gallon during the month ended June 30, 2005 to
$2.15 per gallon during the month ended September 30,
2005. It is likely that prices will remain high at least until
refining capacity has been restored in the affected areas. We
cannot predict when, or if, prices for fuel will decline to
levels we have paid historically. Unless we experience a return
to lower fuel prices, our results of operations will continue to
be materially negatively affected as compared with prior periods.
25
|
|
|
Because the airline industry is characterized by high
fixed costs and relatively elastic revenues, airlines cannot
quickly reduce their costs to respond to shortfalls in expected
revenue. |
The airline industry is characterized by low gross profit
margins, high fixed costs and revenues that generally exhibit
substantially greater elasticity than costs. The operating costs
of each flight do not vary significantly with the number of
passengers flown and, therefore, a relatively small change in
the number of passengers, fare pricing or traffic mix could have
a significant effect on operating and financial results. These
fixed costs cannot be adjusted quickly to respond to changes in
revenues and a shortfall from expected revenue levels could have
a material adverse effect on our net income.
|
|
|
Airline bankruptcies could adversely affect the
industry. |
Since September 11, 2001 several air carriers have sought
to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code, including some of our competitors such as
Avianca and Delta. Successful completion of such reorganizations
could present us with competitors with significantly lower
operating costs derived from labor, supply and financing
contracts renegotiated under the protection of the Bankruptcy
Code. For example, Avianca recently emerged from bankruptcy with
a significantly improved financial condition. In addition, air
carriers involved in reorganizations have historically
undertaken substantial fare discounting in order to maintain
cash flows and to enhance continued customer loyalty. Such fare
discounting could further lower yields for all carriers,
including us. Further, the market value of aircraft would likely
be negatively impacted if a number of air carriers seek to
reduce capacity by eliminating aircraft from their fleets.
|
|
|
The 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States have
adversely affected, and any additional terrorist attacks or
hostilities would further adversely affect, the airline industry
by decreasing demand and increasing costs. |
The terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11,
2001 had a severe adverse impact on the airline industry.
Airline traffic in the United States fell dramatically after the
attacks and decreased less severely throughout Latin America.
Our revenues depend on the number of passengers traveling on our
flights. Therefore, any future terrorist attacks or threat of
attacks, whether or not involving commercial aircraft, any
increase in hostilities relating to reprisals against terrorist
organizations or otherwise and any related economic impact could
result in decreased passenger traffic and materially and
negatively affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
The airline industry experienced increased costs following the
2001 terrorist attacks. Airlines have been required to adopt
additional security measures and may be required to comply with
more rigorous security guidelines in the future. Premiums for
insurance against aircraft damage and liability to third parties
increased substantially, and insurers could reduce their
coverage or increase their premiums even further in the event of
additional terrorist attacks, hijackings, airline crashes or
other events adversely affecting the airline industry abroad or
in Latin America. In the future, certain aviation insurance
could become unaffordable, unavailable or available only for
reduced amounts of coverage that are insufficient to comply with
the levels of insurance coverage required by aircraft lenders
and lessors or applicable government regulations. While
governments in other countries have agreed to indemnify airlines
for liabilities that they might incur from terrorist attacks or
provide low-cost insurance for terrorism risks, the Panamanian
government has not indicated an intention to provide similar
benefits to us. Increases in the cost of insurance may result in
both higher airline ticket prices and a decreased demand for air
travel generally, which could materially and negatively affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
The negative impact on the airline industry of the current
global state of affairs, including the aftermath of the Iraq war
and the threat of another outbreak of a communicable disease,
may continue or possibly worsen. |
The combination of continued instability in the aftermath of the
Iraq war and the publics concerns about the possibility of
an outbreak of a disease that can be spread by fellow commercial
air passengers (such as avian flu or Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome) has continued to have a negative impact on the
publics willingness to travel by air. It is impossible to
determine if and when such adverse effects will abate and
whether they will further decrease demand for air travel, which
could materially and negatively affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
26
Risks Relating to Panama and our Region
|
|
|
Our performance is heavily dependent on economic
conditions in the countries in which we do business. |
Passenger demand is heavily cyclical and highly dependant on
global and local economic growth, economic expectations and
foreign exchange rate variations. In the past, we have been
negatively impacted by poor economic performance in certain
emerging market countries in which we operate. Any of the
following developments in the countries in which we operate
could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in economic or other governmental policies; |
|
|
|
changes in regulatory, legal or administrative practices; or |
|
|
|
other political or economic developments over which we have no
control. |
Additionally, a significant portion of our revenues is derived
from discretionary and leisure travel which are especially
sensitive to economic downturns. A worsening of economic
conditions could result in a reduction in passenger traffic, and
leisure travel in particular, which in turn would materially and
negatively affect our financial condition and results of
operations. Any perceived weakening of economic conditions in
this region could likewise negatively affect our ability to
obtain financing to meet our future capital needs in
international capital markets.
|
|
|
We are highly dependent on conditions in Panama. |
A substantial portion of our assets are located in the Republic
of Panama, a significant proportion of our customers are
Panamanian, and substantially all of Copas flights operate
through our hub at Tocumen International Airport. As a result,
we depend on economic and political conditions prevailing from
time to time in Panama. Panamas economic conditions in
turn highly depend on the continued profitability and economic
impact of the Panama Canal. Control of the Panama Canal and many
other assets were transferred from the United States to Panama
in 1999 after nearly a century of U.S. control. Although
the Panamanian government is democratically elected and the
Panamanian political climate is currently stable, we cannot
assure you that current conditions will continue. If the
Panamanian economy experiences a recession or a reduction in its
economic growth rate, or if Panama experiences significant
political disruptions, our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and negatively
affected.
|
|
|
We have paid relatively low taxes in the past, and any
increase in the corporate income taxes we pay in Panama or the
other countries where we do business would adversely affect our
profitability. |
We cannot assure you that we will not be subject to additional
taxes in the future or that current taxes will not be increased.
Our provision for income taxes was $2,999,000, $3,644,000 and
$5,732,000 in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004 which represented an effective income tax rate of 12.7%,
7.0% and 7.7% for the respective periods. We are subject to
local tax regulations in each of the jurisdictions where we
operate, the great majority of which are related to the taxation
of income. In six of the countries to which we fly, we do not
pay any income taxes because we do not generate income under the
laws of those countries either because they do not have income
tax or because of treaties or other arrangements those countries
have with Panama. In the remaining countries, we pay income tax
at a rate ranging from 25% to 35% of income. Different countries
calculate income in different ways, but they are typically
derived from sales in the applicable country multiplied by our
net margin or by a presumed net margin set by the relevant tax
legislation. The determination of our taxable income in several
countries is based on a combination of revenues sourced to each
particular country and the allocation of expenses of our
operations to that particular country. The methodology for
multinational transportation company sourcing of revenue and
expense is not always specifically prescribed in the relevant
tax regulations, and therefore is subject to interpretation by
both us and the respective taxing authorities. Additionally, in
some countries, the applicability of certain regulations
governing non-income taxes and the determination of our filing
status are also subject to interpretation. We cannot estimate
the amount, if any, of potential tax liabilities that might
result if the allocations, interpretations and filing positions
used by us in our tax returns were challenged by the taxing
authorities of one or more countries. The low rate at which we
pay income
27
tax has been critical to our profitability in recent years and
if it were to increase, our financial performance and results of
operations would be materially and adversely affected.
In the past, our expenses attributable to operations in Panama
have consistently exceeded our revenues attributable to
operations in Panama. As a result, we have typically experienced
losses for Panamanian income tax purposes and were not subject
to any income tax obligations. Recently, the Panamanian
legislature enacted a new income tax law that provides for an
alternative minimum tax that equals 1.4% of a
companys revenues attributable to operations in Panama. We
estimate that our annual income tax liability will be an
additional $1.3 million based on traffic and revenues expected
for 2005. There is also uncertainty under the new law about how
we should allocate revenues to operations in Panama. If the
Panamanian tax authorities do not agree with our interpretation
of the new law or our methods of allocating revenues, we may be
subject to additional tax liability. Airlines in Panama are
currently not subject to any taxes relating specifically to the
airline industry other than the 4% tax collected from passengers
on tickets sold in Panama for the benefit of the Panamanian
Tourism Bureau.
|
|
|
The new social security law in Panama will adversely
affect our net income. |
On June 1, 2005, the Panamanian legislature passed a new
law changing the way the public pension system is funded. In
response to public protests in opposition to the new law, the
government has suspended its effectiveness until
December 31, 2005. If the new law were to become effective
as enacted, we expect that we would be responsible for
additional expenses in respect of all of our Panamanian
employees related to the funding of their future social security
benefits. We estimate that these expenses would have been
approximately $300,000 from June 1, 2005 through the
remainder of 2005 had this new law not been suspended until
December 31, 2005. However, due to the substantial
uncertainty surrounding the law, we cannot estimate its future
effect on our results of operations.
|
|
|
Political unrest and instability in Colombia may adversely
affect our business and the market price of our Class A
shares. |
We completed our acquisition of AeroRepública in the second
quarter of 2005. Almost all of AeroRepúblicas
scheduled operations are conducted within Colombia. As a result,
AeroRepública may be significantly affected by political
conditions in Colombia. Terrorism and violence have plagued
Colombia in the past. Continuing guerrilla activity could cause
political unrest and instability in Colombia, which could
adversely affect AeroRepúblicas financial condition
and results of operations. In addition, the threat of terrorist
attacks could impose additional costs on us, including enhanced
security to protect our aircraft, facilities and personnel
against possible attacks as well as increased insurance premiums.
Risks Relating to Our Class A Shares
|
|
|
The value of our Class A shares may be adversely
affected by ownership restrictions on our capital stock and the
power of our board of directors to take remedial actions to
preserve our operating license and international route rights by
requiring sales of certain outstanding shares or issuing new
stock. |
Pursuant to the Panamanian Aviation Act, as amended and
interpreted to date, and certain of the bilateral treaties
affording us the right to fly to other countries, we are
required to be substantially owned and
effectively controlled by Panamanian nationals. Our
failure to comply with such requirements could result in the
loss of our Panamanian operating license and/or our right to fly
to certain important countries. Our Articles of Incorporation
(Pacto Social) give special powers to our independent
directors to take certain significant actions to attempt to
ensure that the amount of shares held in us by non-Panamanian
nationals does not reach a level which could jeopardize our
compliance with Panamanian and bilateral ownership and control
requirements. If our independent directors determine it is
reasonably likely that we will be in violation of these
ownership and control requirements and our Class B shares
represent less than 10% of our total outstanding capital stock
(excluding newly issued shares sold with the approval of our
independent directors committee), our independent directors will
have the power to issue additional Class B shares or
Class C shares with special voting rights solely to
Panamanian nationals. See Description of Capital
Stock.
28
If any of these remedial actions are taken, the trading price of
the Class A shares may be materially and adversely
affected. An issuance of Class C shares could have the
effect of discouraging certain changes of control of Copa
Holdings or may reduce any voting power that the Class A
shares enjoy prior to the Class C share issuance. There can
be no assurance that we would be able to complete an issuance of
Class B shares to Panamanian nationals. We cannot assure
you that restrictions on ownership by non-Panamanian nationals
will not impede the development of an active public trading
market for the Class A shares, adversely affect the market
price of the Class A shares or materially limit our ability
to raise capital in markets outside of Panama in the future.
|
|
|
Our controlling shareholder has the ability to direct our
business and affairs, and its interests could conflict with
yours. |
As of the closing of this offering, all of our Class B
shares, representing approximately 29.2% of the economic
interest in Copa Holdings and all of the voting power of our
capital stock, will be owned by CIASA. CIASA is in turn
controlled by a group of Panamanian investors. In order to
comply with the Panamanian Aviation Act, as amended and
interpreted to date, in connection with this offering we have
amended our organizational documents to modify our share capital
so that CIASA will continue to exercise voting control of Copa
Holdings. CIASA will not be able to transfer its voting control
unless control of our company will remain with Panamanian
nationals. CIASA will maintain voting control of the company so
long as CIASA continues to own a majority of our Class B
shares and the Class B shares continue to represent more
than 10% of our total share capital (excluding newly issued
shares sold with the approval of our independent directors
committee). Even after CIASA ceases to own the majority of the
voting power of our capital stock, CIASA may continue to control
our board of directors indirectly through its control of our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. As the
controlling shareholder, CIASA may direct us to take actions
that could be contrary to your interests and under certain
circumstances CIASA will be able to prevent other shareholders,
including you, from blocking these actions. Also, CIASA may
prevent change of control transactions that might otherwise
provide you with an opportunity to dispose of or realize a
premium on your investment in our Class A shares.
|
|
|
The Class A shares will only be permitted to vote in
very limited circumstances and may never have full voting
rights. |
The holders of Class A shares have no right to vote at our
shareholders meetings except with respect to corporate
transformations of Copa Holdings, mergers, consolidations or
spin-offs of Copa Holdings, changes of corporate purpose,
voluntary delistings of the Class A shares from the NYSE,
the approval of nominations of our independent directors and
amendments to the foregoing provisions that adversely affect the
rights and privileges of any Class A shares. The holders of
Class B shares have the power, subject to our
shareholders agreement with Continental, to elect the
board of directors and to determine the outcome of all other
matters to be decided by a vote of shareholders. Class A
shares will not have full voting rights unless the Class B
shares represent less than 10% of our total capital stock
(excluding newly issued shares sold with the approval of our
independent directors committee). See Description of
Capital Stock. We cannot assure you that the Class A
shares will ever carry full voting rights.
|
|
|
Substantial future sales of our Class A shares by
Continental or CIASA after this offering could cause the price
of the Class A shares to decrease. |
CIASA will own all of our Class B shares immediately
following this offering, and those Class B shares will be
converted into Class A shares if they are sold to
non-Panamanian investors. Continental will own 13,103,125, or
approximately 42.3%, of our Class A shares following this
offering. CIASA and Continental each will hold registration
rights with respect to a significant portion of their shares
pursuant to a registration rights agreement to be entered into
in connection with this offering. Continental is likely to seek
to exercise its rights to register and sell a significant number
of additional Class A shares as soon as possible after the
expiry of the lock-up period referred to below. The market price
of our Class A shares could drop significantly if
Continental or other holders of our shares sell a significant
number of shares, or if the market perceives that they intend to
sell them. We, the selling shareholders, our directors and
executive officers have agreed, subject to certain exceptions,
not to issue or transfer, until 180 days after the date of
this prospectus, any shares of our
29
capital stock, any options or warrants to purchase shares of our
capital stock, or any securities convertible into, or
exchangeable for, shares of our capital stock. We, the selling
shareholders and our directors and executive officers have also
agreed not to make any demand for, or exercise any right with
respect to, the registration of any Class A shares or any
security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
Class A shares, until 180 days after the date of this
prospectus. Nevertheless, after these lock-up agreements expire,
they will not be restricted from selling the shares in the
public market.
|
|
|
Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive
rights, and as a result you may experience substantial dilution
upon future issuances of stock by us. |
Under Panamanian law and our organizational documents, holders
of our Class A shares are not entitled to any preemptive
rights with respect to future issuances of capital stock by us.
Therefore, unlike companies organized under the laws of many
other Latin American jurisdictions, we will be free to issue new
shares of stock to other parties without first offering them to
our existing shareholders. In the future we may sell
Class A or other shares to persons other than our existing
shareholders at a lower price than the shares being sold in this
offering, and as a result you may experience substantial
dilution of your interest in us.
|
|
|
You may not be able to sell our Class A shares at the
price or at the time you desire because an active or liquid
market for the Class A shares may not develop. |
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our Class A shares. The Class A shares have been
approved for listing on the NYSE. We cannot predict, however,
whether an active liquid public trading market for our
Class A shares will develop or be sustained. Active, liquid
trading markets generally result in lower price volatility and
more efficient execution of buy-and-sell orders for investors.
The liquidity of a securities market is often affected by the
volume of shares publicly held by unrelated parties.
|
|
|
Our board of directors may, in its discretion, amend or
repeal the dividend policy it is expected to adopt upon the
closing of this offering. You may not receive the level of
dividends provided for in the dividend policy or any dividends
at all. |
Our board of directors has determined to adopt a dividend policy
that provides for the payment of dividends to shareholders equal
to approximately 10% of our annual consolidated net income. Our
board of directors may, in its sole discretion and for any
reason, amend or repeal this dividend policy. Our board of
directors may decrease the level of dividends provided for in
this dividend policy or entirely discontinue the payment of
dividends. Future dividends with respect to shares of our common
stock, if any, will depend on, among other things, our results
of operations, cash requirements, financial condition,
contractual restrictions, business opportunities, provisions of
applicable law and other factors that our board of directors may
deem relevant. See Dividend Policy.
|
|
|
To the extent we pay dividends to our shareholders, we
will have less capital available to meet our future liquidity
needs. |
Our board of directors has determined to adopt a dividend policy
that provides for the payment of dividends to shareholders equal
to approximately 10% of our annual consolidated net income. The
aviation industry has cyclical characteristics, and many
international airlines are currently experiencing difficulties
meeting their liquidity needs. Also, our business strategy
contemplates substantial growth over the next several years, and
we expect such growth will require a great deal of liquidity. To
the extent that we pay dividends in accordance with the policy
that our board of directors is adopting in connection with this
offering, the money that we distribute to shareholders will not
be available to us to fund future growth and meet our other
liquidity needs.
|
|
|
Our Articles of Incorporation impose ownership and control
restrictions on our company which ensure that Panamanian
nationals will continue to control us and that these
restrictions operate to prevent any change of control or some
transfers of ownership in order to comply with the Aviation Act
and other bilateral restrictions. |
Under the Panamanian Aviation Act, as amended and interpreted to
date, Panamanian nationals must exercise effective
control over the operations of the airline and must
maintain substantial ownership. These phrases are
not defined in the Aviation Act itself and it is unclear how a
Panamanian court would interpret them. The share ownership
requirements and transfer restrictions contained in our Articles
of
30
Incorporation, as well as the dual-class structure of our voting
capital stock are designed to ensure compliance with these
ownership and control restrictions. See Description of
Capital Stock. These provisions of our Articles of
Incorporation may prevent change of control transactions that
might otherwise provide you with an opportunity to realize a
premium on your investment in our Class A shares. They also
ensure that Panamanians will continue to control all the
decisions of our company for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
The protections afforded to minority shareholders in
Panama are different from and more limited than those in the
United States and may be more difficult to enforce. |
Under Panamanian law, the protections afforded to minority
shareholders are different from, and much more limited than,
those in the United States and some other Latin American
countries. For example, the legal framework with respect to
shareholder disputes is less developed under Panamanian law than
under U.S. law and there are different procedural
requirements for bringing shareholder lawsuits, including
shareholder derivative suits. As a result, it may be more
difficult for our minority shareholders to enforce their rights
against us or our directors or controlling shareholder than it
would be for shareholders of a U.S. company. In addition,
Panamanian law does not afford minority shareholders as many
protections for investors through corporate governance
mechanisms as in the United States and provides no mandatory
tender offer or similar protective mechanisms for minority
shareholders in the event of a change in control. While our
Articles of Incorporation provide limited rights to holders of
our Class A shares to sell their shares at the same price
as CIASA in the event that a sale of Class B shares by
CIASA results in the purchaser having the right to elect a
majority of our board, there are other change of control
transactions in which holders of our Class A shares would
not have the right to participate, including the sale of
interests by a party that had previously acquired Class B
shares from CIASA, the sale of interests by another party in
conjunction with a sale by CIASA, the sale by CIASA of control
to more than one party, or the sale of controlling interests in
CIASA itself.
|
|
|
Developments in Latin American countries and other
emerging market countries may cause the market price of our
Class A shares to decrease. |
The market value of securities issued by Panamanian companies
may be affected to varying degrees by economic and market
conditions in other countries, including other Latin American
and emerging market countries. Although economic conditions in
emerging market countries outside Latin America may differ
significantly from economic conditions in Panama and Colombia or
elsewhere in Latin America, investors reactions to
developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect
on the market value of securities of Panamanian issuers or
issuers with significant operations in Latin America. As a
result of economic problems in various emerging market countries
in recent years (such as the Asian financial crisis of 1997, the
Russian financial crisis of 1998 and the Argentine financial
crisis in 2001), investors have viewed investments in emerging
markets with heightened caution. Crises in other emerging market
countries may hamper investor enthusiasm for securities of
Panamanian issuers, including our shares, which could adversely
affect the market price of our Class A shares.
31
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our
Class A shares by the selling shareholders.
DIVIDENDS AND DIVIDEND POLICY
The payment of dividends on our shares is subject to the
discretion of our board of directors. Under Panamanian law, we
may pay dividends only out of retained earnings and capital
surplus. So long as we do not default in our payments under our
loan agreements, there are no covenants or other restrictions on
our ability to declare and pay dividends. Our Articles of
Incorporation provide that all dividends declared by our board
of directors will be paid equally with respect to all of the
Class A and Class B shares. See Description of
Capital StockDividends.
Our board of directors has determined to adopt a dividend policy
that provides for the payment of approximately 10% of our annual
consolidated net income to shareholders as a dividend to be
declared at our annual shareholders meeting and paid
shortly thereafter. Our board of directors may, in its sole
discretion and for any reason, amend or discontinue the dividend
policy it is expected to adopt upon the closing of this
offering. Our board of directors may change the level of
dividends provided for in this dividend policy or entirely
discontinue the payment of dividends. Future dividends with
respect to shares of our common stock, if any, will depend on,
among other things, our results of operations, cash
requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions,
business opportunities, provisions of applicable law and other
factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
We paid an extraordinary dividend of $10 million to our
shareholders in December 2004 and another extraordinary dividend
of $10 million in June 2005. Prior to the December 2004
dividend payment, we had not paid a dividend since the formation
of Copa Holdings in 1998.
DILUTION
Net tangible book value represents the amount of our total
assets, less our total liabilities and intangible assets, such
as goodwill, acquired routes and trade name. Net tangible book
value per share is determined by dividing our net tangible book
value by the number of our outstanding shares.
As of September 30, 2005, our net tangible book value was
approximately $176,160,000, or $4.03 per share after giving
effect to the recapitalization and the restricted stock awards
to our management that we intend to effect in connection with
this offering. We may adjust the number of restricted stock
awards to our management prior to the offering. The immediate
dilution to purchasers of the shares in the offering is
$15.97 per share, or 79.9%. Dilution, for this
purpose, represents the difference between the price per share
paid by purchasers in this offering and our net tangible book
value per share as of September 30, 2005, as adjusted to
give effect to our recapitalization and the issuance of
restricted stock to certain of our management employees.
32
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents,
short-term debt, long-term debt and total capitalization at
September 30, 2005 on an actual basis and as adjusted to
reflect the recapitalization undertaken in connection with this
offering. As we will receive no proceeds from the sale of the
Class A shares by the selling shareholders, there will be
no change in our overall capitalization as a result of this
offering. You should read this table in conjunction with
Selected Financial and Operating Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. None of our indebtedness is guaranteed by a third
party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
129,201 |
|
|
$ |
129,201 |
|
Indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured indebtedness due through 2015
|
|
|
388,354 |
|
|
|
388,354 |
|
|
Unsecured indebtedness due through 2006
|
|
|
21,920 |
|
|
|
21,920 |
|
AeroRepública
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured indebtedness due through 2012
|
|
|
17,249 |
|
|
|
17,249 |
|
|
Unsecured indebtedness due through 2010
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Class A shares (without par value)
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Class B shares (without par value)
|
|
|
14,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Class A shares (without par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
New Class B shares (without par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
200,209 |
|
|
|
200,209 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
229,223 |
|
|
|
229,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
659,031 |
|
|
|
659,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following table presents summary consolidated financial and
operating data as of the dates and for the periods indicated.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP and are stated in U.S. dollars. You
should read this information in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results
of Operations and Financial Condition appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus.
The summary consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 has been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 and for the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 2001 has been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements that were prepared
under International Accounting Standards and adjusted to be
presented on a basis consistent with U.S. GAAP and which
have not been included in this prospectus.
The summary consolidated financial data as of and for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 has been
derived from our unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements for these periods appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. We recently acquired 99.6% of the stock of
AeroRepública, a Colombian air carrier, and began
consolidating AeroRepúblicas results on
April 22, 2005. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and for future periods, we will be
reporting AeroRepúblicas operations as a separate
segment in our financial statements and the related notes. As a
result of the acquisition, our financial information at and for
the nine-months ended September 30, 2005 is not comparable
to the information at and for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2004. The results of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily
indicative of the operating results to be expected for the
entire year ending December 31, 2005 or for any other
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$ |
226,012 |
|
|
$ |
257,918 |
|
|
$ |
269,629 |
|
|
$ |
311,683 |
|
|
$ |
364,611 |
|
|
$ |
268,652 |
|
|
$ |
398,550 |
|
|
Cargo, mail and other
|
|
|
29,402 |
|
|
|
32,454 |
|
|
|
31,008 |
|
|
|
30,106 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
24,514 |
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
255,414 |
|
|
|
290,372 |
|
|
|
300,637 |
|
|
|
341,789 |
|
|
|
399,837 |
|
|
|
293,166 |
|
|
|
428,929 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
48,126 |
|
|
|
46,514 |
|
|
|
40,024 |
|
|
|
48,512 |
|
|
|
62,549 |
|
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
|
97,733 |
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
30,385 |
|
|
|
38,709 |
|
|
|
39,264 |
|
|
|
45,254 |
|
|
|
51,701 |
|
|
|
35,985 |
|
|
|
48,134 |
|
|
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
33,128 |
|
|
|
32,834 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
|
36,172 |
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
31,537 |
|
|
|
31,652 |
|
|
|
28,720 |
|
|
|
27,681 |
|
|
|
29,073 |
|
|
|
21,458 |
|
|
|
31,456 |
|
|
Reservations and sales
|
|
|
15,238 |
|
|
|
18,629 |
|
|
|
16,707 |
|
|
|
18,011 |
|
|
|
22,118 |
|
|
|
15,727 |
|
|
|
21,415 |
|
|
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
26,815 |
|
|
|
25,369 |
|
|
|
20,733 |
|
|
|
20,354 |
|
|
|
19,742 |
|
|
|
13,899 |
|
|
|
21,933 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
12,453 |
|
|
|
13,887 |
|
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
|
13,135 |
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
8,571 |
|
|
|
8,451 |
|
|
|
8,495 |
|
|
|
10,551 |
|
|
|
12,155 |
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
12,282 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
|
|
25,977 |
|
|
|
29,306 |
|
|
|
19,847 |
|
|
|
25,364 |
|
|
Fleet impairment charge
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
253,797 |
|
|
|
265,368 |
|
|
|
269,796 |
|
|
|
283,493 |
|
|
|
317,494 |
|
|
|
225,664 |
|
|
|
346,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
25,004 |
|
|
|
30,841 |
|
|
|
58,296 |
|
|
|
82,343 |
|
|
|
67,502 |
|
|
|
82,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
Non-operating income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,751 |
) |
|
|
(10,988 |
) |
|
|
(7,629 |
) |
|
|
(11,613 |
) |
|
|
(16,488 |
) |
|
|
(12,076 |
) |
|
|
(15,755 |
) |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
Other,
net(2)
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(9,602 |
) |
|
|
(8,364 |
) |
|
|
(7,174 |
) |
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
|
|
(8,039 |
) |
|
|
(6,146 |
) |
|
|
(8,737 |
) |
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,985 |
) |
|
|
16,640 |
|
|
|
23,667 |
|
|
|
52,133 |
|
|
|
74,304 |
|
|
|
61,356 |
|
|
|
73,604 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
(2,999 |
) |
|
|
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
(5,732 |
) |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(9,515 |
) |
|
|
14,818 |
|
|
|
20,668 |
|
|
|
48,489 |
|
|
|
68,572 |
|
|
|
56,693 |
|
|
|
65,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
(3)
|
|
$ |
16,893 |
|
|
$ |
28,385 |
|
|
$ |
39,088 |
|
|
$ |
65,962 |
|
|
$ |
114,891 |
|
|
$ |
105,531 |
|
|
$ |
129,201 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
36,791 |
|
|
|
30,205 |
|
|
|
24,006 |
|
|
|
31,019 |
|
|
|
27,706 |
|
|
|
30,529 |
|
|
|
54,965 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
61,682 |
|
|
|
69,040 |
|
|
|
73,552 |
|
|
|
108,053 |
|
|
|
156,035 |
|
|
|
151,820 |
|
|
|
208,428 |
|
Purchase deposits for flight equipment
|
|
|
21,035 |
|
|
|
46,540 |
|
|
|
55,867 |
|
|
|
45,869 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
42,189 |
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
205,071 |
|
|
|
227,717 |
|
|
|
345,411 |
|
|
|
480,488 |
|
|
|
541,211 |
|
|
|
521,754 |
|
|
|
572,868 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
270,506 |
|
|
|
300,121 |
|
|
|
421,935 |
|
|
|
591,915 |
|
|
|
702,050 |
|
|
|
678,136 |
|
|
|
846,126 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
142,437 |
|
|
|
111,125 |
|
|
|
211,698 |
|
|
|
311,991 |
|
|
|
380,827 |
|
|
|
345,754 |
|
|
|
369,237 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
|
46,426 |
|
|
|
67,094 |
|
|
|
115,583 |
|
|
|
174,155 |
|
|
|
172,276 |
|
|
|
229,223 |
|
CASH FLOW DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
25,386 |
|
|
$ |
32,997 |
|
|
$ |
50,931 |
|
|
$ |
73,561 |
|
|
$ |
98,633 |
|
|
$ |
70,301 |
|
|
$ |
78,308 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(111,926 |
) |
|
|
(39,473 |
) |
|
|
(145,591 |
) |
|
|
(151,884 |
) |
|
|
(90,268 |
) |
|
|
(50,201 |
) |
|
|
(69,425 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
93,100 |
|
|
|
14,466 |
|
|
|
100,400 |
|
|
|
105,298 |
|
|
|
29,755 |
|
|
|
23,389 |
|
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(4)
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
38,660 |
|
|
|
42,728 |
|
|
|
74,890 |
|
|
|
107,685 |
|
|
|
84,974 |
|
|
|
101,246 |
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
Operating
margin(5)
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per
share(6)
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
Net income (loss) per share
(6)
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue passengers carried
(7)
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
(22) |
Revenue passenger
miles(8)
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
(22) |
Available seat
miles(9)
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
Load
factor(10)
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
65.9 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
70.2 |
% |
|
|
71.8 |
%(22) |
Break-even load
factor(11)
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
|
58.7 |
% |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
56.6 |
% (22) |
Total block
hours(12)
|
|
|
57,443 |
|
|
|
59,760 |
|
|
|
58,112 |
|
|
|
64,909 |
|
|
|
70,228 |
|
|
|
52,161 |
|
|
|
73,645 |
|
Average daily aircraft
utilization(13)
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
Average passenger fare
|
|
|
137.2 |
|
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
148.2 |
|
|
|
153.7 |
|
|
|
156.3 |
|
|
|
155.6 |
|
|
|
131.6 |
(22) |
Yield(14)
|
|
|
13.74 |
|
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
(22) |
Passenger revenue per ASM
(15)
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
8.83 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
Operating revenue per ASM
(16)
|
|
|
9.86 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
|
11.23 |
|
Operating expenses per ASM
(CASM)(17)
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
9.08 |
|
Departures
|
|
|
24,715 |
|
|
|
23,742 |
|
|
|
23,361 |
|
|
|
25,702 |
|
|
|
27,434 |
|
|
|
20,469 |
|
|
|
33,636 |
|
Average daily departures
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
151.8 |
|
Average number of aircraft.
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Airports served at period end
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Employees at period end
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
SEGMENT FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue
|
|
$ |
255,414 |
|
|
$ |
290,372 |
|
|
$ |
300,637 |
|
|
$ |
341,789 |
|
|
$ |
399,837 |
|
|
$ |
293,166 |
|
|
$ |
367,253 |
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
253,797 |
|
|
|
265,368 |
|
|
|
269,796 |
|
|
|
283,493 |
|
|
|
317,494 |
|
|
|
225,664 |
|
|
|
290,832 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
14,342 |
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
20,398 |
|
|
|
20,106 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,751 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
14,188 |
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
Net income (loss) before tax
|
|
|
(7,985 |
) |
|
|
16,640 |
|
|
|
23,667 |
|
|
|
52,133 |
|
|
|
74,304 |
|
|
|
61,356 |
|
|
|
70,629 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
270,506 |
|
|
|
300,121 |
|
|
|
421,935 |
|
|
|
591,915 |
|
|
|
702,050 |
|
|
|
678,136 |
|
|
|
785,383 |
|
AeroRepública (since April 22, 2005):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
61,676 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
55,756 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
502 |
|
Aircraft rentals |
|
|
2,960 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,567 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
106 |
|
Net income (loss) before tax |
|
|
2,975 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
84,103 |
|
SEGMENT OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat
miles(9)
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
Load
factor(10)
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
65.9 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
70.2 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
Break-even load factor
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
|
58.7 |
% |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
Yield(14)
|
|
|
13.74 |
|
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
14.32 |
|
|
Operating revenue per ASM
(16)
|
|
|
9.86 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
|
11.32 |
|
|
CASM(17)
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
8.97 |
|
|
Average stage
length(19)
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
On time
performance(18)
|
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(21) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
AeroRepública (since April 22, 2005):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat
miles(9) |
|
|
575 |
|
Load
factor(10) |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
Break even load factor |
|
|
67.8 |
% |
Yield(14) |
|
|
15.88 |
(22) |
Operating revenue per
ASM(16) |
|
|
10.73 |
|
CASM(17) |
|
|
9.70 |
|
Average stage
length(19) |
|
|
365 |
|
On time
performance(20) |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents impairment losses on our Boeing 737-200 aircraft and
related assets. See the notes to our consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
(2) |
Consists primarily of changes in the fair value of fuel
derivative contracts, foreign exchange gains/losses and gains on
sale of Boeing 737-200 aircraft. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the notes to our
consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes restricted cash and cash equivalents of
$4.6 million as of December 31, 2002,
$4.5 million as of December 31, 2003,
$3.9 million as of December 31, 2004,
$4.4 million as of September 30, 2004 and
$4.9 million as of September 30, 2005. |
|
|
(4) |
EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization minus the
sum of interest capitalized and interest income. EBITDA is
presented as supplemental information because we believe it is a
useful indicator of our operating performance and is useful in
comparing our operating performance with other companies in the
airline industry. However, EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation, as a substitute for net income prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a companys
profitability. In addition, our calculation of EBITDA may not be
comparable to other companies similarly titled measures.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our net income
to EBITDA for the specified periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(9,515 |
) |
|
$ |
14,818 |
|
|
$ |
20,668 |
|
|
$ |
48,489 |
|
|
$ |
68,572 |
|
|
$ |
56,693 |
|
|
$ |
65,346 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,751 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
15,755 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
10,902 |
|
|
|
40,953 |
|
|
|
44,673 |
|
|
|
77,786 |
|
|
|
110,071 |
|
|
|
86,800 |
|
|
|
104,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
(657 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
38,660 |
|
|
|
42,728 |
|
|
|
74,890 |
|
|
|
107,685 |
|
|
|
84,974 |
|
|
|
101,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft rentals represents a significant operating expense of
our business. Because we leased several of our aircraft during
the periods presented, we believe that when assessing our EBITDA
you should also consider the impact of our aircraft rent
expense, which was $20.4 million in 2000,
$20.1 million in 2001, $21.2 million in 2002,
$16.7 million in 2003, $14.4 million in 2004,
$10.4 million during the first nine months of 2004 and
$19.3 million during the first nine months of 2005. |
|
|
(5) |
Operating margin represents operating income divided by
operating revenues. |
|
(6) |
All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated
to reflect the current capital structure described under
Description of Capital Stock and in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements. |
|
(7) |
Total number of paying passengers (including all passengers
redeeming OnePass frequent flyer miles and other travel awards)
flown on all flight segments, expressed in thousands. |
|
(8) |
Number of miles flown by scheduled revenue passengers, expressed
in millions. |
|
(9) |
Aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of miles the
seats are flown, expressed in millions. |
|
|
(10) |
Percentage of aircraft seating capacity that is actually
utilized. Load factors are calculated by dividing revenue
passenger miles by available seat miles. |
|
(11) |
Load factor that would have resulted in total revenues being
equal to total expenses. |
37
|
|
(12) |
The number of hours from the time an airplane moves off the
departure gate for a revenue flight until it is parked at the
gate of the arrival airport. |
|
(13) |
Average number of block hours operated per day per aircraft for
the total aircraft fleet. |
|
(14) |
Average amount (in cents) one passenger pays to fly one mile. |
|
(15) |
Passenger revenues (in cents) divided by the number of available
seat miles. |
|
(16) |
Total operating revenues for passenger aircraft related costs
(in cents) divided by the number of available seat miles. |
|
(17) |
Total operating expenses for passenger aircraft related costs
(in cents) divided by the number of available seat miles. |
|
(18) |
Percentage of flights that arrive at the destination gate within
fifteen minutes of scheduled arrival. |
|
(19) |
The average number of miles flown per flight. |
|
(20) |
Percentage of flights that depart within fifteen minutes of the
scheduled departure time. |
|
(21) |
For AeroRepública operating data, this period covers from
April 22, 2005 until September 30, 2005 which
corresponds to the period that AeroRepública was
consolidated in our financial statements. |
|
(22) |
AeroRepública has not historically distinguished between
revenue passengers and non-revenue passengers. While we are
implementing systems at AeroRepública to record that
information, revenue passenger information and other statistics
derived from revenue passenger data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 has been derived from estimates that we
believe to be materially accurate. Non-revenue passengers
represented approximately 2.3% of AeroRepúblicas
total passengers for the period from April 22, 2005 to
September 30, 2005. |
38
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a leading Latin American provider of international
airline passenger service operating from our strategically
located hub in the Republic of Panama. We currently offer
approximately 80 daily scheduled flights among 30 destinations
in 20 countries in North, Central and South America and the
Caribbean. Additionally, through codeshare agreements with
Continental we offer flights to more than 110 other
international destinations. We provide service to international
destinations through our Panama City hub which enables us to
consolidate passenger traffic from multiple points to achieve a
more profitable system and serve each destination effectively.
We have a modern fleet of 22 Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft
with an average age of 3.3 years as of September 30,
2005 and one new Embraer 190 (not taking into account our
recent acquisition of AeroRepública). To meet our growing
capacity requirements we have firm commitments to accept
delivery over the next four years of seven additional Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft and eleven 94-seat Embraer 190s. We
also have purchase rights and options to purchase up to ten
Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and up to 18 Embraer 190s.
We have a broad commercial alliance with Continental which
includes joint marketing, code-sharing arrangements,
participation in Continentals award-winning OnePass
frequent flyer loyalty program globally and on a co-branded
basis in Latin America and our use of Continentals
Presidents Club VIP lounge program. Our alliance with
Continental also provides us with benefits such as improving our
purchasing power in negotiations with service providers,
aircraft vendors and insurers.
On April 22, 2005 we acquired an initial 85.6% equity
ownership interest in AeroRepública which was followed by
subsequent acquisitions increasing our total ownership interest
in AeroRepública to 99.6% as of September 30, 2005.
The total purchase price we paid through September 30, 2005
for our investment in AeroRepública, including acquisition
costs, was $23.4 million. According to the Colombian Civil
Aviation Administration, Unidad Especial Administrativa de
Aeronautica Civil, in 2004 AeroRepública was the
second-largest domestic carrier in Colombia in terms of number
of passengers carried, providing service to 11 cities in
Colombia with a point-to-point route network. We began to
consolidate AeroRepúblicas results of operations in
our consolidated financial statements beginning April 22,
2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and for
future periods, we will be reporting AeroRepúblicas
operations as a separate segment in our financial statements and
the related notes. See Note 9 to our unaudited financial
statements for segment data for AeroRepública for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
Regional Economic Environment |
Our historical financial results have been, and we expect them
to continue to be, materially affected by the general level of
economic activity and growth of per capita disposable income in
North, South and Central America and the Caribbean (drivers of
our passenger revenue) and the volume of trade between countries
in the region (the principal driver of our cargo revenue).
According to data from The Preliminary Overview of the
Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean, an annual
United Nations publication prepared by the Economic Development
Division, the economy of Latin America (including the Caribbean)
grew by approximately 5.5% in 2004 and 1.9% in 2003, while the
regions per capita gross domestic product is estimated to
have risen by approximately 4% in 2004. According to data from
the International Monetary Fund, in the sub-regions we serve,
gross domestic product (adjusted for purchasing power parity)
rose in 2004 by 6.4% in South America, 4.3% in North America,
3.5% in Central America and 2.1% in the Caribbean, with each
region continuing to build on gains made during 2003 of 2.3% in
South America, 2.8% in North America, 3.6% in Central America
and 1.5% in the Caribbean. As is often the case, the regional
economic performance was closely tied to developments in the
international economy. World economic activity increased in
2004, resulting in estimated global GDP growth of just below
4.0% (versus 2.7% in 2003). According to World Bank estimates,
in recent years, the Panamanian economy has
39
closely tracked the Latin American economy as a whole, and
in 2004 the Panamanian economy grew by 6.0% (versus 4.7% in
2003). Inflation rose by less than one percent in 2004, despite
high fuel prices. Along with other factors, this economic growth
contributed to an 11% increase in 2004 in our revenues generated
in Panama. Additionally, the Colombian economy has experienced
relatively stable growth; according to World Bank estimates, the
Colombian gross domestic product grew by 4.0% in 2003 and 2004,
with inflation (as indicated by the consumer price index) rising
by 6.5% in 2003 and 5.5% in 2004.
We derive our revenues primarily from passenger transportation
which during the nine months ended September 30, 2005
represented approximately 93% of our revenues, with the
remaining 7% derived from cargo and other revenues.
We recognize passenger revenue when transportation is provided
and when unused tickets expire. Passenger revenues reflect the
capacity of our aircraft on the routes we fly, load factor and
yield. Our capacity is measured in terms of available seat miles
(ASMs) which represents the number of seats available on our
aircraft multiplied by the number of miles the seats are flown.
Our usage is measured in terms of revenue passenger miles (RPMs)
which is the number of revenue passengers multiplied by the
miles these passengers fly. Load factor, or the percentage of
our capacity that is actually used by paying customers, is
calculated by dividing RPMs by ASMs. Yield is the average amount
that one passenger pays to fly one mile. We use a combination of
approaches, taking into account yields, flight load factors and
effects on load factors of connecting traffic, depending on the
characteristics of the markets served, to arrive at a strategy
for achieving the best possible revenue per available seat mile,
balancing the average fare charged against the corresponding
effect on our load factors.
We recognize cargo revenue when transportation is provided. Our
other revenue consists primarily of excess baggage charges,
ticket change fees and charter flights.
Overall demand for our passenger and cargo services is highly
dependent on the regional economic environment in which we
operate, including the GDP of the countries we serve and the
disposable income of the residents of those countries. We
believe that approximately 50% of our passengers travel at least
in part for business reasons, and the growth of intraregional
trade greatly affects that portion of our business. The
remaining 50% of our passengers are tourists or travelers
visiting friends and family.
The following table sets forth our capacity, load factor and
yields for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Copa Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity (in available seat miles, in millions)
|
|
|
2,846.9 |
|
|
|
3,225.9 |
|
|
|
3,639.4 |
|
|
|
2,687.2 |
|
|
|
3,243.7 |
|
|
Load factor
|
|
|
65.9 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
70.2 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
Yield (in cents)
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
14.32 |
|
AeroRepública Segment
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity (in available seat miles,
in millions) |
|
|
574.8 |
|
Load factor |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
Yield (in
cents)(2) |
|
|
15.88 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Since April 22, 2005 |
|
(2) |
AeroRepública has not historically distinguished between
revenue passengers and non-revenue passengers. While we are
implementing systems at AeroRepública to record that
information, revenue passenger information and other statistics
derived from revenue passenger data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 has been derived from estimates that we
believe to be materially accurate. Non-revenue passengers
represented approximately 2.3% of AeroRepúblicas
total passengers for the period from April 22, 2005 to
September 30, 2005. |
40
Generally, our revenues from and profitability of our flights
peak during the northern hemispheres summer season in July
and August and again during the December and January holiday
season. Given our high proportion of fixed costs, this
seasonality is likely to cause our results of operations to vary
from quarter to quarter.
The main components of our operating expenses are aircraft fuel,
salaries and benefits, passenger servicing, commissions,
aircraft maintenance, reservations and sales and aircraft rent.
A common measure of per unit costs in the airline industry is
cost per available seat mile (CASM) which is generally
defined as operating expenses divided by ASMs.
Aircraft fuel. The price we pay for aircraft fuel varies
significantly from country to country primarily due to local
taxes. While we purchase aircraft fuel at all the airports to
which we fly, we attempt to negotiate fueling contracts with
companies that have a multinational presence in order to benefit
from volume purchases. During 2004, as a result of the location
of our hub, we purchased approximately 50% of our aircraft fuel
in Panama, where we were able to obtain better prices due to
volume discounts. We have over eleven suppliers of aircraft fuel
across our network. In some cases we tanker fuel in order to
minimize our cost by fueling in countries where fuel prices are
lowest. Our aircraft fuel expenses are variable and fluctuate
based on global oil prices. From 2002 to 2004, the price of West
Texas Intermediate crude oil, a benchmark widely used for crude
oil prices that is measured in barrels and quoted in
U.S. dollars, increased by 39.3% from $31.20 per
barrel to $43.45 per barrel. On September 30, 2005,
the price was $65.25 per barrel. In addition, recently the
prices we pay for jet fuel have been affected by the supply
disruptions caused by Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita in
the southern United States. During the month ended
September 30, 2005, we paid on average $2.15 per
gallon for jet fuel. As of the first quarter of 2005, all of our
Boeing aircraft are also equipped with winglets which we believe
provide estimated fuel consumption savings of approximately four
percent compared to aircraft without winglets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Fuel Data | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Copa Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per gallon of jet fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into
plane (excluding hedge) |
|
|
|
|
(in U.S. dollars) |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
Gallons consumed (in thousands)
|
|
|
43,187 |
|
|
|
46,669 |
|
|
|
44,788 |
|
|
|
48,444 |
|
|
|
50,833 |
|
|
|
43,332 |
|
|
Available seat miles (in millions)
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
Gallons per ASM (in hundredths)
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
AeroRepública Segment
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per gallon of jet
fuel
into plane (excluding hedge)
(in U.S. dollars) |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
Gallons consumed (in thousands) |
|
|
10,985 |
|
Available seat miles (in millions) |
|
|
575 |
|
Gallons per ASM (in hundredths) |
|
|
1.91 |
|
Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits expenses
have historically increased at the rate of inflation and by the
growth in the number of our employees. In some cases, we have
adjusted salaries of our employees to correspond to changes in
the cost of living in the countries where these employees work.
We do not increase salaries based on seniority.
41
Passenger servicing expenses. Our passenger servicing
expenses consist of expenses for liability insurance, baggage
handling, catering, in-flight entertainment and other costs
related to aircraft and airport services. These expenses are
generally directly related to the number of passengers we carry
or the number of flights we operate.
Commissions. Our commission expenses consist primarily of
payments for ticket sales made by travel agents and commissions
paid to credit card companies. Travel agents receive base
commissions, not including back-end incentive programs, ranging
from 0% to 12% depending on the country. The weighted average
rate for these commissions during 2004 was 5.5%. During the last
few years we have reduced our commission expense per available
seat mile as a result of an industry-wide trend of paying lower
commissions to travel agencies and by increasing the proportion
of our sales made through direct channels. We expect this trend
to continue as more of our customers become accustomed to
purchasing through our call center and through the internet.
While increasing direct sales may increase the commissions we
pay to credit card companies, we expect that the savings from
the corresponding reduction in travel agency commissions will
more than offset this increase. In recent years, base
commissions paid to travel agents have decreased significantly.
At the same time, we have encouraged travel agencies to move
from standard base commissions to incentive compensation based
on sales volume and fare types.
Maintenance, material and repair expenses. Our
maintenance, material and repair expenses consist of aircraft
repair and charges related to light and heavy maintenance of our
aircraft, including maintenance materials. Maintenance and
repair expenses, including overhaul of aircraft components, are
charged to operating expenses as incurred. With an average age
of only 3.3 years as of September 30, 2005, our Copa
fleet requires a low level of maintenance compared to the older
fleets of some of our competitors. We also currently incur lower
maintenance expenses on our Boeing aircraft because a
significant number of our aircraft parts remain under multi-year
warranties. As the age of our fleet increases and when our
warranties expire, our maintenance expenses will increase. We
only conduct line maintenance internally and outsource heavy
maintenance to independent third party contractors. In 2003, we
negotiated with GE Engine Services a maintenance cost per hour
program for the repair and maintenance of our CFM-56 engines
which power our Boeing 737 Next Generation fleet. Our engine
maintenance costs are also aided by the sea-level elevation of
our hub and the use of winglets which allow us to operate the
engines on our Boeing 737-700s with lower thrust thus putting
less strain on the engines.
All maintenance for AeroRepúblicas DC-9s and line
maintenance for the MD-80s is performed by
AeroRepúblicas in-house maintenance staff. Heavy
maintenance for the MD-80s is performed by FAA-certified
third-party aviation maintenance companies.
Aircraft rent. Our aircraft rental expenses are generally
fixed by the terms of our operating lease agreements. Currently,
six of Copas operating leases have fixed rates which are
not subject to fluctuations in interest rates and the seventh is
tied to LIBOR. All of AeroRepúblicas operating leases
have fixed rates which are not subject to fluctuations in
interest rates. Our aircraft rent expense also includes rental
payments related to our wet-leasing of freighter aircraft to
supplement our cargo operations.
Reservations and sales expenses. Our reservations and
sales expenses arise primarily from payments to global
distribution systems, such as Amadeus and Sabre, that list our
flight offerings on reservation systems around the world. These
reservation systems tend to raise their rates periodically, but
we expect that if we are successful in encouraging our customers
to purchase tickets through our direct sales channels, these
costs will decrease as a percentage of our operating costs. A
portion of our reservations and sales expense is also comprised
of our licensing payments for the SHARES reservation and
check-in management software we use, which is not expected to
change significantly from period to period.
Flight operations and landing fees and other rentals
are generally directly related to the number of flights we
operate.
Other include publicity and promotion expenses, expenses
related to our cargo operations, technology related initiatives
and miscellaneous other expenses.
42
We are subject to income tax in Panama based on the principle of
territoriality. Beginning in 2004, we adopted an alternate
method of calculating tax in Panama. Based on Article 121
of Executive Decree 170 of 1993, as amended in 1996, income for
international transportation companies is calculated based on a
territoriality method that determines gross revenues earned in
Panama by applying the percentage of miles flown within the
Panamanian territory against total revenues. Under this method,
loss carry forwards cannot be applied to offset tax liability.
Prior to 2004, our Panamanian taxable income was estimated using
revenues from passengers originating in or destined for Panama
which typically resulted in losses for purposes of Panamanian
corporate income tax. Under the new tax law adopted this year,
we are also subject to an alternative minimum tax based on our
revenues generated in Panama. We estimate that the combination
of the alternative minimum tax and the change in our method of
calculating revenues generated in Panama will increase our
Panamanian tax liability to approximately $1.3 million in
2005. Dividends from our Panamanian subsidiaries, including
Copa, are separately subject to a ten percent tax if such
dividends can be shown to be derived from Panamanian income that
has not been otherwise taxed.
We are also subject to local tax regulations in each of the
jurisdictions where we operate, the great majority of which are
related to the taxation of our income. In six of the countries
to which we fly, we do not pay any income taxes because we do
not generate income under the laws of those countries either
because they do not have income tax or due to treaties or other
arrangements those countries have with Panama. Under a
reciprocal exemption confirmed by a bilateral agreement between
Panama and the United States, we are exempt from the
U.S. source transportation income tax derived from the
international operation of aircraft. In the remaining countries,
we pay income tax at a rate ranging from 25% to 35% of our
income attributable to those countries. Different countries
calculate our income in different ways, but they are typically
derived from our sales in the applicable country multiplied by
our net margin or by a presumed net margin set by the relevant
tax legislation. We paid taxes totaling approximately
$2.4 million in 2003 and $4.3 million in 2004.
AeroRepúblicas taxes are based on Colombian income
tax legislation which calculates tax based on the higher of the
ordinary and presumptive income.
Ordinary income is defined as the companys
operating results under Colombian GAAP, and
presumptive income is defined as 6% of net assets
under Colombian GAAP.
We are currently a non-public company incorporated in Panama and
have traditionally prepared our financial statements under
International Financial Reporting Standards. In connection with
the initial preparation of our financial statements under
U.S. GAAP, we and our auditors identified a material
weakness (as defined under standards established by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board) in our internal control over
financial reporting. Specifically, we found that we did not have
appropriate expertise in U.S. GAAP accounting and reporting
among our financial and accounting staff to prepare our periodic
financial statements without needing to make material corrective
adjustments and footnote revisions when those statements are
audited or reviewed. This ineffective control over the
application of U.S. GAAP in relation to our business could
result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. In
light of this material weakness, in preparing the financial
statements included in this prospectus, we performed additional
analyses and other post-closing procedures in the course of
preparing our financial statements and related footnotes in
accordance with U.S. GAAP so that management would be able
to come to the conclusion that the financial statements included
in this prospectus fairly present, in all material respects, our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of
and for the periods presented.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
beginning with our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, we will be required
to furnish a report by our management on our internal control
over financial reporting. This report will contain, among other
matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal
controls over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal
year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal
controls over financial reporting are effective. We have
43
contracted an additional accounting manager with experience in
preparing financial statements under U.S. GAAP, we have
engaged an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist
us in developing our procedures to comply with the requirements
of Section 404 and our management and audit committee are
developing other plans to prepare for our compliance with the
requirements of Section 404 and to correct the weakness
identified above. We expect that these plans may include hiring
additional personnel with appropriate levels of U.S. GAAP
experience and accounting expertise, requiring further education
and training in U.S. GAAP for our existing personnel and
engaging outside resources to assist in the design and
implementation of procedures for the testing of our internal
controls. We will incur incremental costs as a result of these
efforts, including increased auditing and legal fees, the
magnitude of which we are not able to estimate at this time.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires our management to adopt
accounting policies and make estimates and judgments to develop
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and
related notes. We strive to maintain a process to review the
application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the
appropriateness of the estimates required for the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
estimates and judgments are reasonable; however, actual results
and the timing of recognition of such amounts could differ from
those estimates. In addition, estimates routinely require
adjustments based on changing circumstances and the receipt of
new or better information.
Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those
that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties
and potentially result in materially different results under
different assumptions and conditions. For a discussion of these
and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to our annual
consolidated financial statements.
Revenue recognition. Passenger revenue is recognized when
transportation is provided rather than when a ticket is sold.
The amount of passenger ticket sales not yet recognized as
revenue is reflected in the Air traffic liability
line on our consolidated balance sheet. Tickets whose fares have
expired and/or are more than one year old are recognized as
passenger revenue.
Cargo and mail services revenue are recognized when we provide
the shipping services and thereby complete the earning process.
Other revenue is primarily comprised of excess baggage charges,
commissions earned on tickets sold for flights on other
airlines, and charter flights and is recognized when
transportation or service is provided.
Frequent flyer program. We participate in
Continentals frequent flyer program OnePass,
through which our passengers receive all the benefits and
privileges offered by the OnePass program. Continental is
responsible for the administration of the OnePass program. Under
the terms of our frequent flyer agreement with Continental,
OnePass members receive OnePass frequent flyer mileage credits
for travel on Copa and we pay Continental a per mile rate for
each mileage credit granted by Continental, at which point we
have no further obligation. The amounts due to Continental under
this agreement are expensed by us as the mileage credits are
earned.
Impairment of long-lived assets. We record impairment
losses on long-lived assets used in operations, consisting
principally of property and equipment, when events or changes in
circumstances indicate, in managements judgment, that the
assets might be impaired and that the undiscounted cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the
carrying amount of those assets. Our cash flow estimates are
based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best
estimate of future market and operating conditions. The net
carrying value of non-recoverable assets is reduced to fair
value if it is lower than carrying value. Our estimates of fair
value represent our best estimate based on industry trends and
reference to market rates and transactions and are subject to
change. We recognized impairment losses on our Boeing 737-200
aircraft of $3.6 million during the year ended
December 31, 2003 and $13.7 million during the year
ended December 31, 2002.
44
Goodwill and indefinite-lived purchased intangible
assets. We review goodwill and purchased intangible assets
with indefinite lives, all of which relate to our acquisition of
AeroRepública, for impairment annually and whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an
asset may not be recoverable in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). The provisions of
SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step impairment test
be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we compare the fair
value of the AeroRepública reporting unit to its carrying
value. If the fair value of the AeroRepública reporting
unit exceeds the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is
not impaired and we are not required to perform further testing.
If the carrying value of the net assets of the
AeroRepública reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then
we must perform the second step of the impairment test in order
to determine the implied fair value of the AeroRepública
reporting units goodwill. If the carrying value of the
goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an
impairment loss equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142
also requires that the fair value of the purchased intangible
assets with indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the
carrying value. We recognize an impairment loss when the
estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than the
carrying value. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit
or an indefinite-lived purchased intangible asset is judgmental
in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
and market conditions, and determination of appropriate market
comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from
those estimates.
Derivative instruments used for aircraft fuel. In the
past, we have periodically entered into crude oil call options,
jet fuel zero cost collars, and jet fuel swap contracts to
provide for short to mid-term hedge protection (generally
three to eighteen months) against sudden and significant
increases in jet fuel prices, while simultaneously ensuring that
we are not competitively disadvantaged in the event of a
substantial decrease in the price of jet fuel. These derivatives
have historically not qualified as hedges for financial
reporting purposes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly, changes in
the fair value of such derivative contracts, which amounted to
$1.9 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, ($0.9) million in 2004, $0.2 million in 2003 and
$3.1 million in 2002, were recorded as a component of
Other, net within Non-operating income
(expense). The fair value of hedge contracts amounted to
$2.1 million at September 30, 2005, $0.2 million
at December 31, 2004 and $1.1 at December 31, 2003,
and was recorded in the Other current assets line of
our consolidated balance sheet.
45
Results of Operations
The following table shows each of the line items in our income
statements for the periods indicated as a percentage of our
total operating revenues for that period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
|
89.7 |
% |
|
|
91.2 |
% |
|
|
91.2 |
% |
|
|
91.6 |
% |
|
|
92.9 |
% |
|
Cargo, mail and other
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
(13.3 |
)% |
|
|
(14.2 |
)% |
|
|
(15.6 |
)% |
|
|
(14.9 |
)% |
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
(13.1 |
)% |
|
|
(13.2 |
)% |
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
|
|
(12.3 |
)% |
|
|
(11.2 |
)% |
|
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
(11.3 |
)% |
|
|
(10.8 |
)% |
|
|
(9.8 |
)% |
|
|
(9.9 |
)% |
|
|
(8.4 |
)% |
|
Commissions
|
|
|
(9.6 |
)% |
|
|
(8.1 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
Reservation and sales
|
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
|
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
(6.9 |
)% |
|
|
(6.0 |
)% |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(4.4 |
)% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
|
|
(4.6 |
)% |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
Other
|
|
|
(6.4 |
)% |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(6.8 |
)% |
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
|
Fleet impairment charges
|
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(89.7 |
)% |
|
|
(82.9 |
)% |
|
|
(79.4 |
)% |
|
|
(77.0 |
)% |
|
|
(80.8 |
)% |
Operating income
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
Non-operating income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Income/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
Net income
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Includes results from our AeroRepública segment for the
period from April 22, 2005 to September 30, 2005. |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004
Our consolidated net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was $65.3 million, a 15.3% increase
over net income of $56.7 million in the same period in
2004. We had consolidated operating income of $82.3 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 22.0%
increase over operating income of $67.5 million in the same
period in 2004. Our consolidated operating margin in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 was 19.2%, a decrease of
3.8 percentage points over an operating margin of 23.0% in
the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of higher fuel
prices and the consolidation of AeroRepúblicas
results during the period from April 22, 2005 to
September 30, 2005.
46
Our consolidated revenue totaled $428.9 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, a 46.3% increase over
operating revenue of $293.2 million in the same period in
2004 due to increases in our Copa segments passenger and
cargo revenues and the consolidation of $61.7 million in
operating revenues from our AeroRepública segment.
|
|
|
Copa segment operating revenue |
Copas operating revenue totaled $367.3 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 25.3% increase over
operating revenue of $293.2 million in the same period in
2004 due to increases in both passenger and cargo revenues.
Passenger revenue. Passenger revenue totaled
$339.4 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 26.3% increase over passenger revenue of
$268.7 million in the same period in 2004. This increase
resulted primarily from the addition of capacity (ASMs increased
by 20.7% in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as
compared to the same period in 2004) that resulted from an
increase in departures and, to a lesser extent, an increase in
average departures per aircraft, higher average stage length and
the addition of larger aircraft. Revenues also increased due to
our higher overall load factor (load factor increased from 70.2%
in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to 73.1% in the
same period in 2005) during the period and the simultaneous
increase in passenger yield which rose by 0.6% to 14.32 cents in
the first nine months of 2005.
Cargo, mail and other. Cargo, mail and other totaled
$27.9 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 13.7% increase over cargo, mail and other of
$24.5 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily the result of higher cargo revenue resulting from an
increase in belly space capacity available, and to a lesser
extent higher other operating revenue from excess baggage fees.
|
|
|
AeroRepública segment operating revenue |
During the period starting on April 22, 2005, the date on
which we began consolidating AeroRepúblicas results,
and ending September 30, 2005, AeroRepública generated
operating revenue of $61.7 million.
Our consolidated operating expenses totaled $346.6 million
for the first nine-months of 2005, a 53.6% increase over
operating expenses of $225.7 million for the same period in
2004 that was primarily attributable to the growth of our
operations, higher fuel costs, and the consolidation of
$55.8 million in operating expenses from our
AeroRepública segment. An overview of the major variances
on a consolidated basis follows.
Aircraft fuel. Aircraft fuel totaled $97.7 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 123.4%
increase over aircraft fuel of $43.8 million in the same
period in 2004. This increase was primarily a result of higher
fuel costs, higher fuel consumption due to increased capacity of
our Copa operation, and the consolidation of $21.2 million
in AeroRepúblicas aircraft fuel expenses.
Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits totaled
$48.1 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 33.8% increase over salaries and benefits of
$36.0 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily a result of an overall increase in headcount due to
increased capacity of our Copa operation and the consolidation
of $6.6 million in AeroRepública salaries and benefits
expenses.
Passenger servicing. Passenger servicing totaled
$36.2 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 24.2% increase over passenger servicing of
$29.1 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily a result of an increase in Copas capacity, an
increase in Copas on-board passengers, and the
consolidation of $3.2 million in AeroRepública
passenger servicing expenses.
Commissions. Commissions totaled $31.5 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 46.6% increase
over commissions of $21.5 million in the same period in
2004. This increase was primarily a result of higher passenger
revenue and the consolidation of $5.4 million in
AeroRepública commission expenses.
47
The remaining operating expenses totaled $133.1 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of
$37.7 million in the same period in 2004, of which
$19.4 million resulted from the consolidation of
AeroRepública.
|
|
|
Copa segment operating expenses |
The breakdown of operating expenses per available seat mile is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Percent | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in cents) | |
|
|
Operating Expenses per ASM:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
)% |
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
Commissions
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Reservation and sales
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
)% |
Depreciation
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
)% |
Flight operations
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
% |
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
Other
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM before aircraft fuel
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
8.97 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel. Aircraft fuel totaled $76.5 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 74.9%
increase over aircraft fuel of $43.8 million in the same
period in 2004. This increase was primarily a result of a 42.4%
increase in the average price per gallon of jet fuel ($1.75 in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to
$1.23 in the same period in 2004) and the consumption of 14.7%
more fuel due to a 9.6% increase in departures and an increase
in average stage length. These increases were partially offset
by our newer, more fuel-efficient aircraft. Aircraft fuel per
available seat mile increased by approximately 44.9% due to the
increase in average fuel cost per gallon.
Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits totaled
$41.5 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 15.5% increase over salaries and benefits of
$36.0 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily a result of an overall increase of 9.8% in headcount
at period end in 2005 versus the same period end in 2004, mainly
to cover increased operations. Salaries and benefits per
available seat mile decreased by 4.4%.
Passenger servicing. Passenger servicing totaled
$33.0 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 13.2% increase over passenger servicing of
$29.1 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily a result of Copas 20.7% increase in capacity and
an increase of 19.2% in on-board passengers. Passenger servicing
per available seat mile decreased by 6.2% as a result of fixed
costs being spread over a higher number of available seat miles.
Commissions. Commissions totaled $26.1 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 21.6% increase
over commissions of $21.5 million in the same period in
2004. This increase was primarily a result of higher passenger
revenue. Commissions per available seat mile increased by 0.8%.
Reservations and sales. Reservations and sales totaled
$19.0 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 20.5% increase over reservations and sales of
$15.7 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
primarily a result of a 28.5% increase in charges related to
global distribution systems
48
resulting from a 19.2% increase in on-board passengers and a
10.1% increase in average rates. Reservations and sales expenses
per available seat mile decreased by 0.2%.
Maintenance, materials and repairs. Maintenance,
materials and repairs totaled $15.4 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, a 10.6% increase over
maintenance, materials and repairs of $13.9 million in the
same period in 2004. This increase was a result of an increase
in the total number of hours flown by our aircraft, partially
offset by lower average maintenance costs due to the replacement
of the older Boeing 737-200s. Maintenance, materials and repair
per available seat mile decreased by 8.4% as a result of the
lower cost associated with the newer Boeing 737-Next Generation
fleet.
Depreciation. Depreciation totaled $14.3 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 7.3% increase
over depreciation of $13.4 million in the same period in
2004. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of
three new Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft in 2004, partially
offset by lower depreciation expenses related to non-aircraft
related assets. Depreciation per available seat mile decreased
by 11.1%.
Aircraft rentals. Aircraft rentals totaled
$16.4 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 57.1% increase over aircraft rentals of
$10.4 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
a result of three additional leased Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft in December 2004, February 2005 and May 2005. Aircraft
rentals per available seat mile increased by 30.1% as a result
of the higher average lease rate of the three aircraft received.
Flight operations and landing fees and other
rentals. Combined, flight operations and landing fees and
other rentals increased from $22.1 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 to $26.4 million in
the same period in 2005, primarily as a result of Copas
20.7% increase in capacity.
Other. Other expenses totaled $22.3 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 12.2% increase over
other expenses of $19.8 million in the same period in 2004.
This increase was primarily a result of a 17.0% increase in
OnePass frequent flyer miles earned by customers during the
period, as well as other miscellaneous administrative expenses
such as software licenses and legal expenses. Other expenses per
available seat mile decreased by 7.1% as result of
administrative expenses growing slower than capacity.
|
|
|
AeroRepública segment operating expenses |
During the period starting on April 22, 2005, the date on
which we began consolidating AeroRepúblicas results,
and ending September 30, 2005, AeroRepública generated
operating expenses of $55.8 million.
AeroRepúblicas operating margin was 9.6% over the
same period.
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense) |
Our consolidated non-operating expenses totaled
$8.7 million for the first nine-months of 2005, a 42.2%
increase over non-operating expenses of $6.1 million for
the same period in 2004 that was primarily attributable to the
consolidation of $2.9 million in non-operating expenses
from our AeroRepública segment.
|
|
|
Copa segment non-operating income (expense) |
Non-operating expense totaled $5.8 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, a 5.7% decrease over
non-operating expense of $6.1 million in the same period in
2004, attributable primarily to higher interest income and other
non-operating income partially offset by higher interest expense.
Interest expense. Interest expense totaled
$14.2 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 17.5% increase over interest expense of
$12.1 million in the same period in 2004, resulting from a
higher amount of debt related to a greater number of owned
aircraft and higher interest rate. The average effective
interest rates on our debt also increased by 40 basis
points from 4.20% during the first nine months of 2004 to 4.60%
during the same period in 2005. At periods end,
approximately 73% of our outstanding debt was fixed at an
average effective rate of 4.47%.
49
Interest capitalized. Interest capitalized totaled
$0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 30.7% decrease over interest capitalized of
$0.9 million in the same period in 2004, resulting from
lower average debt relating to pre-delivery payments on aircraft.
Interest income. Interest income totaled
$2.2 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2005, a 149.9% increase over interest income of
$0.9 million in the same period in 2004. This increase was
mainly a result of our higher average cash balance over the year
and higher interest rates during the period.
Other, net. Other, net income totaled $5.5 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a 35.0%
increase over other, net income of $4.1 million in the same
period in 2004. This increase was primarily the result of a
$1.1 million gain on sale of two Boeing 737-200 we disposed
of during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as
compared to a $0.6 million gain on sale of one Boeing
737-200 during the same period in 2004.
Year 2004 Compared to Year 2003
Our net income for the year 2004 was $68.6 million, a 41.4%
increase over net income of $48.5 million in 2003. We had
operating income of $82.3 million in 2004, a 41.2% increase
over operating income of $58.3 million in 2003. Our
operating margin in 2004 was 20.6%, an increase of
3.5 percentage points over an operating margin of 17.1% in
2003.
Our operating revenue totaled $399.8 million in 2004, a
17.0% increase over operating revenue of $341.8 million in
2003 due to increases in both passenger and cargo revenues.
Passenger revenue. Passenger revenue totaled
$364.6 million in 2004, a 17.0% increase over passenger
revenue of $311.7 million in 2003. This increase resulted
primarily from the addition of capacity (ASMs increased by 12.8%
in 2004 as compared to 2003) that resulted from an increase in
departures and, to a lesser extent, an increase in average
departures per aircraft, higher average stage length and the
addition of larger aircraft. Revenues also increased due to our
higher overall load factor (load factor increased from 68.0% in
2003 to 70.0% in 2004) during the period and the simultaneous
increase in passenger yield, which rose by 0.7% to 14.31 cents
in 2004. A general increase in passenger demand for air travel
in 2004, in part as a result of growing Latin American and
U.S. economies, allowed us to increase both capacity and
load factor without affecting yields.
Cargo, mail and other. Cargo, mail and other totaled
$35.2 million in 2004, a 17.0% increase over cargo, mail
and other of $30.1 million in 2003. This increase was
primarily the result of higher cargo revenue primarily resulting
from an increase in belly space capacity available as we
replaced four Boeing 737-200s with larger Boeing 737-Next
Generation aircraft during 2004, plus the full year effect of
four Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft received in the second
half of 2003. There was also a general increase in demand for
courier services in the region during 2004.
50
Operating expenses totaled $317.5 million in 2004, a 12.0%
increase over operating expenses of $283.5 million in 2003.
The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to
a 12.0% increase in capacity, an increase in the average cost of
jet fuel and an increase in salaries and benefits expenses. The
breakdown of operating expenses per available seat mile is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Percent | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in cents) | |
|
|
Operating expenses per ASM:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
Commissions
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
)% |
Reservation and sales
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Depreciation
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
Flight operations
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
(23.3 |
)% |
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM before aircraft fuel and fleet
impairment charges
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM before fleet impairment charges
|
|
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Fleet impairment charges
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel. Aircraft fuel totaled $62.5 million
in 2004, a 28.9% increase over aircraft fuel of
$48.5 million in 2003. This increase was primarily a result
of a 30.3% increase in the average price per gallon of jet fuel
($1.32 in 2004 as compared to $1.01 in 2003) and the consumption
of 4.9% more fuel due to a 6.7% increase in departures. These
increases were partially offset by our newer, more
fuel-efficient aircraft. Aircraft fuel per available seat mile
increased by approximately 14.3% due to the increase in average
fuel cost per gallon.
Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits totaled
$51.7 million in 2004, a 14.2% increase over salaries and
benefits of $45.3 million in 2003. This increase was
primarily a result of the full year effect of employees hired
throughout 2003, higher performance bonuses paid as a result of
our improved operating results and an overall increase of 4.3%
in full-time equivalent employees at period end from 2003 to
2004, mainly to cover increased operations. Salaries and
benefits per available seat mile increased by 1.3%.
Passenger servicing. Passenger servicing totaled
$39.2 million in 2004, a 6.4% increase over passenger
servicing of $36.9 million in 2003. This increase was
primarily a result of our 12.8% increase in capacity and an
increase of 15.0% in on-board passengers. Passenger servicing
per available seat mile decreased by 5.7% as a result of fixed
costs being spread over a higher number of available seat miles.
Commissions. Commissions totaled $29.1 million in
2004, a 5.0% increase over commissions of $27.7 million in
2003. This increase was primarily a result of higher passenger
revenue, partially offset by lower average commissions.
Commissions per available seat mile decreased by approximately
6.9% due to lower average commissions and more direct sales.
Reservations and sales. Reservations and sales totaled
$22.1 million in 2004, a 22.8% increase over reservations
and sales of $18.0 million in 2003. This increase was a
result of a 15.0% increase in on-board passengers, a 5.7%
increase in average rates charged by global distribution systems
and the cost of terminating our relationship with a General
Sales Agent in Puerto Rico. Reservations and sales expenses per
available seat mile increased by 8.8%.
51
Depreciation. Depreciation totaled $19.3 million in
2004, a 37.3% increase over depreciation of $14.0 million
in 2003. This increase was primarily due three new Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft acquired in 2004 and the full year
effect of four Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft acquired in
2003. Depreciation per available seat mile increased by 21.7%.
Maintenance, materials and repairs. Maintenance,
materials and repairs totaled $19.7 million in 2004, a 3.0%
decrease over maintenance, materials and repairs of
$20.4 million in 2003. This decreased was a result of the
replacement of four Boeing 737-200 aircraft with newer Boeing
737-Next Generation and the full year effect of disposing of two
Boeing 737-200 aircraft in 2003, partially offset by beginning
of the airframe overhaul schedule for the first four of our
Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft. Maintenance, materials and
repair per available seat mile decreased by 14.0%.
Aircraft rentals. Aircraft rentals totaled
$14.4 million in 2004, a 13.4% decrease over aircraft
rentals cost of $16.7 million in 2003. This decrease
resulted from new aircraft leases with better rates as we
experienced the effect of four lease contracts we renegotiated
in 2003. Aircraft rentals per available seat mile decreased by
23.3% due to higher capacity and the lower lease rates.
Flight operations and landing fees and other rentals. As
a group, flight operations and landing fees and other rentals
increased from $26.5 million in 2003 to $30.1 million
in 2004, or 13.3%, primarily as a result of our 12.8% increase
in capacity.
Other. Other expenses totaled $29.3 million in 2004,
a 12.8% increase over other expenses of $26.0 million in
2003. This increase was primarily due to technology initiatives
related to improving our telecommunications capabilities,
non-recurring expenses related to our evaluation of a potential
acquisition that we chose not to pursue and a 9.0% increase in
publicity and promotion resulting from higher OnePass frequent
flyer miles earned by customers. Other expenses per available
seat mile remained unchanged.
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense) |
Non-operating expense totaled $8.0 million in 2004, a 30.4%
increase over non-operating expense of $6.2 million in
2003, attributable primarily to greater interest expense
partially offset by higher interest income and other
non-operating income.
Interest expense. Interest expense totaled
$16.5 million in 2004, a 42.0% increase over interest
expense of $11.6 million in 2003, resulting from a higher
amount of debt related to a greater number of owned aircraft.
The average effective interest rates on our debt also increased
by 57 basis points from 3.64% during 2003 to 4.21% during
2004. At the end of 2004, we had approximately 77% of our
outstanding debt fixed at an effective rate of 4.47%.
Interest capitalized. Interest capitalized totaled
$1.0 million in 2004, a 52.1% decrease over interest
capitalized of $2.0 million in 2003, resulting from lower
average debt relating to pre-delivery payments on aircraft.
Interest income. Interest income totaled
$1.4 million in 2004, a 60.4% increase over interest income
of $0.9 million in 2003. This increase was mainly a result
of our higher average cash balance over the year and higher
prevailing interest rates during 2004.
Other, net. Other, net income totaled $6.1 million
in 2004, a 137.4% increase over other, net income of
$2.6 million in 2003. This increase was the result of
non-recurring adjustments and a gain of $1.1 million
resulting from the sale of two Boeing 737-200 aircraft,
partially offset by a decrease in the market value of fuel hedge
instruments of $0.9 million.
Year 2003 Compared to Year 2002
Our net income for the year 2003 was $48.5 million, a
134.6% increase over net income of $20.7 million in 2002.
We had operating income of $58.3 million in 2003, an 89.0%
increase over operating income of $30.8 million in 2002.
Our operating margin was 17.1%, an increase of
6.8 percentage points over an operating margin of 10.3% in
2002.
52
Our operating revenue totaled $341.8 million in 2003, a
13.7% increase over operating revenues of $300.6 million in
2002 due primarily to increased passenger revenues.
Passenger revenue. Our passenger revenue totaled
$311.7 million in 2003, a 15.6% increase over passenger
revenues of $269.6 million in 2002. This increase resulted
primarily from the addition of capacity (ASMs increased by 13.3%
in 2003) that resulted from an increase in departures, an
increase in average departures per aircraft and our continued
transition to larger aircraft. Revenues also increased due to
our higher overall load factor (increased by 2.1 percentage
points from 65.9% in 2002 to 68.0% in 2003) during the period.
Passenger yield decreased slightly by 1.2% from 14.38 cents in
2002 to 14.22 cents in 2003, as a result of the longer average
stage length. A general increase in passenger demand for air
travel in 2003, in part as a result of growth in the Latin
American economy, allowed us to increase both capacity and load
factor.
Cargo, mail and other. Cargo, mail and other totaled
$30.1 million in 2003, a 2.9% decrease over cargo, mail and
other of $31.0 million in 2002. This decrease was primarily
the result of a 20.1% reduction in excess baggage revenues as a
result of the standardization of our policies for excess
baggage, which effectively reduced our revenues per passenger.
This decrease was partially offset by an increase in cargo
revenues of 3.9% to $24.1 million in 2003 as a result of an
increase in demand in the region and an increase in our
available cargo capacity as we replaced four Boeing 737-200s
with larger Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft in the second
half of 2003.
Operating expenses totaled $283.5 million in 2003, a 5.1%
increase in operating expenses of $269.8 million in 2002.
The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to
a 13.3% increase in capacity and an increase in the average cost
of jet fuel per gallon of 18.2%. Operating expenses for 2003
also include a fleet impairment charge of $3.6 million
related to the Boeing 737-200 fleet, as compared to the fleet
impairment charge of $13.7 million in 2002 related to the
Boeing 737-200 fleet. The breakdown of operating expenses per
available seat mile is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Percent | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in cents) | |
|
|
Operating expenses per ASM:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
)% |
Commissions
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
)% |
Reservation and sales
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
Depreciation
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
)% |
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
)% |
Flight operations
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
(30.5 |
)% |
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM before aircraft fuel and fleet
impairment charges
|
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
Aircraft Fuel
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM before fleet impairment charges
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
|
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Fleet impairment charges
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
(76.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses per ASM
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Fuel. Aircraft fuel totaled $48.5 million
in 2003, a 21.2% increase over aircraft fuel of
$40.0 million in 2002. This increase was a result of an
18.2% increase in the average price per gallon of jet fuel
($1.01 in 2003 as compared to $0.86 in 2002) and the consumption
of 8.1% more fuel due to a 10.0% increase in departures. These
increases were partially offset by our newer, more
fuel-efficient aircraft. Aircraft fuel per available seat mile
increased by 7.0% due to the increase in average fuel cost per
gallon.
53
Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits totaled
$45.3 million in 2003, a 15.3% increase over salaries and
benefits of $39.3 million in 2002. This increase was
primarily the result of a 7.6% increase in full time equivalent
employees, mainly to cover increased operations, and the full
year effect of salary increases made in October 2002. Salaries
and benefits per available seat mile increased by 1.7%.
Passenger servicing. Passenger servicing totaled
$36.9 million in 2003, an 8.8% increase over passenger
servicing of $33.9 million in 2002. This increase was
primarily a result of higher handling and aircraft servicing
expenses which were partially offset by lower passenger
liability insurance rates resulting from Copa joining
Continentals insurance policies. Passenger servicing per
available seat mile decreased by 4.0% as a result of lower
insurance costs and the distribution of similar fixed costs over
a greater number of available seat miles.
Commissions. Commissions totaled $27.7 million in
2003, a 3.6% decrease as compared to commissions of
$28.7 million in 2002. This decrease was primarily a result
of lower average commissions and a higher percentage of direct
revenues (23% in 2002 as compared to 25% in 2003), partially
offset by a higher volume of sales. Commissions per available
seat mile decreased by 14.9%.
Reservations and sales. Reservations and sales totaled
$18.0 million in 2003, a 7.8% increase over reservation and
sales of $16.7 million in 2002. This increase was a result
of an 11.5% increase in on-board passengers. Reservations and
sales cost per available seat mile decreased by 4.9%.
Depreciation. Depreciation totaled $14.0 million in
2003, a 5.0% increase over depreciation of $13.4 million in
2002. This increase was primarily due to four new Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft acquired in 2003 and the full year
effect of four Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft acquired in
2002, partially offset by lower depreciation expenses of
non-aircraft related equipment. Depreciation per available seat
mile decreased by 7.4%.
Maintenance, materials and repairs. Maintenance,
materials and repairs totaled $20.4 million in 2003, a 1.8%
decrease as compared to maintenance, materials and repairs of
$20.7 million in 2002. This decrease was a result of the
replacement of two Boeing 737-200 aircraft with newer Boeing
737-Next Generation and the full year effect of disposing of
three Boeing 737-200 aircraft in 2002. Maintenance, materials
and repairs per available seat mile decreased by 13.4%.
Flight operations. Flight operations cost totaled
$16.0 million in 2003, a 9.7% increase over flight
operations of $14.6 million in 2002, primarily as a result
of a 10.0% increase in the number of departures. Flight
operations per available seat mile decreased by 3.2%.
Aircraft rentals. Aircraft rentals totaled
$16.7 million in 2003, a 21.2% decrease over aircraft
rentals of $21.2 million in 2002. This decrease resulted
from the replacement of two leased Boeing 737-200 with owned
Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft in 2003 and the full year
effect of the replacement of another two leased Boeing 737-200
with owned Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft in 2002. Aircraft
rentals per available seat mile decreased by 30.5%.
Landing fees and other rentals. Landing fees and other
rentals totaled $10.6 million in 2003, a 24.2% increase
over landing fees and other rentals cost of $8.5 million in
2002. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in
departures of 10.0%, increased rates for landing fees at three
of the airports we serve, and the higher landing fees associated
with the heavier Boeing 737-800 aircraft. Landing fees and other
rentals per available seat miles increased by 9.6%.
Other. Other expenses totaled $26.0 million in 2003,
a 35.5% increase over other expenses of $19.2 million in
2002. This increase was primarily a result of an increase of
$2.2 million in publicity and promotion expenses due to a
new television advertising campaign, as well as an increase in
technology related initiatives, specifically the outsourcing of
information technology services at our locations outside Panama,
which are expected to have a net positive long-term effect on
the results of the company. Other expenses per available seat
mile increased by 19.6%.
Fleet impairment charges. Fleet impairment charges were
recorded relating to the Boeing 737-200 fleet in the amounts of
$3.6 million in 2003 and $13.7 million in 2002 in
accordance with Statement of Financial
54
Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. See Note 8
to our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense) |
Non-operating expense totaled $6.2 million in 2003, a 14.1%
decrease over non-operating expense of $7.2 million in
2002, attributable primarily to greater interest expense
partially offset by higher interest income and other
non-operating income.
Interest expense. Interest expense totaled
$11.6 million in 2003, a 52.2% increase over interest
expense of $7.6 million in 2002, resulting from a higher
amount of debt related to a greater number of owned aircraft.
The average effective interest rates paid increased slightly
from 3.53% during 2002 to 3.64% during 2003.
Interest capitalized. Interest capitalized totaled
$2.0 million in 2003, an 80.3% increase over interest
capitalized of $1.1 million in 2002, resulting from higher
average debt relating to pre-delivery payments for aircraft
deliveries.
Interest income. Interest income totaled
$0.9 million in 2003, a 6.7% increase over interest income
of $0.8 million in 2002, as higher balances in 2003 were
offset by lower prevailing interest rates.
Other, net. Other, net income totaled $2.6 million
in 2003 versus other, net expense of $1.5 million in 2002.
This difference was primarily attributable to a foreign exchange
loss of $0.2 million in 2003 as compared to a foreign
exchange loss of $3.2 million in 2002. The lower foreign
exchange loss in 2003 is mainly attributable to gains totaling
$0.5 million in Argentina and Brazil versus a loss of
$1.0 million in Argentina during 2002.
55
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for each of our last five
quarters, selected data from our statement of income as well as
other financial data and operating statistics. The information
for each of these quarters is unaudited and has been prepared on
the same basis as the audited financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data and operating data) | |
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue
|
|
$ |
106,060 |
|
|
$ |
106,671 |
|
|
$ |
113,608 |
|
|
$ |
137,374 |
|
|
$ |
177,947 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
80,690 |
|
|
|
91,830 |
|
|
|
87,631 |
|
|
|
117,083 |
|
|
|
141,874 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
4,739 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
5,109 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
4,412 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
Net income before tax
|
|
|
22,967 |
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
24,446 |
|
|
|
17,986 |
|
|
|
31,172 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
21,137 |
|
|
|
11,879 |
|
|
|
22,560 |
|
|
|
15,111 |
|
|
|
27,675 |
|
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
31,314 |
|
|
|
22,711 |
|
|
|
32,912 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
41,074 |
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
|
7,437 |
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per
share(2)
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
Net income (loss) per
share(2)
OPERATING DATA
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
Revenue passenger miles
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Available seat miles
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
Load factor
|
|
|
72.0 |
% |
|
|
69.7 |
% |
|
|
72.3 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
Break-even load factor
|
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
57.9 |
% |
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
58.4 |
% |
Yield
|
|
|
14.35 |
|
|
|
14.46 |
|
|
|
14.28 |
|
|
|
14.49 |
|
|
|
14.73 |
|
Passenger revenue per ASM
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
|
|
10.86 |
|
Operating revenue per ASM
|
|
|
11.22 |
|
|
|
11.20 |
|
|
|
11.16 |
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
|
11.60 |
|
Operating expenses per ASM
|
|
|
8.53 |
|
|
|
9.64 |
|
|
|
8.61 |
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
SEGMENT FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue
|
|
|
106,060 |
|
|
|
106,671 |
|
|
|
113,608 |
|
|
|
115,955 |
|
|
|
137,690 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
80,690 |
|
|
|
91,830 |
|
|
|
87,631 |
|
|
|
96,260 |
|
|
|
106,941 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
4,739 |
|
|
|
4,770 |
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
5,831 |
|
|
|
5,882 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
4,412 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
Net income before tax
|
|
|
22,967 |
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
24,446 |
|
|
|
18,360 |
|
|
|
27,823 |
|
AeroRepública (since April 22, 2005):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
21,419 |
|
|
|
40,257 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
20,823 |
|
|
|
34,933 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Aircraft rentals |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Net income (loss) before tax |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
(1) |
EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization minus the
sum of interest capitalized and interest income. EBITDA is
presented as supplemental information because we believe it is a
useful |
56
|
|
|
indicator of our operating
performance and is useful in comparing our operating performance
with other airlines. However, EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation, as a substitute for net income prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a companys
profitability. In addition, our calculation of EBITDA may not be
comparable to other companies similarly titled measures.
The following table presents a reconciliation of our net income
to EBITDA for the specified periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
21,137 |
|
|
$ |
11,879 |
|
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
|
$ |
15,111 |
|
|
$ |
27,675 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
4,412 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
3,497 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
4,739 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
5,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
31,832 |
|
|
|
23,271 |
|
|
|
33,742 |
|
|
|
28,134 |
|
|
|
42,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
31,314 |
|
|
|
22,711 |
|
|
|
32,912 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
41,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated
to reflect the current capital structure described under
Description of Capital Stock and in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In recent years, we have been able to meet our working capital
requirements through cash from our operations. Our capital
expenditures, which consist primarily of aircraft purchases, are
funded through a combination of our cash from operations and
long-term financing. From time to time, we finance pre-delivery
payments related to our aircraft with medium-term financing in
the form of bonds privately placed with commercial banks.
Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased
by $48.9 million from $66.0 million at
December 31, 2003 to $114.9 million at
December 31, 2004. These totals include $3.9 million
and $4.5 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments increased to
$129.2 million at September 30, 2005. This total
includes $4.9 million of restricted cash and cash
equivalents. At September 30, 2005 we had available credit
lines totaling $23.5 million of which there were no amounts
outstanding.
We rely primarily on cash flows from operations to provide
working capital for current and future operations. For the first
nine months of 2005, cash flow from operating activities totaled
$78.3 million. Cash flows from operating activities totaled
$98.6 million in 2004, $73.6 million in 2003 and
$50.9 million in 2002. The increase in operating cash flows
over these periods was primarily due to the growth of our
business. Our accounts receivable at September 30, 2005
increased by $27.3 million since December 31, 2004
primarily as a result of the consolidation of $14.3 million
of AeroRepúblicas receivables and growth in operating
revenues.
During the first nine months of 2005, capital expenditures were
$7.1 million. During 2004, capital expenditures were
$65.8 million, which consisted primarily of expenditures
related to our purchase of three Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft. During 2003, capital expenditures were
$112.2 million, which consisted primarily of expenditures
related to our purchase of four Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft and one CFM 56-7B spare engine. During 2002,
capital expenditures were $76.0 million, which consisted
primarily of expenditures related to our purchase of four Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft.
Financing activities during the first nine months of 2005
consisted primarily of the financing for aircraft pre-delivery
payments with $21.9 million of privately-placed bonds, the
issuance of $20.4 million in
57
commercial debt by AeroRepública, primarily related to the
refinancing of existing liabilities, the repayment of
$34.3 million in long-term debt and $10.1 million in
dividends declared and paid.
Financing activities during 2004 consisted primarily of
financing for three Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft for
$101.2 million ($35.7 million of the proceeds of which
were used to redeem privately-placed bonds used for pre-delivery
payments related to those aircraft), the financing for aircraft
pre-delivery payments with $6.4 million of privately-placed
bonds, the repayment of $32.1 million in long-term debt and
$10.0 million in dividends declared and paid.
Financing activities during 2003 consisted primarily of
financing for four Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and a
spare engine for $140.7 million ($35.2 million of the
proceeds of which were used to redeem privately-placed bonds
used for pre-delivery payments related to those aircraft), the
financing for aircraft pre-delivery payments with
$21.7 million of privately-placed bonds and the repayment
of $22.0 million in long-term debt.
Financing activities during 2002 consisted primarily of
financing for four Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft for
$112.9 million ($47.8 million of the proceeds of which
were used to repay loans used for pre-delivery payments related
to those aircraft), the financing for aircraft pre-delivery
payments with $42.8 million of privately-placed bonds and
the repayment of $55.3 million in long-term debt which
includes payments on debt related to loans used for pre-delivery
payments.
We have generally been able to arrange medium-term financing for
pre-delivery payments through loans with commercial banks
through a private issuance of bonds. Although we believe that
financing on similar terms should be available for our future
aircraft pre-delivery payments, we may not be able to secure
such financing on terms attractive to us.
We have financed the acquisition of fifteen Boeing 737-Next
Generation aircraft and three spare engines through syndicated
loans provided by international financial institutions with the
support of partial guarantees issued by the Export-Import Bank
of the United States, or Ex-Im, with repayment profiles of
12 years. The Ex-Im guarantees support 85% of the net
purchase price and are secured with a first priority mortgage on
the aircraft in favor of a security trustee on behalf of Ex-Im.
The documentation for each loan follows standard market forms
for this type of financing, including standard events of
default. Our Ex-Im supported financings amortize on a quarterly
basis, are denominated in dollars and originally bear interest
at a floating rate linked to LIBOR. Our Ex-Im guarantee
facilities typically offer an option to fix the applicable
interest rate. We have exercised this option with respect to
$299.2 million as of September 30, 2005 at an average
weighted interest rate of 4.47%. The remaining
$45.7 million bears interest at an average weighted
interest of LIBOR plus 0.03%. At September 30, 2005, the
total amount outstanding under our Ex-Im-supported financings
totaled $344.9 million.
We effectively extend the maturity of our Boeing aircraft
financing to 15 years through the use of a Stretched
Overall Amortization and Repayment, or SOAR, structure
which provides serial draw-downs calculated to result in a 100%
loan accreting to a recourse balloon at the maturity of the
Ex-Im guaranteed loan. The SOAR portions of our facilities
require us to maintain certain financial covenants, including an
EBITDAR to fixed charge ratio, a net debt to capitalization
ratio and minimum net worth. To comply with the first ratio, our
EBITDA plus aircraft rent expense, or EBITDAR, for the prior
year must be at least 2.5 times our fixed charge expenses
(including interest, commission, fees, discounts and other
finance payments) for that year. To comply with the second
ratio, our tangible net worth shall be at least five times our
long-term obligations. Third, our tangible net worth must be at
least $50 million. As of September 30, 2005 we
complied with all required covenants. We also pay a commitment
fee on the unutilized portion of our SOAR loans.
We also typically finance approximately 10% of the purchase
price of our Boeing aircraft through commercial loans which
totaled $22.2 million as of September 30, 2005. Under
the commercial loan agreements for aircraft received in 2002, we
are required to comply with four specific financial covenants.
The first covenant requires our EBITDAR for the prior year to be
at least 1.9 times our finance charge expenses (including
interest, commission, fees, discounts and other finance
payments) for the first year of the agreement and 2.0 times our
finance charge expenses for the remainder of the agreement. The
second covenant limits our net borrowings to 92% of our
capitalization during the first two years, 90% during the next
two years and 85% during the last six years of the agreement.
The third covenant requires our tangible net worth to be at
least $30 million for the first
58
two years, $70 million for the next three years and
$120 million for the last four years of the agreement. The
last covenant requires us to maintain a minimum of
$30 million in available cash (including cash equivalents
and committed credit facilities) for the first five years and
$50 million for the last five years of the agreement. As of
September 30, 2005 we complied with all required covenants.
Our Embraer aircraft purchases will not be eligible for Ex-Im
guaranteed financing. We have arranged financing for the six
Embraer aircraft to be delivered through the end of 2006, having
obtained a commitment for senior term loan facilities in the
amount of approximately $134 million from PK AirFinance US,
Inc., an affiliate of General Electric. The loans will have a
term of twelve years. We entered into definitive documentation
with respect to these facilities and drew our first installment
under the facilities in connection with the delivery of our
first Embraer 190 on November 16, 2005. We will also pay a
commitment fee with respect to the unused portion of the
facilities.
Upon our acquisition of AeroRepública, we arranged a
commercial credit facility in the amount of $15.0 million,
primarily to refinance existing liabilities and to provide
AeroRepública with working capital. This facility was
divided in two tranches of $5.0 million and
$10.0 million with maturities of three and five years,
respectively. This facility is secured by credit card
receivables. The facility requires AeroRepública to
maintain certain financial covenants such as a financial debt to
EBITDAR ratio of less than 4.5. As of September 30, 2005 we
complied with all required covenants.
Capital resources. We finance our aircraft through long
term debt and operating lease financings. Although we expect to
finance future aircraft deliveries with a combination of similar
debt arrangements and financing leases, we may not be able to
secure such financing on attractive terms. To the extent we
cannot secure financing, we may be required to modify our
aircraft acquisition plans or incur higher than anticipated
financing costs. We expect to meet our operating obligations as
they become due through available cash and internally generated
funds, supplemented as necessary by short-term credit lines.
We have placed firm orders with The Boeing Company for seven
Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and we have purchase rights
for an additional ten Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft. We
have also placed firm orders with Embraer for eleven Embraer 190
aircraft and we have options to purchase an additional eighteen
Embraer 190 aircraft. The schedule for delivery of our firm
orders is as follows: one in 2005, six in 2006, six in 2007,
four in 2008 and one in 2009. We meet our pre-delivery deposit
requirements for our Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft by
paying cash, or by using medium-term borrowing facilities and/or
vendor financing for deposits required 24 to 6 months prior
to delivery. We are also required to make pre-delivery payments
with respect to our Embraer aircraft at the time of our
commitment to purchase and at periodic intervals prior to
delivery. We fund these deposits with our own cash.
Contractual Obligations
Our non-cancelable contractual obligations at September 30,
2005 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Remainder | |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
of 2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars) | |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft and engine purchase commitments
|
|
$ |
579,406 |
|
|
$ |
62,004 |
|
|
$ |
166,091 |
|
|
$ |
189,549 |
|
|
$ |
128,742 |
|
|
$ |
33,020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Aircraft operating leases
|
|
|
126,051 |
|
|
|
7,960 |
|
|
|
28,418 |
|
|
|
28,203 |
|
|
|
26,918 |
|
|
|
21,750 |
|
|
|
12,802 |
|
Other operating leases
|
|
|
24,473 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
8,501 |
|
Short-term debt and long-term debt
(1)
|
|
|
501,817 |
|
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
84,706 |
|
|
|
49,778 |
|
|
|
48,052 |
|
|
|
44,454 |
|
|
|
259,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,231,747 |
|
|
$ |
86,668 |
|
|
$ |
283,159 |
|
|
$ |
271,099 |
|
|
$ |
207,186 |
|
|
$ |
102,594 |
|
|
$ |
281,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes actual interest and estimated interest for
floating-rate debt based on September 30, 2005 rates.
Most contract leases include renewal options. Non-aircraft
related leases have renewable terms of one year, and their
respective amounts included in the table below have been
estimated through 2009, but we cannot estimate amounts with
respect to those leases for later years. Our leases do not
include residual value guarantees.
59
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None of our operating lease obligations are reflected on our
balance sheet and we have no other off-balance sheet
arrangements. We are responsible for all maintenance, insurance
and other costs associated with operating these aircraft;
however, we have not made any residual value or other guarantees
to our lessors.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The risks inherent in our business are the potential losses
arising from adverse changes to the price of fuel, interest
rates and the U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Aircraft Fuel. Our results of operations are affected by
changes in the price and availability of aircraft fuel. To
manage the price risk, we use crude oil option contracts, zero
cost collars and swap agreements. Market risk is estimated as a
hypothetical 10% increase in the December 31, 2004 cost per
gallon of fuel. Based on projected 2005 fuel consumption, such
an increase would result in an increase to aircraft fuel expense
of approximately $7.9 million in 2005, not taking into
account our derivative contracts. We currently have hedged
approximately 15% of Copas projected 2005 fuel
requirements and 10% of Copas projected fuel consumption
from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006. All existing
hedge contracts settle by March 2006.
Interest. Our earnings are affected by changes in
interest rates due to the impact those changes have on interest
expense from variable-rate debt instruments and operating leases
and on interest income generated from our cash and investment
balances. If interest rates average 10% more in 2005 than
they did during 2004, our interest expense would increase by
approximately $152,000, and the fair value of our debt would
decrease by approximately $3.6 million. If interest rates
average 10% less in 2005 than they did in 2004, our
interest income from cash equivalents would decrease by
approximately $238,000 and the fair value of our debt would
increase by approximately $3.7 million. These amounts are
determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical
interest rates on our variable-rate debt and cash equivalent
balances at December 31, 2004.
Foreign Currencies. The majority of our obligations are
denominated in U.S. dollars. Since Panama uses the
U.S. dollar as legal tender, the majority of our operating
expenses are also denominated in U.S. dollars. Our foreign
exchange risk is limited as approximately 50% of our revenues
are in U.S. dollars. While a significant part of our
revenues are in foreign currency, no single currency represented
more than 6.0% of our operating revenues in 2004, except for the
Colombian Peso which represented 10.3%. Generally, our exposure
to most of these foreign currencies is limited to the period of
up to two weeks between the completion of a sale and the
repatriation to Panama in dollars.
2004 Revenues and Expenses Breakdown by Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue | |
|
Expense | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brazilian Real
|
|
|
4.95% |
|
|
|
2.30% |
|
Colombian Peso
|
|
|
10.26% |
|
|
|
4.58% |
|
Costa Rican Colon
|
|
|
5.18% |
|
|
|
2.07% |
|
Mexican Peso
|
|
|
5.57% |
|
|
|
2.51% |
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
51.07% |
|
|
|
78.75% |
|
Venezuelan Bolivar
|
|
|
4.56% |
|
|
|
2.07% |
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
18.41% |
|
|
|
7.71% |
|
(1) Argentine Peso, Chilean Peso, Dominican Peso, Guatemalan
Quetzal, Jamaican Dollar, Honduran Lempira, Haitian Gourde.
As a result of the acquisition of AeroRepública in April
2005, we have an increased exposure to the Colombian Peso than
that noted in the table above. AeroRepúblicas
revenues from April 22, 2005 to September 30, 2005
represent 14.4% of total consolidated revenues.
Outlook: Remainder of 2005 and 2006
We seek to expand our operations by adding additional flights to
existing routes and adding new routes, which includes, among
others, increasing the number of flights to San Salvador in
December 2005 and Santiago, Chile in January 2006. For the
remainder of 2005, we expect to continue to concentrate on
keeping
60
our operating costs low and pursuing ways to make our operations
more efficient. In 2006, we expect to expand our operations by
adding frequencies and new routes with the addition of six new
aircraft to our fleet, including two Boeing-737 Next Generation
and four Embraer 190 aircraft.
We expect jet fuel prices will continue to be high in 2005 and
expect to continue evaluating fuel hedging programs to help
protect us against short-term movements in crude oil prices. We
also expect interest rates to increase during the rest of 2005
which would increase the amount of interest expense related to
the 30% of our debt that bears interest at floating rates. We
also expect that our 2005 earnings will be affected by a new
Panamanian corporate income tax law and a new Panamanian social
security law. For 2005, we expect the new corporate income tax
law to increase our Panamanian tax liability to approximately
$1.3 million. We estimate that the new social security law
would have had an incremental effect of approximately $300,000
from June 1, 2005 through the remainder of 2005 had the new
social security law not been suspended until December 2005.
We took delivery of our first Embraer 190 aircraft on
November 16, 2005. We believe that the addition of the
Embraer 190 aircraft will enhance our ability to provide
efficient service to new destinations in mid-sized markets that
currently do not generate sufficient demand to justify service
with our larger Boeing aircraft. Nevertheless, we expect to
incur one-time charges associated with integrating a new
aircraft type into our fleet prior to it entering revenue
service, including obtaining the necessary certifications, the
hiring and training of new pilots, technicians and flight
attendants. We do not expect these expenses to be material.
We expect that our recent acquisition of AeroRepública will
enhance our access and visibility in the Colombian market of
45 million inhabitants, which we expect to translate into
additional passenger traffic through our network and increased
revenues. However, we also believe that the consolidation of
AeroRepúblicas results in future periods will
continue to reduce our consolidated operating margins.
AeroRepública expects to initiate international flights
between Medellín and Panama City, Cali and Panama City and
between Cartagena and Panama City. In addition,
AeroRepública expects to initiate flights between Cali and
Medellín and between Bogotá and Cúcuta and
expects to take delivery of one additional MD-80 aircraft in
December of 2005.
We expect our consolidated capacity to increase by approximately
3.2% in the last quarter of 2005 as compared to the previous
quarter primarily as a result of AeroRepúblicas new
flights. We currently expect AeroRepública to break even or
have a small loss for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
to experience improvement for 2006. Over the next few years we
expect to fund between $8 million and $12 million in
AeroRepública which will be primarily used for capital
investment projects and short term working capital needs.
61
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a leading Latin American provider of international
airline passenger and cargo service. Operating from our
strategically located position in the Republic of Panama, we
currently offer approximately 80 daily scheduled flights among
30 destinations in 20 countries in North, Central and South
America and the Caribbean. Additionally, we provide passengers
with access to flights to more than 110 other destinations
through codeshare arrangements with Continental Airlines
pursuant to which each airline places its name and flight
designation code on the others flights. We provide airline
passenger and cargo service through our Panama City hub which
enables us to consolidate passenger traffic from multiple points
to serve each destination effectively. We also operate a
Colombian carrier, AeroRepública S.A., that we acquired
during the second quarter of 2005.
We operate a modern fleet of 22 Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft with an average age of approximately 3.3 years as
of September 30, 2005 (not taking into account the fleet of
AeroRepública, our recently-purchased operating
subsidiary). We also accepted delivery of our first 94-seat
Embraer 190 aircraft on November 16, 2005. To meet our growing
capacity requirements, we have firm commitments to accept
delivery of 18 additional aircraft through 2009 and have
negotiated purchase rights and options that, if exercised, would
allow us to accept delivery of up to 28 additional aircraft
through 2011. Our firm orders are for seven additional Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft and eleven additional Embraer 190s,
and our purchase rights and options are for up to ten Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft and up to 18 Embraer 190s.
Since January 2001, Copa Holdings has grown significantly and
has established a track record of consistent profitability,
recording four consecutive years of increasing earnings. Our
total operating revenues have increased from $290.4 million
in 2001 to $399.8 million in 2004, while our net income has
increased from $14.8 million to $68.6 million over the
same period. Our operating margins also improved from 8.6% in
2001 to 20.6% in 2004. Over the same period, Copa Airlines
increased its capacity from 2,920 million available seat
miles to 3,639 million available seat miles while improving
its load factor from 64.0% during 2001 to 70.0% during 2004 and
its yield from 13.79 cents during 2001 to 14.31 cents during
2004.
We started our strategic alliance with Continental Airlines in
1998 in conjunction with its purchase of 49% of our capital
stock. Together, we conduct joint marketing and code-sharing
arrangements, and we participate in the award-winning OnePass
frequent flyer loyalty program globally and on a co-branded
basis in Latin America. We believe that our co-branding and
joint marketing activities with Continental have enhanced our
brand and reputation in Latin America, and that our relationship
has afforded us many cost-related benefits, such as improving
our purchasing power in negotiations with service providers,
aircraft vendors and insurers. Immediately prior to the
consummation of this offering, our alliance and related services
agreements with Continental will be extended until 2015.
We recently purchased AeroRepública S.A. for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $23.4 million, including
acquisition costs. AeroRepública is a Colombian air carrier
that operates a fleet of ten leased MD-80s and two owned DC-9s.
According to the Colombian Civil Aviation Administration,
Unidad Especial Administrativa de Aeronáutica Civil,
in 2004 AeroRepública was the second-largest domestic
carrier in Colombia in terms of number of passengers carried,
providing service to 11 cities in Colombia through a
point-to-point route network. We believe that this acquisition
represents an attractive opportunity to increase our access to
one of the largest airline passenger markets in Latin America
and to improve AeroRepúblicas operational and
financial performance.
Our Strengths
We believe our primary business strengths that have allowed us
to compete successfully in the airline industry include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Hub of the Americas airport is strategically
located. We believe that our base of operations at the
geographically central location of Tocumen International Airport
in Panama City, Panama |
62
|
|
|
|
|
provides convenient connections to our principal markets in
North, Central and South America and the Caribbean, enabling us
to consolidate traffic to serve several destinations that do not
generate enough demand to justify point-to-point service.
Flights from Panama operate with few service disruptions due to
weather, contributing to high completion factors and on-time
performance. Tocumen International Airports sea-level
altitude allows our aircraft to operate without performance
restrictions that they would be subject to at higher-altitude
airports. We believe that the geographic reach provided by our
central location allows us to generate revenue across a large
and diverse base of destinations. We also believe that our hub
in Panama allows us to benefit from Panama Citys status as
a center for financial services, shipping and commerce and from
Panamas stable, dollar-based economy, free-trade zone and
growing tourism industry. |
|
|
|
We focus on keeping our operating costs low. In recent
years, our low operating costs and efficiency have contributed
significantly to our profitability. Our cost per available seat
mile was 8.72 cents in 2004 and 9.08 cents in the first nine
months of 2005. The cost per available seat mile of our Copa
operating segment when excluding costs for fuel and fleet
impairment charges was 7.50 cents in 2001, 7.59 cents in 2002,
7.17 cents in 2003, 7.01 cents in 2004 and 6.61 cents
during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Results of
Operations for a reconciliation of our cost per available
seat mile when excluding costs for fuel and fleet impairment
charges to our cost per available seat mile. We believe that our
cost per available seat mile reflects our modern fleet,
efficient operations and the competitive cost of labor in Panama. |
|
|
|
We operate a modern fleet. Copa Airlines recently
completed a fleet renovation program through which it replaced
all of its older Boeing 737-200s with Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft equipped with winglets and other modern cost-saving and
safety features. We also recently accepted delivery of our first
Embraer 190 aircraft. Over the next four years, we intend to
further enhance our modern fleet through the addition of at
least seven additional Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and
eleven new Embraer 190s. We expect our Boeing 737-700s and
737-800s and our new Embraer 190s to offer substantial
operational cost savings over the replaced aircraft in terms of
fuel efficiency and maintenance costs. In addition, Copa
Airlines believes that its modern fleet contributes to its
excellent on-time performance and high completion factor which
contribute to passenger satisfaction. |
|
|
|
We believe we have a strong brand and a reputation for
quality service. We believe that the Copa brand is
associated with value to passengers, providing world-class
service and competitive pricing. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, Copa Airlines statistic for
on-time performance was 93.3%, completion factor was 99.7% and
baggage handling was 0.8 mishandled bags per
1000 passengers. Our goal is to apply our expertise in
these areas to improve AeroRepúblicas service
statistics to comparable levels. Our focus on customer service
has helped to build passenger loyalty. We believe that our brand
has also been enhanced through our relationship with
Continental, including our joint marketing of the OnePass
loyalty program in Latin America, the similarity of our aircraft
livery and aircraft interiors and our participation in
Continentals Presidents Club lounge program. |
|
|
|
Our management fosters a culture of teamwork and continuous
improvement. Our management team has been successful at
creating a culture based on teamwork and focused on achieving
greater efficiencies through continuous improvement. Each of our
employees has individual objectives based on corporate goals
that serve as a basis for measuring performance. When corporate
operational and financial targets are met, employees are
eligible to receive bonuses according to our profit sharing
program. See BusinessEmployees. We also
recognize outstanding performance of individual employees
through company-wide recognition, one-time awards, special
events and, in the case of our senior management after this
offering, grants of restricted stock and stock options.
According to internal surveys, over 90% of our employees report
being satisfied with their job. Our goal-oriented culture and
incentive programs have contributed to a motivated work force
that is focused on satisfying customers, achieving efficiencies
and growing profitability. |
63
Our Strategy
Our goal is to continue to grow profitably and enhance our
position as a leader in Latin American aviation by providing a
combination of superior customer service, convenient schedules
and competitive fares, while maintaining competitive costs. The
key elements of our business strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Expand our network by increasing frequencies and adding new
destinations. We believe that demand for air travel in Latin
America is likely to expand in the next decade, and we intend to
use our increasing fleet capacity to meet this growing demand.
We intend to focus on expanding our operations by increasing
flight frequencies on our most profitable routes and initiating
service to new destinations. Our Panama City hub allows us to
consolidate traffic and provide service to certain underserved
markets, particularly in Central America and the Caribbean, and
we intend to focus on providing new service to regional
destinations that we believe best enhance the overall
connectivity and profitability of our network. With the addition
of Embraer 190 aircraft and growth in overall capacity, we will
have more flexibility in scheduling our flights for our
customers convenience. |
|
|
|
Continue to focus on keeping our costs low. We seek to
reduce our cost per available seat mile without sacrificing
services valued by our customers as we execute our growth plans.
Our goal is to maintain a young fleet of modern aircraft and to
make effective use of our resources through efficient aircraft
utilization and employee productivity. We intend to reduce our
distribution costs by increasing direct sales, including
internet and call center sales, as well as improving efficiency
through technology and automated processes. |
|
|
|
Introduce service with new Embraer 190 aircraft. We
believe that the addition of the Embraer 190 aircraft in
late 2005 will allow us to provide service to new destinations
in underserved markets whose demand would be more efficiently
served with the 94-seat Embraer 190 aircraft. In addition, we
believe that the Embraer 190s will also enable us to more
efficiently match our capacity to demand, allowing us to improve
service frequencies to currently served markets and to redeploy
the higher capacity Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft to serve
routes with greater demand. |
|
|
|
Emphasize superior service and value to our customers. We
intend to continue to focus on satisfying our customers and
earning their loyalty by providing a combination of superior
service and competitive fares. We believe that continuing our
operational success in keeping flights on time, reducing
mishandled luggage and offering convenient schedules to
attractive destinations will be essential to achieving this
goal. We intend to continue to incentivize our employees to
improve or maintain operating and service metrics relating to
our customers satisfaction by continuing our profit
sharing plan and employee recognition programs and to reward
customer loyalty with the popular OnePass frequent flyer
program, upgrades and access to Presidents Club lounges. |
|
|
|
Selectively evaluate future acquisitions. From time to
time in the future, we expect to evaluate acquisition
opportunities in the Latin American aviation sector as they
arise. We intend to evaluate any such opportunities selectively,
focusing in particular on the extent to which they might
complement our existing operations and provide potential for
growth and increased shareholder value. |
History
Copa was established in 1947 by a group of Panamanian investors
and Pan American World Airways, which provided technical and
economic assistance as well as capital. Initially, Copa served
three domestic destinations in Panama with a fleet of three
Douglas C-47 aircraft. In the 1960s, Copa began its
international service with three weekly flights to cities in
Costa Rica, Jamaica and Colombia using a small fleet of
Avro 748s and Electra 188s. In 1971, Pan American World
Airways sold its stake in Copa to a group of Panamanian
investors who retained control of the airline until 1986. During
the 1980s, Copa suspended its domestic service to focus on
international flights.
In 1986, CIASA purchased 99% of Copa, which was controlled by
the group of Panamanian shareholders who currently control
CIASA. From 1992 until 1998, Copa was a part of a commercial
alliance with Grupo TACAs network of Central American
airline carriers. In 1997, together with Grupo TACA, Copa entered
64
into a strategic alliance with American Airlines. After a year
our alliance with American was terminated by mutual consent. In
May 1998, CIASA sold a 49% stake in Copa Holdings to Continental
and entered into an extensive alliance agreement with
Continental providing for code-sharing, joint marketing,
technical exchanges and other cooperative initiatives between
the airlines.
Since 1998, we have grown and modernized our fleet while
improving customer service and reliability. In 1999, we received
our first Boeing 737-700s and in 2003 we received our first
Boeing 737-800s. In the first quarter of 2005, we completed our
fleet renovation program and discontinued use of our last Boeing
737-200s. Since 1998, we have expanded from 24 destinations in
18 countries to 30 destinations in 20 countries. We plan to
continue our expansion in the future, and we plan to almost
double our fleet over the next five years.
AeroRepública
We acquired 85.6% of AeroRepública on April 22, 2005
and another 14.0% in a series of transactions ending in the
third quarter of 2005. We carried out the acquisition by
purchasing substantially all of the equity ownership interest in
AeroRepública from its several former shareholders for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $23.4 million,
including acquisition costs. According to the Colombian Civil
Aviation Administration, Unidad Especial Administrative de
Aeronáutica Civil, AeroRepública is the second
largest passenger air carrier in Colombia, with a market share
of approximately 27% of the domestic traffic in Colombia in 2004
and approximately 1,300 employees.
Our goal is to achieve growth at AeroRepública through a
combination of increasing Colombian domestic passenger traffic
volume and increasing market share, particularly in the business
travelers segment. We believe that Copas operational
coordination with AeroRepública may create additional
passenger traffic in our existing route network by providing
Colombian passengers more convenient access to the international
destinations served through our Panama hub.
We believe that AeroRepúblicas revenues were
approximately $87 million for 2003 and approximately
$118 million for 2004. We also believe that during those
years AeroRepública operated with very low net operating
margins and experienced a net loss in 2003. However, in the
course of our due diligence investigations in connection with
the purchase, we and our external accounting advisors discovered
certain inconsistencies in AeroRepúblicas accounting
and internal controls that caused us to believe that its
published financial statements as prepared under Colombian GAAP
may not have accurately reflected its results of operations for
the years covered. Since we acquired AeroRepública, we have
retained an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist
us in the maintenance of accounting records, perform additional
analyses and post-closing procedures necessary for the
preparation of AeroRepúblicas financial statements
and provide other assistance in areas in which
AeroRepública had insufficient internal resources.
Additionally, our accounting personnel have been directly
involved in the preparation and review of
AeroRepúblicas financial information consolidated
into our financial statements subsequent to the acquisition. As
a result, we believe the financial information of
AeroRepública that is consolidated into our financial
statements has been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and
that our interim financial statements for the periods subsequent
to our acquisition of AeroRepública are materially correct.
Our management and audit committee are developing plans for the
remediation of the deficiencies in AeroRepúblicas
internal controls. These plans include additional oversight by
our accounting personnel, further education and training in U.S.
GAAP for AeroRepúblicas existing personnel and
engaging outside resources to assist in the design and
implementation of additional internal controls. We expect to
carry out these plans during the next year in connection with
our initial assessment of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The
consolidation of AeroRepública into our results of
operations has substantially increased our revenues and
decreased our operating margins and is likely to do so for the
foreseeable future.
Industry
In Latin America, the scheduled passenger service market
consists of three principal groups of travelers: strictly
leisure, business and travelers visiting friends and family.
Leisure passengers and passengers visiting
65
friends and family typically place a higher emphasis on lower
fares, whereas business passengers typically place a higher
emphasis on flight frequency, on-time performance, breadth of
network and service enhancements, including loyalty programs and
airport lounges.
According to data from the International Air Transport
Association, or IATA, Latin America comprised approximately 7%
of worldwide passengers flown in 2004, or 94 million
passengers. The majority of this traffic consisted of passengers
flying between the United States and Latin America.
The Central American aviation market is dominated by
international traffic. According to data from IATA,
international traffic represented more than 61.6% of passengers
carried and 79.2% of passenger miles flown in Central America in
2004. International passenger traffic is concentrated between
North America and Central America. This segment represented
61.9% of international passengers flown in Central America in
2004, compared to 20.0% for passengers flown between Central
America and South America and 18.1% for passengers flown within
Central American countries. Total passengers flown on
international flights in Central America grew by 7.3% in
2004, and load factors on international flights to and from
Central America were 68.9% on average.
Domestic traffic, or flights within Central American countries,
represented approximately 38.4% of passengers carried and 20.8%
of passenger miles flown in 2004. According to data collected by
IATA, domestic passenger miles in Central America grew by 2.6%
in 2004 while passengers flown grew by 1.6%. Average load
factors on domestic flights within Central America were 63.7% in
2004. The chart below details passenger traffic in 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 IATA Traffic Results | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Passengers | |
|
|
|
Passenger | |
|
|
|
|
Carried | |
|
Change | |
|
Miles | |
|
Change | |
|
ASMs | |
|
Change | |
|
Load | |
|
|
(Thousands) | |
|
(%) | |
|
(Millions) | |
|
(%) | |
|
(Million) | |
|
(%) | |
|
Factor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
International Scheduled Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North AmericaCentral America
|
|
|
12,671 |
|
|
|
11.10% |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
16.10% |
|
|
|
25,288 |
|
|
|
11.30% |
|
|
|
69.90% |
|
North AmericaSouth America
|
|
|
18,686 |
|
|
|
17.70% |
|
|
|
39,448 |
|
|
|
20.50% |
|
|
|
55,761 |
|
|
|
17.30% |
|
|
|
70.70% |
|
Central AmericaSouth America
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
15.80% |
|
|
|
8,271 |
|
|
|
19.60% |
|
|
|
11,978 |
|
|
|
15.60% |
|
|
|
69.10% |
|
Within Central America
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
27.50% |
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
29.10% |
|
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
|
31.70% |
|
|
|
64.70% |
|
Within South America
|
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
12.90% |
|
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
7.50% |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
4.40% |
|
|
|
64.60% |
|
Domestic Scheduled Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central America
|
|
|
12,749 |
|
|
|
1.60% |
|
|
|
7,941 |
|
|
|
2.60% |
|
|
|
12,464 |
|
|
|
0.80% |
|
|
|
63.70% |
|
South America
|
|
|
34,251 |
|
|
|
15.60% |
|
|
|
17,584 |
|
|
|
16.10% |
|
|
|
26,423 |
|
|
|
7.50% |
|
|
|
66.50% |
|
Panama serves as a hub for connecting passenger traffic between
major North American, South American, Caribbean and Central
American markets. Accordingly, passenger traffic to and from
Panama is significantly influenced by economic growth in
surrounding regions. Major passenger traffic markets in
North America, South America and Central America
experienced growth in their GDP in 2004 on both an absolute and
per capita basis. Real GDP in our two most important markets
also grew in 2004, increasing by 6.0% in Panama and 4.0% in
Colombia in 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP | |
|
GDP per Capita | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 GDP | |
|
2004 Real GDP | |
|
2004 GDP per Capita | |
|
|
(US$bn) | |
|
(% Growth) | |
|
(US$) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Brazil
|
|
|
599.7 |
|
|
|
5.2% |
|
|
|
3,417.1 |
|
Argentina
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
|
3,912.1 |
|
Chile
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
|
|
5,856.2 |
|
Mexico
|
|
|
676.5 |
|
|
|
4.4% |
|
|
|
6,506.3 |
|
Colombia
|
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
|
2,099.2 |
|
Panama
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
6.0% |
|
|
|
4,523.8 |
|
USA
|
|
|
11,733.5 |
|
|
|
4.4% |
|
|
|
39,934.3 |
|
Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook
Database, April 2005; real GDP growth calculated in local
currency
Panama has benefitted from a stable economy with moderate
inflation and steady GDP growth. According to World Bank
estimates, from 1999 to 2003 Panamas real GDP grew at an
average annual rate of
66
2.9% while inflation averaged 0.6% per year. The service
sector represents approximately 76% of total real GDP in Panama,
a higher percentage of GDP than the service sector represents in
most other Latin American countries. The World Bank currently
estimates Panamas population to be 3.0 million, an
increase of 1.5% from 2.9 million in 2002, with the
majority of the population concentrated in Panama City, where
our hub at Tocumen International Airport is located. We believe
the combination of a stable, service-oriented economy and steady
population growth has helped drive our domestic origin and
destination passenger traffic. The World Bank estimates that
annual aircraft departures in Panama increased by 17% from
21,900 in 2002 to 25,700 in 2003.
Domestic travel within Panama primarily consists of individuals
visiting families as well as domestic and foreign tourist
visiting the countryside. Most of this travel is done via ground
transportation, and its main flow is to and from Panama City,
where most of the economic activity and population is
concentrated. Demand for domestic air travel is growing and
relates primarily to leisure travel from foreign and local
tourist. The market is served primarily by two local airlines,
Turismo Aereo and Aeroperlas, which operate turbo prop aircraft
generally with less than 50 seats. These airlines do not
offer international service and operate in the domestic terminal
of Panama City, which is located 30 minutes by car from Tocumen
International Airport.
Colombia is the third largest country in Latin America in terms
of population, with a population of approximately
45 million in 2004 according to the World Bank, and has a
land area of approximately 440,000 square miles.
Colombias GDP was approximately $98.2 billion in
2004, and per capita income was $2,216. Colombias
geography is marked by the Andean mountains and an inadequate
road and rail infrastructure, making air travel a convenient and
attractive transportation alternative. Colombia shares a border
with Panama, and for historic, cultural and business reasons it
represents a significant market for many Panamanian businesses.
Route Network and Schedules
As of September 30, 2005, we provided regularly scheduled
flights to 30 cities in North, Central and South America
and the Caribbean. Substantially all of our flights operate
through our hub in Panama which allows us to transport
passengers and cargo among a large number of destinations with
service which is more frequent than if each route were served
directly.
We believe our hub-and-spoke model is the most efficient way for
us to operate our business since most of the
origination/destination city pairs we serve would not generate
sufficient traffic to justify a point-to-point connection, and
because we serve many countries, it would be very difficult to
obtain the bilateral route rights necessary to operate a
point-to-point system.
We schedule a morning bank and an evening bank of flights, with
flights timed to arrive at the hub at approximately the same
time and to depart a short time later. Over the next few years,
as our hub expands to allow us to de-peak our schedules and with
the addition of two new banks to our hub, we intend to increase
the number of destinations and frequencies. Operating more banks
during the day will increase our asset utilization and allow us
to utilize the employees at our hub more efficiently since
periods of low activity without arriving or departing flights at
the hub will be shorter. Additional banks will also give us the
opportunity to provide more frequent service to many
destinations, allow some passengers more convenient connections
and increase the flexibility of scheduling flights throughout
our route network.
67
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our route system based on our flight schedule in effect as of
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Passengers | |
|
|
|
|
Carried in Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Region |
|
ASMs per Week | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
North America
|
|
|
21,833,388 |
|
|
|
247,995 |
|
|
|
335,294 |
|
|
|
395,497 |
|
Central America
|
|
|
7,889,543 |
|
|
|
593,258 |
|
|
|
655,726 |
|
|
|
741,295 |
|
South America
|
|
|
33,274,109 |
|
|
|
739,067 |
|
|
|
799,057 |
|
|
|
884,298 |
|
Caribbean
|
|
|
12,367,023 |
|
|
|
245,788 |
|
|
|
265,660 |
|
|
|
290,372 |
|
As a part of our strategic relationship with Continental, we
provide flights through code-sharing arrangements to over 110
other destinations. To a limited extent, we also provide flights
through tactical and regional code-sharing arrangements with
Mexicana, Gol and Gulfstream International Airlines.
In addition to increasing the frequencies to destinations we
already serve, our business strategy is also focused on adding
new destinations across Latin America, the Caribbean and North
America in order to increase the attractiveness of our Hub of
the Americas at Tocumen International Airport hub for
intra-American traffic. We currently plan to introduce new
destinations and to increase frequencies to many of the
destinations that we currently serve. The addition of the
Embraer 190s should also allow us to improve our service by
enabling us to increase frequencies and service new destinations
that cannot be served efficiently with a Boeing 737-Next
Generation or that can be served more profitably with a smaller
aircraft.
Our plans to introduce new destinations and increase frequencies
depend on the allocation of route rights, a process over which
we do not have direct influence. Route rights are allocated
through negotiations between the government of Panama and the
governments of countries to which we intend to increase flights.
If we are unable to obtain route rights, we will exercise the
flexibility within our route network to re-allocate capacity as
appropriate.
We do not currently provide any domestic service in the Republic
of Panama, choosing instead to focus entirely on international
traffic both regionally and around the Americas. We divide our
sales and marketing into the following regions: North America;
South America; Central America (excluding Panama); the
Caribbean; and Panama. The following table shows our sales
generated in each of these regions.
Revenue by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Region |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
North
America(1)
|
|
|
13.4% |
|
|
|
15.5% |
|
|
|
17.3% |
|
South America
|
|
|
39.4% |
|
|
|
38.6% |
|
|
|
38.3% |
|
Central America
|
|
|
16.7% |
|
|
|
16.0% |
|
|
|
15.2% |
|
Caribbean(2)
|
|
|
14.0% |
|
|
|
13.3% |
|
|
|
12.9% |
|
Panama
|
|
|
16.6% |
|
|
|
16.6% |
|
|
|
16.2% |
|
|
|
(1) |
The United States, Canada and Mexico. |
|
(2) |
Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Puerto Rico |
68
AeroRepública currently provides scheduled service to the
following cities in Colombia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Passengers | |
|
|
|
|
Departures | |
|
Carried During the | |
|
|
Date Service | |
|
Scheduled | |
|
Year Ended | |
Destinations Served |
|
Commenced | |
|
per Week(1) | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Barranquilla
|
|
|
Jun 1995 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
102,012 |
|
Bogotá
|
|
|
Jun 1993 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,002,500 |
|
Bucaramanga
|
|
|
May 1995 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
85,093 |
|
Cali
|
|
|
Jun 1993 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
323,311 |
|
Cartagena
|
|
|
Jun 1993 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
174,867 |
|
Leticia
|
|
|
Nov 1993 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24,501 |
|
Medellín
|
|
|
Oct 1994 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
228,594 |
|
Montería
|
|
|
Jul 1994 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
56,221 |
|
Pereira
|
|
|
Mar 2003 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
27,169 |
|
San Andrés
|
|
|
Jun 1993 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
203,185 |
|
Santa Marta
|
|
|
Jun 1993 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
83,677 |
|
|
|
(1) |
As of September 30, 2005. |
In addition to the destinations described above,
AeroRepública periodically operates charter flights to
Margarita Island, Venezuela; Havana, Cuba; Punta Cana, Dominican
Republic and Montego Bay, Jamaica.
AeroRepública is in the process of adding limited
international service to its schedule and, in June 2005,
AeroRepública was granted the authorization to fly regular
services to Panama City from Cali, Medellín and
San Andrés, Colombia. We expect that
AeroRepúblicas new service on these routes will
provide feeder traffic and complement Copas existing
service out of Panama City. In addition, AeroRepública has
been granted the authorization to fly between Cali and
Medellín and between Bogotá and Cúcuta.
AeroRepública has applied for authorization to fly routes
between Bogotá and Quito and between Bogotá and
Guayaquil. It also has code-sharing agreements with the
Venezuelan carrier, Aeropostal, and the Spanish carrier, Air
Plus Comet, both of which provide AeroRepública the ability
to offer expanded international service to its customers.
Colombia has open-skies agreements with the Andean Pact
(Comunidad Andina) nations of Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru and
Venezuela.
Airline Operations
Passenger revenues accounted for approximately
$364.6 million or 91.2% of Copas total revenues in
2004, all earned from international routes. Leisure traffic,
which makes up close to half of Copas total loads, tends
to coincide with holidays, school schedules and cultural events
and peaks in July and August and again in December and January.
Despite these seasonal variations, Copas overall traffic
pattern is relatively stable due to the constant influx of
business travelers. Approximately 40% of Copa passengers regard
Panama City as their destination or origination point, and most
of the remaining passengers pass through Panama City in transit
to other points on our route network.
AeroRepúblicas business is more concentrated on
passenger service, which in 2004 accounted for approximately 97%
of its total revenues. The majority of AeroRepúblicas
customers are leisure travelers and travelers visiting friends
and family, and traffic is heaviest during the vacation months
of July, August and the holiday season in December.
In addition to our passenger service, we make efficient use of
extra capacity in the belly of our aircraft by carrying cargo.
Our cargo business generated revenues of approximately
$23.2 million in 2002, $24.1 million in
69
2003 and $28.2 million in 2004, representing 7.7%, 7.0% and
7.0%, respectively, of Copas operating revenues. We sold
our remaining dedicated Boeing 737-200 Freighter aircraft in
April 2002. However, we still wet-lease freighter capacity from
time to time to reliably meet our cargo customers needs.
In 2004, our cargo business consisted of approximately 69.5% in
courier and freight; 28.3% in wet leases; and 2.2% in mail
service. Of these sub-categories of service, courier traffic has
shown the most growth, and we expect that in the future it will
constitute a larger share of our cargo business.
We recently acquired a cargo management system that allows us to
improve our monitoring, tracking, and pricing capabilities. This
new system includes a reservations module, a web-tracking
system, electronic delivery confirmations and information
management through bar codes. This new system complies with
Cargo 2000 standards, a worldwide quality management system for
the air cargo industry.
Pricing and Revenue Management
We have designed our fare structure to balance our load factors
and yields in a way that we believe will maximize profits on our
flights. We also maintain revenue management policies and
procedures that are intended to maximize total revenues, while
remaining generally competitive with those of our major
competitors.
We charge slightly more for tickets on higher-demand routes,
tickets purchased on short notice and other itineraries
suggesting a passenger would be willing to pay a premium. This
represents strong value to our business customers, who can count
on competitive rates when flying with Copa. The number of seats
we offer at each fare level in each market results from a
continual process of analysis and forecasting. Past booking
history, seasonality, the effects of competition and current
booking trends are used to forecast demand. Current fares and
knowledge of upcoming events at destinations that will affect
traffic volumes are included in our forecasting model to arrive
at optimal seat allocations for our fares on specific routes. We
use a combination of approaches, taking into account yields,
flight load factors and effects on load factors of continuing
traffic, depending on the characteristics of the markets served,
to arrive at a strategy for achieving the best possible revenue
per available seat mile, balancing the average fare charged
against the corresponding effect on our load factors. We
recently replaced our Revenue Management software with a more
sophisticated revenue management system designed by SABRE.
During 2002, we purchased an automated pricing system from SMG
Technologies that allows us to efficiently monitor our
competitors published, unpublished and web fares and
easily file fares with automated services. This gives us the
time to publish competitive fares to and from points in the
United States that we serve via our code-share agreement with
Continental and to analyze the impact of any change on revenue.
The system was fully implemented in February 2004.
Improvements are being made to AeroRepúblicas revenue
management, pricing capabilities and systems that we expect will
be completely in place by early 2006. We are evaluating options
to upgrade AeroRepúblicas revenue management system
with the capability of working more effectively in a low-cost
airline business model.
Relationship with Continental Airlines
In recent years, many airlines have sought to form marketing
alliances with other carriers. Such alliances generally provide
for codesharing, frequent flyer reciprocity, coordinated
scheduling of flights of each alliance member to permit
convenient connections and other joint marketing activities.
Such arrangements permit an airline to market flights operated
by other alliance members as its own. This increases the
destinations, connections and frequencies offered by the
airline, which provide an opportunity for the airline to
increase traffic on flight segments which connect with those of
the alliance partners.
Concurrently with its 49% investment in our company in May 1998,
Continental entered into an alliance agreement, as well as
related services, frequent flyer participation, trademark and
other agreements with Copa. These agreements were initially
signed for a period of ten years. We intend to amend and restate
the major
70
agreements in connection with the offering and extend them
through 2015. Continentals continued ownership of our
shares is not a condition to the ongoing effectiveness of these
agreements. As we coordinate our activities more closely with
our new AeroRepública subsidiary, we may involve the
Colombian carrier in some aspects of our alliance with
Continental. Our alliance with Continental currently enjoys
antitrust immunity in the United States which allows us to
coordinate pricing, scheduling and joint marketing initiatives.
In an effort to maximize the benefit from the relationship,
Continental and Copa work together on the following initiatives:
Product Positioning. Since the start of the alliance with
Continental, we have introduced a new image to align ourselves
more tangibly with the U.S. carrier. Our color scheme,
logo, aircraft interior and staff uniforms are similar to
Continentals. With initiatives such as the introduction of
our business class product Clase Ejecutiva and a
smoke-free cabin, the Copa in-flight product was
modeled on Continentals. Furthermore, our business class
passengers enjoy access to Continentals Presidents
Club business lounges, and we jointly operate a co-branded
Presidents Club lounge with Continental at Tocumen
International Airport.
We have also adopted Continentals OnePass frequent flyer
program globally and on a co-branded basis in Latin America
which has enabled us to develop brand loyalty among business
travelers. The co-branding of the OnePass loyalty programs has
helped us by leveraging the brand recognition that Continental
already enjoyed across Latin America and enabling the two
airlines to compete more effectively against regional
competition such as Grupo TACA and the oneworld alliance
represented by American Airlines and LAN Airlines.
Continental is sponsoring our proposed affiliation with the Sky
Team global alliance network, which also includes Delta,
Northwest, Aeroméxico, Air France, Alitalia, KLM, Korean
Air and CSA Czech.
Code-sharing. We currently place the Copa designator code
on Continental operated flights from Panama to Houston and
Panama to Newark. In addition, flights carrying the Copa code
operate to over 110 other Continental destinations, primarily
through Continentals gateways in Houston and Newark.
Continentals flights from Guatemala City and Managua City
to Houston, and from Guatemala City to Newark also share our
code. In May 2001, the DOT awarded us antitrust immunity for our
code-share agreement, allowing us to deepen the alliance
through, among other things, coordinating schedules and pricing.
The downgrading of the Panamanian AAC to IASAs Category 2
in 2001, although no reflection on our own safety standards,
resulted in the suspension of our code-share status with
Continental until Category 1 status was restored in April 2004.
See Safety.
Aircraft Maintenance & Flight Safety.
Continental and Copa have been cooperating closely to fully
integrate both airlines maintenance programs. Continental
and Copas maintenance programs for the Boeing 737-Next
Generation are identical. We share Continentals Sceptre
inventory management software which allows us to pool spare
parts with the larger airline and we rely on Continental to
provide engineering support for maintenance projects. We have
also been able to take advantage of Continentals
purchasing power and negotiate more competitive rates for spare
parts and third-party maintenance work.
Sales & Revenue Management. The two airlines
recently embarked upon a co-branding of our city ticket offices,
or CTOs, throughout Latin America, and as a result both now
enjoy greater access to this important direct sales channel at
little incremental cost. Joint corporate and travel agency
incentive programs have been launched. Also, a new revenue
management system and team were introduced at Copa under the
direct management of experts brought in from Continental. We
believe that we benefit from Continentals experience in
distribution costs and channel strategy studies, and management
as a whole is gaining an intangible benefit from the high level
of cooperation with Continental.
Information Technology. By leveraging Continentals
expertise and experience, we have implemented several important
information technology systems, such as the Sceptre system for
maintenance and the SHARES computer reservation
system. In November 2000, we transitioned from the SABRE
reservation and airport check-in system to SHARES in
an effort to maintain commonality with Continental.
71
Fleet Modernization. All of our Boeing aircraft share
nearly identical configurations to Continentals
configurations. We have also been able to take advantage of
Continentals greater purchasing power with its suppliers,
including Boeing, thus enabling us to negotiate lower purchase
prices for these new aircraft.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
Sales and Distribution. Approximately 75% of sales during
2004 were through travel agents and other airlines while
approximately 25% were direct sales via our CTOs, our call
centers, our airport counters or our website. Travel agents
receive base commissions, not including back-end incentive
payments, ranging from 0% to 12% depending on the country. The
weighted average rate for these commissions during 2004 was
5.5%. In recent years, base commissions have decreased
significantly in most markets as more efficient back-end
incentive programs have been implemented to reward selected
travel agencies that exceed their sales targets.
Travel agents obtain airline travel information and issue
airline tickets through global distribution systems, or GDSs,
that enable them to make reservations on flights from a large
number of airlines. GDSs are also used by travel agents to make
hotel and car rental reservations. We participate actively in
all major international GDSs, including SABRE, Amadeus, Galileo
and Worldspan. In return for access to these systems, we pay
transaction fees that are generally based on the number of
reservations booked through each system.
We have a sales and marketing network consisting of 78 domestic
and international ticket offices, including airport and city
ticket offices. We have 17 CTOs co-branded with Continental.
Approximately 20.3% and 4.1% of our sales for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were booked through our ticket counters
and our call centers, respectively.
E-tickets, a key component of our sales efforts through the
Internet and our call centers, was launched at the end of 2002
and, by December 2003, E-Ticketing for direct sales, non-revenue
passengers (company business, elite reward travel and
promotional travel), as well as American Airlines and
Continental interline tickets had been implemented. E-tickets
for travel agencies was implemented in the second quarter of
2004.
The call center that operates our reservations and sales
services handles calls from Panama as well as most other
countries we fly to. Such centralization has resulted in a
significant increase in telephone sales as it efficiently
allowed for improvements in service levels such as
24-hour-a-day, 7-days-a-week service.
We encourage the use of direct Internet bookings by our
customers because it is our most efficient distribution channel.
During mid 2002, we signed a contract with Amadeus to use their
booking engine to facilitate ticket purchases on www.copaair.com
and launched the system on January 6, 2003. The cost of
each booking via the website is roughly 25% the cost of a
regular travel agency booking. In 2004, we purchased a new
booking engine in order to further reduce distribution costs,
and 0.8% of our sales were made via our website. Our goal is to
channel more of our total sales through the website.
Advertising and Promotional Activities. Our advertising
and promotional activities include the use of television, print,
radio and billboards, as well as targeted public relation events
in the cities where we fly. We believe that the corporate
traveler is an important part of our business, and we
particularly promote our service to these customers by conveying
the reliability, convenience and consistency of our service and
offering value-added services such as convention and conference
travel arrangements, as well as our Business Rewards loyalty
program for our frequent corporate travelers. We also promote
package deals among the destinations where we fly through
combined efforts with selected hotels and travel agencies.
AeroRepública does not currently have a mileage-based
frequent flyer program but instead offers one free ticket to
passengers for every five purchased trips. We are in the process
of implementing the OnePass frequent flyer program at
AeroRepública. AeroRepública is also in the process of
implementing e-ticketing and expects to complete implementation
by December 2005 to complement its call center, 26 city ticket
72
offices and 11 airport ticket offices. We believe e-ticketing
will improve passenger convenience and reduce commission costs.
In 2004, approximately 75% of AeroRepúblicas sales
were made through travel agencies and 25% were made directly to
passengers.
Competition
We face intense competition throughout our route network.
Overall airline industry profit margins are low and industry
earnings are volatile. Airlines compete in the areas of pricing,
scheduling (frequency and flight times), on-time performance,
frequent flyer programs and other services. Copa competes with a
number of other airlines that currently serve the routes on
which we operate, including Grupo TACA, American Airlines Inc.,
LAN Airlines S.A. and Avianca. Some of our competitors, such as
American Airlines, have larger customer bases and greater brand
recognition in the markets we serve outside Panama, and some of
our competitors have significantly greater financial and
marketing resources than we have. Airlines based in other
countries may also receive subsidies, tax incentives or other
state aid from their respective governments, which are not
provided by the Panamanian government. The commencement of, or
increase in, service on the routes we serve by existing or new
carriers could negatively impact our operating results.
Likewise, competitors service on routes that we are
targeting for expansion may make those expansion plans less
attractive. We must constantly react to changes in prices and
services offered by our competitors to remain competitive.
Traditional hub-and-spoke carriers in the United States and
Europe have in recent years faced substantial and increasing
competitive pressure from low-cost carriers offering discounted
fares. The low-cost carriers operations are typically
characterized by point-to-point route networks focusing on the
highest demand city pairs, high aircraft utilization, single
class service and fewer in-flight amenities. As evidenced by the
operations of Gol in Brazil and several new low-cost carriers
planning to start service in Mexico, among others, the
low-cost carrier business model appears to be
gaining acceptance in the Latin American aviation industry, and
we may face new and substantial competition from low-cost
carriers in the future.
The main source of competition to Copa, and our alliance with
Continental, comes from the multinational Grupo TACA and its
alliance partner, American Airlines, the U.S. airline with
the largest Latin American route network. Colombian carrier
Avianca and Chilean carrier LAN Airlines are also significant
competitors.
Grupo TACAs strategy has been to develop three hubs at
San Jose, Costa Rica, San Salvador, El Salvador
and Lima, Peru, which serve more than 40 cities in 19
countries and compete with Copas hub at Tocumen
International Airport. In addition, Grupo TACAs strategic
alliance with American Airlines has enabled it to utilize
American Airlines Latin American hub in Miami. Grupo TACA
also has alliances with Iberia and Air France. Grupo TACA
primarily operates a fleet of Airbus A319 and A320 aircraft and
they intend to take delivery of a significant number of new
Airbus aircraft between now and December 2009. We have routes to
several of the Central American republics where Grupo TACA has
established service, including Managua, Nicaragua,
San Jose, Costa Rica and Guatemala. Grupo TACA places its
code on our flights between San Salvador and Managua. Grupo
TACA lowered many of its fares a year ago in an effort to
generate higher demand, and we have been forced to respond by
adjusting our fares to remain competitive on the affected
routes. It is premature to determine whether or not Grupo
TACAs recent fare reductions represent the commencement of
its transition to a new business model. Such a transition could
result in significant and lasting downward pressure on the fares
we charge for flights on the routes on which we compete with
Grupo TACA.
American Airlines also offers significant competition. American
attracts strong brand recognition throughout the Americas and is
able to attract brand loyalty through its AAdvantage
frequent flyer program. American Airlines competes through its
hubs at Miami and San Juan, Puerto Rico. American Airlines
was a founding member of the oneworld global marketing alliance.
LAN Airlines is another oneworld member that offers service to
more than 50 destinations, primarily in Latin America. LAN
Airlines is comprised of LAN Chile, LAN Peru, LAN Ecuador, LAN
Argentina, LAN Cargo and LAN Express. While we do not compete
directly with LAN Airlines on many of our current routes,
73
LAN Airlines has grown rapidly over the past several years and
may become a more significant competitor in the future.
We are also introducing service to and from destinations where
the local airline is less viable and competitive, such as the
Dominican Republic (Santo Domingo), Ecuador (Quito and
Guayaquil) and Venezuela (Caracas). Several smaller airlines
also compete in Central America, including AeroHonduras and
Tikal Jets.
Copa has also established itself as a significant player on
traffic to and from Colombia, with strong market share on routes
to and from Barranquilla, Bogotá, Cali, Cartagena,
Medellín and San Andrés. AeroRepública
competes more directly with Avianca and other Colombian carriers
in the Colombian domestic market. Avianca recently emerged from
U.S. bankruptcy protection, after being purchased by
Brazils Synergy Group. The new owners of Avianca have
announced their intention to increase Aviancas market
share and transform Bogotá into a major international
aviation hub which, if successful, will compete directly with
our hub at Tocumen International Airport. We cannot predict
whether Avianca will become more competitive under its new
management, or if their increased operations from Bogotá
will prove successful. The other Colombian carriers against
which AeroRepública competes, Aires, Aerolineas de
Antioquia and the state-owned airline Satena, collectively
accounted for approximately 25% of the domestic Colombian market
in 2004. Airlines that seek to compete in the Colombian air
transportation market face substantial barriers to entry, as the
Colombian government requires an airline to operate at least
five aircraft and comply with extensive filing and certification
requirements before it becomes eligible to receive domestic
route rights on certain Colombian routes between major cities.
In addition, the number of air carriers offering service on any
route is currently regulated by the Colombian Aviation Authority.
With respect to our cargo operations, we will continue to face
competition from all of the major airfreight companies, most
notably DHL, which has a large cargo hub operation at Tocumen
International Airport.
Aircraft
As of September 30, 2005 Copa operated a fleet consisting
of 22 aircraft, including 18 Boeing 737-700 Next Generation
aircraft and four Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft. In
the first quarter of 2005, we discontinued use of our remaining
Boeing 737-200 aircraft. On November 16, 2005, we accepted
delivery on the first of our twelve firm commitments to purchase
the Embraer 190. We currently have firm orders to purchase seven
additional Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and eleven
Embraer 190s. We also have options for an additional 18 Embraer
190s and purchase rights for an additional ten 737-Next
Generation aircraft, some of which may be used to purchase
aircraft for our AeroRepública subsidiary.
The current composition of the Copa fleet as of
September 30, 2005 is more fully described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Aircraft | |
|
of Lease | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average Age | |
|
Seating | |
|
|
Total | |
|
Owned | |
|
Leased | |
|
(Years) | |
|
(Years) | |
|
Capacity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Boeing 737-700
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Boeing 737-800
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
As of September 30, 2005, the Copa fleet consisted of 18
Boeing 737-700s (six of which we leased) and four Boeing
737-800s (one of which we leased). Our fleet will continue to
center on the Boeing 737-700 model, although we will continue to
add Boeing 737-800s to our fleet in order to cover high-demand
routes and Embraer 190s to serve underserved markets as well as
fly additional frequencies where we believe excess demand
exists. The table below describes the expected development of
our Copa fleet until December 31, 2009.
Expected Fleet Plan (Year End)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Type |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
737-200
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737-700
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
737-800(1)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Embraer 190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fleet
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We have the option to take delivery of Boeing 737-700s rather
than Boeing 737-800s for deliveries scheduled after 2006. |
The Boeing 737-700 and Boeing 737-800 aircraft currently in our
fleet are fuel-efficient and suit our operations well for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
They have simplified maintenance procedures. |
|
|
|
They require just one type of standardized training for our
crews. |
|
|
|
They have one of the lowest operating costs in their class. |
Our focus on profitable operations means that we periodically
review our fleet composition. As a result, our fleet composition
changes over time when we conclude that adding other types of
aircraft will help us achieve this goal. The introduction of any
new type of aircraft to our fleet is only done if, after careful
consideration, we determine that such a step will improve our
profitability. In line with this philosophy, after conducting a
careful cost-benefit analysis, we decided to add the Embraer 190
aircraft because its combination of smaller size and highly
efficient operating characteristics made it the ideal aircraft
to serve new mid-sized markets and to increase frequency to
existing destinations. The Embraer 190 incorporates advanced
design features, such as integrated avionics, fly-by-wire flight
controls, and efficient CF34-10 engines made by General
Electric. The Embraer E190 is expected to have a range of
approximately 2,000 nautical miles enabling it to fly to a wide
range of destinations from short-haul to certain medium-haul
destinations. We will configure our Embraer aircraft with a
business class section similar to the business class section we
have on our Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft.
Through several special purpose vehicles, we currently have
beneficial ownership of 16 of our aircraft, including our new
Embraer 190. In addition, we lease six of our Boeing 737-700s
and one of our Boeing 737-800s under long-term operating lease
agreements that have an average remaining term of
68 months. Leasing some of our aircraft provides us with
flexibility to change our fleet composition if we consider it to
be in our best interests to do so. We make monthly rental
payments, some of which are based on floating rates, but are not
required to make termination payments at the end of the lease.
Currently, we do not have purchase options in any of our lease
agreements. Under our operating lease agreements, we are
required in some cases to maintain maintenance reserve accounts
and in other cases to make supplemental rent payments at the end
of the lease that are calculated with reference to the
aircrafts maintenance schedule. In either case, we must
return the aircraft in the agreed upon condition at the end of
the lease term. Title to the aircraft remains with the lessor.
We are responsible for the maintenance, servicing, insurance,
repair and overhaul of the aircraft during the term of the lease.
To respond to and cater to the growing number of business
travelers, we introduced business class (Clase Ejecutiva)
in November of 1998. Our business class service features twelve
luxury seats in the Boeing 737-700s with a 38-inch pitch,
upgraded meal service, special check-in desks, bonus mileage for
full-fare
75
business class passengers and access to VIP lounges. Our Boeing
737-800s are configured with 14 business class seats. Our
Embraer 190s will have 10 business class seats in a three
abreast configuration and 38-inch pitch.
Each of our Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft is powered by
two CFM International Model CFM 56-7B engines. We currently
have three spare engines for service replacements and for
periodic rotation through our fleet.
AeroRepública currently operates a fleet of two owned
DC-9s, five leased MD-81s, three leased MD-82s and two leased
MD-83s with an average age in excess of 20 years.
AeroRepública expects to take delivery of one additional
MD-82 aircraft in 2005. All of the AeroRepública fleet is
configured as a single class, with the MD fleet having an
average capacity of 157 seats and the DC-9 fleet having an
average capacity of 110 seats.
Maintenance
The maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided into
two general categories: line and heavy maintenance. Line
maintenance consists of routine, scheduled maintenance checks on
our aircraft, including pre-flight, daily and overnight checks,
A-checks and any diagnostics and routine repairs.
Most of our line maintenance is performed by our own highly
experienced technicians at our base in Panama. Some line
maintenance is also carried out at the foreign stations by Copa
employees or third-party contractors. Heavy maintenance consists
of more complex inspections and overhauls, including
C-checks, and servicing of the aircraft that cannot
be accomplished during an overnight visit. Maintenance checks
are performed as defined by the aircraft manufacturer. These
checks are based on the number of hours or calendar months
flown. We contract with certified outside maintenance providers,
such as Goodrich Aviation Technical Services, Inc. in Everett,
Washington, which is certified as an authorized repair station
by the FAA and the AAC, for heavy aircraft maintenance services.
We also have an exclusive long-term contract with GE Engines
whereby they will perform maintenance on all of our CFM-56
engines. In 2004, outside contractors performed airframe heavy
maintenance on four of our aircraft. When possible, we attempt
to schedule heavy maintenance during our lower-demand season in
April, May, October and November.
We employ over 200 maintenance professionals, including
engineers, supervisors, technicians and mechanics, who perform
maintenance in accordance with maintenance programs that are
established by the manufacturer and approved and certified by
international aviation authorities. Every mechanic is trained in
factory procedures and goes through our own rigorous in-house
training program. Every mechanic is licensed by the AAC and
approximately 22 of our mechanics are also licensed by the FAA.
Our safety and maintenance procedures are reviewed and
periodically audited by the aircraft manufacturer, the AAC, the
FAA, IATA and, to a lesser extent, every foreign country to
which we fly. Our maintenance facility at Tocumen International
Airport has been certified by the FAA as an approved repair
station, and each year the FAA inspects our facilities to renew
the certification. Our aircraft are initially covered by
warranties that have a term of four years, resulting in lower
maintenance expenses during the period of coverage. As part of
the purchase agreement for the new Embraer 190s, several of our
mechanics are enrolled in a comprehensive factory training
course on the maintenance program for the Embraer 190s. All of
our mechanics will eventually be trained to perform line
maintenance on the Embraer 190s.
All maintenance for AeroRepúblicas DC-9s and line
maintenance for the MD-80s is performed by
AeroRepúblicas in-house maintenance staff, while
C-checks on the MD-80s are performed by FAA certified
third-party aviation maintenance companies. All of
AeroRepúblicas maintenance and safety procedures are
performed according to Boeing standards (certified by the FAA),
and certified by the Aeronáutica Civil of Colombia and
BVQi, the institute that issues ISO quality certificates. All of
AeroRepúblicas maintenance personnel are licensed by
the Aeronáutica Civil of Colombia.
76
Safety
We place a high priority on providing safe and reliable air
service. We have uniform safety standards and safety-related
training programs that cover all of our operations. In
particular, we periodically evaluate the skills, experience and
safety records of our pilots in order to maintain strict control
over the quality of our pilot crews. All of our pilots
participate in training programs, some of which are sponsored by
aircraft manufacturers, and all are required to undergo
recurrent training two times per year. We have a full time
program of Flight Data Analysis (FOQA) wherein the flight
data from every Copa flight is analyzed for safety or technical
anomalies. During 2005, Copa Airlines completed a Line
Operations Safety Audit under contract with University of Texas
researchers. We also recently successfully completed our IATA
Operational Safety Audit (IOSA).
In the last ten years, Copa has had no accidents or incidents
involving major injury to passengers, crew or aircraft. Over
thirteen years ago, we lost one aircraft and all of its
passengers in an accident believed to have been caused by
failure of a navigation instrument. Just prior to our
acquisition of AeroRepública, one of its planes slid off of
a runway in an accident without serious injuries to passengers;
however, the aircraft was severely damaged and declared a total
loss by its insurers.
The FAA periodically audits the aviation regulatory authorities
of other countries. As a result of their investigation, each
country is given an International Aviation Safety Assessment, or
IASA, rating. In May 2001, Panamas IASA rating was
downgraded from Category 1 to Category 2 due to alleged
deficiencies in the Panamanian governments air safety
standards and AACs capability to provide regulatory
oversight. As a result of this downgrade, we were prevented from
adding flights to new destinations in the United States and from
certifying new aircraft for flights to the United States, and
Continental was prevented from placing its code on our flights.
On April 14, 2004, the FAA upgraded the IASA rating for
Panama from Category 2 to Category 1,
which indicates a strong level of confidence in the safety
regulation of the AAC. The return to Category 1 allowed
Continental to reestablish placing its code on our flights and
allowed us to add new U.S. destinations to our network.
In order to recover Category 1 status, the Panamanian government
passed a new law regulating aviation; and the AAC issued new
regulations compliant with standards of the International Civil
Aviation Organization, or ICAO. FAA inspectors and ICAO advisors
were hired to help with training; and the government approved a
budget of $14 million for the AAC to comply with various
regulations of ICAO.
Airport Facilities
We believe that our hub at Panama Citys Tocumen
International Airport (PTY) is an excellent base of
operations for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Panamas consistently temperate climate is ideal for
airport operations. For example, Tocumen was closed and
unavailable for flight operations for a total of less than two
hours in each 2003 and 2004. |
|
|
|
Tocumen is the only airport in Central America with two
operational runways. Also unlike some other regional airports,
we are currently not constrained by a lack of available
gates/parking positions at Tocumen, and there is ample room to
expand Tocumen. |
|
|
|
From Panamas central location, our 124-seat Boeing
737-700s can efficiently serve long-haul destinations in South
American cities such as Santiago, Chile; Buenos Aires,
Argentina; and São Paulo, Brazil as well as short-haul
destinations in Central and South America. |
|
|
|
Travelers can generally make connections easily through Tocumen
because of its manageable size and Panamas policies
accommodating in-transit passengers. |
Tocumen International Airport is operated by an independent
corporate entity established by the government, where
stakeholders have a say in the operation and development of the
airport. A Copa executive, as a representative of the Panamanian
Airline Association, holds a seat on the board of this airport
operator. The law that created this entity also provided for a
significant portion of revenues generated at Tocumen to be used
for airport expansion and improvements. We do not have any
formal, written agreements with the airport
77
management that govern access fees, landing rights or allocation
of terminal gates. We rely upon our good working relationship
with the airports management and the Panamanian government
to ensure that we have access to the airport resources we need
at prices that are reasonable.
We have worked closely with the airports management and
consulted with the IATA infrastructure group to provide plans
and guidance for Phase I of an airport expansion that will
provide up to eight new gate positions with jet bridges, six new
remote parking positions, expand retail areas and improve the
baggage-handling facilities. The government has authorized
$70 million to cover the costs of this expansion. In April
2004, Leo A. Daly, an American company whose experience includes
the renovation of the Miami, Dallas and Washington, D.C.
(Reagan) airports, won the bid to remodel and expand the
terminal. Work on Phase I is expected to be completed by
the first quarter of 2006. We are considering an increased role
for Copa in facilitating a planned Phase II of the airport
expansion that would add another five gates to the airport.
We provide all of our own ground services and handling of
passengers and cargo at Tocumen International Airport. In
addition, we provide services to several of the principal
foreign airlines that operate at Tocumen. At most of the foreign
airports where we operate, foreign airport services companies
provide all of our support services other than sales, counter
services and some minor maintenance.
We lease a variety of facilities at Tocumen, including our
maintenance hangar and our operations facilities in the airport
terminal. From our System Operations Control Center located at
Tocumen International Airport, we dispatch, track and direct our
aircraft throughout the hemisphere and respond to operational
contingencies as necessary. We generally cooperate with the
airport authority to modify the lease terms as necessary to
account for capital improvements and expansion plans. Currently,
our elite passengers have access to a Presidents Club at
the airport, which is jointly operated with Continental and was
opened in March 2000. The Presidents Club will be expanded
to approximately twice its current size as part of the Tocumen
International Airport expansion project.
Bogotas El Dorado Airport is AeroRepúblicas
main operating terminal. It is also Colombias main
international and domestic terminal, with two operational
runways. El Dorado is undergoing a privatization process in
which improvements are expected to the passenger and cargo
terminals. AeroRepública currently leases a variety of
facilities at El Dorado, including counters, maintenance and
administrative and dispatch areas.
Fuel
Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many
global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither
control nor accurately predict. Due to its inherent volatility,
aircraft fuel has historically been our most unpredictable unit
cost. Concurrent with the worlds economic recovery, demand
for oil has surged, especially in fast-growing China. This
increase in demand coupled with limited refinery capacity and
instability in oil-exporting countries has led to a rapid
increase in prices. When combined with the relative weakness of
the U.S. dollar, the currency in which oil is traded, these
factors have caused a record high price for oil in nominal
dollar terms.
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Fuel Data | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Copa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per gallon of jet fuel into plane (excluding
hedge) (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
Gallons consumed (in thousands)
|
|
|
43,187 |
|
|
|
46,669 |
|
|
|
44,788 |
|
|
|
48,444 |
|
|
|
50,833 |
|
|
|
43,332 |
|
|
Available seat miles (in millions)
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
3,639 |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
Gallons per ASM (in hundredths)
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
AeroRepública(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per gallon of jet fuel into plane
(excluding hedge) (in U.S. dollars) |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
Gallons consumed (in thousands) |
|
|
10,985 |
|
Available seat miles (in millions) |
|
|
575 |
|
Gallons per ASM (in hundredths) |
|
|
1.91 |
|
During 2004, we paid an average price, including into plane
charges, of $1.32 per gallon of jet fuel; a 30.7% increase
from 2003s rate of $1.01 per gallon. On a per unit
basis, our consumption did not increase in line with the rise in
the cost of jet fuel due to the replacement of older, less fuel
efficient Boeing 737-200s with new Boeing 737-Next Generation
aircraft. Based on our experience, the Boeing 737-Next
Generation family is 15-20% more fuel efficient than first
generation Boeing 737 models. We have equipped all of our Boeing
737-Next Generation Aircraft with winglets which are believed to
increase their fuel efficiency by approximately 4%. All of our
new Embraer 190s will also be equipped with winglets.
Since 2004, the price of jet fuel has continued to climb. The
continued increase in prices was exacerbated by the disruptions
in refining capacity caused by Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane
Rita. During the month ended September 30, 2005, we paid an
average of $2.15 per gallon for jet fuel. We cannot predict
when, or if, these prices will decline in the future.
Since 1998, we have had a policy of consistently hedging a
portion of our exposure to fluctuations in world fuel prices. In
2004, we hedged 31% of our requirements through the use of swap
and zero-cost collar transactions. We have hedged only 15% of
our anticipated fuel needs for 2005, and therefore any prolonged
increase in the price of jet fuel will likely materially and
negatively affect our business, financial condition and results
of operation.
AeroRepública is supplied by two fuel providers. The price
for fuel is fixed by the Colombian government on a monthly basis
based on international fuel indices. Although AeroRepública
does not currently have a hedging policy, it expects to
implement one in the future.
Employees
We believe that our growth potential and the achievement of our
results-oriented corporate goals are directly linked to our
ability to attract, motivate and maintain the best professionals
available in the airline business. In order to help retain our
employees, we encourage open communication channels between our
employees and management. Our CEO meets quarterly with all of
our employees in Panama in town hall-style meetings during which
he explains the companys performance and encourages
feedback from attendees. A similar presentation is made by our
senior executives at each of our foreign stations. Our
compensation strategy reinforces our determination to retain
talented and highly motivated employees and is designed to align
the interests of our employees with our shareholders through
profit-sharing. Our competitive compensation and culture of
concern for our employees have led to over 90% of our employees
reporting that they are satisfied with their job and awards
among Latin American employers for high levels of employee
satisfaction.
79
Our profit-sharing program reflects our belief that our
employees will remain dedicated to our success if they have a
stake in that success. We identify key performance drivers
within each employees control as part of our annual
objectives plan, or Path to Success. Typically, we
pay bonuses in February based on our performance during the
preceding calendar year. For members of management, 75% of the
bonus amount is based on the our performance as a whole and 25%
is based on the achievement of individual goals. Bonuses for
non-management employees is based on the companys
performance, and is typically a multiple of the employees
weekly salary. For 2004, the non-management employees received
five or six weeks salary, depending on their position. The
bonus payments are at the discretion of our compensation
committee. We typically make accruals each month for the
expected annual bonuses, which are reconciled to actual payments
at their dispersal in February.
We maintain generally good relations with our union and
non-union employees and have not experienced work stoppages for
the past twenty years. Approximately 78% of Copas
employees are located in Panama, while the remaining 22% are
distributed among our stations. Copas employees can be
categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pilots
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Flight Attendants
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
Mechanics
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Customer Service Agents, Reservation Agents, Ramp and Other
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
Management and Clerical
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employees
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide training for all of our employees including technical
training for our pilots, dispatchers, flight attendants and
other technical staff. In addition, we provide recurrent
customer service training to frontline staff, as well as
leadership training for managers. We recently invested in a
Level B flight simulator for 737-Next Generation training
that will serve 80% of our initial training, transition and
upgrade training and 100% of our recurrent training needs
relating to that aircraft after it is delivered.
Approximately 59% of Copas employees are unionized. There
are currently five unions covering our employees in Panama: the
pilots union (SIPAC); the flight attendants union
(SIPANAB); the mechanics union (SINTECMAP); the traffic
attendants union (UTRACOPA); and a generalized union,
SIELAS, which represents ground personnel, messengers, drivers,
counter agents and other non-executive administrative staff.
After negotiations, we entered into a new collective bargaining
agreement with SIELAS on October 26, 2005. We will begin
negotiations for new collective bargaining agreements with
SINTECMAP and SIPANAB near the end of this year. Our next
negotiation with the pilots union will begin around the
middle of 2008. Typically, our collective bargaining agreements
in Panama have a four year term. We also have agreements with
employees in São Paulo, Brazil and Mexico. We have
traditionally experienced good relations with our unions, and we
generally agree to terms in line with the economic environment
affecting Panama, our company and the airline industry
generally. Approximately 8% of Copas employees work
part-time.
AeroRepúblicas pilots and flight attendants are
represented by two separate unions. The pilots union,
Asociación Colombiana de Aviadores Civiles (ACDAC),
represents 96 of AeroRepúblicas 112 pilots and
co-pilots. The flight attendants union, Asociación
Colombiana de Auxiliares de Vuelo (ACAV), represents all of
AeroRepúblicas 178 flight attendants. Contracts with
both unions were signed or affirmed in May 2005 with customary
increases in wages and benefits that provide for annual salary
increases of two percent in addition to adjustments to reflect
inflation. The agreement with the pilots union will be in
effect until the end of 2006, and the agreement with the flight
attendants union will be in effect until March 2008. In
general our relationships with the labor unions representing
AeroRepúblicas employees are believed to be good as
reflected by the agreements reached this year.
80
Insurance
We maintain passenger liability insurance in an amount
consistent with industry practice, and we insure our aircraft
against losses and damages on an all risks basis. We
have obtained all insurance coverage required by the terms of
our leasing and financing agreements. We believe our insurance
coverage is consistent with airline industry standards and
appropriate to protect us from material loss in light of the
activities we conduct. No assurance can be given, however, that
the amount of insurance we carry will be sufficient to protect
us from material losses. We recently negotiated lower premiums
on our insurance policies by leveraging the purchasing power of
our alliance partner, Continental. Our Copa operations are
insured under Continentals joint insurance policy with
Northwest Airlines. We maintain separate insurance policies for
our AeroRepública operations.
Intellectual Property
We believe that the Copa brand has strong value and indicates
superior service and value in the Latin American travel
industry. We have registered the trademarks Copa and
Copa Airlines with the trademark office in Panama
and have filed requests for registration in other countries,
including the United States. We license certain brands,
logos and trade dress under the trademark license agreement with
Continental related to our alliance. We will have the right to
continue to use our current logos on our aircraft for up to five
years after the end of the alliance agreement term.
AeroRepúblicas has registered its name as a trademark
in Colombia for the next ten years, and plans to register its
trademark in Panama, Ecuador, Venezuela and Peru.
We operate a number of software products under licenses from our
vendors, including our booking engine, our automated pricing
system from SMG Technologies, our SABRE revenue management
software and our Cargo Management system. Under our agreements
with Boeing, we also use a large amount of Boeings
proprietary information to maintain our aircraft. The loss of
these software systems or technical support information from
Boeing could negatively affect our business.
Properties
We have recently moved into a newly built headquarters building
located six miles away from Tocumen International Airport. We
have agreed to lease five floors consisting of approximately
104,000 square feet of the building from Desarollo
Inmobiliario del Este, S.A., an entity controlled by the same
group of investors that controls CIASA, under a 10-year lease at
a rate of $106,000 per month during the first three years,
$110,000 per month from year 4 to year 6, $113,000
from year 7 to year 9 and $116,000 per month in
year 10, which we believe to be a market rate. We are in
the process of selling our previous headquarters building in
Panama City and currently expect to complete the sale in 2006.
At Tocumen International Airport, we lease a maintenance hangar,
operations offices in the terminal, counter space, parking
spaces and other operational properties from the entity that
manages the airport. We pay approximately $82,000 per month
for this leased property. Around Panama City, we also lease
various office spaces, parking spaces and other properties from
a variety of lessors, for which we pay approximately
$20,000 per month in the aggregate.
In each of our destination cities, we also lease space at the
airport for check-in, reservations and airport ticket office
sales, and we lease space for CTOs in more than 25 of those
cities.
AeroRepública leases most of its airport and city ticket
offices. Owned properties include one city ticket office, a
warehouse close to the airport and one floor in a high-rise
building in downtown Bogotá.
81
Environmental
Our operations are covered by various local, national, and
international environmental regulations. These regulations
cover, among other things, emissions into the atmosphere,
disposal of solid waste and aqueous effluents, aircraft noise
and other activities that result from the operation of aircraft.
Our aircraft comply with all environmental standards applicable
to their operations as described in this prospectus. We have
hired a consulting firm to conduct an environmental audit of our
hanger and support facilities at the Tocumen International
Airport to determine what, if any, measures we need to implement
in order to satisfy the Panamanian effluent standards and the
General Environmental Law at those facilities. We plan to
implement all measures required for compliance once the audit is
completed. Additionally, the Panamanian Civil Aviation Code
(RAC) contains certain environmental provisions that are
similar to those set forth in the General Environmental Law
regarding effluents, although said provisions do not contain
compliance grace periods. In the event the AAC determines that
our facilities do not currently meet the RAC standards, we could
be subject to a fine. The measures that will be implemented
pursuant to the environmental audit that is underway will also
satisfy the requirements of the RAC. We expect these measures to
be tentatively in operation by 2006. While we do not believe
that compliance with these regulations will expose us to
material expenditures, compliance with these or other
environmental regulations, whether new or existing, that may be
applicable to us in the future could increase our costs. In
addition, failure to comply with these regulations could
adversely affect us in a variety of ways, including adverse
effects on our reputation.
Litigation
In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various
legal actions, which we believe are incidental to the operation
of our business. While legal proceedings are inherently
uncertain, we believe that the outcome of the proceedings to
which we are currently a party are not likely to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows. The Antitrust Administrative Agency
(Comisión de Libre Competencia y Asuntos del
Consumidor, or CLICAC), together with a group of travel
agencies, have filed an antitrust lawsuit against Copa,
Continental, American Airlines, Grupo TACA and Delta Airlines in
the Panamanian Commercial Tribunal alleging monopolistic
practices in reducing travel agents commissions. The
outcome of this lawsuit is still uncertain and may take several
years. We believe that in the worst scenario the airlines could
be required to pay up to $20 million. In addition, ACES, a
now-defunct Colombian airline, filed an antitrust lawsuit
against Copa, Avianca and SAM, alleging monopolistic practices
in relation to their code-sharing agreements. This case is
currently in the discovery period and could take several years
to be resolved. If Copa, Avianca and/or SAM were found at fault
and in breach of antitrust legislation, they could be
potentially liable for up to $11 million.
82
REGULATION
Panama
Panamanian law requires airlines providing commercial services
in Panama to hold an Operation Certificate and an Air
Transportation License/ Certificate issued by the AAC. The Air
Transportation Certificate specifies the routes, equipment used,
capacity, and the frequency of flights. This certificate must be
updated every time Copa acquires new aircraft, or when routes
and frequencies to a particular destination are modified.
Panamanian law also requires that the aircraft operated by Copa
be registered with the Panamanian National Aviation Registrar
kept by the AAC, and that the Panamanian National Aviation
authority certify the airworthiness of each aircraft in
Copas fleet. This requirement does not apply to
AeroRepublicas aircraft which are registered in Colombia.
Copas aircraft must be re-certified every year.
The government of the Republic of Panama does not have an equity
interest in our company. Panamanian government officials have
typically worked closely with us to establish policies that
benefit both our company and the country. Bilateral agreements
signed by the government of Panama have protected our
operational position and route network, allowing us to have in
Panama a significant hub to transport intra-region traffic
within and between the Americas and the Caribbean. All
international fares are filed and technically subject to the
approval of the Panamanian government. Historically, we have
been able to modify ticket prices on a daily basis to respond to
market conditions.
We cooperated with the government of Panama to restore the
countrys Category 1 status after it was downgraded to
Category 2 in early May 2001 by the FAA, a status that is
important both to the operations of Copa as an airline and the
general perception of Panama as a country, particularly in view
of the fact that a major initiative is in place to boost tourism
in Panama. The countrys Category 1 status was restored
April 2004. In meeting the requirements for Category 1 status,
the Panamanian government approved $14 million for the AAC
to comply with various regulations of the ICAO, and AAC
personnel are currently receiving training on Embraer
airworthiness certification so they will continue to be
qualified to evaluate our pilots and aircraft.
Our status as a private carrier means that we are not required
under Panamanian law to serve any particular route and are free
to withdraw service from any of the routes we currently serve as
we see fit, subject to bilateral agreements. We are also free to
determine the frequency of service we offer across our route
network without any minimum frequencies imposed by the
Panamanian authorities.
The most significant restriction on our company imposed by the
Panamanian Aviation Act, as amended and interpreted to date, is
that Panamanian nationals must exercise effective
control over the operations of the airline and must
maintain substantial ownership. These phrases are
not defined in the Aviation Act itself and it is unclear how a
Panamanian court would interpret them. The share ownership
requirements and transfer restrictions contained in our Articles
of Incorporation, as well as the structure of our capital stock
described under the caption Description of Capital
Stock, are designed to ensure compliance with these
ownership and control restrictions created by the Aviation Act.
While we believe that our proposed ownership structure after
giving effect to the offering will comply with the ownership and
control restrictions of the Aviation Act as interpreted by a
recent decree by the Executive Branch, we cannot assure you that
a Panamanian court would share our interpretation of the
Aviation Act or the decree or that any such interpretations
would remain valid for the entire time you hold our Class A
shares.
Although the Panamanian government does not currently have the
authority to dictate the terms of our service, the government is
responsible for negotiating the bilateral agreements with other
nations that allow us to fly to other countries. Several of
these agreements require Copa to remain effectively
controlled and substantially owned by
Panamanian nationals in order for us to use the rights conferred
by the agreements. Such requirements are analogous to the
Panamanian aviation law described above that requires Panamanian
control of our business.
83
During 1997, several Central American countries (including
Panama) and the United States signed an open-skies agreement
allowing carriers from each country to initiate service in any
other. There is no bilateral agreement between Panama and either
El Salvador or Costa Rica, the nations in which Grupo TACA has
its principal hubs. Panama only has reciprocity agreements with
these countries at present.
|
|
|
Antitrust regulation, enforcement |
In 1996, the Republic of Panama enacted antitrust legislation,
which regulates industry concentration and vertical
anticompetitive practices and prohibits horizontal collusion.
The Free Trade and Consumer Affairs Commission is in charge of
enforcement and may impose fines only after a competent court
renders an adverse judgment. The law also provides for direct
action by any affected market participant or consumer,
independently or though class actions. The law does not provide
for the granting of antitrust immunity, as is the case in the
United States.
|
|
|
Noise regulations effects |
Panama has adopted Annex 16 of the ICAO regulations and the
noise abatement provisions of ICAO, through Book XIV of the
Panamanian Civil Aviation Regulations (RAC). Thus, articles
227-229 of Book XIV of the RAC require aircraft registered
in Panama to comply with at least Stage 2 noise
requirements, and all aircraft registered for the first time
with the Panamanian Civil Aviation Authority after
January 1, 2003, to comply with Stage 3 noise
restrictions. Currently, all the airplanes we operate or have on
order meet the most stringent noise requirements established by
both ICAO and the AAC.
Colombia
The Colombian aviation market is heavily regulated by the
Colombian Civil Aviation Administration, Unidad Especial
Administrativa de Aeronáutica Civil, or
Aeronáutica Civil. Colombia is a Category 1 country under
the FAAs IASA program. With respect to domestic aviation,
airlines must present feasibility studies to secure specific
route rights, and no airline may serve the city pairs with the
most traffic unless that airline has at least five aircraft with
their airworthiness certificates in force. In addition,
Aeronáutica Civil sets minimum and maximum fares for each
route and a maximum number of competing airlines for each route
based on the size of the city pairs served. Airlines in Colombia
must also add a surcharge for fuel to their ticket prices.
Passengers in Colombia are also entitled by law to compensation
in cases of delays in excess of four hours, over-bookings and
cancellations. Currently, only the Cali, Cartagena and
Barranquilla airports are under private management arrangements.
However, the government has stated its intention of privatizing
other airports in order to finance necessary expansion projects
and increase the efficiency of operations, which may lead to
increases in landing fees and facility rentals at those airports.
AeroRepública may not have as much productive cooperation
with the Colombian government over the negotiation of route
rights with other countries as we may enjoy in Panama. Colombia
has open-skies agreements with the Andean Pact (Comunidad
Andina) nations of Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela.
AeroRepública has been recently granted the use of 14 of
the 39 available route rights for service by Colombian carriers
between Colombia and Panama. We expect that these rights will
allow AeroRepública to begin scheduled service between the
two countries in late 2005. AeroRepública currently has the
right to fly from Bogotá to Caracas, Venezuela and back.
There are currently no route rights available to the United
States from Colombia.
U.S. Airline Regulation
Operations to the United States by non-U.S. airlines, such
as Copa, are subject to Title 49 of the U.S. Code,
under which the DOT, the FAA and the TSA exercise regulatory
authority. The U.S. Department of Justice also has
jurisdiction over airline competition matters under the federal
antitrust laws.
Authorizations and Licenses. The DOT has jurisdiction
over international aviation with respect to the United States
and related route authorities, subject to review by the
President of the United States. The DOT also has jurisdiction
with respect to unfair practices and methods of competition by
airlines and related
84
consumer protection matters. We are authorized by the DOT to
engage in scheduled and charter air transportation services,
including the transportation of persons, property
(cargo) and mail, or combinations thereof, between points
in Panama and points in the United States and beyond (via
intermediate points in other countries). We hold the necessary
authorizations from the DOT in the form of a foreign air carrier
permit, an exemption authority and statements of authorization
to conduct our current operations to and from the United States.
The exemption authority was granted by the DOT in February 1998.
This exemption authority was due to expire in February 2000.
However, the authority remains in effect by operation of law
under the terms of the Administrative Procedure Act pending
final DOT action on the application we filed to renew the
authority on January 3, 2000. There can be no assurance
that the DOT will grant the application. Our foreign air carrier
permit has no expiration date.
Our operations to the United States are also subject to
regulation by the FAA with respect to safety matters, including
aircraft maintenance and operations, equipment, aircraft noise,
ground facilities, dispatch, communications, personnel,
training, weather observation, air traffic control and other
matters affecting air safety. The FAA requires each foreign air
carrier serving the United States to obtain operational
specifications pursuant to Part 129 of its regulations and
to meet operational criteria associated with operating specified
equipment on approved international routes. We believe that we
are in compliance in all material respects with all requirements
necessary to maintain in good standing our operations
specifications issued by the FAA. The FAA can amend, suspend,
revoke or terminate those specifications, or can suspend
temporarily or revoke permanently our authority if we fail to
comply with the regulations, and can assess civil penalties for
such failure. A modification, suspension or revocation of any of
our DOT authorizations or FAA operating specifications could
have a material adverse effect on our business. The FAA also
conducts safety audits and has the power to impose fines and
other sanctions for violations of airline safety regulations. We
have not incurred any material fines related to operations.
Security. On November 19, 2001, the
U.S. Congress passed, and the President signed into law,
the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, also referred to
as the Aviation Security Act. This law federalized substantially
all aspects of civil aviation security and created the TSA to
which the security responsibilities previously held by the FAA
were transitioned. The TSA is an agency of the Department of
Homeland Security. The Aviation Security Act requires, among
other things, the implementation of certain security measures by
airlines and airports, such as the requirement that all
passenger bags be screened for explosives. Funding for airline
and airport security required under the Aviation Security Act is
provided in part by a $2.50 per segment passenger security
fee for flights departing from the U.S., subject to a
$10 per roundtrip cap; however, airlines are responsible
for costs incurred to meet security requirements beyond those
provided by the TSA. There is no assurance this fee will not be
raised in the future as the TSAs costs exceed the revenue
it receives from these fees. The current administration has
proposed to raise this fee to $5.50, which is subject to
approval by the U.S. Congress. Implementation of the
requirements of the Aviation Security Act has resulted in
increased costs for airlines and their passengers. Since the
events of September 11, 2001, the U.S. Congress has
mandated and the TSA has implemented numerous security
procedures and requirements that have imposed and will continue
to impose burdens on airlines, passengers and shippers.
Noise Restrictions. Under the Airport Noise and Capacity
Act of 1990, or ANCA, and related FAA regulations, aircraft that
fly to the United States must comply with certain Stage 3
noise restrictions, which are currently the most stringent FAA
operating noise requirements. All of our Copa aircraft meet the
Stage 3 requirement.
FAA regulations also require compliance with the Traffic Alert
and Collision Avoidance System, approved airborne windshear
warning system and aging aircraft regulations. Our fleet meets
these requirements.
Proposed Laws and Regulations. Additional U.S. laws
and regulations have been proposed from time to time that could
significantly increase the cost of airline operations by
imposing additional requirements or restrictions on airlines.
There can be no assurance that laws and regulations currently
enacted or enacted in the future will not adversely affect our
ability to maintain our current level of operating results.
85
Other Jurisdictions
We are also subject to regulation by the aviation regulatory
bodies which set standards and enforce national aviation
legislation in each of the jurisdictions to which we fly. These
regulators may have the power to set fares, enforce
environmental and safety standards, levy fines, restrict
operations within their respective jurisdictions or any other
powers associated with aviation regulation. We cannot predict
how these various regulatory bodies will perform in the future
and the evolving standards enforced by any of them could have a
material adverse effect on our operations.
86
MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position |
|
Age | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Pedro Heilbron
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
47 |
|
Victor Vial
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
40 |
|
Lawrence Ganse
|
|
Senior Vice-President of Operations |
|
|
62 |
|
Jorge Isaac García
|
|
Vice-President, Commercial |
|
|
45 |
|
Daniel Gunn
|
|
Vice-President of Planning |
|
|
37 |
|
Jaime Aguirre
|
|
Vice President of Maintenance |
|
|
43 |
|
Vidalia de Casado
|
|
Vice President of Passenger Services |
|
|
48 |
|
Alexander Gianareas
|
|
Senior Director of Human Resources |
|
|
52 |
|
Victor Varela
|
|
Senior Director of Information Technology |
|
|
41 |
|
Roberto Junguito Pombo
|
|
Chief Executive Officer of AeroRepública |
|
|
35 |
|
Mr. Pedro Heilbron has been our Chief Executive
Officer for 17 years. He received an MBA from George
Washington University and a B.A. from Holy Cross.
Mr. Heilbron is a Member of the Board of Governors of IATA
and an Alternate Member of the Board of Directors of Banco
Continenal de Panama, S.A.
Mr. Victor Vial has been our Chief Financial Officer
since 2000. From 1995 until 2000, Mr. Vial served as our
Director of Planning. Prior to his service at Copa,
Mr. Vial was a Senior Financial Analyst for HBO-Time
Warner. Mr. Vial holds a B.B.A. in International Business
from George Washington University.
Captain Lawrence Ganse has been our Senior Vice-President
of Operations and Chief Operating Officer since 2000. Captain
Ganse has 38 years experience in the airline industry,
including management positions at TWA, Northwest Airlines, and,
most recently, Grupo TACA in El Salvador. Captain Ganse received
a B.B.A. in Aviation Administration from the University of Miami
and an M.B.A. in Management Science from California State
University at Hayward.
Mr. Jorge Isaac García has been our
Vice-President, Commercial since 1999. He has also served as our
Vice-President of Maintenance and as our Assistant to the
President. Prior to joining Copa, he was a Project Director at
Petróleos Delta. Mr. García received a B.S. in
Mechanical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and
an M.B.A. from Boston College.
Mr. Daniel Gunn has been our Vice-President of
Planning and Alliances since 2002. He joined Copa in 1999 and
has served as our Director of Alliances and Senior Director of
Planning and Alliances. Prior to joining Copa, he spent five
years with American Airlines holding positions in Finance, Real
Estate and Alliances. Mr. Gunn received a B.A. in
Business & Economics from Wheaton College and an M.B.A.
with an emphasis in Finance and International Business from the
University of Southern California.
Mr. Jaime Aguirre has been our Vice President of
Maintenance since 2002. Prior to that, he served as our Director
of Engineering and Quality Assurance. Before joining Copa,
Mr. Aguirre was the Technical Services Director at Avianca,
S.A. Mr. Aguirre received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering
from Los Andes University, a Master of Engineering with an
emphasis on Engineering Management from Javeriana University and
is currently pursuing an M.B.A. from the University of
Louisville.
Ms. Vidalia de Casado has been our Vice-President of
Passenger Services since 1995. She joined Copa in 1989 and
served as our Passenger Services Manager from 1989 to 1995.
Prior to joining Copa, she spent seven years with Air
Panamá Internacional, S.A. Ms. de Casado received a
B.S. in Business from Universidad Latina and an M.B.A. from the
University of Louisville.
Mr. Alexander Gianareas has been our Senior Director
of Human Resources since 2001. Prior to joining Copa, he was the
Director of Organizational Effectiveness for the Panama Canal
Commission. Mr. Gianareas received a B.S. in Electrical
Engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Nova
Southeastern.
87
Mr. Victor Varela has been our Senior Director of
Information Technology since 2001. He has also served as our
Director of Information Systems and our Information Systems
Manager. Mr. Varela received a B.S. in Computer Science
from Virginia Polytechnic University and an M.B.A. from Nova
Southeastern University.
Mr. Roberto Junguito Pombo joined our company on
November 8, 2005 as the Chief Executive Officer of our
AeroRepública operating subsidiary. Mr. Junguito
previously spent two years with Avianca, holding positions as
the Vice President of Planning, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Restructuring Officer. Avianca declared bankruptcy in
March 2003. Mr. Junguito received a B.S. in Industrial
Engineering at the Universidad de Los Andes, an M.A. in
International Studies from the Joseph H. Lauder Institute of the
University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. with an emphasis on
finance from the Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania.
The business address for all of our senior management is
c/o Copa Airlines, Avenida Principal y Avenida de la
Rotonda, Urbanización Costa del Este, Complejo Business
Park, Torre Norte, Parque Lefevre Panama City, Panama.
Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position |
|
Age | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Pedro Heilbron
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
47 |
|
Stanley Motta
|
|
Chairman and Director |
|
|
60 |
|
Osvaldo Heilbron
|
|
Director |
|
|
79 |
|
Jaime Arias
|
|
Director |
|
|
70 |
|
Ricardo Alberto Arias
|
|
Director |
|
|
66 |
|
Alberto C. Motta, Jr.
|
|
Director |
|
|
59 |
|
Mark Erwin
|
|
Director |
|
|
50 |
|
George Mason
|
|
Director |
|
|
59 |
|
Roberto Artavia Loria
|
|
Director |
|
|
46 |
|
José Castañeda Velez
|
|
Director |
|
|
61 |
|
Mr. Stanley Motta has been one of the directors of
Copa Airlines since 1986 and a director of Copa Holdings, since
it was established in 1998. Since 1990, he has served as the
President of Motta Internacional, S.A. an international importer
of alcohol, cosmetics, jewelry and other consumer goods.
Mr. Motta is the brother of our director, Alberto C. Motta
Jr. He serves on the boards of directors of Motta Internacional,
S.A., Banco Continental de Panama, S.A., ASSA Compañía
de Seguros, S.A., Televisora Nacional, S.A., Inversiones
Bahía, Ltd. and GBM Corporation. Mr. Motta is a
graduate of Tulane University.
Mr. Osvaldo Heilbron has been one of the directors
of Copa Airlines since 1986 and a director of Copa Holdings,
since it was established in 1998. He is Treasurer of Banco
Continental de Panama, S.A. Mr. Heilbron is the father of
Mr. Pedro Heilbron, our chief executive officer. He serves
on the boards of directors of CIASA, Desarrollo Costa Del Este,
S.A., Harinas Panama, S.A., Televisora Nacional, S.A.,
Petróleos Delta, S.A., SSA Panama Inc. and Banco
Continental de Panama, S.A.
Mr. Jaime Arias has been one of the directors of
Copa Airlines since 1983 and a director of Copa Holdings, since
it was established in 1998. He is a founding partner of Galindo,
Arias & Lopez, the law firm passing on the validity of
the shares offered by this prospectus. Mr. Arias holds a
B.A. from Yale University, a J.D. from Tulane University and
legal studies at the University of Paris, Sorbonne. He serves as
an advisor to the President of the Republic of Panama and serves
on the boards of directors of Televisora Nacional, S.A., ASSA
Compañía de Seguros, S.A. , Empresa General de
Inversiones, S.A., Compañia General de Petróleos,
S.A., Banco Continental de Panama, S.A. and Bac International
Bank, Inc.
Mr. Ricardo Arias has been one of the directors of
Copa Airlines since 1985 and a director of Copa Holdings, since
it was established in 1998. He is a founding partner of Galindo,
Arias & Lopez, the law firm passing on the validity of
the shares offered by this prospectus. Mr. Arias currently
serves as Panamas
88
ambassador to the United Nations. Mr. Arias holds a B.A. in
international relations from Georgetown University, an LL.B.
from the University of Puerto Rico and an LL.M. from The Yale
Law School. He serves on the boards of directors of Banco
General, S.A. and Empresa General de Inversiones, S.A., which is
the holding company that owns Banco General S.A., and Empresa
General de Petróleos, S.A. Mr. Arias is also listed as
a principal or alternate director of several subsidiary
companies of Banco General, S.A. and Empresa General de
Inversiones, S.A.,
Mr. Alberto Motta, Jr. has been one of the
directors of Copa Airlines since 1983 and a director of Copa
Holdings, since it was established in 1998. He is a Vice
President of Inversiones Bahía, Ltd. Mr. Motta
attended the University of Hartwick. He is the brother of
Mr. Stanley Motta. He also serves on the boards of
directors of Motta Internacional, S.A., Grupo Financiero
Continental, S.A., Inversiones Costa del Este, S.A., ASSA
Compañía de Seguros, S.A., Petróleos Delta, S.A.,
Productos Toledanos, S.A., Financiera Automotriz, S.A.,
Televisora Nacional, S.A., Hotel Miramar Inter-Continental and
Industrias Panama Boston, S.A.
Mr. Mark Erwin has been one of the directors of Copa
Airlines and Copa Holdings since 2004. He is the Senior Vice
PresidentAsia/ Pacific and Corporate Development of
Continental Airlines and the President and Chief Executive
Officer and serves on the board of directors of Continental
Micronesia, Inc., the wholly owned western Pacific subsidiary of
Continental Airlines, Inc. Mr. Erwin held the position of
Senior Vice President of Airport Services of Continental
Airlines, Inc. from 1995 through 2002.
Mr. George Mason has been one of the directors of
Copa Holdings since 1999. He was the Senior Vice President
for Technical Operations of Continental Airlines, Inc. from 1996
until his retirement in 2003. He has held officer level
positions at Piedmont Airlines, Inc., USAir and Midway Airlines.
He is a graduate of Grove City College and the University of
Pittsburgh.
Mr. Roberto Artavia Loria will become one of the
independent directors of Copa Holdings in connection with this
offering. He is currently Chief Executive Officer of INCAE
Business School, Chairman of Asociacion MarViva de Costa Rica
and Protector of Viva Trust. Mr. Artavia Loria is also an
advisor to the Interamerican Development Bank and to the
governments of nine countries in Latin America, and a strategic
advisor to Purdy Motor, S.A., Grupo Nación and FUNDESA.
Mr. Artavia Loria serves on the board of directors of INCAE
Business School, Foundation for Management Education in Central
America, Asociacion MarViva de Costa Rica, Viva Trust, Global
Foundation for Management Development, Compañía
Cervecera de Nicaragua, SUMAQ Alliance OBS de Costa Rica and OBS
Americas.
Mr. José Castañeda Velez will become one
of the independent directors of Copa Holdings in connection with
this offering. He is currently director of MMG Bank Corporation.
Previously, Mr. Castañeda Velez was the chief
executive officer of Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones,
S.A.BLADEX and has held managerial and officer level
positions at Banco Río de la Plata, Citibank, N.A., Banco
de Crédito del Perú and Crocker National Bank. He is a
graduate of the University of Lima.
Our board of directors currently meets quarterly. Additionally,
informal meetings with Continental are held on an ongoing basis,
and are supported by quarterly formal meetings of an
Alliance Steering Committee, which directs and
reports on the progress of the Copa and Continental Alliance.
Our board of directors is focused on providing our overall
strategic direction and as a result is responsible for
establishing our general business policies and for appointing
our executive officers and supervising their management.
Currently, our board of directors is comprised of ten members.
We expect to add an additional independent director to the board
of directors shortly after this offering. The additional
independent director will be appointed by the Nominating and
Corporate Goverance Committee of the board. Members of our board
of directors serve two-year terms and may be reelected. The
number of directors elected each year will alternate between six
directors and five directors. The terms of the
Messrs. Pedro Heilbron, Osvaldo Heilbron, Ricardo Arias,
Mark Erwin, and Roberto Artavia will expire at our next annual
shareholders meeting. Our charter does not have a
mandatory retirement age for our directors.
Pursuant to contractual arrangements with us and CIASA,
Continental will be entitled to designate two of our directors
for so long as it owns at least 19% of our common stock and will
be entitled to designate at least one of our directors for so
long as our alliance agreement remains in effect.
89
Corporate Governance
The NYSE requires that corporations with shares listed on the
exchange comply with certain corporate governance standards. As
a foreign private issuer, we are only required to comply with
certain NYSE rules relating to audit committees and periodic
certifications to the NYSE. The NYSE also requires that we
provide a summary of the significant differences between our
corporate governance practices and those that would apply to a
U.S. domestic issuer. We believe the following to be the
significant differences between our corporate governance
practices and those that would typically apply to a
U.S. domestic issuer under the NYSE corporate governance
rules.
In addition, companies that are registered in Panama are
required to disclose whether or not they comply with certain
corporate governance guidelines and principles that are
recommended by the National Securities Commission
(Comisión Nacional de Valores, or CNV). Statements
below referring to Panamanian governance standards reflect these
voluntary guidelines set by the CNV rather than legal
requirements or standard national practices. Our Class A
shares will be registered with the CNV, and we will comply with
the CNVs disclosure requirements.
|
|
|
NYSE Standards |
|
Our Corporate Governance Practice |
|
|
|
Director Independence. Majority of
board of directors must be independent. §303A.01 |
|
Panamanian corporate governance standards recommend that one in
every five directors should be an independent director. The
criteria for determining independence under the Panamanian
corporate governance standards differs from the NYSE rules. In
Panama, a director would be considered independent as long as
the director does not directly or indirectly own 5% or more of
the issued and outstanding voting shares of the company, is not
involved in the daily management of the company and is not a
spouse or related to the second degree by blood or marriage to
the persons named above. |
|
|
Our Articles of Incorporation require us to have three
independent directors as defined under the NYSE rules. |
Executive Sessions. Non-management directors
must meet regularly in executive sessions without management.
Independent directors should meet alone in an executive session
at least once a year. §303A.03 |
|
There are no mandatory requirements under Panamanian law that a
company should hold, and we currently do not hold, such
executive sessions. |
Nominating/corporate governance committee.
Nominating/corporate governance committee of
independent directors is required. The committee must have a
charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures
of the committee. §303A.04 |
|
Panamanian corporate governance standards recommend that
registered companies have a nominating committee composed of
three members of the board of directors, at least one of which
should be an independent director, plus the chief executive
officer and the chief financial officer. In Panama, the majority
of public corporations do not have a nominating or corporate
governance committee.
Our Articles of Incorporation require that we maintain a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with at least one
independent director until the first shareholders meeting
to elect directors after such time as the Class A shares
are entitled to full voting rights. |
90
|
|
|
NYSE Standards |
|
Our Corporate Governance Practice |
|
|
|
Compensation committee. Compensation committee
of independent directors is required, which must approve
executive officer compensation. The committee must have a
charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures
of the committee. §303A.05 |
|
Panamanian corporate governance standards recommend that the
compensation of executives and directors be overseen by the
nominating committee but do not otherwise address the need for a
compensation committee.
While we maintain a compensation committee that operates under a
charter as described by the NYSE governance standards, none of
the members of that committee are independent. |
Equity compensation plans. Equity compensation
plans require shareholder approval, subject to limited
exemptions. |
|
Under Panamanian law, shareholder approval is not required for
equity compensation plans.
Although the equity compensation plan we intend to enter into in
connection with this offering will be approved by our current
shareholders, we do not intend to require any future equity
compensation plans to be subject to shareholder approval. |
Code of Ethics. Corporate governance guidelines
and a code of business conduct and ethics is required, with
disclosure of any waiver for directors or executive officers.
§303A.10 |
|
Panamanian corporate governance standards do not require the
adoption of specific guidelines as contemplated by the NYSE
standards, although they do require that companies disclose
differences between their practices and a list of specified
practices recommended by the CNV.
We have not adopted a set of corporate governance guidelines as
contemplated by the NYSE, although we will be required to comply
with the disclosure requirement of the CNV.
Panamanian corporate governance standards recommend that
registered companies adopt a code of ethics covering such topics
as its ethical and moral principles, how to address conflicts of
interest, the appropriate use of resources, obligations to
inform of acts of corruption and mechanism to enforce the
compliance with established rules of conduct.
We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to our senior
management, including our chief executive officer, our chief
financial officer and our chief accounting officer, as well as
to other employees. |
Committees of the Board of Directors
Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee is responsible for
the coordination of the internal audit process, appointment of
the independent auditors and presenting to the board of
directors its opinion with respect to the financial statements
and the areas that are subject to an audit process.
Messrs. José Castañeda and Roberto Artavia are
the current members of our Audit Committee, and
Mr. José Castañeda is the chairman of the audit
committee as well as our audit committee financial expert. We
expect that our third independent director will also be a member
of the audit committee.
Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is
responsible for the selection process of the Chief Executive
Officer and the evaluation of all executive officers (including
the CEO), recommending the level of compensation and any
associated bonus. Messrs. Stanley Motta, Jaime Arias and
José Castañeda are the members of our Compensation
Committee and Mr. Stanley Motta is the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee.
91
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
developing and recommending criteria for selecting new
directors, screening and recommending to the board of directors
individuals qualified to become executive officers, overseeing
evaluations of the board of directors, its members and
committees of the board of directors and handling other matters
that are specifically delegated to the compensation committee by
the board of directors from time to time. Our charter documents
require that there be at least one independent member of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee until the first
shareholders meeting to elect directors after such time as
the Class A shares are entitled to full voting rights.
Messrs. Ricardo Arias, Osvaldo Heilbron and Roberto Artavia
are the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, and Mr. Ricardo Arias is the Chairman of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Independent Directors Committee. Our Independent
Directors Committee is created by our Articles of Incorporation
and consists of any directors that the board of directors
determines from time to time meet the independence requirements
of the NYSE and the Securities Act. Our Articles of
Incorporation provide that there will be three independent
directors at all times, subject to certain exceptions. Under our
Articles of Incorporation, the Independent Directors Committee
must approve:
|
|
|
|
|
any transactions in excess of $5 million between us and our
controlling shareholders, |
|
|
|
the designation of certain primary share issuances that will not
be included in the calculation of the percentage ownership
pertaining to the Class B shares for purposes of
determining whether the Class A shares should be converted
to voting shares under our Articles of Incorporation, and |
|
|
|
the issuance of additional Class B shares or Class C
shares to ensure Copa Airlines compliance with aviation
laws and regulations. |
The Independent Directors Committee shall also have any other
powers expressly delegated by the Board of Directors. Under the
Articles of Incorporation, these powers can only be changed by
the Board of Directors acting as a whole upon the written
recommendation of the Independent Directors Committee. The
Independent Directors Committee will only meet regularly until
the first shareholders meeting at which the Class A
shareholders will be entitled to vote for the election of
directors and afterwards at any time that Class C shares
are outstanding. All decisions of the Independent Directors
Committee shall be made by a majority of the members of the
committee. See Description of Capital Stock.
Compensation
In 2004, we paid an aggregate of approximately
$2.52 million in cash compensation to our executive
officers. In addition, approximately $0.4 million earned by
our executive officers during 2004 pursuant to our Long Term
Retention Plan and originally scheduled to vest in 2009 will
instead be paid prior to the completion of this offering. We
have not set aside any funds for future payments to executive
officers.
In connection with this offering, the Compensation Committee of
our board of directors approved increases in salaries and one
time restricted stock bonuses for certain executive officers and
eliminated the existing Long Term Retention Plan. The restricted
stock awards will be granted pursuant to a new equity-based
long-term incentive compensation plan that we will adopt prior
to the completion of the offering. The plan will provide for
awards to our executive officers, certain key employees and
non-employee directors. The plan provides for the grant of
restricted stock, stock options and certain other equity-based
awards. A number of shares equal to five percent of our
aggregate outstanding shares as of the offering date will be
reserved for future issuances that will be granted to our
employees. This includes a grant of restricted stock awards
under the plan to certain of our executive officers immediately
following the offering that have an aggregate value of
approximately $17.8 million. The restricted stock awards
granted to our named executive officers under the plan as of the
offering date will consist of approximately 890,625 shares
of restricted stock, which will vest over five years in yearly
installments equal to 15% of the awarded stock on each of the
first three anniversaries of the offering, 25% on the fourth
anniversary and 30% on the fifth anniversary. After the closing
of the offering, we also intend to pay $3 million to
management that will be tied to an agreement not to compete with
us in the
92
future. We will also grant a small amount of restricted stock
having an aggregate value of approximately $937,500, to each of
our managers, officers and key employees that are not on our
senior management team which will vest on the second anniversary
of this offering. These amounts may be adjusted prior to the
offering. Following the offering, the Compensation Committee
plans to make additional equity based awards under the plan from
time to time, including additional restricted stock and stock
option awards. While the Compensation Committee will retain
discretion to vary the exact terms of future awards, we
anticipate that future employee restricted stock and stock
option awards granted pursuant to the plan after the offering
will generally vest over a three year period and the stock
options will carry a ten year term.
After this offering, we intend to compensate the members of our
board of directors that are not officers of either Copa or
Continental for their service on our board. We expect that we
will pay each such director $25,000 per year plus expenses
incurred to attend our board of directors meetings. In addition,
members of committees of the board of directors would receive
$1,000 per committee meeting, with the chairman of the
audit committee receiving $2,000 per meeting of the audit
committee. All of the members of our board of directors and
their spouses will receive benefits to travel on Copa flights as
well.
93
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information relating to the
beneficial ownership of our common shares as of
November 23, 2005 and after giving effect to the
recapitalization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Shares | |
|
Class A Shares | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
Owned Prior to | |
|
Owned After | |
|
|
the Offering | |
|
the Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Shares | |
|
(%)(1) | |
|
Shares | |
|
(%)(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CIASA(2)
|
|
|
9,056,250 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
1,181,250 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Continental
|
|
|
20,978,125 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
13,103,125 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30,034,375 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
14,284,375 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on a total of 30,034,375 Class A shares outstanding
immediately prior to the offering and 30,971,875 Class A
shares outstanding after the offering which, in the case of
shares outstanding after the offering, includes 937,500
Class A shares that were awarded to certain members of our
management. |
|
(2) |
CIASA owns 100% of the Class B shares of Copa Holdings
before and after the offering, representing 29.2% of our total
capital stock after the offering. |
CIASA currently owns 100% of the Class B shares of Copa
Holdings. After the completion of this offering, CIASA will
continue to own 100% of the Class B shares of Copa
Holdings, representing all of the voting power of our capital
stock. CIASA is controlled by a group of Panamanian investors
representing several prominent families in Panama. This group of
investors has historically acted together in a variety of
business activities both in Panama and elsewhere in Latin
America, including banking, insurance, real estate,
telecommunications, international trade and commerce and
wholesale. Members of the Motta, Heilbron and Arias families and
their affiliates beneficially own approximately 90% of
CIASAs shares. Our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Pedro
Heilbron, and several of our directors, including
Messrs. Stanley Motta and Alberto C. Motta Jr.,
Mr. Osvaldo Heilbron, Mr. Jaime Arias and
Mr. Ricardo Alberto Arias as a group hold beneficial
ownership of approximately 78% of the voting power in CIASA.
This ownership includes 33.4% of the shares of CIASA acquired by
Messrs. Stanley Motta and Alberto C. Motta Jr.,
Mr. Osvaldo Heilbron, Mr. Jaime Arias,
Mr. Ricardo Alberto Arias, Mr. Pedro Heilbron and
other CIASA shareholders in June 2005 from the controlling
shareholders of Copas principal Latin American competitor
in a transaction valued at approximately $60,000,000.
Prior to the offering, the holders of more than 78% of the
issued and outstanding stock of CIASA will enter into a
shareholders agreement providing that the parties to the
agreement will vote all of their shares in CIASA together as a
group on all matters concerning CIASAs holdings of
Class B shares. Additionally, the shareholders
agreement restricts transfers of CIASA shares to non-Panamanian
nationals. Messrs. Stanley Motta and Alberto C. Motta Jr.
together exercise effective control of CIASA.
One of our directors, Mr. Erwin, is an officer of
Continental Airlines, Inc. and may be deemed to share beneficial
ownership with Continental of our Class A shares held by
Continental, but Mr. Erwin disclaims such beneficial ownership.
The address of CIASA is Corporación de Inversiones
Aéreas, S.A., c/o Campañía Panameña de
Aviación, S.A., Boulevard Costa del Este, Avenida Principal
y Avenida de la Rotonda, Urbanización Costa del Este,
Complejo Business Park, Torre Norte, Parque Lefevre, Panama
City, Panama. The address of Continental is Continental
Airlines, Inc., 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002.
94
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Agreements with the Selling Stockholders
Copa Holdings will be a party to the amended and restated
shareholders agreement with CIASA and Continental that
will be entered into in connection with this offering. The
amended and restated shareholders agreement provides for,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a right of each of CIASA and Continental to designate a certain
number of directors to our board of directors for so long as
they hold a certain amount of our common stock. Of the 11
members of our board, CIASA initially has the right to designate
six directors and Continental initially has the right to
designate two directors, with the remaining three directors
being independent under the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange; |
|
|
|
certain limitations on transfers of our common stock by CIASA or
Continental; |
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, a right of first offer in favor
of CIASA to purchase any shares of our common stock Continental
proposes to sell to any third party; and |
|
|
|
the ability of Continental to tag-along their shares
of our common stock to certain sales of common stock by CIASA to
non-Panamanians or, in the case of certain sales of Class B
stock by CIASA to Panamanians, to receive additional
registration rights with respect to the shares they would
otherwise have been able to sell. |
A material uncured breach of the Shareholders Agreement by
CIASA or Copa Holdings will trigger rights of Continental in the
Alliance Agreement, Services Agreement and Frequent Flyer
Agreement to terminate those agreements as described below.
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement |
Copa Holdings is party to an amended and restated registration
rights agreement with CIASA and Continental pursuant to which
CIASA and Continental are entitled to certain demand and
piggyback rights with respect to the registration and sale of
our common stock held by them after this offering. The
registration rights agreement permits each of CIASA and
Continental to make up to two demands on us to register the
shares of common stock held by them that exceed 19% of the total
common stock of Copa Holdings. The registration rights agreement
will also cover additional shares held by Continental in the
event that CIASA sells shares to unaffiliated Panamanians. One
half of the registration expenses incurred in connection with
each such demand registration, which expenses exclude
underwriting discounts and commissions, will be paid ratably by
each security holder participating in such offering in
proportion to the number of their shares that are included in
the offering, and the balances of such expenses will be paid by
the Copa Holdings for the first two demand registrations.
Thereafter, all such expenses will be paid ratably by each
security holder participating in such offering in proportion to
the number of their shares that are included in the offering. In
connection with this offering, CIASA and Continental entered
into certain lock-up agreements with the underwriters which
restrict their sales of our common stock for 180 days
following the offering. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, CIASA and Continental are also entitled to certain
piggyback registration rights in connection with other
registered offerings by us.
In addition, under registration rights agreement, in connection
with a registered underwritten offering, CIASA and Continental
have agreed, if required by the underwriters of such offering,
not to effect any sale or distribution of any securities of Copa
Holdings for a period of up to 180 days after the effective
date of such registration, so long as we have agreed to cause
other holders of any securities of ours purchased from us (at
any time other than in a public offering) to so agree.
A material uncured breach of the registration rights agreement
by CIASA or Copa Holdings will trigger rights of Continental in
the alliance agreement, services agreement and frequent flyer
agreement to terminate those agreements as described below.
95
Commercial Agreements with Continental
Our alliance relationship with Continental is governed by
several interrelated agreements. In connection with this
offering, we are amending and restating each of these agreements
to extend their term and make such other modifications as the
parties deem appropriate in our evolving relationship. Each of
the agreements as amended and restated will expire only upon
three years written notice by one of the airlines to the
other, which may not be given before May 2012. Other events of
termination are set forth in the descriptions of the major
alliance-related agreements set forth below.
Alliance Agreement. Under our alliance agreement with
Continental, both airlines agree to continue their codesharing
relationship with extensions as they feel are appropriate and to
work to maintain our antitrust immunity with the DOT. In order
to support the codesharing relationship, the alliance agreement
also contains provisions mandating a continued frequent flyer
relationship between the airlines, setting minimum levels of
quality of service for the airlines and encouraging cooperation
in marketing and other operational initiatives. Continental and
we are prohibited by the alliance agreement from entering into
commercial agreements with certain classes of competing
airlines, and the agreement requires both parties to include
each other, as practicable, in their commercial relationships
with other airlines. Other than by expiration as described
above, the agreement is also terminable by an airline in cases
of, among other things, uncured material breaches of the
alliance agreement by the other airline, bankruptcy of the other
airline, termination of the services agreement for breach by the
other airline, termination of the frequent flyer participation
agreement without entering into a successor agreement by the
other airline, termination by Continental upon the material
unremedied breach of the shareholders agreement or the
registration rights agreement by CIASA or Copa Holdings,
termination by Copa upon the material unremedied breach of the
shareholders agreement or the registration rights agreement by
Continental, certain competitive activities, certain changes of
control of either of the parties and certain significant
operational service failures by the other airline.
Services Agreement. Under the services agreement, both
airlines agree to provide to each other certain services over
the course of the agreement at the providing carriers
incremental cost, subject to certain limitations. Services
covered under the agreement include consolidating purchasing
power for equipment purchases and insurance coverage, sharing
management information systems, pooling maintenance programs and
inventory management, joint training and employee exchanges,
sharing the benefits of other purchase contracts for goods and
services, telecommunications and other services. Other than by
expiration as described above, the agreement is also terminable
by an airline in cases of, among other things, uncured material
breaches of the alliance agreement by the other airline,
bankruptcy of the other airline, termination of the services
agreement for breach by the other airline, termination of the
frequent flyer participation agreement without entering into a
successor agreement by the other airline, termination by
Continental upon the material unremedied breach of the
shareholders agreement or the registration rights agreement by
CIASA or Copa Holdings, termination by Copa upon the material
unremedied breach of the shareholders agreement or the
registration rights agreement by Continental, certain changes of
control of either of the parties and certain significant
operational service failures by the other airline.
Frequent Flyer Participation Agreement. Under the
frequent flyer participation agreement, we participate in
Continentals OnePass frequent flyer global program and on
a co-branded basis in Latin America. Customers in the program
receive credit for flying on segments operated by us, which can
be redeemed for award travel on our flights and those of other
partner airlines. The agreement also governs joint marketing
agreements under the program, settlement procedures between the
airlines and revenue-sharing under bank card affinity
relationships. Further, if the Services Agreement is terminated
or expires, the compensation structure of the frequent flyer
program will be revised to be comparable to other of
Continentals frequent flyer relationships. We also have
the right under the agreement to participate on similar terms in
any successor program operated by Continental. Other than by
expiration as described above, the agreement is also terminable
by an airline in cases of, among other things, uncured material
breaches of the alliance agreement by the other airline,
bankruptcy of the other airline, termination of the services
agreement for breach by the other airline, termination of the
frequent flyer participation agreement without entering into a
successor agreement by the other airline, termination by
Continental upon the material unremedied breach of the
96
shareholders agreement or the registration rights agreement by
CIASA or Copa Holdings, termination by Copa upon the material
unremedied of the shareholders agreement or the registration
rights agreement by Continental, certain changes of control of
either of the parties and certain significant operational
service failures by the other airline.
Trademark License Agreement. Under the trademark license
agreement, we have the right to use a logo incorporating a globe
design that is similar to the globe design of Continentals
logo. We also have the right to use Continentals trade
dress, aircraft livery and certain other Continental marks under
the agreement that allow us to more closely align our overall
product with our alliance partner. The trademark license
agreement is coterminous with the Alliance Agreement and can
also be terminated for breach. In most cases, we will have a
period of five years after termination to cease to use the marks
on our aircraft, with less time provided for signage and other
uses of the marks or in cases where the agreement is terminated
for a breach by us.
Agreements with our controlling shareholders and their
affiliates
Our directors and controlling shareholders have many other
commercial interests within Panama and throughout Latin America.
We have commercial relationships with several of these
affiliated parties from which we purchase goods or services, as
described below. In each case we believe our transactions with
these affiliated parties are at arms length and on terms
that we believe reflect prevailing market rates.
|
|
|
Banco Continental de Panama, S.A. |
We have a strong commercial banking relationship with Banco
Continental de Panama, S.A., a bank with approximately
$2.5 billion in assets and which is controlled by our
controlling shareholders. As of December 31, 2004, we owed
Banco Continental de Panama, S.A., approximately
$15.3 million under short to medium term financing
arrangements made to fund aircraft pre-payments and for part of
the commercial loan tranche of one of our Ex-Im facilities. We
also maintain general lines of credit and time deposit accounts
with Banco Continental.
|
|
|
ASSA Compañía de Seguros, S.A. |
Panamanian law requires us to maintain our insurance policies
through a local insurance company. We have contracted with ASSA,
an insurance company controlled by our controlling shareholders,
to provide substantially all of our insurance. ASSA has, in
turn, reinsured almost all of the risks under those policies
with insurance companies around the world. The net payment to
ASSA, after taking into account the reinsurance of these risks,
is approximately $30,000 per year.
When our supply contract with Texaco for jet fuel expired at the
end of June of this year, we entered into a contract with
Petróleos Delta, S.A. to supply our jet fuel needs. The
price we pay under this contract is based on the two week
average of the U.S. Gulf Coast Waterborne Mean index plus
local taxes, certain third-party handling charges and a handling
charge to Delta which is expected to aggregate between
$2.5 million and $3 million per year assuming we
maintain a rate of fuel consumption comparable to expected
volumes for 2005. The contract has a one year term that
automatically renews for one year periods unless terminated by
one of the parties. While our controlling shareholders do not
hold a controlling equity interest in Petróleos Delta,
S.A., one of our executive officers, Jorge Garcia, previously
served as a Project Director at Petróleos Delta, S.A., one
of our directors, Alberto Motta Jr., serves on its board of
directors, one of our directors, Osvaldo Heilbron, serves on the
board of directors of Empresa General de Petróleos, S.A.,
the holding company that owns Petróleos Delta, S.A., and
one of our directors, Ricardo Arias, serves on the board of
directors of Empresa General de Inversiones, S.A., the holding
company that owns Empresa General de Petróleos, S.A.
97
|
|
|
Desarollo Inmobiliario del Este, S.A. |
We will be moving into a recently built headquarters building
located six miles away from Tocumen International Airport later
this year. We have agreed to lease five floors consisting of
approximately 104,000 square feet of the building from
Desarollo Inmobiliario del Este, S.A., an entity controlled by
the same group of investors that controls CIASA, under a 10-year
lease at a rate of $106,000 per month during the first
three years, $110,000 per month from year 4 to year 6,
$113,000 from year 7 to year 9 and $116,000 per month in
year 10, which we believe to be a market rate.
Most of our legal work, including passing on the validity of the
shares offered by this prospectus, is carried out by the law
firm Galindo, Arias & Lopez. Messrs. Jaime Arias
and Ricardo Alberto Arias, partners of Galindo, Arias &
Lopez, are indirect shareholders of CIASA and serve on our board
of directors.
We also purchase most of the alcohol and some of the other
beverages served on our aircraft from Motta Internacional, S.A.
and Global Brands, S.A., both of which are controlled by our
controlling shareholders. We do not have any formal contracts
for these purchases, but pay wholesale prices based on price
lists periodically submitted by those importers. We pay
approximately $0.4 million per year to these entities.
Our telecommunications services have been provided by
Telecarrier, Inc. since February 2003. Some of the controlling
shareholders of CIASA have a controlling interest in
Telecarrier, Inc. Additionally, one of our directors, Ricardo
Arias, serves on the board of directors of Empresa General de
Inversiones, a holding company that has a minority interest in
Telecarrier, Inc. Payments to Telecarrier, Inc. totaled
$0.4 million and $0.2 million in 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The advertising agency that we use in Panama, Rogelio Diaz
Publicidad (RDP), is owned by the brother-in-law of our chief
executive officer. Gross invoices for all services performed
through RDP total approximately $1.3 million annually.
98
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a summary of the material terms of Copa
Holdings capital stock and a brief summary of certain
significant provisions of Copa Holdings Articles of
Incorporation as they were recently amended in connection with
this offering. This description contains all material
information concerning the common stock but does not purport to
be complete. For additional information regarding the common
stock, reference is made to the Articles of Incorporation, a
copy of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
For purposes of this section only, reference to
our or the company shall refer only to
Copa Holdings and references to Panamanians shall
refer to those entities or natural persons that are considered
Panamanian nationals under the Panamanian Aviation Act, as it
may be amended or interpreted.
Common Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 80 million shares
of common stock without par value, divided into Class A
shares, Class B shares and Class C shares. Immediately
following the completion of this offering, there are expected to
be 30,971,875 Class A shares, 12,778,125 Class B
shares and no Class C shares outstanding. Class A and
Class B shares have the same economic rights and
privileges, including the right to receive dividends, except as
described in this section. Other than the recapitalization we
effected in connection with this offering reflected in the
description below, there have not been and we do not expect
there to be any changes to the amounts of share capital
outstanding, the classes of share capital or any changes in the
voting rights attached to the share capital.
The holders of the Class A shares will not be entitled to
vote at our shareholders meetings, except in connection
with the following specific matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a transformation of Copa Holdings into another corporate type; |
|
|
|
a merger, consolidation or spin-off of Copa Holdings; |
|
|
|
a change of corporate purpose; |
|
|
|
voluntarily delisting Class A shares from the NYSE; |
|
|
|
approving the nomination of Independent Directors nominated by
our board of directors Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee following our next annual general shareholders
meeting; and |
|
|
|
any amendment to the foregoing special voting provisions
adversely affecting the rights and privileges of the
Class A shares. |
At least 30 days prior to taking any of the actions listed
above, we must give notice to the Class A and Class B
shareholders of our intention to do so. If requested by
shareholders representing at least 5% of our outstanding shares,
the board of directors shall call an extraordinary
shareholders meeting to approve such action. At the
extraordinary shareholders meeting, shareholders
representing a majority of all of the outstanding shares must
approve a resolution authorizing the proposed action. For such
purpose, every holder of the companys shares is entitled
to one vote per share. See Shareholders
Meetings.
The Class A shareholders will acquire full voting rights,
entitled to one vote per Class A share on all matters upon
which shareholders are entitled to vote, if in the future our
Class B shares ever represent fewer than 10% of the total
number of shares of our common stock and the Independent
Directors Committee shall have determined that such additional
voting rights of Class A shareholders would not cause a
triggering event referred to below. In such event, the right of
the Class A shareholders to vote on the specific matters
described in the preceding paragraph will no longer be
applicable. The 10% threshold described in the first sentence of
this paragraph will be calculated without giving effect to any
newly issued shares sold with the approval of the Independent
Directors Committee.
99
At such time, if any, as the Class A shareholders acquire
full voting rights, the Board of Directors shall call an
extraordinary shareholders meeting to be held within
90 days following the date as of which the Class A
shares are entitled to vote on all matters at our
shareholders meetings. At the extraordinary
shareholders meeting, the shareholders shall vote to elect
all eleven members of the board of directors in a slate
recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The
terms of office of the directors that were serving prior to the
extraordinary shareholders meeting shall terminate upon
the election held at that meeting.
Every holder of Class B shares is entitled to one vote per
share on all matters for which shareholders are entitled to
vote. Class B shares will be automatically converted into
Class A shares upon the registration of transfer of such
shares to holders which are not Panamanian as described below
under Restrictions on Transfer of Common Stock;
Conversion of Class B Shares.
Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of a triggering
event described below in Aviation Rights
Protections, the Independent Directors Committee of our
board of directors, or the board of directors as a whole if
applicable, are authorized to issue Class C shares to the
Class B holders pro rata in proportion to such Class B
holders ownership of Copa Holdings. The Class C
shares will have no economic value and will not be transferable,
but will possess such voting rights as the Independent Directors
Committee shall deem necessary to ensure the effective control
of the company by Panamanians. The Class C shares will be
redeemable by the company at such time as the Independent
Directors Committee determines that such a triggering event
shall no longer be in effect. The Class C shares will not
be entitled to any dividends or any other economic rights.
Objects and Purposes
Copa Holdings is principally engaged in the investment in
airlines and aviation-related companies and ventures, although
our Articles of Incorporation grant us general powers to engage
in any other lawful business, whether or not related to any of
the specific purposes set forth in the Articles of Incorporation.
Restrictions on Transfer of Common Stock; Conversion of
Class B Shares
The Class B shares may only be held by Panamanians, and
upon registration of any transfer of a Class B share to a
holder that does not certify that it is Panamanian, such
Class B share shall automatically convert into a
Class A share. Transferees of Class B shares will be
required to deliver to us written certification of their status
as a Panamanian as a condition to registering the transfer to
them of Class B shares. Class A shareholders will not
be required or entitled to provide such certification. If a
Class B shareholder intends to sell any Class B shares
to a person that has not delivered a certification as to
Panamanian nationality and immediately after giving effect to
such proposed transfer the outstanding Class B shares would
represent less than 10% of our outstanding stock (excluding
newly issued shares sold with the approval of our Independent
Directors Committee), the selling shareholder must inform the
board of directors at least ten days prior to such transfer. The
Independent Directors Committee may determine to refuse to
register the transfer if the Committee reasonably concludes, on
the basis of the advice of a reputable external aeronautical
counsel, that such transfer would be reasonably likely to cause
a triggering event as described below. After the first
shareholders meeting at which the Class A
shareholders are entitled to vote for the election of our
directors, the role of the Independent Directors described in
the preceding sentence shall be exercised by the entire board of
directors acting as a whole.
Also, the board of directors may refuse to register a transfer
of stock if the transfer violates any provision of the Articles
of Incorporation.
100
Tag-along Rights
Our board of directors may refuse to register any transfer of
shares in which CIASA proposes to sell Class B shares
pursuant to a sale at a price per share that is greater than the
average public trading price per share of the Class A
shares for the preceding 30 days to an unrelated third
party that would, after giving effect to such sale, have the
right to elect a majority of the board of directors and direct
our management and policies, unless the proposed purchaser
agrees to make, as promptly as possible, a public offer for the
purchase of all outstanding Class A shares and Class B
shares at a price per share equal to the price per share paid
for the shares being sold by CIASA. While our Articles of
Incorporation provide limited rights to holders of our
Class A shares to sell their shares at the same price as
CIASA in the event that a sale of Class B shares by CIASA
results in the purchaser having the right to elect a majority of
our board, there are other change of control transactions in
which holders of our Class A shares would not have the
right to participate, including the sale of interests by a party
that had previously acquired Class B shares from CIASA, the
sale of interests by another party in conjunction with a sale by
CIASA, the sale by CIASA of control to more than one party, or
the sale of controlling interests in CIASA itself.
Aviation Rights Protections
As described in RegulationPanama, the
Panamanian Aviation Act, including the related decrees and
regulations, and the bilateral treaties between Panama and other
countries that allow us to fly to those countries require that
Panamanians exercise effective control of Copa and
maintain significant ownership of the airline. The
Independent Directors Committee have certain powers under our
Articles of Incorporation to ensure that certain levels of
ownership and control of Copa Holdings remain in the hands of
Panamanians upon the occurrence of certain triggering events
referred to below.
In the event that the Class B shareholders represent less
than 10% of the total share capital of the company (excluding
newly issued shares sold with the approval of our Independent
Directors Committee) and the Independent Directors Committee
determines that it is reasonably likely that Copas or Copa
Holdings legal ability to engage in the aviation business
or to exercise its international route rights will be revoked,
suspended or materially inhibited in a manner which would
materially and adversely affect the company, in each case as a
result of such non-Panamanian ownership (each a triggering
event), the Independent Directors Committee may take either or
both of the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of additional Class B shares to
Panamanians at a price determined by the Independent Directors
to reflect the current market value of such shares or |
|
|
|
authorize the issuance to Class B shareholders such number
of Class C shares as the Independent Directors Committee,
or the board of directors if applicable, deems necessary and
with such other terms and conditions established by the
Independent Directors Committee that do not confer economic
rights on the Class C shares. |
Dividends
The payment of dividends on our shares is subject to the
discretion of our board of directors. Under Panamanian law, we
may pay dividends only out of retained earnings and capital
surplus. Our Articles of Incorporation provide that all
dividends declared by our board of directors will be paid
equally with respect to all of the Class A and Class B
shares. Our board of directors has initially determined to adopt
a dividend policy that provides for the payment of approximately
10% of our annual consolidated net income to Class A and
Class B shareholders. Our board of directors may, in its
sole discretion and for any reason, amend or discontinue the
dividend policy it is expected to adopt upon the closing of this
offering. Our board of directors may change the level of
dividends provided for in this dividend policy or entirely
discontinue the payment of dividends.
101
Shareholder Meetings
Our Articles of Incorporation require us to hold an ordinary
annual meeting of shareholders within the first five months of
each fiscal year. The ordinary annual meeting of shareholders is
the corporate body that elects the board of directors, approves
the annual financial statements of Copa Holdings and approves
any other matter that does not require an extraordinary
shareholders meeting. Shareholders representing at least
5% of the issued and outstanding common stock entitled to vote
may submit proposals to be included in such ordinary
shareholders meeting, provided the proposal is submitted at
least 45 days prior to the meeting.
Extraordinary meetings may be called by the board of directors
when deemed appropriate. Ordinary and extraordinary meetings
must be called by the board of directors when requested by
shareholders representing at least 5% of the issued shares
entitled to vote at such meeting. Only matters that have been
described in the notice of an extraordinary meeting may be dealt
with at that extraordinary meeting.
Resolutions are passed at shareholders meetings by the
affirmative vote of a majority of those shares entitled to vote
at such meeting and present or represented at the meeting.
Notice to convene the ordinary annual meeting or extraordinary
meeting is given by publication in at least one national
newspaper in Panama and at least one national newspaper widely
read in New York City not less than 30 days in advance of
the meeting. We intend to publish such official notices in a
national journal recognized by the NYSE.
Shareholders meetings are to be held in Panama City,
Panama unless otherwise specified by the board of directors.
Generally, a quorum for a shareholders meeting is
established by the presence, in person or by proxy, of
shareholders representing a simple majority of the issued shares
eligible to vote on any actions to be considered at such
meeting. If a quorum is not present at the first meeting and the
original notice for such meeting so provides, the meeting can be
immediately reconvened on the same day and, upon the meeting
being reconvened, shareholders present or represented at the
reconvened meeting are deemed to constitute a quorum regardless
of the percentage of the shares represented.
Our Articles of Incorporation provide that, for so long as the
Class A shares do not have full voting rights, each holder,
by owning our Class A shares, grants a general proxy to the
Chairman of our board of directors or any person designated by
our Chairman to represent them and vote their shares on their
behalf at any shareholders meeting, provided that due
notice was made of such meeting and that no specific proxy
revoking or replacing the general proxy has been received from
such holder prior to the meeting in accordance with the
instructions provided by the notice.
Other Shareholder Rights
As a general principle, Panamanian law bars the majority of a
corporations shareholders from imposing resolutions which
violate its articles of incorporation or the law, and grants any
shareholder the right to challenge, within 30 days, any
shareholders resolution that is illegal or that violates
its articles of incorporation or by-laws, by requesting the
annulment of said resolution and/or the injunction thereof
pending judicial
102
decision. Minority shareholders representing at least 5% of all
issued and outstanding shares have the right to require a judge
to call a shareholders meeting and to appoint an
independent auditor (revisor) to examine the corporate
accounting books, the background of the companys
incorporation or its operation.
Shareholders have no pre-emptive rights on the issue of new
shares.
Our Articles of Incorporation provide that directors will be
elected in staggered two-year terms, which may have the effect
of discouraging certain changes of control.
Listing
Our Class A shares have been approved for listing on the
NYSE under the symbol CPA. The Class B shares
and Class C shares will not be listed on any exchange
unless the board of directors determines that it is in the best
interest of the company to list the Class B shares on the
Panama Stock Exchange.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our Class A shares is
Mellon Investor Services LLC. Until the board of directors
otherwise provides, the transfer agent for our Class B
shares and any Class C shares is Galindo, Arias &
Lopez which maintains the share register for each class in
Panama. Transfers of Class B shares must be accompanied by
a certification of the transferee that such transferee is
Panamanian.
Summary of Significant Differences between Shareholders
Rights and Other Corporate Governance Matters Under Panamanian
Corporation Law and Delaware Corporation Law
Copa Holdings is a Panamanian corporation (sociedad
anónima). The Panamanian corporation law was originally
modeled after the Delaware General Corporation Law. As such,
many of the provisions applicable to Panamanian and Delaware
corporations are substantially similar, including (1) a
directors fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the
corporation, (2) a lack of limits on the number of terms a
person may serve on the board of directors, (3) provisions
allowing shareholders to vote by proxy and (4) cumulative
voting if provided for in the articles of incorporation. The
following table highlights the most significant provisions that
materially differ between Panamanian corporation law and
Delaware corporation law.
|
|
|
Panama |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
Directors |
Conflict of Interest Transactions. Transactions involving
a Panamanian corporation and an interested director or officer
are initially subject to the approval of the board of
directors.
At the next shareholders meeting, shareholders will then
have the right to disapprove the board of directors
decision and to decide to take legal actions against the
directors or officers who voted in favor of the transaction. |
|
Conflict of Interest Transactions. Transactions involving
a Delaware corporation and an interested director of that
corporation are generally permitted if:
(1) the material facts as to the interested directors
relationship or interest are disclosed and a majority of
disinterested directors approve the transaction;
(2) the material facts are disclosed as to the interested
directors relationship or interest and the stockholders
approve the transaction; or
(3) the transaction is fair to the corporation at the time it is
authorized by the board of directors, a committee of the board
of directors or the stockholders. |
103
|
|
|
Panama |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
Terms. Panamanian law does not set limits on the length
of the terms that a director may serve. Staggered terms are
allowed but not required. |
|
Terms. The Delaware General Corporation Law generally
provides for a one-year term for directors. However, the
directorships may be divided into up to three classes with up to
three-year terms, with the years for each class expiring in
different years, if permitted by the articles of incorporation,
an initial by-law or a by-law adopted by the shareholders. |
Number. The board of directors must consist of a minimum
of three members, which could be natural persons or legal
entities. |
|
Number. The board of directors must consist of a minimum
of one member. |
|
Authority to take Actions. In general, a simple majority
of the board of directors is necessary and sufficient to take
any action on behalf of the board of directors. |
|
Authority to take Actions. The articles of incorporation
or by-laws can establish certain actions that require the
approval of more than a majority of directors. |
|
Shareholder Meetings and Voting Rights |
Quorum. The quorum for shareholder meetings must be set
by the articles of incorporation or the by-laws. If the articles
of incorporation and the notice for a given meeting so provide,
if quorum is not met a new meeting can be immediately called and
quorum shall consist of those present at such new meeting. |
|
Quorum. For stock corporations, the articles of
incorporation or bylaws may specify the number to constitute a
quorum but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than
one-third of shares entitled to vote at a meeting. In the
absence of such specifications, a majority of shares entitled to
vote shall constitute a quorum. |
|
Action by Written Consent. Panamanian law does not permit
shareholder action without formally calling a meeting. |
|
Action by Written Consent. Unless otherwise provided in
the articles of incorporation, any action required or permitted
to be taken at any annual meeting or special meeting of
stockholders of a corporation may be taken without a meeting,
without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or
consents in writing, setting forth the action to be so taken, is
signed by the holders of outstanding shares having not less than
the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize
or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to
vote thereon were present and noted. |
|
Other Shareholder Rights |
Shareholder Proposals. Shareholders representing 5% of
the issued and outstanding capital of the corporation have the
right to require a judge to call a general shareholders
meeting and to propose the matters for vote. |
|
Shareholder Proposals. Delaware law does not specifically
grant shareholders the right to bring business before an annual
or special meeting. If a Delaware corporation is subject to the
SECs proxy rules, a shareholder who owns at least $2,000
in market value, or 1% of the corporations securities
entitled to vote, may propose a matter for a vote at an annual
or special meeting in accordance with those rules. |
104
|
|
|
Panama |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
Appraisal Rights. Shareholders of Panamanian corporation
do not have the right to demand payment in cash of the
judicially determined fair value of their shares in connection
with a merger or consolidation involving the corporation.
Nevertheless, in a merger, the majority of shareholders could
approve the total or partial distribution of cash, instead of
shares, of the surviving entity. |
|
Appraisal Rights. Delaware law affords shareholders in
certain cases the right to demand payment in cash of the
judicially-determined fair value of their shares in connection
with a merger or consolidation involving their corporation.
However, no appraisal rights are available if, among other
things and subject to certain exceptions, such shares were
listed on a national securities exchange or designated national
market system or such shares were held of record by more than
2,000 holders. |
Shareholder Derivative Actions. Any shareholder, with the
consent of the majority of the shareholders, can sue on behalf
of the corporation, the directors of the corporation for a
breach of their duties of care and loyalty to the corporation or
a violation of the law, the articles of incorporation or the
by-laws. |
|
Shareholder Derivative Actions. Subject to certain
requirements that a shareholder make prior demand on the board
of directors or have an excuse not to make such demand, a
shareholder may bring a derivative action on behalf of the
corporation to enforce the rights of the corporation against
officers, directors and third parties. An individual may also
commence a class action suit on behalf of himself and other
similarly-situated stockholders if the requirements for
maintaining a class action under the Delaware General
Corporation Law have been met. Subject to equitable principles,
a three-year period of limitations generally applies to such
shareholder suits against officers and directors. |
Inspection of Corporate Records. Shareholders
representing at least 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of
the corporation have the right to require a judge to appoint an
independent auditor to examine the corporate accounting books,
the background of the companys incorporation or its
operation. |
|
Inspection of Corporate Records. A shareholder may
inspect or obtain copies of a corporations shareholder
list and its other books and records for any purpose reasonably
related to a persons interest as a shareholder. |
|
Anti-takeover Provisions |
Panamanian corporations may include in their articles of
incorporation or by-laws classified board and super-majority
provisions.
Panamanian corporation laws anti-takeover provisions apply
only to companies that are(1) registered with the CNV for a
period of six months before the public offering,(2) have
over 3,000 shareholders, and(3) have a permanent office in
Panama with full time employees and investments in the country
for more than US$1,000,000.
These provisions are triggered when a buyer makes a public offer
to acquire 5% or more of any class of |
|
Delaware corporations may have a classified board,
super-majority voting and shareholders rights plan.
Unless Delaware corporations specifically elect otherwise,
Delaware corporations may not enter into a business
combination, including mergers, sales and leases of
assets, issuances of securities and similar transactions, with
an interested stockholder, or one that beneficially
owns 15% or more of a corporations voting stock, within
three years of such person becoming an interested shareholder
unless:
(1) the transaction that will cause the person to become an
interested shareholder is approved by |
105
|
|
|
Panama |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
shares with a market value of at least US$5,000,000. In sum, the
buyer must deliver to the corporation a complete and accurate
statement that includes(1) the name of the company, the
number of the shares that the buyer intends to acquire and the
purchase price;(2) the identity and background of the
person acquiring the shares;(3) the source and amount of
the funds or other goods that will be used to pay the purchase
price;(4) the plans or project the buyer has once it has
acquired the control of the company;(5) the number of
shares of the company that the buyer already has or is a
beneficiary of and those owned by any of its directors,
officers, subsidiaries, or partners or the same, and any
transactions made regarding the shares in the last
60 days;(6) contracts, agreements, business relations
or negotiations regarding securities issued by the company in
which the buyer is a party;(7) contract, agreements,
business relations or negotiations between the buyer and any
director, officer or beneficiary of the securities;
and(8) any other significant information. This declaration
will be accompanied by, among other things, a copy of the
buyers financial statements.
If the board of directors believes that the statement does not
contain all required information or that the statement is
inaccurate, the board of directors must send the statement to
the CNV within 45 days from the buyers initial
delivery of the statement to the CNV. The CNV may then hold a
public hearing to determine if the information is accurate and
complete and if the buyer has complied with the legal
requirements. The CNV may also start an inquiry into the case,
having the power to decide whether or not the offer may be
made.
Regardless of the above, the board of directors has the
authority to submit the offer to the consideration of the
shareholders. The board should only convene a shareholders
meeting when it deems the statement delivered by the offeror to
be complete and accurate. If convened, the shareholders
meeting should take place within the next 30 days. At the
shareholders meeting, two-thirds of the holders of the
issued and outstanding shares of each class of shares of the
corporation with a right to vote must approve the offer and the
offer is to be executed within 60 days from the
|
|
the board of directors of the target prior to the
transactions;
(2) after the completion of the transaction in which the person
becomes an interested shareholder, the interested shareholder
holds at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation not
including shares owned by persons who are directors and also
officers of interested shareholders and shares owned by
specified employee benefit plans; or
(3) after the person becomes an interested shareholder, the
business combination is approved by the board of directors of
the corporation and holders of at least 66.67% of the
outstanding voting stock, excluding shares held by the
interested shareholder. |
106
|
|
|
Panama |
|
Delaware |
|
|
|
shareholders approval. If the board decides not to convene
the shareholders meeting within 15 days following the
receipt of a complete and accurate statement from the offeror,
shares may then be purchased. In all cases, the purchase of
shares can take place only if it is not prohibited by an
administrative or judicial order or injunction.
The law also establishes some actions or recourses of the
sellers against the buyer in cases the offer is made in
contravention of the law.
|
|
|
|
Previously Acquired Rights |
In no event can the vote of the majority shareholders deprive
the shareholders of a corporation of previously-acquired rights.
Panamanian jurisprudence and doctrine has established that the
majority shareholders cannot amend the articles of incorporation
and deprive minority shareholders of previously-acquired rights
nor impose upon them an agreement that is contrary to those
articles of incorporation.
Once a share is issued, the shareholders become entitled to the
rights established in the articles of incorporation and such
rights cannot be taken away, diminished nor extinguished without
the express consent of the shareholders entitled to such rights.
If by amending the articles of incorporation, the rights granted
to a class of shareholders is somehow altered or modified to
their disadvantage, those shareholders will need to approve the
amendment unanimously. |
|
No comparable provisions exist under Delaware law. |
107
INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
United States
The following summary describes the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition
of our Class A shares as of the date hereof. The discussion
set forth below is applicable to United States Holders (as
defined below) that hold our Class A shares as capital
assets for United States federal income tax purposes (generally,
property held for investment). This summary does not represent a
detailed description of the United States federal income tax
consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special
treatment under the United States federal income tax laws,
including if you are:
|
|
|
|
|
a bank; |
|
|
|
a dealer in securities or currencies; |
|
|
|
a financial institution; |
|
|
|
a regulated investment company; |
|
|
|
a real estate investment trust; |
|
|
|
an insurance company; |
|
|
|
a tax-exempt organization; |
|
|
|
a person holding our Class A shares as part of a hedging,
integrated or conversion transaction, a constructive sale or a
straddle; |
|
|
|
a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market
method of accounting for your securities; |
|
|
|
a person liable for alternative minimum tax; |
|
|
|
a person who owns 10% or more of our voting stock; |
|
|
|
a partnership or other pass-through entity for United States
federal income tax purposes; or |
|
|
|
a person whose functional currency is not the United
States dollar. |
The discussion below is based upon the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), and regulations, rulings and judicial
decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities
may be replaced, revoked or modified so as to result in United
States federal income tax consequences different from those
discussed below. This discussion, to the extent that it states
matters of United States federal income tax law or legal
conclusions and subject to the qualifications herein, represents
the opinion of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, our
United States counsel.
If a partnership holds our Class A shares, the tax
treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of
the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a
partner of a partnership holding our Class A shares, you
should consult your tax advisors.
If you are considering the purchase, ownership or disposition
of our Class A shares, you should consult your own tax
advisors concerning the United States federal income tax
consequences to you in light of your particular situation as
well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other
taxing jurisdiction.
As used herein, United States Holder means a holder
of our Class A shares that is for United States federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or
the District of Columbia; |
108
|
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a
United States person. |
Distributions on the Class A shares (including amounts
withheld to reflect Panamanian withholding taxes) will be
taxable as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United
States federal income tax principles. Such income (including
withheld taxes) will be includable in your gross income as
ordinary income on the day actually or constructively received
by you. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends
received deduction allowed to corporations.
With respect to non-corporate United States investors, certain
dividends received in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2009 from a qualified foreign corporation may be
subject to reduced rates of taxation. A foreign corporation
generally is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with
respect to dividends paid by that corporation on shares that are
readily tradable on an established securities market in the
United States. United States Treasury Department guidance
indicates that our Class A shares, which are expected to be
listed on the NYSE, will be readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States once listed on the
NYSE. There can be no assurance, however, that our Class A
shares will be listed on the NYSE or considered readily tradable
on an established securities market. Non-corporate holders that
do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which
they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to
treat the dividend income as investment income
pursuant to section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be
eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our
status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate
reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a
dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to
positions in substantially similar or related property. This
disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been
met. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the
application of these rules to your particular circumstances.
Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Panamanian
withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes
eligible for credit against your United States federal income
tax liability. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax
credit, dividends paid on the Class A shares will be
treated as income from sources outside the United States and
will generally constitute passive income. Further, in certain
circumstances, if you:
|
|
|
|
|
have held Class A shares for less than a specified minimum
period during which you are not protected from risk of
loss, or |
|
|
|
are obligated to make payments related to the dividends, |
you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes
imposed on dividends paid on the Class A shares. The rules
governing the foreign tax credit are complex. You are urged to
consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the
foreign tax credit under your particular circumstances.
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year,
as determined under United States federal income tax principles,
the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of
capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of the
Class A shares (thereby increasing the amount of gain, or
decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized by you on a
subsequent disposition of the Class A shares), and the
balance in excess of adjusted basis will be taxed as capital
gain recognized on a sale or exchange (as discussed below under
Taxation of Capital Gains). Consequently, such
distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings
and profits would generally not give rise to foreign source
income and you would generally not be able to use the foreign tax
109
credit arising from any Panamanian withholding tax imposed on
such distributions unless such credit can be applied (subject to
applicable limitations) against United States federal income tax
due on other foreign source income in the appropriate category
for foreign tax credit purposes. However, we do not intend to
keep earnings and profits in accordance with United States
federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that
a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend (as
discussed above).
|
|
|
Passive Foreign Investment Company |
We do not believe that we are a passive foreign investment
company (a PFIC) for United States federal income
tax purposes (or that we were one in 2004), and we expect to
operate in such a manner so as not to become a PFIC. If,
however, we are or become a PFIC, you could be subject to
additional United States federal income taxes on gain
recognized with respect to the Class A shares and on
certain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes
treated as having been deferred under the PFIC rules.
Non-corporate United States Holders will not be eligible for
reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us in
taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2009, if we are
a PFIC in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or
the preceding taxable year. Our United States counsel expresses
no opinion with respect to our statements of belief and
expectation contained in this paragraph.
|
|
|
Taxation of Capital Gains |
For United States federal income tax purposes, you will
recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of a
Class A share in an amount equal to the difference between
the amount realized for the Class A share and your tax
basis in the Class A share. Such gain or loss will
generally be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of individuals
derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one
year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any
gain or loss recognized by you will generally be treated as
United States source gain or loss.
|
|
|
Information reporting and backup withholding |
In general, information reporting will apply to dividends in
respect of our Class A shares and the proceeds from the
sale, exchange or redemption of our Class A shares that are
paid to you within the United States (and in certain cases,
outside the United States), unless you are an exempt recipient
such as a corporation. A backup withholding tax may apply to
such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification
number or certification of other exempt status or fail to report
in full dividend and interest income.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be
allowed as a refund or a credit against your United States
federal income tax liability provided the required information
is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Panamanian Taxation
The following is a discussion of the material Panamanian tax
considerations to holders of Class A shares under
Panamanian tax law, and is based upon the tax laws and
regulations in force and effect as of the date hereof, which may
be subject to change. This discussion, to the extent it states
matters of Panamanian tax law or legal conclusions and subject
to the qualifications herein, represents the opinion of Galindo,
Arias & Lopez, our Panamanian counsel.
Panamas income tax regime is based on territoriality
principles, which define taxable income only as that revenue
which is generated from a source within the Republic of Panama,
or for services rendered outside of Panama, but which, by their
nature, are intended to directly benefit the local commercial
activities of
110
individuals or corporations which operate within its territory.
Said taxation principles have governed the Panamanian fiscal
regime for decades, and have been upheld through judicial and
administrative precedent.
Distributions by Panamanian corporations, whether in the form of
cash, stock or other property, are subject to a 10% withholding
tax for the portion of the distribution that is attributable to
Panamanian sourced income, as defined pursuant to the
territoriality principles that govern Panamanian tax law.
Distributions made by a holding company which correspond to
dividends paid by its subsidiary for which the dividend tax was
paid, are not subject to any further withholding under
Panamanian law. Therefore, distributions on the Class A
shares being offered would not be subject to withholding taxes
to the extent that said distributions are attributable to
dividends received from any of our subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Taxation of capital gains |
As long as the Class A shares are registered with the CNV
and are sold through an organized market, Panamanian taxes on
capital gains will not apply either to Panamanians or other
countries nationals. As part of this offering process, we
will register the Class A shares, with both the New York
Stock Exchange and the CNV.
There are no estate, gift or other taxes imposed by the
Panamanian government that would affect a holder of the
Class A shares, whether such holder were Panamanian or a
national of another country.
111
UNDERWRITING
Copa Holdings, the selling shareholders and the underwriters
named below have entered into an underwriting agreement with
respect to the Class A shares being offered. Subject to
certain conditions, each underwriter has severally agreed to
purchase the number of Class A shares indicated in the
following table. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and
Goldman, Sachs & Co. are acting as joint book-running
managers and representatives of the underwriters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriters |
|
Class A Shares | |
|
|
| |
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
5,512,500 |
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
5,512,500 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
1,575,000 |
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
1,575,000 |
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated
|
|
|
1,575,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,750,000 |
|
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the
Class A shares being offered, if any are taken, other than
the Class A shares covered by the option described below,
unless and until the option is exercised.
If the underwriters sell more Class A shares than the total
number set forth in the table above, the underwriters have an
option to buy up to an additional 2,362,500 Class A shares
from the selling shareholders. The underwriters may exercise
this option for 30 days following the date of this
prospectus. If any Class A shares are purchased pursuant to
this option, the underwriters will severally purchase
Class A shares in approximately the same proportion as set
forth in the table above.
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discount to be paid to the underwriters by the selling
shareholders. Such amounts are shown assuming both no exercise
and full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase
up to 2,362,500 additional Class A shares from the selling
shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by the Selling Shareholders |
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per Class A Share
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
15,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,112,500 |
|
Class A shares sold by the underwriters to the public will
initially be offered at the initial public offering price set
forth on the cover of this prospectus. Any Class A shares
sold by the underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a
discount of up to $0.65 per share from the initial public
offering price. If all the Class A shares are not sold at
the initial public offering price, the representatives may
change the offering price and the other selling terms.
Copa Holdings, Copa Holdings selling shareholders,
directors and executive officers have agreed that, without the
prior written consent of the representatives of the
underwriters, Copa Holdings and they will not, during the period
ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, sell, contract to sell, grant any option, right or
warrant to purchase, or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any Class A shares or any securities
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Class A
shares; or |
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of Class A shares, |
whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of Class A shares or such other securities, in
cash or otherwise. In addition, Copa Holdings and each such
person agrees that, without the prior
112
written consent of the representatives of the underwriters, they
will not, during the period ending 180 days after the date
of this prospectus, make any demand for, or exercise any right
with respect to, the registration of any Class A shares or
any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
Class A shares.
The restrictions described in the immediately preceding
paragraph to do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of Class A shares to the underwriters; |
|
|
|
transactions by any person other than Copa Holdings relating to
Class A shares or other securities acquired in open market
transactions after the completion of the offering of the
Class A shares; or |
|
|
|
any existing employee benefits plan. |
The 180 day restricted period described in the preceding
paragraph will be extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the 180 day restricted
period Copa Holdings issues an earnings release or material news
event relating to Copa Holdings occurs, or |
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the 180 day restricted period,
Copa Holdings announces that it will release earnings results
during the 16 day period beginning on the last day of the
180 day period, |
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
180 day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings
release or the occurrence of the material news or material event.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for Copa
Holdings Class A shares. The initial public offering
price will be negotiated between the selling shareholders and
the representatives of the underwriters. The factors to be
considered in determining the initial public offering price of
the Class A shares will be Copa Holdings historical
performance, Copa Holdings business prospects, an
assessment of Copa Holdings management and the
consideration of the above factors in relation to market
valuation of companies in Copa Holdings industry, and the
price-earnings ratios, market prices of securities and other
quantitative and qualitative data relating to such businesses.
The Class A shares have been approved for listing on the
NYSE under the trading symbol CPA. In order to meet
one of the requirements for listing Copa Holdings
Class A shares on the NYSE, the underwriters have
undertaken to sell lots of 100 or more Class A shares to a
minimum of 2,000 beneficial holders.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell Class A shares in the open market. These
transactions may include short sales, stabilizing transactions
and purchases to cover positions created by short sales. Short
sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number
of Class A shares than they are required to purchase in the
offering. Covered short sales are sales made in an
amount not greater than the underwriters option to
purchase additional Class A shares from the selling
shareholders. The underwriters may close out any covered short
position by either exercising their option to purchase
additional Class A shares or purchasing Class A shares
in the open market. In determining the source of Class A
shares to close out the covered short position, the underwriters
will consider, among other things, the price of Class A
shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to
the price at which they may purchase additional Class A
shares pursuant to the option granted to them. Naked
short sales are any sales in excess of such option. The
underwriters must close out any naked short position by
purchasing Class A shares in the open market. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
Copa Holdings Class A shares in the open market after
pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in
the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids
for or purchases of Class A shares made by the underwriters
in the open market prior to the completion of the offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased Class A shares sold by or
for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or
short-covering transactions.
113
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing transactions
may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the
market price of Copa Holdings Class A shares, and
together with the imposition of the penalty bid, may stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the market price of our
Class A shares. As a result, the price of Class A
shares may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist
in the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may
be discontinued at any time. These transactions may be effected
on the NYSE, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Each of the underwriters has represented and agreed that:
|
|
|
(a) (i) it is a person whose ordinary activities
involve it in acquiring, holding, managing or disposing of
investments (as principal or agent) for the purposes of its
business and (ii) it has not offered or sold and will not
offer or sell the Class A shares other than to persons
whose ordinary activities involve them in acquiring, holding,
managing or disposing of investments (as principal or as agent)
for the purposes of their businesses or who it is reasonable to
expect will acquire, hold, manage or dispose of investments (as
principal or agent) for the purposes of their businesses where
the issue of the Class A shares would otherwise constitute
a contravention of Section 19 of the Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (the FSMA) by Copa Holdings; |
|
|
(b) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA) received by
it in connection with the issue or sale of the Class A
shares in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA
does not apply to Copa Holdings; and |
|
|
(c) it has complied and will comply with all applicable
provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the Class A shares in, from or otherwise
involving the United Kingdom. |
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
(the European Union plus Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein)
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant
Member State), each of the underwriters has represented and
agreed that with effect from and including the date on which the
Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member
State (the Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and
will not make an offer of Class A shares to the public in
that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a
prospectus in relation to the Class A shares which has been
approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member
State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant
Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive,
except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant
Implementation Date, make an offer of Class A shares to the
public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
|
|
|
(a) to legal entities which are authorised or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorised or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities; |
|
|
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last
financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than
50,000,000, as
shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; or |
|
|
(c) in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive. |
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of Class A shares to the public in
relation to any Class A shares in any Relevant Member State
means the communication in any form and by any means of
sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the
Class A shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to
decide to purchase or subscribe the Class A shares, as the
same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/ EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State.
Class A shares may not be offered or sold by means of any
document other than to persons whose ordinary business is to buy
or sell shares or debentures, whether as principal or agent, or
in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public
within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of
114
Hong Kong, and no advertisement, invitation or document relating
to the Class A shares may be issued, whether in Hong Kong
or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of which are
likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong
(except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong
Kong) other than with respect to Class A shares which are
or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong
Kong or only to professional investors within the
meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571)
of Hong Kong and any rules made thereunder.
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the
Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus
and any other document or material in connection with the offer
or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the
Class A shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor
may the Class A shares be offered or sold, or be made the
subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether
directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than
(i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of
the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore
(the SFA), (ii) to a relevant person, or any person
pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the
conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or
(iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the
conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
Where the Class A shares are subscribed or purchased under
Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a) a
corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole
business of which is to hold investments and the entire share
capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of
whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the
trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to
hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor,
shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that
corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest in
that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after
that corporation or that trust has acquired the Class A
shares under Section 275 except: (1) to an
institutional investor under Section 274 of the SFA or to a
relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A),
and in accordance with the conditions, specified in
Section 275 of the SFA; (2) where no consideration is
given for the transfer; or (3) by operation of law.
Class A shares have not been and will not be registered
under the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan (the Securities
and Exchange Law) and each underwriter has agreed that it will
not offer or sell any Class A shares, directly or
indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident
of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in
Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under
the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale,
directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan,
except pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the
Securities and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws,
regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts
to exceed five percent of the total number of Class A
shares offered.
Copa Holdings and the selling shareholders have agreed to
indemnify the several underwriters against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act or to contribute
to payments the underwriters may be required to make because of
any of these liabilities.
From time to time, certain of the underwriters have provided,
and may provide in the future, investment banking, commercial
banking and other financial services to Copa Holdings and
Continental for which they have received and may continue to
receive customary fees and commissions.
Under U.S. federal securities laws, Corporación de
Inversiones Aéreas, S.A. and Continental Airlines, as the
selling shareholders, may be deemed to be underwriters.
115
EXPENSES OF THE OFFERING
We estimate that our expenses in connection with this offering,
other than underwriting discounts and commissions, will be as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds of | |
Expenses |
|
Amount | |
|
This Offering (%) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$ |
33,592.65 |
|
|
|
* |
|
NYSE listing fee
|
|
|
77,280 |
|
|
|
* |
|
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. filing fee
|
|
|
36,725 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Accountant fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Miscellaneous costs
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,877,597.65 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
We will not receive any of the net proceeds of this offering. |
All amounts in the table are estimated except the Securities and
Exchange Commission registration fee, the NYSE listing fee and
the NASD filing fee.
The total underwriting discounts and commissions that the
selling shareholders will be required to pay will be
approximately $15,750,000 million or 5.0% of the gross
proceeds of this offering.
VALIDITY OF SECURITIES
The validity of the Class A shares and other matters
governed by Panamanian law will be passed upon for us and the
underwriters by Galindo, Arias & Lopez, Panama City,
Panama. Certain matters of New York law will be passed upon for
us by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, New
York. Messrs. Jaime Arias and Ricardo Alberto Arias,
partners of Galindo, Arias & Lopez, are indirect
shareholders of CIASA and serve on our board of directors.
EXPERTS
Ernst & Young, Panama, independent registered public
accounting firm, has audited our consolidated financial
statements and schedule at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004, as set forth in their report. We have
included our financial statements and schedule in the prospectus
and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on
Ernst & Youngs report, given on their authority
as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Commission a registration statement
(including amendments and exhibits to the registration
statement) on Form F-1 under the Securities Act. This
prospectus, which is part of the registration statement, does
not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration
statement. For further information, we refer you to the
registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as
part of the registration statement. If a document has been filed
as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to the
copy of the document that has been filed. Each statement in this
prospectus relating to a document filed as an exhibit is
qualified in all respects by the filed exhibit.
Upon completion of this offering, we will become subject to the
informational requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, which is also known as the Exchange Act.
Accordingly, we will be
116
required to file reports and other information with the
Commission, including annual reports on Form 20-F and
reports on Form 6-K. You may inspect and copy reports and
other information to be filed with the Commission at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission at 100 F Street, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20549, and copies of the materials may
be obtained there at prescribed rates. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Commissions Public
Reference Room by calling the Commission in the United States at
1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the Commission maintains an
Internet website at www.sec.gov, from which you can
electronically access the registration statement and its
materials.
As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to the same
disclosure requirements as a domestic U.S. registrant under
the Exchange Act. For example, we are not required to prepare
and issue quarterly reports. However, we intend to furnish our
shareholders with annual reports containing financial statements
audited by our independent auditors and to make available to our
shareholders quarterly reports containing unaudited financial
data for the first three quarters of each fiscal year. We plan
to file quarterly financial statements with the SEC within two
months of the first three quarters of our fiscal year, and we
will file annual reports on Form 20-F within the time
period required by the SEC, which is currently six months from
December 31, the end of our fiscal year.
117
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages | |
|
|
| |
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24 |
|
|
|
|
F-25 |
|
|
|
|
F-26 |
|
|
|
|
F-27 |
|
|
|
|
F-28 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Copa Holdings, S.A. and its subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Panama City, Republic of Panama
August 30, 2005, except for the effects of the
reorganization
discussed in Note 5, as to
which
the date is November 25, 2005
F-2
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in US$ thousands, | |
|
|
except share and per | |
|
|
share data) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
95,718 |
|
|
$ |
57,598 |
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
4,530 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
15,225 |
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
|
114,891 |
|
|
|
65,962 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2,622 and $3,046 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively
|
|
|
27,706 |
|
|
|
31,019 |
|
|
Expendable parts and supplies, net of allowance for obsolescence
of $1,739 and $1,733 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
8,403 |
|
|
|
6,061 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
156,035 |
|
|
|
108,053 |
|
Property and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment
|
|
|
593,825 |
|
|
|
491,276 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27,233 |
|
|
|
25,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621,058 |
|
|
|
517,053 |
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(87,037 |
) |
|
|
(82,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,021 |
|
|
|
434,619 |
|
|
Purchase deposits for flight equipment
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
45,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
|
541,211 |
|
|
|
480,488 |
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension asset
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
Other assets,
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
702,050 |
|
|
$ |
591,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
30,573 |
|
|
$ |
59,654 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
25,335 |
|
|
|
25,310 |
|
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
53,423 |
|
|
|
47,223 |
|
|
Taxes and interest payable
|
|
|
16,269 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
Accrued expenses payable
|
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
143,011 |
|
|
|
156,733 |
|
Non-Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
380,827 |
|
|
|
311,991 |
|
|
Post employment benefits liability
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
4,402 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities
|
|
|
384,884 |
|
|
|
319,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
527,895 |
|
|
|
476,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock80,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A29,028,125 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
|
Class B13,784,375 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
144,932 |
|
|
|
86,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
174,155 |
|
|
|
115,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$ |
702,050 |
|
|
$ |
591,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
F-3
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in US$ thousands, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Operating Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$ |
364,611 |
|
|
$ |
311,683 |
|
|
$ |
269,629 |
|
|
Cargo, mail and other
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
30,106 |
|
|
|
31,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,837 |
|
|
|
341,789 |
|
|
|
300,637 |
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
62,549 |
|
|
|
48,512 |
|
|
|
40,024 |
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
51,701 |
|
|
|
45,254 |
|
|
|
39,264 |
|
|
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
29,073 |
|
|
|
27,681 |
|
|
|
28,720 |
|
|
Reservations and sales
|
|
|
22,118 |
|
|
|
18,011 |
|
|
|
16,707 |
|
|
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
19,742 |
|
|
|
20,354 |
|
|
|
20,733 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
16,686 |
|
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
12,155 |
|
|
|
10,551 |
|
|
|
8,495 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
29,306 |
|
|
|
25,977 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
|
Fleet impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,494 |
|
|
|
283,493 |
|
|
|
269,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
82,343 |
|
|
|
58,296 |
|
|
|
30,841 |
|
Non-operating Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(16,488 |
) |
|
|
(11,613 |
) |
|
|
(7,629 |
) |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,039 |
) |
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
|
|
(7,174 |
) |
Income before Income Taxes
|
|
|
74,304 |
|
|
|
52,133 |
|
|
|
23,667 |
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
68,572 |
|
|
$ |
48,489 |
|
|
$ |
20,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
Shares used for computation
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
F-4
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value) | |
|
Issued Capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in US$ thousands) | |
At December 31, 2001
|
|
|
29,028,125 |
|
|
|
13,784,375 |
|
|
$ |
19,813 |
|
|
$ |
9,410 |
|
|
$ |
17,203 |
|
|
$ |
46,426 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,668 |
|
|
|
20,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2002
|
|
|
29,028,125 |
|
|
|
13,784,375 |
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
37,871 |
|
|
|
67,094 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,489 |
|
|
|
48,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2003
|
|
|
29,028,125 |
|
|
|
13,784,375 |
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
86,360 |
|
|
|
115,583 |
|
|
Dividends Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,572 |
|
|
|
68,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
29,028,125 |
|
|
|
13,784,375 |
|
|
$ |
19,813 |
|
|
$ |
9,410 |
|
|
$ |
144,932 |
|
|
$ |
174,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
F-5
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in US$ thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
68,572 |
|
|
$ |
48,489 |
|
|
$ |
20,668 |
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
19,279 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
(Gain)/ loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
Fleet impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
Provision for obsolescence of expendable parts and supplies
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
Derivative instruments mark to market
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(4,612 |
) |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
(9,167 |
) |
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
(2,130 |
) |
|
|
2,897 |
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,430 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
(3,855 |
) |
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
8,809 |
|
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
5,013 |
|
|
|
5,578 |
|
|
|
6,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
98,633 |
|
|
|
73,561 |
|
|
|
50,931 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(11,391 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
Advance payments on aircraft purchase contracts
|
|
|
(16,314 |
) |
|
|
(41,232 |
) |
|
|
(72,263 |
) |
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(65,764 |
) |
|
|
(112,181 |
) |
|
|
(75,957 |
) |
|
Disposal of property and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(90,268 |
) |
|
|
(151,884 |
) |
|
|
(145,591 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from loans and borrowings
|
|
|
101,198 |
|
|
|
140,732 |
|
|
|
112,898 |
|
|
Payments on loans and borrowings
|
|
|
(32,125 |
) |
|
|
(21,969 |
) |
|
|
(55,280 |
) |
|
Issuance of bonds
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
21,736 |
|
|
|
42,782 |
|
|
Redemption of bonds
|
|
|
(35,675 |
) |
|
|
(35,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
|
|
|
29,755 |
|
|
|
105,298 |
|
|
|
100,400 |
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
38,120 |
|
|
|
26,975 |
|
|
|
5,740 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
January 1st
|
|
|
57,598 |
|
|
|
30,623 |
|
|
|
24,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31
|
|
$ |
95,718 |
|
|
$ |
57,598 |
|
|
$ |
30,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
16,021 |
|
|
$ |
10,449 |
|
|
$ |
6,839 |
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
F-6
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Corporate Information
Copa Holdings, S. A. (the Company) is a Panamanian
entity incorporated in 1998 and its capital shares are 51% and
49% owned by Corporación de Inversiones Aéreas, S. A.
(CIASA) and Continental Airlines, Inc.
(Continental), respectively. The Company owns 99.8%
of the shares of Compañía Panameña de
Aviación, S. A. (Copa), and 100% of the shares
of Oval Financial Leasing, Ltd. (OVAL), and OPAC, S.
A. (OPAC). Copa is incorporated according to the
laws of the Republic of Panama and provides international air
transportation for passengers, cargo and mail to countries in
North, Central and South America and the Caribbean. OVAL was
incorporated on November 15, 1994, according to the laws of
the British Virgin Islands, and controls the special-purpose
vehicles that have a beneficial interest in 17 aircraft with a
carrying value of $492.4 million, all of which are leased
to Copa. The aircraft are pledged as collateral for the
obligations of the special-purpose vehicles, which are all
consolidated by the Company for financial reporting purposes;
however, the creditors of the special-purpose vehicles have no
recourse to the general credit of the Company or Copa. OPAC is
incorporated according to the laws of the Republic of Panama,
and owns the corporate headquarters located in Panama City,
which is leased to Copa.
The Company is a leading Latin American provider of
international airline passenger and cargo service. Operating
from its Panama City hub in the Republic of Panama, the Company
currently offers approximately 80 daily scheduled flights among
30 destinations in 20 countries in North, Central and South
America and the Caribbean, as of December 31, 2004.
Additionally, the Company provides passengers with access to
flights to more than 120 other international destinations
through codeshare agreements with Continental and other
airlines. The Company has a broad commercial alliance with
Continental which includes joint marketing, code-sharing
arrangements, participation in Continentals OnePass
frequent flier loyalty program and access to Continentals
VIP lounge program, Presidents Club, along with other
benefits such as improved purchasing power in negotiations with
service providers, aircraft vendors and insurers. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company operated a fleet of 22
aircraft; two Boeing 737-200 aircraft, and 20 modern Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft.
The airline industry is by nature cyclical and seasonal, and the
Companys operating results may vary from quarter to
quarter. The Company tends to experience the highest levels of
traffic and revenue in July and August, with a smaller peak in
traffic in December and January. In general, demand for air
travel is higher in the third and fourth quarters, particularly
in international markets, because of the increase in vacation
travel during these periods relative to the remainder of the
year. The Company generally experiences its lowest levels of
passenger traffic in April and May. Given its high proportion of
fixed costs, seasonality can affect the Companys
profitability from quarter to quarter. Demand for air travel is
also affected by factors such as economic conditions, war or the
threat of war, fare levels and weather conditions.
A substantial portion of the Companys assets are located
in the Republic of Panama, a significant proportion of the
Companys customers are Panamanian, and substantially all
of the Companys flights operate through its hub at Tocumen
International Airport in Panama City. As a result, the Company
depends on economic and political conditions prevailing from
time to time in Panama.
As used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the
terms the Company, we, us,
our and similar terms refer to Copa Holdings, S.A.
and, unless the context indicates otherwise, its consolidated
subsidiaries.
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
All financial information contained is presented in
U.S. Dollars unless otherwise stated and prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
F-7
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements comprise the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. The financial statements of
subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the
parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is
transferred to the Company and cease to be consolidated from the
date on which control is transferred from the Company. All
intercompany accounts, transactions and profits arising from
consolidated entities have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at banks, short-term
time deposits, asset-backed commercial paper and securities, and
U.S. agency securities with original maturities of three
months or less. Restricted cash is primarily collateral for
government letters of credit.
The Company invests in short-term time deposits, asset-backed
commercial paper and securities, and U.S. government agency
securities with original maturities of more than three months.
These investments are classified as short-term investments in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Short-term
investments are stated at their amortized cost, and are
classified as held-to-maturity securities.
|
|
|
Expendable Parts and Supplies |
Expendable parts and supplies for flight equipment are carried
at average acquisition cost and are expensed when used in
operations. An allowance for obsolescence is provided over the
remaining estimated useful life of the related aircraft, plus an
allowance for expendable parts currently identified as excess to
reduce the carrying cost to net realizable value. These
allowances are based on management estimates, which are subject
to change.
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated
to estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives
using the straight-line method. Jet aircraft, jet engines and
aircraft rotables are assumed to have an estimated residual
value of 15% of original cost; other categories of property and
equipment are assumed to have no residual value. The estimated
useful lives for property and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
Building
|
|
40 |
Jet aircraft.
|
|
25 to 30 |
Jet engines
|
|
10 to 30 |
Ground property and equipment
|
|
10 |
Furniture, fixture, equipment and others
|
|
5 to 10 |
Software rights and licenses
|
|
3 to 8 |
Aircraft rotables
|
|
7 to 30 |
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lesser of remaining lease term
or useful life |
F-8
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Measurement of Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets used
in operations, consisting principally of property and equipment,
when events or changes in circumstances indicate, in
managements judgment, that the assets might be impaired
and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets.
Cash flow estimates are based on historical results adjusted to
reflect the Companys best estimate of future market and
operating conditions. The net carrying value of assets not
recoverable is reduced to fair value if lower than carrying
value. Estimates of fair value represent the Companys best
estimate based on industry trends and reference to market rates
and transactions and are subject to change.
Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is provided
rather than when a ticket is sold. The amount of passenger
ticket sales not yet recognized as revenue is reflected as
Air traffic liability in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Tickets whose fares have expired and/or are one year old
are recognized as passenger revenue. A significant portion of
the Companys ticket sales are processed through major
credit card companies, resulting in accounts receivable which
are generally short-term in duration and typically collected
prior to when revenue is recognized. The Company believes that
the credit risk associated with these receivables is minimal.
|
|
|
Cargo and Mail Services Revenue |
Cargo and mail services revenue are recognized when the Company
provides the shipping services and thereby completes the earning
process.
Other revenue is primarily comprised of excess baggage charges,
commissions earned on tickets sold for flights on other airlines
and charter flights, and is recognized when transportation or
service is provided.
The Company participates in Continentals
OnePass frequent flyer program, for which the
Companys passengers receive all the benefits and
privileges offered by the OnePass program. Continental is
responsible for the administration of the OnePass program. Under
the terms of the Companys frequent flyer agreement with
Continental, OnePass members receive OnePass frequent flyer
mileage credits for travel on Copa and the Company pays
Continental a per mile rate for each mileage credit granted by
Continental, at which point the Company has no further
obligation. The amounts due to Continental under this agreement
are expensed by the Company as the mileage credits are earned.
|
|
|
Passenger Traffic Commissions |
Passenger traffic commissions are recognized as expense when the
transportation is provided and the related revenue is
recognized. Passenger traffic commissions paid but not yet
recognized as expense are included in Prepaid
expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Foreign Currency Transactions
The Companys functional currency is the U.S. Dollar,
the legal tender in Panama. Assets and liabilities in foreign
currencies are translated at end-of-period exchange rates,
except for non-monetary assets, which are
F-9
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
translated at equivalent U.S. dollar costs at dates of
acquisition using historical rates. Operations are translated at
average exchange rates in effect during the period. Foreign
exchange gains and losses are included as a component of
Other, net within Non-operating income
(expense) in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
In 2004, approximately 80% of the Companys expenses and
50% of the Companys revenues were denominated in
U.S. dollars. The remainder of the Companys expenses
and revenues were denominated in the currencies of the various
countries to which the Company flies, with the largest
non-dollar amount denominated in Colombian pesos. The Company
currently does not hedge the risk of fluctuation in foreign
exchange rates.
|
|
|
Maintenance and Repair Costs |
Maintenance and repair costs for owned and leased flight
equipment, including the overhaul of aircraft components, are
charged to operating expenses as incurred. Engine overhaul costs
covered by power-by-the-hour arrangements are paid and expensed
as incurred, on the basis of hours flown per the contract.
The Company sponsors a profit-sharing program for both
management and non-management personnel. For members of
management, profit-sharing is based on a combination of the
Companys performance as a whole and the achievement of
individual goals. Profit-sharing for non-management employees is
based solely on the Companys performance. The Company
accrues each month for the expected profit-sharing, which is
paid annually in February. Amounts accrued for the
Companys profit-sharing program as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 were $5.5 million and $4.6 million,
respectively.
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. The Company
recognized as advertising expense $2.8 million,
$3.4 million, and $2.6 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
Deferred income taxes are provided under the liability method
and reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between
the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements.
F-10
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
At December 31, long-term debt consisted of the following
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term fixed rate debt
|
|
$ |
318.7 |
|
|
$ |
246.9 |
|
|
(Secured fixed rate indebtedness due through 2015. Effective
rates from 3.98% to 6.07% at December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term variable rate debt
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
|
(Secured variable rate indebtedness due through 2015. Effective
rates from 2.09% to 6.15% at December 31, 2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private bond issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
(Unsecured variable rate indebtedness due in 2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
411.4 |
|
|
|
371.7 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
$ |
380.8 |
|
|
$ |
312.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
$ |
262.2 |
|
The Company has financed the acquisition of fifteen Boeing
737-Next Generation aircraft and three spare engines through
syndicated loans provided by international financial
institutions with the support of partial guarantees issued by
the Export-Import Bank of the United States, with repayment
profiles of 12 years.
The Export-Import Bank generally provides guarantees to
companies that purchase goods from U.S. companies, enabling
them to obtain financing at substantially lower interest rates
relative to those that could be obtained without a guarantee.
The Company had $368.1 million and $301.9 million of
outstanding indebtedness that is owed to financial institutions
under financing arrangements guaranteed by the Export-Import
Bank at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Export-Import Bank guarantees support 85% of the net
purchase price of the aircraft and are secured with a first
priority mortgage on the aircraft in favor of a security trustee
on behalf of Export-Import Bank. The documentation for each loan
follows standard market forms for this type of financing,
including standard events of default. The Companys
Export-Import Bank supported financings are amortized on a
quarterly basis, are denominated in dollars and originally bear
interest at a floating rate linked to LIBOR. The Export-Import
Bank guaranteed facilities typically offer an option to fix the
applicable interest rate. The Company has exercised this option
with respect to $318.7 million as of December 31, 2004
at an average weighted interest rate of 4.47%. The remaining
$49.4 million bears interest at an average weighted
interest of LIBOR plus 0.06%. At December 31, 2004, the
total amount outstanding under our Export-Import Bank supported
financings totaled $368.1 million.
The Company effectively extends the maturity of its aircraft
financing to 15 years through the use of a Stretched
Overall Amortization and Repayment, or SOAR, structure
which provides serial draw-downs calculated to result in a 100%
loan accreting to a recourse balloon at the maturity of the
Export-Import Bank guaranteed loan. The SOAR portions of the
Companys facilities require the Company to maintain certain
F-11
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
financial covenants, including an EBITDAR to fixed charge ratio,
a net debt to capitalization ratio and minimum net worth. To
comply with the first ratio, the Companys EBITDA plus
aircraft rent expense, or EBITDAR, for the prior year must be at
least 2.5 times the fixed charge expenses (including interest,
commission, fees, discounts and other finance payments) for that
year. To comply with the second ratio, the Companys
tangible net worth shall be at least five times the long-term
obligations. Third, the Companys tangible net worth must
be at least $50 million. As of December 31, 2004, the
Company complied with all required covenants. The Company also
pays a commitment fee on the unutilized portion of the SOAR
loans. The Company also typically finances approximately 10% of
the purchase price of the Boeing aircraft through commercial
loans which totaled $28.3 million as of December 31,
2004. Under the commercial loan agreements for aircraft received
in 2002, the Company is required to comply with four specific
financial covenants. The first covenant requires EBITDAR for the
prior year to be at least 1.9 times the finance charge expenses
(including interest, commission, fees, discounts and other
finance payments) for the first year of the agreement and 2.0
times the finance charge expenses for the remainder of the
agreement. The second covenant limits net borrowings to 92% of
the Companys capitalization during the first two years,
90% during the next two years and 85% during the last six years
of the agreement. The third covenant requires the Companys
tangible net worth to be at least $30 million for the first
two years, $70 million for the next three years and
$120 million for the last four years of the agreement. The
last covenant requires the Company to maintain a minimum of
$30 million in available cash (including cash equivalents
and committed credit facilities) for the first five years and
$50 million for the last five years of the agreement. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company complied with all required
covenants.
The Companys Embraer aircraft purchases will not be
eligible for Export-Import Bank guaranteed financing. To
contribute to the financing for the six Embraer aircraft to be
delivered through the end of 2006, the Company has agreed to
terms on a senior term loan facility in the amount of
approximately $134 million with PK AirFinance US, Inc., an
affiliate of General Electric. The loans will have a term of
twelve years. The Company also pays commitment fees with respect
to the loans.
The Company issued private bonds in 2004, 2003 and 2002 for
advanced delivery payments for new aircraft. In order to secure
this issuance, the Company granted to the agent (Banco
Continental, S. A.), for the benefit of the bondholders, a first
priority security interest in its rights, title and interest
over the four aircraft purchased in 2003 (two Boeing 737-700 and
two Boeing 737-800), and the three aircraft purchased in 2004
(two Boeing 737-700 and one Boeing 737-800). These bonds have
matured and none are outstanding at December 31, 2004.
The Company issued additional private bonds in the amount of
$10.8 million on January 4, 2005, $2.8 million on
May 3, 2005, $2.8 million on June 1, 2005 and
$2.8 million in August 1, 2005, also for advanced
delivery payments of new aircraft. The Company has granted, for
the benefit of the bondholders, a first priority security
interest in the rights, title and interest over the two Boeing
737-700 aircraft having delivery months of May and June 2006.
Interest on the bonds is paid on March 31, June 30,
September 30, and December 31 with the balance of the
bonds to be repaid upon delivery of the aircraft for which the
advance payments related. Assets, primarily aircraft, subject to
agreements securing the Companys indebtedness amounted to
$508.4 million, $410.0 million, and
$264.0 million as of December 31, 2004, 2003, and
2002, respectively.
The Company leases certain aircraft and other assets under
long-term lease arrangements. Other leased assets include real
property, airport and terminal facilities, sales offices,
maintenance facilities, training centers and general offices.
Most contract leases include renewal options. Non-aircraft
related leases, primarily held with local governments, generally
have renewable terms of one year. In certain cases, the rental
payments during the renewal periods would be greater than the
current payments. Because the lease renewals are not
F-12
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
considered to be reasonably assured, as defined in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, the rental payments
that would be due during the renewal periods are not included in
the determination of rent expense until the leases are renewed.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the contractually
committed lease term, which does not include the renewal
periods. The Companys leases do not include residual value
guarantees.
At December 31, 2004, the scheduled future minimum lease
payments under operating leases that have initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Aircraft | |
|
Non-Aircraft | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Year ending December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Later years
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
67.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense was $20.0 million, $21.6 million
and $24.8 million for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
|
|
4. |
Financial Instruments and Risk Management |
|
|
|
Fuel Price Risk Management |
The Company periodically enters into crude oil call options, jet
fuel zero cost collars, and jet fuel swap contracts to provide
for short to mid-term hedge protection (generally three to
eighteen months) against sudden and significant increases in jet
fuel prices, while simultaneously ensuring that the Company is
not competitively disadvantaged in the event of a substantial
decrease in the price of jet fuel. The Company does not hold or
issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The
Companys derivatives have historically not qualified as
hedges for financial reporting purposes in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly,
changes in the fair value of such derivative contracts, which
amounted to ($0.9) million, $0.2 million, and
$3.1 million in years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively,
were recorded as a component of Other, net within
Non-operating income (expense). The fair value of hedge
contracts at December 31 amounted to $0.2 million and
$1.1 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively, and was
recorded in Other current assets in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The Companys purchases of fuel and oil are
made substantially from one supplier.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company held derivative
instruments on 5% of its projected 2005 fuel consumption, as
compared with derivatives held on 31% of actual fuel consumed in
2004. In April 2005, the Company entered into a derivative
instrument to cover an additional 10% of its projected fuel
consumption through March 2006.
The fair value of the Companys debt with a carrying value
of $411.4 million and $371.7 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was approximately
$370.6 million and $355.8 million. These estimates
were based on the discounted amount of future cash flows using
the Companys current incremental rate of borrowing for a
similar liability.
F-13
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Other Financial Instruments |
The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash,
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value
due to their short-term nature.
|
|
5. |
Issued Capital and Corporate Reorganization |
On November 23, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors
and shareholders approved a reorganization of the Companys
capital stock. Following the reorganization, the Companys
authorized capital stock consists of 80 million shares of
common stock without par value, divided into Class A
shares, Class B shares and Class C shares. Immediately
following the reorganization, there were 29,028,125 Class A
shares outstanding, 13,784,375 Class B shares outstanding,
all owned by CIASA (a Panamanian entity), and no Class C
shares outstanding. The reorganization did not impact the
operations or financial condition of the Company in any respect
and, as such, does not result in a new basis of accounting. All
share and per share information for all periods presented have
been restated to give retroactive effect to the reorganization.
Class A and Class B shares have the same economic
rights and privileges, including the right to receive dividends,
except that the holders of the Class A shares are not
entitled to vote at the Companys shareholders
meetings, except in connection with a transformation of the
Company into another corporate type; a merger, consolidation or
spin-off of the Company; a change of corporate purpose;
voluntarily delisting Class A shares from the NYSE;
approving the nomination of independent directors nominated by
the Companys Board of Directors Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee; and any amendment to the
foregoing special voting provisions adversely affecting the
rights and privileges of the Class A shares.
The Class A shareholders will acquire full voting rights,
entitled to one vote per Class A share on all matters upon
which shareholders are entitled to vote, if in the future the
Companys Class B shares ever represent fewer than 10%
of the total number of shares of the Companys common stock
outstanding and the Independent Directors Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors (the Independent
Directors Committee) shall have determined that such
additional voting rights of Class A shareholders would not
cause a triggering event referred to below. In such event, the
right of the Class A shareholders to vote on the specific
matters described in the preceding paragraph will no longer be
applicable. At such time, if any, as the Class A
shareholders acquire full voting rights, the Board of Directors
shall call an extraordinary shareholders meeting to be
held within 90 days following the date as of which the
Class A shares are entitled to vote on all matters at the
Companys shareholders meetings. At the extraordinary
shareholders meeting, the shareholders shall vote to elect
all eleven members of the Board of Directors in a slate
recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The
terms of office of the directors that were serving prior to the
extraordinary shareholders meeting shall terminate upon
the election held at that meeting.
Every holder of Class B shares is entitled to one vote per
share on all matters for which shareholders are entitled to
vote. Class B shares will be automatically converted into
Class A shares upon the registration of transfer of such
shares to holders which are not Panamanian.
The Class C shares will have no economic value and will not
be transferable, but will possess such voting rights as the
Independent Directors Committee shall deem necessary to ensure
the effective control of the company by Panamanians. The
Class C shares will be redeemable by the Company at such
time as the Independent Directors Committee determines that a
triggering event, as discussed below, shall no longer be in
effect. The Class C shares will not be entitled to any
dividends or any other economic rights.
The Panamanian Aviation Act, including the related decrees and
regulations, which regulates the aviation industry in the
Republic of Panama, requires that substantial
ownership and effective control of Copa remain
in the hands of Panamanian nationals. Under certain of the
bilateral treaties between Panama and other countries pursuant
to which the Company has the right to fly to those other
countries and over their territory, the Company must continue to
have substantial Panamanian ownership and effective control to
F-14
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
retain these rights. Neither substantial ownership
nor effective control are defined in the Panamanian
Aviation Act or in the bilateral treaties, and it is unclear how
a Panamanian court or, in the case of the bilateral treaties,
foreign regulatory authorities might interpret these
requirements. On November 25, 2005, the Executive Branch of
the Government of Panama promulgated a decree stating that the
substantial ownership and effective
control requirements of the Panamanian Aviation Act are
met if a Panamanian citizen or a Panamanian company is the
record holder of shares representing 51% or more of the voting
power of the Company. Although the decree has the force of law
for so long as it remains in effect, it does not supersede the
Panamanian Aviation Act, and it can be modified or superseded at
any time by a future Executive Branch decree. Additionally, the
decree has no binding effect on regulatory authorities of other
countries whose bilateral agreements impose Panamanian ownership
and control limitations on the Company. In the event that the
Class B shareholders represent less than 10% of the total
share capital of the Company (excluding newly issued shares sold
with the approval of the Independent Directors Committee) and
the Independent Directors Committee determines that it is
reasonably likely that the Companys legal ability to
engage in the aviation business or to exercise its international
route rights will be revoked, suspended or materially inhibited
in a manner which would materially and adversely affect the
Company, in each case as a result of such non-Panamanian
ownership (each a triggering event), the Independent Directors
Committee may authorize the issuance of additional Class B
shares to Panamanians at a price determined by the Independent
Directors to reflect the current market value of such shares
and/or authorize the issuance to Class B shareholders such
number of Class C shares as the Independent Directors
Committee, or the Board of Directors if applicable, deems
necessary and with such other terms and conditions established
by the Independent Directors Committee that do not confer
economic rights on the Class C shares.
The Company pays taxes in the Republic of Panama and in other
countries in which it operates, based on regulations in effect
in each respective country. The Companys revenues come
principally from foreign operations and according to the
Panamanian Fiscal Code these foreign operations are not subject
to income tax in Panama.
In the past, the Companys expenses attributable to
operations in Panama have consistently exceeded the revenue
attributable to operations in Panama. As a result, the Company
typically experienced losses for Panamanian income tax purposes
and was not subject to any Panamanian income tax obligations
through the year ended December 31, 2003. Beginning in
2004, the Company adopted an alternate method of calculating tax
in Panama. Under this alternative method, based on
Article 121 of the Panamanian Fiscal Code, income for
international transportation companies is calculated based on a
territoriality method that determines gross revenues earned in
Panama by applying the percentage of miles flown within the
Panamanian territory against total revenues. Under this method,
loss carry forwards cannot be applied to offset tax liability.
Dividends from the Companys Panamanian subsidiaries,
including Copa Airlines, are separately subject to a ten percent
tax if such dividends can be shown to be derived from income
from sources in Panama.
Recently, the Panamanian legislature enacted a new income tax
law that provides for an alternative minimum tax
that equals 1.4% of a companys revenues attributable to
operations in Panama. The Company has not yet determined the
exact impact of the new law on its tax liability, but the
Company estimates that the new law will increase the
Companys Panamanian tax liability to approximately
$1.3 million in 2005. There is also uncertainty under the
new law about how the Company should allocate revenues to
operations in Panama. If the Panamanian tax authorities do not
concur with the Companys interpretation of the new law or
its methods of allocating revenues, the Company may be subject
to additional tax liability.
The Company is also subject to local tax regulations in each of
the jurisdictions where it operates, the great majority of which
are related to the taxation of income. In six of the countries
to which the Company flies, the Company does not pay any income
taxes because it does not generate income under the laws of those
F-15
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
countries either because they do not have income tax or because
of treaties or other arrangements those countries have with
Panama. In the remaining countries, the Company pays income tax
at a rate ranging from 25% to 35% of income. Different countries
calculate income in different ways, but they are typically
derived from sales in the applicable country multiplied by the
Companys net margin or by a presumed net margin set by the
relevant tax legislation. The determination of the
Companys taxable income in several countries is based on a
combination of revenues sourced to each particular country and
the allocation of expenses of the Companys operations to
that particular country. The methodology for multinational
transportation company sourcing of revenue and expense is not
always specifically prescribed in the relevant tax regulations,
and therefore is subject to interpretation by both the Company
and the respective taxing authorities. Additionally, in some
countries, the applicability of certain regulations governing
non-income taxes and the determination of the filing status of
the Company are also subject to interpretation. The Company
cannot estimate the amount, if any, of the potential tax
liabilities that might result if the allocations,
interpretations and filing positions used by the Company in its
tax returns were challenged by the taxing authorities of one or
more countries.
Under a reciprocal exemption confirmed by a bilateral agreement
between Panama and the United States the Company is exempt from
the U.S. source transportation income tax derived from the
international operation of aircraft.
The provision for income taxes recorded in the Income Statement
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Panama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid taxes of $4.3 million, $2.4 million
and $1.3 million in years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Income tax returns for all companies incorporated in the
Republic of Panama are subject to review by tax authorities up
to the last three (3) years, including the year ended
December 31, 2004 according to current tax regulations. For
other countries where the Company operates, it is subject to
review by their respective tax authorities for periods ranging
from the last two (2) to six (6) years.
Pretax income, based on the Companys internal route
profitability measures, related to Panamanian operations was
$25.5 million, $23.5 million, and $18.3 million
in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, and related to foreign
operations was $48.8 million, $28.6 million, and
$5.4 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
As previously discussed, through the year ended
December 31, 2003, the Company did not incur Panamanian
income tax. Under the alternative Panamanian tax method adopted
by the Company in 2004, tax in Panama is determined by applying
a tax rate to gross revenues rather than the general rule of
applying a statutory income tax rate against taxable net income.
As a result, the amount of income tax expense incurred in Panama
prior to 2004 varies from the Panamanian statutory rate because
of the excess of Panamanian source expenses over Panamanian
source revenues, and, beginning in 2004, the tax varies from the
statutory rate because of the Panamanian gross tax election.
Income taxes outside of Panama are generally determined on the
basis of net income, but several countries have modified tax
regimes and all of the countries have rates
F-16
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
that vary from the Panamanian statutory rate. The
reconciliations of income tax computed at the Panamanian
statutory tax rate to income tax expense for the years ended
December 31 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for income taxes at Panamanian statutory rates
|
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Panamanian gross tax election
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of excess of Panamanian source expenses over Panamanian
source revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
(23.1 |
)% |
Difference in Panamanian statutory rates and non-Panamanian
statutory rates
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(13.0 |
)% |
|
|
(9.5 |
)% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes are provided under the liability method
and reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between
the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements. Significant components of
the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets are as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance reserves
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
Pension obligation
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-employment benefit obligation
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Employee Benefit Plans |
The Company has defined benefit pension and post-employment
benefit plans. All of the Companys Panamanian employees
are covered by one or more of these plans. The benefits under
both plans are based on years of service and an employees
accumulated compensation. Pension obligations are measured as of
December 31 of each year.
Panamanian labor laws require that employers establish a
severance fund to pay employees upon cessation of the labor
relationship, regardless of the cause. The Company contributes
to the fund based on 1.92% of applicable wages paid annually as
is required by law.
F-17
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table sets forth the defined benefit pension
plans change in projected benefit obligation (in millions)
at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the defined benefit pension
plans change in the fair value of plan assets (in
millions) at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension cost recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheet at December 31 is computed as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Funded status of the plannet overfunded
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset recognized
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine the
actuarial present value of projected benefit obligation at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average assumed discount rate
|
|
|
5.75% |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
Weighted average rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.50% |
|
|
|
4.00% |
|
Net periodic benefit expense for the years ended
December 31 included the following components (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine the
net periodic benefit expense for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average assumed discount rate
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
6.75% |
|
|
|
7.25% |
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
4.00% |
|
|
|
4.00% |
|
|
|
4.00% |
|
Weighted average rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00% |
|
|
|
4.50% |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
The Companys discount rate is determined based upon the
review of high quality corporate bond rates, the change in these
rates during the year, and year-end rate levels.
The Company holds its Seniority Premium funds with Profuturo, a
Panamanian pension fund management company backed by various
banks and insurance companies. The Seniority Premium is invested
in Proahorro, a conservative fund which invests in instruments
such as savings accounts (2.10%) and time deposits (97.9%), with
return on funds amounting to 4.0% in 2004. The expected return
on plan assets is based upon an evaluation of the Companys
historical trends and experience taking into account current and
expected market conditions.
Estimated future contribution and benefit payments, which
reflect expected future service, for the years ended
December 31, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future contribution payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Future benefit payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Remaining five years
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
Post-employment Benefit Plan |
The Company sponsors a termination indemnity plan pursuant to
Panamanian laws which require that employers establish an
indemnity fund to pay employees upon cessation of the labor
relationship due to termination. The Company contributes to the
fund based on 0.33% of total applicable wages paid annually as
is required by law and payments are based on 6.54% of applicable
wages earned over the duration of the employment period of the
terminated employee. This plan is accounted for as a
post-employment benefit plan under SFAS No. 112,
Employers Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits, whereby post-employment benefit expense is
recognized over the employees approximate service periods.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
total expense for the post-employment benefits was
$0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million,
respectively.
|
|
8. |
Fleet Impairment Charges |
The events of September 11, 2001 caused a dramatic impact
on the airline industry and prompted the Company to review and
monitor the carrying values of its Boeing 737-200 aircraft,
rotable and expendable parts in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In the months following
September 11, 2001, the Company assessed the carrying
values of its Boeing 737-200 fleet and determined that no
substantial change had occurred to their valuation and thus no
impairment was recorded in fiscal 2001. Subsequent reductions in
demand for air travel, resulting in overcapacity in the industry
led to the grounding and/or early retirements of older, less
efficient aircraft by many airlines. In light
F-19
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
of this trend, the Company re-evaluated the value of its Boeing
737-200 fleet in late 2002 and determined that the expected
future cash flows to be derived by the fleet were not sufficient
to recover the carrying value of the fleet and therefore an
impairment to their value existed. As a result, the Company
recorded an impairment charge in fiscal 2002 to write the
aircraft down to their estimated fair value. Given the ongoing
distress in the industry, the Company continued to monitor the
value of Boeing 737-200 aircraft and in late 2003 determined
their value had incurred an additional impairment in value
resulting in an additional impairment charge in fiscal 2003.
In evaluating whether an impairment existed, the Company
estimated the future undiscounted expected cash flows to be
derived from the Boeing 737-200 fleet based on historical
results adjusted to reflect its best estimate of future market
and operating conditions. Estimates of the undiscounted future
cash flows were less than the carrying values of the Boeing
737-200 aircraft in both 2003 and 2002. As a result, the net
carrying values of impaired aircraft and related items not
recoverable were reduced to their respective fair value and
impairment charges of $3.6 and $13.7 million were
recognized in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Estimates of fair
value represent the Companys best estimate based on
industry trends and reference to market rates.
In 2004, the Company entered into a sales agreement for its
remaining Boeing 737-200 aircraft. Gains on the sale of the
aircraft of $1.1 million in each of 2004 and 2005 are
included within Non-operating income (expense).
|
|
9. |
Related Party Transactions |
The following is a summary of significant related party
transactions that occurred during 2004, 2003 and 2002. Except as
otherwise discussed, the payments to and from the related
parties in the ordinary course of business were based on
prevailing market rates.
Continental Airlines. In 1998, Continental
acquired a 49% stake in the Company and have since implemented a
comprehensive commercial and services alliance with COPA. Key
elements of the alliance include: similar brand images, code
sharing, co-branding of the OnePass frequent flyer program in
Latin America, joint construction and operation of the
Panama Presidents Club VIP lounge, joint purchasing, maintenance
and engineering support and a number of other marketing, sales
and service initiatives.
As a result of these activities, the Company paid Continental
$14.1 million, $13.5 million, and $10.9 million
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and Continental Airlines
paid COPA $12.3 million, $14.1 million, and
$10.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
Company owed Continental $3.3 million and $2.2 million
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The services
provided are considered normal to the daily operations of both
airlines.
Banco Continental de Panamá, S.A. (Banco
Continental). The Company has a strong commercial
banking relationship with Banco Continental, which is controlled
by the Companys controlling shareholders. The Company
obtains financing from Banco Continental under short- to
medium-term financing arrangements to fund aircraft pre-payments
and for part of the commercial loan tranche of one of the
Companys Export-Import bank facilities. The Company also
maintains general lines of credit and time deposit accounts with
Banco Continental.
Payments to Banco Continental totaled $1.1 million,
$0.7 million and $0.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, and the Company received $1.1 million,
$0.5 million, and $0.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. The debt balance outstanding at December 31
amounted to $15.3 million and $24.1 million in 2004
and 2003, respectively. These amounts are included in
Current maturities of long-term debt and
Long-term debt in the Balance Sheet.
ASSA Compañía de Seguros, S.A.
(ASSA). Panamanian law requires the Company
to maintain its insurance policies through a local insurance
company. The Company has contracted with ASSA, an insurance
F-20
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
company controlled by the Companys controlling
shareholders, to provide substantially all of its insurance.
ASSA has, in turn, reinsured almost all of the risks under those
policies with insurance companies in North America. The net
payment to ASSA, after taking into account the reinsurance of
these risks totaled $0.03 million in each of 2004, 2003 and
2002.
Petróleos Delta, S.A. (Delta
Petroleum). When the Companys supply
contract with Texaco for jet fuel expired at the end of June of
this year, it entered into a contract with Petróleos Delta,
S.A. to supply its jet fuel needs. The price agreed to under
this contract is based on the two week average of the
U.S. Gulf Coast Waterborne Mean index plus local taxes,
certain third-party handling charges and a handling charge to
Delta which is expected to aggregate between $2.5 million
and $3.0 million per year assuming the Company maintains a
rate of fuel consumption comparable to expected volumes for
2005. The contract has a one year term that automatically renews
for one year periods unless terminated by one of the parties.
While the Companys controlling shareholders do not hold a
controlling equity interest in Petróleos Delta, S.A., one
of the Companys executive officers, Jorge Garcia,
previously served as a Project Director at Petróleos Delta,
S.A. and one of the Companys directors, Alberto Motta,
served on its board of directors.
Desarrollo Inmobiliario del Este, S.A. (Desarrollo
Inmobiliario). The Company will be moving into a
recently constructed headquarters building located six miles
away from Tocumen International Airport in 2005. The Company has
agreed to lease five floors consisting of approximately
104,000 square feet of the building from Desarollo
Inmobiliario, an entity controlled by the same group of
investors that controls CIASA, under a ten-year lease at a rate
of $106,000 per month during the first three years,
$110,000 per month from year 4 to year 6, $113,000
from year 7 to year 9 and $116,000 per month in
year 10, which we believe to be a market rate.
Galindo, Arias & Lopez. Most of the
Companys legal work, including passing on the validity of
the shares offered by this prospectus, is carried out by the law
firm Galindo, Arias & Lopez. Certain partners of
Galindo, Arias & Lopez are indirect shareholders of
CIASA and serve on the Companys board of directors.
Other Transactions. The Company purchases most of
the alcohol and other beverages served on its aircraft from
Motta Internacional, S.A. and Global Brands, S.A., both of which
are controlled by the Companys controlling shareholders.
The Company does not have any formal contracts for these
purchases, but pays wholesale prices based on price lists
periodically submitted by those importers. The Company paid
$0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Companys telecommunications services have been
provided by Telecarrier, Inc. since February 2003. Some of the
controlling shareholders of CIASA have a controlling interest in
Telecarrier, Inc. Payments to Telecarrier, Inc. totaled
$0.4 million and $0.2 million in 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
|
|
10. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had firm commitments
to purchase two Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and ten
Embraer 190s, with an aggregate list price of approximately
$448 million. The Company also has options to purchase an
additional twenty Embraer 190 aircraft. The schedule for
delivery of the firm orders is as follows: two in 2005, four
each in 2006 and 2007 and two in 2008. Committed expenditures
for these aircraft, based on aircraft net price and including
estimated amounts for contractual price escalations and
pre-delivery deposits, are $87.6 million in 2005,
$99.3 million in 2006, $109.3 million in 2007, and
$56.7 million in 2008. The Company arranged financing for a
significant portion of the commitment relating to such aircraft
and will require substantial capital from external sources to
meet the Companys remaining financial commitment. The
Company expects to meet its pre-delivery deposit requirements
for the Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft by paying cash, or
by using medium-term borrowing facilities and/or vendor
financing for deposits required twenty-four to six months prior
to delivery. Pre-delivery deposits for the
F-21
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Embraer 190 aircraft are required eighteen, twelve and six
months prior to delivery. The Company expects to fund these
deposits with available cash.
In April 2005, the Company entered into agreements which provide
for additional firm commitments to purchase five Boeing 737-Next
Generation aircraft and two Embraer 190s, with an aggregate list
price of approximately $368 million. These agreements also
provide the Company with ten purchase rights for Boeing 737-Next
Generation aircraft available through 2011 and reduce the
options of Embraer 190 aircraft to eighteen. The schedule for
delivery of the additional firm orders is as follows: two each
in 2006, 2007, and 2008 and one in 2009.
Approximately 62% of the Companys 2,754 employees are
unionized. There are currently five unions covering employees in
Panama: the pilots union (SIPAC); the flight
attendants union (SIPANAB); the mechanics union
(SINTECMAP); the traffic attendants union (UTRACOPA); and
a generalized union, SIELAS, which represents ground personnel,
messengers, drivers, counter agents and other non-executive
administrative staff. The Company is currently in negotiations
for new contracts with SIELAS and will begin negotiations with
SINTECMAP and SIPANAB near the end of this 2005.
|
|
|
Lines of Credit for Working Capital and Letters of
Credit |
The Company maintained available facilities for working capital
with several banks with year-end available balances of
$9.4 million and $5.5 million in the years ending
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. There was no
outstanding balance at December 31, 2004 and 2003 for these
facilities.
The Company maintained available facilities for letters of
credit with several banks with outstanding balances of
$10.8 million and $10.7 million in the years ending
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These letters of
credit are pledged for aircraft rentals, maintenance and
guarantees for airport facilities.
In June 2005, the Company and the International Finance
Corporation entered into an agreement for a $15.0 million
revolving line of credit available for working capital purposes.
|
|
|
Termination of General Sales Agent |
The Company historically outsourced sales functions in some
outstations through agreements with general sales agents. Over
the past few years, the Company has been discontinuing existing
agreements in order to reduce distribution costs and take direct
control over these functions. As a result of this process, the
Company terminated general sales agent agreements in 2004, 2003
and 2002. In accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, the Company recorded, within other
operating expenses, provisions amounting to $1.3 million,
$1.0 million and $2.0 million in the years ending
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, when the
general sales agreements were terminated.
Payments relating to the termination of the general sales agent
agreements amounted to $1.3 million, $2.9 million,
$0.1 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company has no remaining GSA agreements with significant
termination contingencies.
|
|
|
Purchase of AeroRepública |
On April 22, 2005 the Company purchased AeroRepública
S.A. (AeroRepública), a Colombian airline that
operated a fleet of seven leased MD-80s and two owned DC-9s. The
Company carried out the
F-22
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
acquisition by purchasing or committing to purchase
substantially all of the equity ownership interest in
AeroRepública from its several former shareholders for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $23.4 million,
including acquisition costs. The acquisition of
AeroRepública enhances the Companys access and
visibility to Colombias population of more than
45 million inhabitants. The Company intends to allow
AeroRepúblicas existing management to continue
operating the airline as a point-to-point Colombian carrier,
while coordinating the flight schedules of Copa and
AeroRepública to allow increased convenience and
connectivity for passengers. The Company has begun code-sharing
between AeroRepública and Copa and, in conjunction with
Continental, intends to extend mutually agreed elements of the
Copa-Continental relationship to AeroRepública.
Upon acquisition of AeroRepública, the Company arranged a
commercial credit facility in the amount of $15.0 million,
primarily to refinance existing liabilities and to provide
AeroRepública with working capital. This facility was
divided in two tranches of $5.0 million and
$10.0 million with maturities of three and five years,
respectively. This facility is secured by credit card
receivables. The facility requires AeroRepública to
maintain certain financial covenants such as a financial debt to
EBITDAR ratio of less than 4.5.
On June 30, 2005, the Company declared and paid cash
dividends totaling $10.0 million.
F-23
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(in US$ thousands, except | |
|
|
share and per share data) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
102,496 |
|
|
$ |
95,718 |
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,882 |
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
21,823 |
|
|
|
15,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
|
129,201 |
|
|
|
114,891 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$6,174 and $2,622 as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
54,965 |
|
|
|
27,706 |
|
|
Accounts receivable from related parties
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expendable parts and supplies, net of allowance for obsolescence
of $8 and $1,739 as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
14,921 |
|
|
|
8,403 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,685 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
208,428 |
|
|
|
156,035 |
|
Property and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment
|
|
|
575,511 |
|
|
|
593,825 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
33,873 |
|
|
|
27,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,384 |
|
|
|
621,058 |
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(78,705 |
) |
|
|
(87,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530,679 |
|
|
|
534,021 |
|
|
Purchase deposits for flight equipment
|
|
|
42,189 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
|
572,868 |
|
|
|
541,211 |
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension asset
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
|
32,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,454 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
64,830 |
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
846,126 |
|
|
$ |
702,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
60,571 |
|
|
$ |
30,573 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
38,509 |
|
|
|
25,335 |
|
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
9,683 |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
78,969 |
|
|
|
53,423 |
|
|
Taxes and interest payable
|
|
|
26,974 |
|
|
|
16,269 |
|
|
Accrued expenses payable
|
|
|
13,591 |
|
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
233,844 |
|
|
|
143,011 |
|
Non-Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
369,237 |
|
|
|
380,827 |
|
|
Post employment benefits liability
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities
|
|
|
383,059 |
|
|
|
384,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
616,903 |
|
|
|
527,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock80,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A29,028,125 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
|
19,813 |
|
|
|
Class B13,784,375 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
200,209 |
|
|
|
144,932 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
229,223 |
|
|
|
174,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$ |
846,126 |
|
|
$ |
702,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these financial statements.
F-24
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
(in US$ thousands, except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
Operating Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$ |
398,550 |
|
|
$ |
268,652 |
|
|
Cargo, mail and other
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
24,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,929 |
|
|
|
293,166 |
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
97,733 |
|
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
48,134 |
|
|
|
35,985 |
|
|
Passenger servicing
|
|
|
36,172 |
|
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
31,456 |
|
|
|
21,458 |
|
|
Reservations and sales
|
|
|
21,415 |
|
|
|
15,727 |
|
|
Maintenance, materials and repairs
|
|
|
21,933 |
|
|
|
13,899 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
|
13,135 |
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
Landing fees and other rentals
|
|
|
12,282 |
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
25,364 |
|
|
|
19,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,588 |
|
|
|
225,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
82,341 |
|
|
|
67,502 |
|
Non-operating Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,755 |
) |
|
|
(12,076 |
) |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,737 |
) |
|
|
(6,146 |
) |
Income before Income Taxes
|
|
|
73,604 |
|
|
|
61,356 |
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
65,346 |
|
|
$ |
56,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
Shares used for computation
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
|
|
42,812,500 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these financial statements.
F-25
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Par value) | |
|
Issued Capital | |
|
|
|
Other- | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Loss | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(in US$ thousands) | |
At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
29,028,125 |
|
|
|
13,784,375 |
|
|
$ |
19,813 |
|
|
$ |
9,410 |
|
|
$ |
144,932 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
174,155 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,346 |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,137 |
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005
|
|
|
29,028,125 |
|
|
|
13,784,375 |
|
|
$ |
19,813 |
|
|
$ |
9,410 |
|
|
$ |
200,209 |
|
|
$ |
(209 |
) |
|
$ |
229,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these financial statements.
F-26
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
(in US$ thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
65,346 |
|
|
$ |
56,693 |
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(9,431 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
(Gain)/ Loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
Allowance for obsolescence of expendable parts and supplies
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments mark to market
|
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(18,123 |
) |
|
|
(947 |
) |
|
|
Accounts receivable from related parties
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(10,594 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
21,065 |
|
|
|
8,890 |
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
8,126 |
|
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
78,308 |
|
|
|
70,301 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(6,598 |
) |
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
Advance payments on aircraft purchase contracts
|
|
|
(34,999 |
) |
|
|
(14,221 |
) |
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(7,114 |
) |
|
|
(40,888 |
) |
|
Disposal of property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
Purchase of AeroRepublica, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(22,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(69,425 |
) |
|
|
(50,201 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from loans and borrowings
|
|
|
20,374 |
|
|
|
64,645 |
|
|
Payments on loans and borrowings
|
|
|
(34,329 |
) |
|
|
(24,652 |
) |
|
Issuance of bonds
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
Redemption of bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,961 |
) |
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
23,389 |
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,778 |
|
|
|
43,489 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
95,718 |
|
|
|
57,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
102,496 |
|
|
$ |
101,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these financial statements.
F-27
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
September 30, 2005 and 2004
Copa Holdings, S. A. (the Company) is a leading
Latin American provider of international airline passenger and
cargo services. The Company is incorporated according to the
laws of the Republic of Panama and its capital shares are 51%
and 49% owned by Corporación de Inversiones Aéreas, S.
A. (CIASA) and Continental Airlines, Inc.
(Continental), respectively. The Company owns 99.8%
of the shares of Compañía Panameña de
Aviación, S. A. (Copa), 100% of the shares of
Oval Financial Leasing, Ltd. (OVAL) and OPAC, S. A.
(OPAC), and 99.6% of AeroRepública, S.A.
(AeroRepública).
Copa, the Companys core operation, is incorporated
according to the laws of the Republic of Panama and provides
international air transportation for passengers, cargo and mail.
Copa operates from its Panama City hub in the Republic of
Panama, from where it offers approximately 80 daily scheduled
flights among 30 destinations in 20 countries in North, Central
and South America and the Caribbean. Additionally, Copa provides
passengers with access to flights to more than 120 other
international destinations through codeshare agreements with
Continental and other airlines. The Company has a broad
commercial alliance with Continental which includes joint
marketing, code-sharing arrangements, participation in
Continentals OnePass frequent flyer loyalty program and
access to Continentals VIP lounge program,
Presidents Club, along with other benefits such as
improved purchasing power in negotiations with service
providers, aircraft vendors and insurers. As of
September 30, 2005, Copa operated a fleet of 22 modern
Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft with an average age of
3.3 years. OVAL is incorporated according to the laws of
the British Virgin Islands, and controls the special-purpose
vehicles that have a beneficial interest in 15 aircraft with a
carrying value of $492.4 million, all of which are leased
to Copa. The aircraft are pledged as collateral for the
obligation of the special-purpose vehicles, which are all
consolidated by the Company for financial reporting purposes;
however, the creditors of the special-purpose vehicles have no
recourse to the general credit of the Company or Copa. OPAC is
incorporated according to the laws of the Republic of Panama,
and owns the corporate headquarters located in Panama City,
which is leased to Copa.
Additionally, during 2005 the Company purchased 99.6% of
AeroRepública S.A., a Colombian air carrier, which is
incorporated according to the laws of the Republic of Colombia
and operates a fleet of nine leased MD-80s and two owned DC-9s
as of September 30, 2005 (See Note 3).
The airline industry is by nature cyclical and seasonal, and the
Companys operating results may vary from quarter to
quarter. The Company tends to experience the highest levels of
traffic and revenue in July and August, with a smaller peak in
traffic in December and January. In general, demand for air
travel is higher in the third and fourth quarters, particularly
in international markets, because of the increase in vacation
travel during these periods relative to the remainder of the
year. The Company generally experiences its lowest levels of
passenger traffic in April and May. Given its high proportion of
fixed costs, seasonality can affect the Companys
profitability from quarter to quarter. Demand for air travel is
also affected by factors such as economic conditions, war or the
threat of war, fare levels and weather conditions.
A substantial portion of the Companys assets are located
in the Republic of Panama, a significant proportion of the
Companys customers are Panamanian, and substantially all
of the Copas flights operate through its hub at Tocumen
International Airport in Panama City. As a result, the Company
depends on economic and political conditions prevailing from
time to time in Panama.
As used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the
terms the Company, we, us,
our and similar terms refer to Copa Holdings, S.A.
and, unless the context indicates otherwise, its consolidated
subsidiaries.
F-28
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
These unaudited consolidated interim financial statements were
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial reporting using the
U.S. Dollar as the functional currency. Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31,
2004.
The financial statements of AeroRepública are measured
using the Colombian Peso as the functional currency; adjustments
to translate those statements into U.S. Dollars are
recorded in other comprehensive income.
|
|
3. |
Acquisition of AeroRepública |
On April 22, 2005, the Company acquired a controlling
ownership interest in AeroRepública, a Colombian airline.
According to the Colombian Civil Aviation Administration, Unidad
Especial Administrativa de Aeronautica Civil, in 2004
AeroRepública was the second-largest domestic carrier in
Colombia in terms of number of passengers carried, providing
service to 11 cities in Colombia with a point-to-point
route network. As of the acquisition date AeroRepública
operated a fleet of seven leased MD-80s and two owned DC-9s. The
Company believes that the acquisition of AeroRepública
represents an attractive opportunity to increase the
Companys access and visibility to Colombia, one of the
largest airline passenger markets in Latin America with more
than 45 million inhabitants, and to improve
AeroRepúblicas operational and financial performance.
Colombia shares a border with Panama, and for historic, cultural
and business reasons it represents a significant market for many
Panamanian businesses. Management believes that operational
coordination with AeroRepública may create additional
passenger traffic in the Companys existing route network
by providing Colombian passengers more convenient access to the
international destinations served through the Companys
Panama hub. Additionally, the Companys goal is to achieve
growth at AeroRepública through a combination of increasing
Colombian domestic passenger traffic volume and increasing
market share, particularly in the business travelers segment.
The results of AeroRepúblicas operations have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
beginning April 22, 2005, the date the Company acquired an
initial 85.56% equity ownership interest in AeroRepública
and gained control of AeroRepública. The initial
acquisition was followed by subsequent acquisitions increasing
the total equity ownership interest in AeroRepública to
99.63% as of September 30, 2005. The total purchase price
paid through September 30, 2005 of $23.4 million,
including acquisition costs, was negotiated individually with
each of the respective selling parties and, largely due to the
factors described above, resulted in the recognition of
goodwill. The Company funded these acquisitions with a
combination of existing cash and short-term investments.
F-29
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase
price is allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets of
AeroRepública based on their fair values as of the dates of
acquisition. The following table summarizes the Companys
estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The purchase
price allocation is preliminary and will be finalized after
completion of the valuation of significant assets and
liabilities acquired. Independent valuation specialists are
currently conducting an independent valuation in order to assist
management in determining the fair values of a significant
portion of these assets. The work performed by the independent
valuation specialists has been considered in managements
estimates of the fair values reflected in the financial
statements. The final determination of these fair values will
include managements consideration of a final valuation
prepared by the independent valuation specialists. This final
valuation will be based on the actual net tangible and
intangible assets of AeroRepública that existed as of the
date of acquisition. Therefore, the final amounts recorded may
differ from the amounts included in these financial statements
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
Property, plant & equipment
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$ |
88.8 |
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
22.4 |
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
$ |
65.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Of the total estimated purchase price, approximately
$60.6 million has been allocated to goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite lives. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
lives are not amortized but instead will be tested for
impairment at least annually (more frequently if certain
indicators are present). Goodwill, approximately
$28.9 million, represents the excess of the purchase price
of the acquired business over the fair value of the underlying
net tangible and intangible assets and is recorded in the
AeroRepública segment. Intangible assets with indefinite
lives consist primarily of the fair value allocated to the
routes and the AeroRepública trade name, valued at
$27.2 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
AeroRepúblicas domestic route network within Colombia
was determined to have an indefinite useful life as the access
to each domestic city is limited to a set number of airline
carriers in addition to requiring the necessary permits to
operate within Colombia. The permit to fly into each city does
not have a set expiration date. The AeroRepública trade
name was determined to have an indefinite useful life due to
several factors and considerations, including the brand
awareness and market position, customer recognition and loyalty
and
F-30
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
the continued use of the AeroRepública brand. In the event
that the Company determines that the value of goodwill or
intangible assets with indefinite lives has become impaired, the
Company will incur an accounting charge for the amount of
impairment during the period in which the determination is made.
The following table presents pro forma financial information as
if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of each
period presented. The pro forma financial information is not
intended to represent or be indicative of the combined results
which would have occurred had the transaction actually been
consummated on the date indicated above and should not be taken
as representative of the consolidated results of operations
which may occur in the future (in millions except share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
Pro Forma |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total Revenue
|
|
$ |
466.6 |
|
|
$ |
377.9 |
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
The Company issued private bonds in the amount of
$10.8 million on January 4, 2005, $2.8 million on
May 3, 2005, $2.8 million on June 1, 2005,
$2.8 million on August 1, 2005 and $2.8 million
on September 1, 2005 for advanced delivery payments of two
Boeing 737-700 aircraft with delivery months of May and June
2006. The Company has granted, for the benefit of the
bondholders, a first priority security interest in the rights,
title and interest over these aircraft. Interest on the bonds is
paid on March 31, June 30, September 30, and
December 31 with the balance of the bonds to be repaid with
the delivery of the aircraft for which the advance payments
relate.
Upon acquisition of AeroRepública, the Company arranged a
commercial credit facility in the amount of $15.0 million,
primarily to refinance existing liabilities and to provide
AeroRepública with working capital. This facility was
divided in two tranches of $5.0 million and
$10.0 million with maturities of three and five years,
respectively. This facility is secured by credit card
receivables. The facility requires AeroRepública to
maintain certain financial covenants such as a financial debt to
EBITDAR ratio of less than 4.5. As of September 30, 2005,
the Company complied with all required covenants.
5. Issued Capital and Corporate Reorganization
On November 23, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a reorganization of the Companys capital stock.
Following the reorganization, the Companys authorized
capital stock consists of 80 million shares of common stock
without par value, divided into Class A shares,
Class B shares and Class C shares. Immediately
following the reorganization, there were 29,028,125 Class A
shares outstanding, 13,784,375 Class B shares outstanding,
all owned by CIASA (a Panamanian entity), and no Class C
shares outstanding. The reorganization did not impact the
operations or financial condition of the Company in any respect
and, as such, does not result in a new basis of accounting. All
share and per share information for all periods presented have
been restated to give retroactive effect to the reorganization.
Class A and Class B shares have the same economic
rights and privileges, including the right to receive dividends,
except that the holders of the Class A shares are not
entitled to vote at the Companys shareholders
meetings, except in connection with a transformation of the
Company into another corporate type; a merger, consolidation or
spin-off of the Company; a change of corporate purpose;
voluntarily delisting Class A shares from the NYSE;
approving the
F-31
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
nomination of independent directors nominated by the
Companys Board of Directors Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee; and any amendment to the foregoing special
voting provisions adversely affecting the rights and privileges
of the Class A shares.
The Class A shareholders will acquire full voting rights,
entitled to one vote per Class A share on all matters upon
which shareholders are entitled to vote, if in the future the
Companys Class B shares ever represent fewer than 10%
of the total number of shares of the Companys common stock
outstanding and the Independent Directors Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors (the Independent
Directors Committee) shall have determined that such
additional voting rights of Class A shareholders would not
cause a triggering event referred to below. In such event, the
right of the Class A shareholders to vote on the specific
matters described in the preceding paragraph will no longer be
applicable. At such time, if any, as the Class A
shareholders acquire full voting rights, the Board of Directors
shall call an extraordinary shareholders meeting to be
held within 90 days following the date as of which the
Class A shares are entitled to vote on all matters at the
Companys shareholders meetings. At the extraordinary
shareholders meeting, the shareholders shall vote to elect
all eleven members of the Board of Directors in a slate
recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The
terms of office of the directors that were serving prior to the
extraordinary shareholders meeting shall terminate upon
the election held at that meeting.
Every holder of Class B shares is entitled to one vote per
share on all matters for which shareholders are entitled to
vote. Class B shares will be automatically converted into
Class A shares upon the registration of transfer of such
shares to holders which are not Panamanian.
The Class C shares will have no economic value and will not
be transferable, but will possess such voting rights as the
Independent Directors Committee shall deem necessary to ensure
the effective control of the company by Panamanians. The
Class C shares will be redeemable by the Company at such
time as the Independent Directors Committee determines that a
triggering event, as discussed below, shall no longer be in
effect. The Class C shares will not be entitled to any
dividends or any other economic rights.
The Panamanian Aviation Act, including the related decrees and
regulations, which regulates the aviation industry in the
Republic of Panama, requires that substantial
ownership and effective control of Copa remain
in the hands of Panamanian nationals. Under certain of the
bilateral treaties between Panama and other countries pursuant
to which the Company has the right to fly to those other
countries and over their territory, the Company must continue to
have substantial Panamanian ownership and effective control to
retain these rights. Neither substantial ownership
nor effective control are defined in the Panamanian
Aviation Act or in the bilateral treaties, and it is unclear how
a Panamanian court or, in the case of the bilateral treaties,
foreign regulatory authorities might interpret these
requirements. On November 25, 2005, the Executive Branch of
the Government of Panama promulgated a decree stating that the
substantial ownership and effective
control requirements of the Panamanian Aviation Act are
met if a Panamanian citizen or a Panamanian company is the
record holder of shares representing 51% or more of the voting
power of the Company. Although the decree has the force of law
for so long as it remains in effect, it does not supersede the
Panamanian Aviation Act, and it can be modified or superseded at
any time by a future Executive Branch decree. Additionally, the
decree has no binding effect on regulatory authorities of other
countries whose bilateral agreements impose Panamanian ownership
and control limitations on the Company. In the event that the
Class B shareholders represent less than 10% of the total
share capital of the Company (excluding newly issued shares sold
with the approval of the Independent Directors Committee) and
the Independent Directors Committee determines that it is
reasonably likely that the Companys legal ability to
engage in the aviation business or to exercise its international
route rights will be revoked, suspended or materially inhibited
in a manner which would materially and adversely affect the
Company, in each case as a result of such non-Panamanian
ownership (each a triggering event), the Independent Directors
Committee may authorize the issuance of additional Class B
shares to Panamanians at a price determined by the Independent
Directors to reflect the current market value of such shares
and/or authorize the issuance to
F-32
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Class B shareholders such number of Class C shares as
the Independent Directors Committee, or the Board of Directors
if applicable, deems necessary and with such other terms and
conditions established by the Independent Directors Committee
that do not confer economic rights on the Class C shares.
|
|
6. |
Fuel Price Risk Management |
The Company periodically enters into crude oil call options, jet
fuel zero cost collars, and jet fuel swap contracts to provide
for short to mid-term hedge protection (generally three to
eighteen months) against sudden and significant increases in jet
fuel prices, while simultaneously ensuring that the Company is
not competitively disadvantaged in the event of a substantial
decrease in the price of jet fuel. The company does not hold or
issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The
Companys derivatives have historically not qualified as
hedges for financial reporting purposes in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly,
changes in the fair value of such derivative contracts, which
amounted to $1.9 million and $1.8 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
were recorded as a component of Other, net within
Non-operating income (expense). The fair value of such
derivative contracts at September 30 amounted to
$2.1 million and $2.9 million in 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and was recorded in Other current
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The
Companys purchases of fuel and oil are made substantially
from one supplier.
As of September 30, 2005, the Company held derivative
instruments on 15% of its projected remaining 2005 fuel
consumption, and 10% of its projected fuel consumption from
January 1, 2006 through March 2006.
|
|
7. |
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets |
In 2004, the Company entered into a sales agreement for its
remaining Boeing 737-200 aircraft. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, the Company completed the sale of the
aircraft and recorded a gain of $1.1 million included in
the Consolidated Statement of Income caption Other,
net within Non-operating income (expense).
|
|
8. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
As of September 30, 2005, the Company had firm commitments
to purchase seven Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft and twelve
Embraer 190s, with an aggregate list price of approximately
$816 million. The Company also has options to purchase an
additional eighteen Embraer 190 aircraft. The schedule for
delivery of the firm orders is as follows: two in 2005, six each
in 2006 and 2007, four in 2008, and one in 2009. Committed
expenditures for these aircraft, based on aircraft net price and
including estimated amounts for contractual price escalations
and pre-delivery deposits, are $62.0 million in 2005,
$166.1 million in 2006, $189.5 million in 2007,
$128.7 million in 2008, and $33.0 million in 2009. The
Company arranged financing for a significant portion of the
commitment relating to such aircraft and will require
substantial capital from external sources to meet the
Companys remaining financial commitment. The Company
expects to meet its pre-delivery deposit requirements for the
Boeing 737-Next Generation aircraft by paying cash, or by using
medium-term borrowing facilities and/or vendor financing for
deposits required twenty-four to six months prior to delivery.
Pre-delivery deposits for the Embraer 190 aircraft are required
eighteen, twelve and six months prior to delivery. The Company
expects to fund these deposits with available cash.
|
|
|
Line of Credit from the International Finance
Corporation |
In June 2005 the Company and the International Finance
Corporation entered in to an agreement for a $15.0 million
revolving line of credit available for working capital purposes.
F-33
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
|
Termination of General Sales Agent Contract |
The Company historically outsourced sales functions in some
outstations through agreements with general sales agents. Over
the past few years, the Company has been discontinuing existing
agreements in order to reduce distribution costs and take direct
control over these functions. In 2004 the Company terminated a
general sales agreement, and in accordance with
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities, recorded a provision
amounting to $1.3 million upon termination. In April 2005,
the Company paid $1.3 million relating to the contract
termination.
The Company has no remaining GSA agreements with significant
termination contingencies.
Prior to the acquisition of AeroRepública on April 22,
2005, the Company had one reportable segment. Upon the
acquisition of AeroRepública, as discussed in Note 3,
the Company determined it has two reportable segments, the Copa
segment and the AeroRepública segment, primarily because:
(1) management evaluates the financial and operational
results of the Copa segment and AeroRepública segment
separately for internal reporting and management performance
evaluation purposes; and (2) management intends to allow
AeroRepúblicas existing management to continue
operating the airline as a point-to-point Colombian carrier,
without significant integration into the Copa network. The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in Note 1, Summary of Accounting
Policies, included in the Companys annual financial
statements. General corporate and other assets are allocated to
the Copa segment.
F-34
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Operating information for the Copa segment and the
AeroRepública segment for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 (which includes the results of
AeroRepública only from the date of acquisition) is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
367.3 |
|
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
429.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft rentals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
(16.4 |
) |
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
76.4 |
|
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
(14.2 |
) |
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
70.6 |
|
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
73.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets at End of Period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copa segment
|
|
$ |
785.4 |
|
|
AeroRepública segment
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
846.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
COPA HOLDINGS, S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Through and including January 8, 2006 (the 25th day
after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting
transactions in these securities, whether or not participating
in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This
is in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their
unsold allotments or subscriptions.